Interobserver agreement of current and new proposed endoscopic scores for postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) is widely used for the assessment of endoscopic postoperative recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn's disease (CD) after ileocolic resection to guide therapeutic decisions. To improve the validity and prognostic value of this endoscopic assessment, 2 new scores have been proposed. This study assessed the interobserver agreement of the current score (mRS) and the new endoscopic score for ePOR in CD. METHODS: Sixteen Dutch academic and nonacademic inflammatory bowel disease specialists assessed endoscopic videos (n = 71) of postoperative CD patients (n = 66) retrieved from 9 Dutch centers. Each video was assessed for degree of inflammation by 4 gastroenterologists using the mRS and the new proposed endoscopic score: the REMIND score (separate score of anastomosis and neoterminal ileum) and the updated Rutgeerts score (assessment of lesions at the anastomotic line, ileal inlet, ileal body, and neoterminal ileum). In addition, lesions at the ileal body, ileal inlet, neoterminal ileum, and colonic and/or ileal blind loop were separately assessed. Interobserver agreement was assessed by using Fleiss' weighted kappa. RESULTS: Fleiss' weighted kappa for the mRS was .67 (95% confidence interval [CI], .59-.74). The weighted kappa for the REMIND score was .73 (95% CI, .65-.80) for lesions in the neoterminal ileum and .46 (95% CI, .35-.58) for anastomotic lesions. The weighted kappa for the updated Rutgeerts score was .69 (95% CI, .62-.77). The weighted kappa for lesions in the ileal body, ileal inlet, neoterminal ileum, and colonic and ileal blind loop was .61 (95% CI, .49-.73), .63 (95% CI, .54-.72), .61 (95% CI, .49-.74), .83 (95% CI, .62-1.00) and .68 (95% CI, .46-.89), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver agreement of the mRS is substantial. Similarly, the interobserver agreement is substantial for the updated Rutgeerts score. According to the REMIND score, the interobserver agreement was substantial for lesions in the neoterminal ileum, although only moderate for anastomotic lesions. Because therapeutic decisions in clinical practice are based on these assessments, and these scores are used as outcome measure in clinical studies, further improvement of the interobserver agreement is essential.

Addition of Platelet-Rich Plasma to Endorectal Advancement Flap Repair Does Not Enhance the Healing of Cryptoglandular Transsphincteric Fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Endorectal advancement flap repair is often performed for the treatment of cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistulas. However, this procedure fails in approximately 1 of 4 patients. Based on its supposed healing properties, platelet-rich plasma might enhance the outcome of this procedure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the short-term and long-term outcomes after endorectal advancement flap repair with and without platelet-rich plasma injection in patients with a cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistula. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital for proctology in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with a cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistula. Inverse propensity score-weighted comparison was used to adjust for confounding and selection bias. INTERVENTIONS: Endorectal advancement flap repair with and without platelet-rich plasma injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical fistula closure within 1 year without need for a reintervention (primary healing), clinical fistula closure within 1 year corrected for reinterventions (secondary healing), overall fistula healing within 1 year, and long-term outcomes assessed by a questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 219 patients underwent an endorectal advancement flap repair. In 88 patients (40.2%), platelet-rich plasma was injected. No significant difference was observed in primary healing (67.0% vs 69.5%, p = 0.71), secondary healing (37.5% vs 43.5%, p = 0.60), or overall healing (73.9% vs 77.1%, p = 0.58) between patients treated with and without platelet-rich plasma injection. Long-term follow-up was available in 67.1% of the patients with a mean follow-up of 6.8 years (SD: 3.7 years). Among all patients who reached fistula healing, whether primary or secondary, within 1 year and had available long-term follow-up data, recurrence rates were also not significantly different (6.3% vs 2.9%, p = 0.37). Propensity score-weighted analysis showed that patients treated with a platelet-rich plasma injection were not more likely to achieve primary healing (OR 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5-1.9), secondary healing (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.2-3.2), overall healing (OR 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.7), or recurrence at long-term follow-up (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.4-18.8) compared with patients without platelet-rich plasma injection. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, lack of postoperative imaging, and assessment of long-term follow-up using a questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Addition of platelet-rich plasma injection does not improve the short-term and long-term outcomes of endorectal advancement flap repair in patients with a cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistula treated in a tertiary referral center. See Video Abstract . ADICIN DE PLASMA RICO EN PLAQUETAS A LA REPARACIN DEL COLGAJO DE AVANCE ENDORRECTAL NO MEJORA LA CURACIN DE LAS FSTULAS TRANSESFINTERIANAS CRIPTOGLANDULARES: ANTECEDENTES:La reparación con colgajo de avance endorrectal a menudo se realiza para el tratamiento de fístulas transesfinterianas criptoglandulares. Sin embargo, este procedimiento falla en aproximadamente uno de cada cuatro pacientes. Basándose en sus supuestas propiedades curativas, el plasma rico en plaquetas (PRP) podría mejorar el resultado de este procedimiento.OBJETIVO:Evaluar y comparar los resultados a corto y largo plazo después de la reparación con colgajo de avance endorrectal con y sin inyección de PRP en pacientes con una fístula transesfintérica criptoglandular.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ÁMBITO:Hospital terciario de referencia para proctología en los Países Bajos.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con fístula transesfintérica criptoglandular. Se utilizó una comparación ponderada por puntuación de propensión inversa para ajustar los factores de confusión y el sesgo de selección.INTERVENCIONES:Reparación del colgajo de avance endorrectal con y sin inyección de PRP.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Cierre clínico de la fístula dentro de un año sin necesidad de reintervención (cicatrización primaria), cierre clínico de la fístula dentro de un año corregido por reintervenciones (cicatrización secundaria), curación general de la fístula dentro de un año y resultados a largo plazo evaluados mediante un cuestionario.RESULTADOS:En total, 219 pacientes se sometieron a una reparación con colgajo de avance endorrectal. En 88 pacientes (40,2%) se inyectó PRP. No se observaron diferencias significativas en la curación primaria (67,0% frente a 69,5%, p = 0,71), curación secundaria (37,5% frente a 43,5%, p = 0,60) y curación general (73,9% frente a 77,1%, p = 0,58).) entre pacientes con y sin inyección de PRP, respectivamente. El seguimiento a largo plazo estuvo disponible en el 67,1% de los pacientes con un seguimiento medio de 6,8 años (desviación estándar: 3,7 años). Dentro de todos los pacientes que alcanzaron la curación de la fístula, tanto primaria como secundaria, dentro de un año y tenían datos de seguimiento a largo plazo disponibles, las tasas de recurrencia tampoco fueron significativamente diferentes (6,3% vs. 2,9%, p = 0,37). El análisis ponderado por puntuación de propensión mostró que los pacientes tratados con una inyección de PRP no tenían más probabilidades de lograr la curación primaria (odds ratio [OR] 1,0; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95 %: 0,5 - 1,9), curación secundaria (OR 1,1; IC del 95 % 0,2 - 3,2), curación general (OR 0,9; IC 95 % 0,5 - 1,7) o recurrencia en el seguimiento a largo plazo (OR 1,1; IC 95 % 0,4 - 18,8) en comparación con pacientes sin inyección de PRP.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, falta de imágenes postoperatorias y evaluación del seguimiento a largo plazo mediante un cuestionario.CONCLUSIÓN:La adición de la inyección de PRP no mejora el resultado a corto y largo plazo de la reparación con colgajo de avance endorrectal en pacientes con una fístula transesfintérica criptoglandular tratados en un centro de referencia terciario. (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Systematic review: Patient-related, microbial, surgical, and histopathological risk factors for endoscopic post-operative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification for endoscopic post-operative recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn's disease (CD) is required to identify patients who would benefit most from initiation of prophylactic medication and intensive monitoring of recurrence. AIMS: To assess the current evidence on patient-related, microbial, surgical and histopathological risk factors for ePOR in patients with CD after ileocolic (re-)resection. METHODS: Multiple online databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were searched up to March 2024. Studies with reported associations of patient-related, microbial, surgical and/or histopathological factors for ePOR (i.e., Rutgeerts' score ≥i2 or modified Rutgeerts' score ≥i2a) were included. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational cohort studies and case-control studies. RESULTS: In total, 47 studies were included (four RCTs, 29 cohort studies, 12 case-control studies, one cross-sectional study and one individual participant data meta-analysis) including 6006 patients (median sample size 87 patients [interquartile range 46-170]). Risk of bias assessment revealed a poor quality in 41% of the studies. An association was reported in multiple studies of ePOR with active smoking at and post-surgery, male sex and prior bowel resection. A heterogeneous association with ePOR was reported for other risk factors included in the current guidelines (penetrating disease, perianal disease, younger age, extensive small bowel disease and presence of granulomas in the resection specimen or myenteric plexitis in the resection margin), and other patient-related, microbial, surgical and histopathological factors. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for ePOR in international guidelines are not consistently reported as risk factors in current literature except for active smoking and prior bowel resection. To develop evidence-based, personalised strategies, large prospective studies are warranted to identify risk factors for ePOR. Validation studies of promising (bio)markers are also required.