Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Endovasc Ther ; : 15266028241248311, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654524

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Recent reports of the Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular graft (Zenith Alpha AAA, Cook, Inc., Bloomington, Indiana) have demonstrated an unexpectedly high incidence of limb graft occlusion (LGO). The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the performance of the Zenith AAA in Japan, with a specific focus on LGO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs) for abdominal aortic aneurysms performed using the Zenith Alpha AAA from July 2020 to October 2021 in 23 Japanese hospitals were prospectively evaluated. All computed tomographic images were analyzed in the core laboratory. Late complications were defined as any aneurysm-related events occurring >30 days after EVAR, including aneurysm sac enlargement of >5 mm and any reinterventions performed. Endoleaks without sac enlargement or reintervention were excluded as late complications. RESULTS: During the study period, 147 EVARs were performed using the Zenith Alpha AAA. The mean patient age was 76.5±7.7 years, 84.4% of patients were male, and the mean aneurysm diameter was 52.4±9.2 mm. Instruction-for-use violations were observed in 76 patients (51.7%), primarily associated with a severely angulated proximal neck (>60°). There were six intraoperative complications and 62 additional intraoperative treatments reported, most of which involved preemptive coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery (37 cases). Technical success, defined as the absence of type 1 or 3 endoleaks on final angiography, was achieved in 99.3% of patients. At 12 months, there was only one case of type 1/3 endoleak (0.8%) and one aneurysm sac enlargement exceeding 5 mm (0.8%); however, a high incidence of type 2 endoleaks was observed in 35.2% of patients, and aneurysm sac regression exceeding 5 mm was achieved in 30.1% of patients. Nine late complications were observed, and the rate of freedom from late complications at 12 months was 93.5%, encompassing four LGOs and one limb graft stenosis (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to recent reports, our Japanese multicenter prospective study demonstrated satisfactory early clinical results, including an acceptable LGO rate, for the low-profile Zenith Alpha AAA. Long-term follow-ups will be performed to confirm the persistence of these outcomes. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study prospectively evaluated the performance of 147 Zenith Alpha AAAs used for endovascular aneurysm repair with core-lab adjudication focusing especially on limb graft occlusion (LGO). At 12 months, aneurysm sac regression exceeding 5 mm was achieved in 30.1% of patients, and there was only one type 1/3 endoleak, one aneurysm sac enlargement (>5 mm), and nine late complications including five LGOs (3.4%), resulting in rate of freedom from late complications at 93.5%. Satisfactory early clinical results, including an acceptable rate of LGO can be achieved, particularly with cautious usage of the Zenith Alpha Spiral-Z Endovascular Leg." 5mm), and nine late complications including five LGOs (3.4%), resulting in rate of freedom from late complications at 93.5%. Satisfactory early clinical results, including an acceptable rate of LGO can be achieved, particularly with cautious usage of the Zenith Alpha Spiral-Z Endovascular Leg.

2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 98: 293-300, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37454901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with malignancy are at high risk of venous thromboembolism, and early diagnosis is important. The Khorana score is known as a risk assessment for cancer-related thrombosis during chemotherapy, but there are still few reports on its diagnostic potential, the optimal D-dimer cutoff values for indications other than chemotherapy and the use of the Khorana score in combination with D-dimers. In this study, we examined the clinical appropriateness of increasing the D-dimer cutoff value. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 208 malignancies out of 556 patients who underwent lower extremity venous ultrasonography at our hospital over a 2-year period from January 2018 to December 2019. The optimal D-dimer cutoff value for predicting deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with malignancy was calculated by the Youden index. The usefulness of the Khorana score alone and the model combining the Khorana score with D-dimer for predicting DVT diagnosis was compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Of 208 eligible patients, 59 (28.4%) had confirmed DVT. The optimal D-dimer cutoff value for predicting DVT comorbidity in patients with malignancy was 3.96 µg/mL. When the new D-dimer cutoff value was set at 4.0 µg/mL, the odds ratio (OR) for DVT diagnosis was 4.23 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.10-8.55, P < 0.001), which was higher than the OR of 1.33 (95% CI: 0.98-1.81, P = 0.064) for the Khorana score. The area under the curve for the Khorana score and D-dimer was 0.714, which was significantly higher than the 0.611 for the Khorana score alone, with the difference being significantly higher at 0.103 (P = 0.004, 95% CI: 0.033-0.173). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal D-dimer cutoff value for the diagnosis of DVT in patients with malignancy was 4.0 µg/mL. It was also suggested that the combination of the Khorana score with the D-dimer level was more accurate in diagnosing DVT than the Khorana score alone.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Venous Thrombosis , Humans , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Comorbidity
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 104: 174-184, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Juxtarenal aortic occlusion (JRAO), in which the occlusion of the aorta extends to just below the renal artery, is often treated by bypass surgery because of concerns about the risk of procedural failure and fatal embolization to abdominal organs when treated with endovascular treatment (EVT). This study assessed the outcome of EVT for JRAO compared with aorto-biiliac /aorto-bifemoral (AOB) or axillo-bifemoral (AXB) bypass. METHODS: A retrospective review of an international database created by 30 centers in Asia (CHronic Abdominal Aortic Occlusion, ASian Multicenter registry) was performed for patients who underwent revascularization for chronic total occlusion of the infrarenal aorta from 2007 to 2017. Of the 436 patients, 130 with JRAO (Forty-seven AOBs, 32 AXBs, and 51 EVTs) from 25 institutions were included in this study. RESULTS: Patients were significantly older in the AXB and EVT groups and more malnourished in the EVT group than the AOB group. EVT was attempted but failed in 1 patient. Seven patients (1 [2.1%] in the AOB group, 1 [3.1%] in the AXB group, and 5 [9.8%] in the EVT group) died during hospitalization, but most of the causes in the EVT group were not related to the revascularization procedure. No visceral embolism was observed, which had been concerned, even though protection was performed only in 2 cases of the EVT group. At the latest follow-up (median duration 3.0 years), the ankle-brachial pressure index was significantly higher in the order of AOB, EVT, and AXB. At 4 years, the estimated primary and secondary patency rates of the AOB group (87.5% and 90.3%, respectively) were significantly higher than the AXB group (66.7% and 68.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: AOB remains the gold standard and should be the first choice for acceptable risk patients. For frail patients, EVT is a good option and likely preferable as a first-line treatment compared to AXB.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal , Aortic Diseases , Arterial Occlusive Diseases , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Registries , Humans , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Risk Factors , Chronic Disease , Middle Aged , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Asia , Aorta, Abdominal/surgery , Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Abdominal/physiopathology , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Diseases/physiopathology , Aortic Diseases/mortality , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/physiopathology , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Vascular Patency , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Risk Assessment
4.
Nagoya J Med Sci ; 86(1): 16-23, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38505712

ABSTRACT

We previously reported that spinal cord injury following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for a thoracic aortic aneurysm is a micro embolism caused by a vulnerable mural thrombus. Conversely, patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissection develop spinal cord injury less frequently due to fewer mural thrombi. Paying attention to preserving blood flow toward the spinal cord, namely collateral circulation and steal phenomenon, prevents spinal cord injury following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL