When Functional Impairment Develops Early: Perspectives from Middle-Aged Adults.

BACKGROUND: Difficulty performing basic daily activities such as bathing and dressing ("functional impairment") affects more than 15% of middle-aged people, and this proportion is increasing. Little is known about the experiences and needs of individuals who develop functional impairment in middle age. OBJECTIVE: To examine the experiences and needs of adults who developed functional impairment in middle age. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients aged 50-64 years who developed functional impairment in middle age, recruited from four primary care clinics in San Francisco. APPROACH: Interviews included open-ended questions about participants' daily life, ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), and needs related to functional impairment. We analyzed interviews using qualitative thematic analysis. KEY RESULTS: Interviews revealed several themes related to the psychosocial and physical impacts of developing functional impairment in middle age. Participants noted that losses associated with functional impairment, such as loss of independence, control, and social roles, caused conflict in their sense of identity. To cope with these losses, participants used strategies including acceptance, social comparison, adjusting standards, and engaging in valued life activities. Participants reflected on the intersection of their functional impairment with the aging process, noting that their impairments seemed premature compared to the more "natural" aging process in older adults. In terms of physical impacts, participants described how a lack of accommodations in the built environment exacerbated their impairments. While participants used behavioral strategies to overcome these challenges, unmet needs remained, resulting in downstream physical and psychological impacts including safety risks, falls, frustration, and fear. CONCLUSIONS: Unmet psychosocial and physical needs were common among middle-aged adults with functional impairment and led to negative downstream effects. Eliciting and addressing unmet needs may help mitigate downstream health consequences for this growing population, optimizing function and quality of life.

"The More They Know, the Better Care They Can Give": Patient Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

BACKGROUND: Despite its importance to care and outcomes for older adults, functional status is seldom routinely measured in primary care. Understanding patient perspectives is necessary to develop effective, patient-centered approaches for measuring function, yet we know little about patient views on this topic. OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and caregiver perspectives on measuring activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs). DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight patients aged 65 or older and five caregivers in primary care clinics at one Veterans Affairs Medical Center. APPROACH: We conducted interviews to elicit patient and caregiver perspectives on the importance of measuring function, including preferences for method of screening and assessment, wording of questions, and provider communication style. We analyzed interviews using qualitative thematic analysis. KEY RESULTS: We identified several themes related to measuring function in primary care. First, most participants reported that measuring function is part of quality, holistic care. However, a minority of participants noted that discussing function, especially IADLs, was not medically relevant. Second, in terms of preferences for measuring function, participants noted that interdisciplinary approaches to measuring function are optimal and that face-to-face assessment is most "intimate" and can prompt reflection on one's limitations. However, some participants indicated that self-assessment is less invasive than in-person assessment. Third, participants had varied preferences regarding communicating about function. Participants noted that asking about difficulty with activities versus need for help are distinct and complementary concepts and that providing context is essential when discussing sensitive topics such as functional decline. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients and caregivers reported that measuring function was important, preferred face-to-face assessment, and emphasized the importance of providing context when asking about function. These findings suggest that incorporating patient and caregiver preferences for measuring function can improve satisfaction and experience with functional assessment in primary care.

Subjective Sleep Related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms among Trauma-Exposed Men and Women.

Objective/Background: Sleep difficulty is both a common symptom of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a risk factor for the development and maintenance of PTSD symptomatology. Gender differences in sleep following trauma exposure have been posited to contribute to the increased risk for the development of PTSD among women, but the persistence and long-term contributions of these potential differences to the maintenance and severity of PTSD symptoms is unclear. Participants: Men and women reporting a history of trauma exposure (n = 112, 63% female) participated in this study. Methods: Subjective sleep complaints and PTSD symptom severity were assessed using well-validated measures (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PTSD Symptom Checklist). Multivariable regression models (full sample and gender-stratified) were used to predict PTSD symptom severity from global, subscale, and individual item sleep parameters, adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, education, and body mass index. Results: In the full sample, traditional measures of sleep quality and sleep disturbance were associated with PTSD symptom severity. Difficulty falling asleep, poor sleep quality, and sleep disturbance from a variety of sources were related to higher PTSD symptom severity in men, while self-reported sleep disturbance related to nightmares and emotional regulation were associated with PTSD symptom severity among women. Conclusions: These findings add to the limited literature on gender-specific risk factors related to sleep and PTSD, and may inform intervention development and implementation related to PTSD severity among vulnerable adults.

Perceptions of Patients with Primary Nonadherence to Statin Medications.

BACKGROUND: Despite emphasis on efforts to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD), 13% to 34% of people never fill a prescribed statin (primary nonadherence). This study determined perceptions of adults with primary nonadherence to statins. METHODS: Ten focus groups were conducted with 61 adults reporting primary nonadherence to statins (93% without known CVD). Participants were recruited from an academic medical center and nationwide Internet advertisements. RESULTS: Major themes related to primary nonadherence were 1) desire to pursue alternatives before starting a statin (eg, diet and/or exercise, dietary supplements), 2) worry about risks and adverse effects of statins, 3) perceptions of good personal health (suggesting that a statin was not needed), and 4) doubt about the benefits of statins in the absence of disease. Additional themes included mistrust of the pharmaceutical industry, mistrust of prescribing providers, inadequate provider communication about statins, and negative prior experiences with medication. Although rare, a few patients said that high cholesterol does not require treatment if it is genetic. One third noted during focus group discussions that they did not communicate their decision not to take a statin to providers. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with primary nonadherence to statins describe seeking alternatives, avoiding perceived risks of statins, poor acceptance/understanding of CVD risk estimates, and doubts about the benefits of statins. Many do not disclose their decisions to providers, thus highlighting the need for provider awareness of the potential for primary nonadherence at the point of prescribing, and the need for future work to develop strategies to identify patients with potential primary nonadherence.

Primary nonadherence to statin medications: Survey of patient perspectives.

Statin medications reduce cardiovascular events, but many patients never start taking their prescribed statin (primary nonadherence). Limited knowledge exists about the attitudes and beliefs of those with primary nonadherence. In this study, patients with primary nonadherence to statin medications (n = 173) completed a self-administered cross-sectional survey that assessed their attitudes and beliefs related to primary nonadherence and to potential motivators for statin use. Patients were recruited in 2019 from two academic health systems and nationwide internet advertisements. Only 49 of 173 (28.3%) patients with primary nonadherence reported having cardiovascular disease (CVD). Ninety-nine patients (57.2%) never filled their prescription, and 74 (42.8%) filled but never took any statin. Over half failed to initially inform their prescriber they might not take the statin. Patients strongly or somewhat agreed that they desired alternate treatment plans such as diet and/or exercise (n = 134; 77.4%) or natural remedies/dietary supplements (n = 125; 72.3%). Ninety-eight (56.6%) stronglyor somewhat worried about the possibility of statin dependence or addiction. Twenty-seven (15.6%) patients noted that they would not take a statin based solely on CVD risk estimates; 50 (28.9%) selected a CVD risk threshold of >20%; and 23 (13.3%) a threshold of >50% as motivating factors to take statins. Patients with primary nonadherence have attitudes about taking statins based on CVD risk that differ from scientific recommendations, may not tell providers about their hesitation to take statins, and likely prefer alternative initial approaches to cholesterol lowering. Early shared decision-making and assessment of patient attitudes about statins could potentially better align initial approaches for CVD risk reduction.

Prevalence and Knowledge of Potential Interactions Between Over-the-Counter Products and Apixaban.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban, are the most commonly prescribed anticoagulants, with advantages in that they do not require routine monitoring. However, less frequent contact with healthcare professionals may contribute to poor patient knowledge about potential interactions between over-the-counter (OTC) products and DOACs. OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence of use of OTC products (OTC medications and dietary supplements) with potentially serious apixaban interactions and assess patient knowledge of potential interactions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Academic-affiliated outpatient medical practices in northern and southern California. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 791 English- or Spanish-speaking patients prescribed apixaban. MEASUREMENTS: Use and knowledge of OTC medications and dietary supplements with potentially serious apixaban interactions. RESULTS: Almost all respondents (n = 771; 97.5%) reported OTC product use. Of respondents, 33% (n = 266) took at least one OTC product with potentially serious apixaban interactions daily/most days and 53 (6.7%) took multiple products (mean = 2.6 [SD = 2.6]). Aspirin was taken daily by 116 (14.7%; of which 75 [64.7%] also consumed other potentially interacting OTC products), and some days/as needed by an additional 82 (10.4%). Ibuprofen and naproxen were taken daily/most days by 14 (1.8%) and occasionally by 225 (28.5%). Dietary supplements with potentially serious interactions were taken daily/most days by 160 (20.2%). Approximately 66% of respondents were either uncertain or incorrect about the potential for increased bleeding from combining nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and apixaban. Less knowledge about OTC products with potentially serious interactions was associated with greater OTC product use (odds ratio = 0.54; 95% confidence interval = 0.35-0.85). CONCLUSION: Significant numbers of patients take OTC products (particularly dietary supplements) with potentially serious interactions with the DOAC apixaban and appear to lack knowledge about potentially harmful interactions. Interventions are needed to educate patients and healthcare providers about potential dangers of taking interacting OTC products in combination with apixaban, and data are needed on outcomes associated with concomitant apixaban-OTC product use. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:155-162, 2019.