Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 181
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Urol ; 211(1): 20-25, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37707243

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this American Urological Association (AUA) guideline amendment is to provide a useful reference on the effective evidence-based treatment strategies for early-stage testicular cancer. METHODOLOGY/METHODS: The original methodology protocol included searches of PubMed®, Embase®, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from January 1980 through August 2018. The search strategy used medical subject heading (MeSH) terms and key words relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of early-stage testicular cancer. The searches conducted for the update presented herein utilized the same methodological protocol to capture literature published through March 2023. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions. RESULTS: Updates were made to statements on imaging, seminoma management, non-seminoma management, surveillance for stage I testicular cancer, and additional survivorship. Further revisions were made to the methodology and reference sections as appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline seeks to improve clinicians' ability to evaluate and treat patients with early-stage testicular cancer based on currently available evidence. Future studies will be essential to further support or refine these statements to improve patient care.


Subject(s)
Testicular Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Testicular Neoplasms/therapy , United States
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 175(10): 1411-1422, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36063550

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is intended to improve maternal and child health outcomes. In 2009, the WIC food package changed to better align with national nutrition recommendations. PURPOSE: To determine whether WIC participation was associated with improved maternal, neonatal-birth, and infant-child health outcomes or differences in outcomes by subgroups and WIC enrollment duration. DATA SOURCES: Search (January 2009 to April 2022) included PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies had a comparator of WIC-eligible nonparticipants or comparison before and after the 2009 food package change. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired team members independently screened articles for inclusion and evaluated risk of bias. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 20 observational studies. We found: moderate strength of evidence (SOE) that maternal WIC participation during pregnancy is likely associated with lower risk for preterm birth, low birthweight infants, and infant mortality; low SOE that maternal WIC participation may be associated with a lower likelihood of inadequate gestational weight gain, as well as increased well-child visits and childhood immunizations; and low SOE that child WIC participation may be associated with increased childhood immunizations. We found low SOE for differences in some outcomes by race and ethnicity but insufficient evidence for differences by WIC enrollment duration. We found insufficient evidence related to maternal morbidity and mortality outcomes. LIMITATION: Data are from observational studies with high potential for selection bias related to the choice to participate in WIC, and participation status was self-reported in most studies. CONCLUSION: Participation in WIC was likely associated with improved birth outcomes and lower infant mortality, and also may be associated with increased child preventive service receipt. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42020222452).


Subject(s)
Food Assistance , Program Evaluation , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Nutrition Policy , Observational Studies as Topic
3.
J Urol ; 205(2): 370-382, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32915080

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cancer specific survival for men with early stage (I to IIB) testicular germ cell tumors is greater than 90% with any management strategy. The data regarding the comparative effectiveness of surveillance, primary chemotherapy, radiotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were synthesized with a focus on oncologic outcomes, patient reported outcomes, and short and long-term toxicities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed®, Embase® and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1980 to 2018 for studies addressing the effectiveness of surveillance, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, according to pathology and clinical stage, for men with an early stage testicular germ cell tumor. RESULTS: Cancer specific survival ranged from 94% to 100% for patients with early stage testicular germ cell tumors regardless of tumor histology and initial management strategy. For men with seminoma the median cancer specific survival was 99.7% (range 97% to 100%), 99.5% (96.8% to 100%) and 100% (100% to 100%) among those managed by surveillance, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. Median cancer specific survival for men with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors was 100% (range 98.6% to 100%), 100% (96.9% to 100%) and 100% (94% to 100%) when managed by surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and chemotherapy, respectively. Recurrence rates and toxicities varied by management strategy. For men with seminoma surveillance, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with median recurrence rates of 15%, 2% and 3.7%, respectively. For men with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors the median recurrence rates were 20.5%, 3.3% and 11.1% for surveillance, chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, respectively. Surveillance was associated with minimal toxicities compared to other approaches. Primary chemotherapy had the highest rate of short-term toxicities and was associated with long-term risks of metabolic syndrome, hypogonadism, renal impairment, neuropathy, infertility and secondary malignancies. Toxicities with radiotherapy included acute dermatitis and long-term gastrointestinal complications, infertility and high rates of secondary malignancies (2% to 3%). Patients undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection had significant risk of toxicity perioperatively and long-term infertility in men with anejaculation. Transient detriments in patient reported outcomes and quality of life were noted with all management options. CONCLUSIONS: Men with early stage testicular germ cell tumors experience excellent cancer specific survival regardless of management strategy. Management options, however, differ in terms of associated recurrence rates, short and long-term toxicities, and patient reported outcomes. The profile for each approach should be clearly communicated to patients and matched with patient preferences to offer the best individual outcome.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Male , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/radiotherapy , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/surgery , Retroperitoneal Space , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Watchful Waiting
4.
J Urol ; 203(5): 894-901, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609176

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We synthesized evidence on the comparative performance characteristics, benefits and harms of diagnostic imaging modalities used in combination with serum tumor markers for clinical staging of testicular germ cell tumors. The diagnostic imaging modalities included computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography and chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired reviewers independently searched PubMed, Embase® and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1980 to 2018 using title-abstract and full-text screening to identify original studies of the use of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, chest radiographs and serum tumor markers for the clinical staging of early stage testicular germ cell tumors. RESULTS: We found 21 studies of a total of 1,702 patients. With significant bias and limitations to the data, the performance characteristics of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography for staging of the retroperitoneum were similar, with median sensitivity ranging from 67% to 80% and median specificity ranging from 95% to 100%. Computerized tomography of the chest (median sensitivity 100%) was more sensitive than a chest radiograph (median sensitivity 76%), especially in men with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. The addition of serum tumor markers to diagnostic imaging improved staging sensitivity from 38% to 41% to 59% to 60%. No study specifically reported on harms of the imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of axial imaging with computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and serum tumor markers demonstrates optimal performance characteristics for staging early stage testicular germ cell tumors. There is little use for chest computerized tomography in men with seminoma, negative abdominal imaging and negative serum tumor markers.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/diagnosis , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Reproducibility of Results
5.
J Urol ; 204(1): 33-41, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31967523

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review of studies assessing the diagnosis and effectiveness of management strategies for germ cell neoplasia in situ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired investigators independently searched for studies on the diagnosis and management of testicular germ cell neoplasia in situ using PubMed®, Embase® and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1980 through August 2018. The reviewers then extracted data and assessed quality. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. Among patients with a testicular germ cell tumor the prevalence of contralateral germ cell neoplasia in situ was 4.0% to 8.1%. No significant difference in the risk of metachronous malignancy was identified between unscreened groups vs those with routine contralateral testicular screening (cumulative incidence 1.9% vs 3.1%, p=0.097, respectively). Patients who presented with a history of testicular atrophy, age less than 40 years or cryptorchidism had an elevated risk of germ cell neoplasia in situ. In patients with germ cell neoplasia in situ the use of 18 to 20 Gy radiation therapy demonstrated the lowest rate of disease on followup biopsies (0% to 2.5%), compared to a median of 30% on biopsies in patients treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy. Carboplatin based treatment regimens demonstrated positive disease in 66% to 75% on repeat biopsies. Rates of treatment related hypogonadism were 30.8% to 38.5% and 13% to 20% for patients treated with 18 to 20 Gy and cisplatin based chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a testicular germ cell tumor the risk of having contralateral germ cell neoplasia in situ is 4% to 8%, with a greater risk in patients with testicular atrophy, cryptorchidism or age less than 40 years. The risk is high enough to support use of contralateral testicular biopsy in patients with these risk factors for germ cell neoplasia in situ. However, routine screening is not advised. Radiation therapy with 18 to 20 Gy was associated with much better eradication of germ cell neoplasia in situ than chemotherapy. Chemotherapy may eradicate germ cell neoplasia in situ in up to two-thirds of patients undergoing chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for a primary germ cell tumor. Further research and data are needed to strengthen many aspects of the evidence base.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Testicular Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
6.
J Urol ; 202(2): 272-281, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31059667

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Testis cancer is the most common solid malignancy in young males. The purpose of this guideline is to provide a useful reference on the effective evidence-based treatment of early stage testicular cancer. METHODS: The systematic review utilized to inform this guideline was conducted by a methodology team at the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center. The methodology team searched using PubMed®, Embase®, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from January 1980 through August 2018. The evidence review team also reviewed relevant systematic reviews and references provided by the panel to identify articles that may have been missed by the database searches. RESULTS: When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low). Such evidence-based statements are provided as Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In instances of insufficient evidence, additional guidance is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline attempts to improve a clinician's ability to evaluate and treat patients with testicular cancer, but higher quality evidence in future trials will be essential to improve level of care for these patients.


Subject(s)
Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Testicular Neoplasms/therapy , Algorithms , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology
7.
J Gen Intern Med ; 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689121
8.
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc ; 130: 156-165, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31516179

ABSTRACT

Medical education is in the eye of public policy makers more than ever before. Many forces contribute to the interest of policy makers in medical education, including public awareness of how policies can affect access to and quality of clinical care. Governmental legislatures are getting more involved in medical education policy, with less acceptance of the profession's autonomy. Professional societies are not positioned to respond optimally to governmental involvement in medical education policy due to limited resources, poor coordination, and competing concerns. To urge leaders in medicine to strengthen their voice in public policy on medical education, I review educational issues that have recently received attention in the policy arena, and what professional societies have focused on. I highlight strengths and weaknesses of how professional societies have addressed public policy on medical education, and suggest opportunities for strengthening the voice of the medical community.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical , Public Policy , American Medical Association , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Quality of Health Care , Societies, Medical , United States
9.
Ann Intern Med ; 168(11): 791-800, 2018 06 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29710087

ABSTRACT

Background: Given the obesity pandemic, rigorous methodological approaches, including natural experiments, are needed. Purpose: To identify studies that report effects of programs, policies, or built environment changes on obesity prevention and control and to describe their methods. Data Sources: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EconLit (January 2000 to August 2017). Study Selection: Natural experiments and experimental studies evaluating a program, policy, or built environment change in U.S. or non-U.S. populations by using measures of obesity or obesity-related health behaviors. Data Extraction: 2 reviewers serially extracted data on study design, population characteristics, data sources and linkages, measures, and analytic methods and independently evaluated risk of bias. Data Synthesis: 294 studies (188 U.S., 106 non-U.S.) were identified, including 156 natural experiments (53%), 118 experimental studies (40%), and 20 (7%) with unclear study design. Studies used 106 (71 U.S., 35 non-U.S.) data systems; 37% of the U.S. data systems were linked to another data source. For outcomes, 112 studies reported childhood weight and 32 adult weight; 152 had physical activity and 148 had dietary measures. For analysis, natural experiments most commonly used cross-sectional comparisons of exposed and unexposed groups (n = 55 [35%]). Most natural experiments had a high risk of bias, and 63% had weak handling of withdrawals and dropouts. Limitation: Outcomes restricted to obesity measures and health behaviors; inconsistent or unclear descriptions of natural experiment designs; and imperfect methods for assessing risk of bias in natural experiments. Conclusion: Many methodologically diverse natural experiments and experimental studies were identified that reported effects of U.S. and non-U.S. programs, policies, or built environment changes on obesity prevention and control. The findings reinforce the need for methodological and analytic advances that would strengthen evaluations of obesity prevention and control initiatives. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health, Office of Disease Prevention, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42017055750).


Subject(s)
Obesity/prevention & control , Adult , Bias , Built Environment , Child , Diet, Reducing , Exercise , Health Behavior , Health Policy , Humans , Program Evaluation , Research Design , United States
10.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(11): 1990-2001, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30206789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This systematic review identifies programs, policies, and built-environment changes targeting prevention and control of adult obesity and evaluates their effectiveness. METHODS: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EconLit from January 2000 to March 2018. We included natural experiment studies evaluating a program, policy, or built-environment change targeting adult obesity and reporting weight/body mass index (BMI). Studies were categorized by primary intervention target: physical activity/built environment, food/beverage, messaging, or multiple. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias for each study using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool. RESULTS: Of 158 natural experiments targeting obesity, 17 reported adult weight/BMI outcomes. Four of 9 studies reporting on physical activity/built environment demonstrated reduced weight/BMI, although effect sizes were small with low strength of evidence and high risk of bias. None of the 5 studies targeting the food/beverage environment decreased weight/BMI; strength of evidence was low, and 2 studies were rated high risk of bias. DISCUSSION: We identified few natural experiments reporting on the effectiveness of programs, policies, and built-environment changes on adult obesity. Overall, we found no evidence that policies intending to promote physical activity and healthy eating had beneficial effects on weight/BMI and most studies had a high risk of bias. Limitations include few studies met our inclusion criteria; excluded studies in children and those not reporting on weight/BMI outcomes; weight/BMI reporting was very heterogeneous. More high-quality research, including natural experiments studies, is critical for informing the population-level effectiveness of obesity prevention and control initiatives in adults.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Built Environment , Exercise/physiology , Health Policy , Obesity/therapy , Preventive Health Services/methods , Body Weight/physiology , Diet, Healthy/methods , Humans , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/prevention & control , Weight Loss/physiology
11.
J Urol ; 198(3): 520-529, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28479239

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This AUA Guideline focuses on evaluation/counseling and management of adult patients with clinically localized renal masses suspicious for cancer, including solid-enhancing tumors and Bosniak 3/4 complex-cystic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review utilized research from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and additional supplementation by the authors and consultant methodologists. Evidence-based statements were based on body of evidence strength Grade A/B/C (Strong/Moderate/Conditional Recommendations, respectively) with additional statements presented as Clinical Principles or Expert Opinions. RESULTS: Great progress has been made since the previous guidelines on management of localized renal masses were released (2009). The current guidelines provide updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding evaluation/counseling of patients with clinically localized renal masses, including the evolving role of renal mass biopsy. Given great variability of clinical, oncologic and functional characteristics, index patients are not utilized and the panel advocates individualized counseling/management. Management options (partial nephrectomy/radical nephrectomy/thermal ablation/active surveillance) are reviewed including recent data about comparative effectiveness and potential morbidities. Oncologic issues are prioritized while recognizing that functional outcomes are of great importance for survivorship for most patients with localized kidney cancer. A more restricted role for radical nephrectomy is recommended following well-defined selection criteria. Priority for partial nephrectomy is recommended for clinical T1a lesions, along with selective use of thermal ablation, particularly for tumors ≤3.0 cm. Important considerations for shared decision-making about active surveillance are explicitly defined. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors should be considered during counseling/management of patients with clinically localized renal masses, including general health/comorbidities, oncologic potential of the mass, pertinent functional issues and relative efficacy/potential morbidities of various management strategies.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Ablation Techniques , Humans , Nephrectomy , Patient Selection , United States , Watchful Waiting
12.
Ann Intern Med ; 164(6): 417-24, 2016 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26830055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Iodine contrast media are essential components of many imaging procedures. An important potential side effect is contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). PURPOSE: To compare CIN risk for contrast media within and between osmolality classes in patients receiving diagnostic or therapeutic imaging procedures. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov, and Scopus through June 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials that reported CIN-related outcomes in patients receiving low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) or iso-osmolar contrast media for imaging. DATA EXTRACTION: Independent study selection and quality assessment by 2 reviewers and dual extraction of study characteristics and results. DATA SYNTHESIS: None of the 5 studies that compared types of LOCM reported a statistically significant or clinically important difference among study groups, but the strength of evidence was low. Twenty-five randomized, controlled trials found a slight reduction in CIN risk with the iso-osmolar contrast media agent iodixanol compared with a diverse group of LOCM that just reached statistical significance in a meta-analysis (pooled relative risk, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.99]; P = 0.045). This comparison's strength of evidence was moderate. In a meta regression of randomized, controlled trials of iodixanol, no relationship was found between route of administration and comparative CIN risk. LIMITATIONS: Few studies compared LOCM. Procedural details about contrast administration were not uniformly reported. Few studies specified clinical indications or severity of baseline renal impairment. CONCLUSION: No differences were found in CIN risk among types of LOCM. Iodixanol had a slightly lower risk for CIN than LOCM, but the lower risk did not exceed a criterion for clinical importance. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/adverse effects , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Kidney Diseases/epidemiology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Incidence , Osmolar Concentration , Risk Factors , Triiodobenzoic Acids/adverse effects
13.
Ann Intern Med ; 164(6): 406-16, 2016 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26830221

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: N-acetylcysteine, sodium bicarbonate, statins, and ascorbic acid have been studied for reducing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). PURPOSE: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of interventions to reduce CIN in adults receiving contrast media. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus databases through June 2015. Risk of bias and overall strength of evidence (SOE) of studies were assessed. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials of N-acetylcysteine, sodium bicarbonate, statins, or ascorbic acid that used intravenous (IV) or intra-arterial contrast media and defined CIN with enough data for meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Low-dose N-acetylcysteine plus IV saline compared with IV saline (risk ratio [RR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89]; low SOE), N-acetylcysteine plus IV saline compared with IV saline in patients receiving low-osmolar contrast media (RR, 0.69 [CI, 0.58 to 0.84]; moderate SOE), and statins plus N-acetylcysteine plus IV saline versus N-acetylcysteine plus IV saline (RR, 0.52 [CI, 0.29 to 0.93]; low SOE) had clinically important and statistically significant benefits. The following 3 comparisons suggested a clinically important difference that was not statistically significant: sodium bicarbonate versus IV saline in patients receiving low-osmolar contrast media (RR, 0.65 [CI, 0.33 to 1.25]; low SOE), statins plus IV saline versus IV saline (RR, 0.68 [CI, 0.39 to 1.20]; low SOE), and ascorbic acid versus IV saline (RR, 0.72 [CI, 0.48 to 1.01]; low SOE). Strength of evidence was generally insufficient for comparisons of the need for renal replacement, cardiac events, and mortality. LIMITATION: Too few studies were done in patients receiving IV contrast media. CONCLUSION: The greatest reduction in CIN was seen with N-acetylcysteine plus IV saline in patients receiving LOCM and with statins plus N-acetylcysteine plus IV saline. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/adverse effects , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Kidney Diseases/prevention & control , Acetylcysteine/therapeutic use , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Ascorbic Acid/therapeutic use , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Free Radical Scavengers/therapeutic use , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Infusions, Intravenous , Odds Ratio , Sodium Bicarbonate/therapeutic use , Sodium Chloride/therapeutic use , United States
14.
Cancer ; 122(21): 3267-3276, 2016 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27508947

ABSTRACT

Solid renal masses and cystic lesions with solid components are suspicious for renal cell carcinoma. Without an effective screening test, composite models and nomograms rely on patient and tumor characteristics to stratify the risk of benign disease versus malignant disease. To guide decisions about the use of renal mass sampling or excision, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the ability of composite models to predict the likelihood of malignancy on the basis of preoperative clinical variables was performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 1, 1997, through May 1, 2015, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Composite models necessarily included imaging results and at least 1 element from the following to be compared with surgical pathology: demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and blood or urine tests. Two independent reviewers screened citations and extracted data. Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to assess the risk of bias. The strength of evidence was graded with the scheme recommended by Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Twenty studies (12,149 patients) were included in this review. The only significant predictors of malignancy in the composite models were tumor size (effect size, 1.33-fold increased risk per centimeter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.43) and male sex (effect size, 2.71; 95% CI, 2.39-3.02). The results were inconclusive or not significant for tumor characteristics, age, body mass index, and incidental presentation. In conclusion, composite models currently have a limited ability to distinguish malignant renal masses from benign renal masses, with increased tumor size and male sex associated with malignancy. Cancer 2016;122:3267-3276. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Statistical , Nomograms
15.
J Urol ; 195(5): 1340-1347, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26901507

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Clinical practice varies widely on the diagnostic role of biopsy for clinically localized renal masses suspicious for renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of the available literature to quantify the accuracy and rate of adverse events of renal mass biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE®, Embase® and the Cochrane databases were searched (January 1997 to May 2015) for relevant studies. The systematic review process established by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality was followed. Nondiagnostic biopsies were excluded from diagnostic accuracy calculations. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies with 2,979 patients and 3,113 biopsies were included in the study. The overall nondiagnostic rate was 14.1% with 90.4% of those undergoing surgery found to have malignancy. Repeat biopsy led to diagnosis in 80% of patients. The false-positive rate was low (4.0%), histological and renal cell carcinoma subtype concordance was substantial, and Fuhrman upgrading notable (16%) from low grade (1 to 2) to high grade (3 to 4). Core biopsy was highly sensitive (97.5%, CI 96.5-98.5) and specific (96.2%, CI 90.7-100) when a diagnostic result was obtained, but most patients (∼80%) did not undergo surgery after a benign biopsy. Among patients undergoing extirpation 36.7% with a negative biopsy had malignant disease on surgical pathology (negative predictive value 63.3%, CI 52.4-74.2). Direct complications included hematoma (4.9%), clinically significant pain (1.2%), gross hematuria (1.0%), pneumothorax (0.6%) and hemorrhage (0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic accuracy was generally high for biopsy of localized renal masses with a low complication rate, but the nondiagnostic rate and negative predictive value were concerning. Renal mass sampling should be used judiciously as further research will determine its true clinical utility.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/methods , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors
16.
J Urol ; 196(4): 989-99, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27157369

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Several options exist for management of clinically localized renal masses suspicious for cancer, including active surveillance, thermal ablation and radical or partial nephrectomy. We summarize evidence on effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of these treatment approaches for patients with a renal mass suspicious for localized renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE®, Embase® and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1997 through May 1, 2015. Paired investigators independently screened articles to identify controlled studies of management options or cohort studies of active surveillance, abstracted data sequentially and assessed risk of bias independently. Strength of evidence was graded by comparisons. RESULTS: The search identified 107 studies (majority T1, no active surveillance or thermal ablation stratified outcomes of T2 tumors). Cancer specific survival was excellent among all management strategies (median 5-year survival 95%). Local recurrence-free survival was inferior for thermal ablation with 1 treatment but reached equivalence to other modalities after multiple treatments. Overall survival rates were similar among management strategies and varied with age and comorbidity. End-stage renal disease rates were low for all strategies (0.4% to 2.8%). Radical nephrectomy was associated with the largest decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate and highest incidence of chronic kidney disease. Thermal ablation offered the most favorable perioperative outcomes. Partial nephrectomy showed the highest rates of urological complications but overall rates of minor/major complications were similar among interventions. Strength of evidence was moderate, low and insufficient for 11, 22 and 30 domains, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative studies demonstrated similar cancer specific survival across management strategies, with some differences in renal functional outcomes, perioperative outcomes and postoperative harms that should be considered when choosing a management strategy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Kidney/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Global Health , Humans , Incidence , Kidney/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Rate/trends , Treatment Outcome
17.
Med Care ; 54(12): 1105-1111, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27116111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital-acquired Conditions (HACs) are increasingly being used for pay-for-performance and public reporting despite concerns over their validity. Given the potential for these measures to misinform patients, misclassify hospitals, and misapply financial and reputational harm to hospitals, these need to be rigorously evaluated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess PSI and HAC measure validity. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and the gray literature from January 1, 1990 through January 14, 2015 for studies that addressed the validity of the HAC measures and PSIs. Secondary outcomes included the effects of present on admission (POA) modifiers, and the most common reasons for discrepancies. We developed pooled results for measures evaluated by ≥3 studies. We propose a threshold of 80% for positive predictive value or sensitivity for pay-for-performance and public reporting suitability. RESULTS: Only 5 measures, Iatrogenic Pneumothorax (PSI 6/HAC 17), Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (PSI 7), Postoperative hemorrhage/hematoma (PSI 9), Postoperative deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolus (PSI 12), and Accidental Puncture/Laceration (PSI 15), had sufficient data for pooled meta-analysis. Only PSI 15 (Accidental Puncture and Laceration) met our proposed threshold for validity (positive predictive value only) but this result was weakened by considerable heterogeneity. Coding errors were the most common reasons for discrepancies between medical record review and administrative databases. POA modifiers may improve the validity of some measures. CONCLUSION: This systematic review finds that there is limited validity for the PSI and HAC measures when measured against the reference standard of a medical chart review. Their use, as they currently exist, for public reporting and pay-for-performance, should be publicly reevaluated in light of these findings.


Subject(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./standards , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Patient Safety/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/standards , Hospitals/standards , Humans , Quality of Health Care/standards , Reproducibility of Results , United States
18.
Ann Intern Med ; 161(7): 491-501, 2014 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25111499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinicians face uncertainty about the prognostic value of troponin testing in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) without suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature on troponin testing in patients with CKD without ACS. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through May 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Studies examining elevated versus normal troponin levels in patients with CKD without ACS. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired reviewers selected articles for inclusion, extracted data, and graded strength of evidence (SOE). Meta-analyses were conducted when studies had sufficient homogeneity of key variables. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ninety-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Elevated troponin levels were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among patients receiving dialysis (moderate SOE). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality from studies that adjusted for age and coronary artery disease or a risk equivalent were 3.0 (95% CI, 2.4 to 4.3) for troponin T and 2.7 (CI, 1.9 to 4.6) for troponin I. The pooled adjusted HRs for cardiovascular mortality were 3.3 (CI, 1.8 to 5.4) for troponin T and 4.2 (CI, 2.0 to 9.2) for troponin I. Findings were similar for patients with CKD who were not receiving dialysis, but there were fewer studies. No study tested treatment strategies by troponin cut points. LIMITATION: Studies were heterogeneous regarding assays, troponin cut points, covariate adjustment, and follow-up. CONCLUSION: In patients with CKD without suspected ACS, elevated troponin levels were associated with worse prognosis. Future studies should focus on whether this biomarker is more appropriate than clinical models for reclassifying risk of patients with CKD and whether such classification can help guide treatment in those at highest risk for death. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood , Troponin I/blood , Troponin T/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Humans , Prognosis , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Risk
19.
Ann Intern Med ; 161(7): 502-12, 2014 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25111593

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have high prevalence of elevated serum troponin levels, which makes diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) challenging. PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of troponin in ACS diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis among patients with CKD. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through May 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Studies examining elevated versus normal troponin levels in terms of their diagnostic performance in detection of ACS, effect on ACS management strategies, and prognostic value for mortality or cardiovascular events after ACS among patients with CKD. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired reviewers selected articles for inclusion, extracted data, and graded strength of evidence (SOE). DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria. The sensitivity of troponin T for ACS diagnosis ranged from 71% to 100%, and specificity ranged from 31% to 86% (6 studies; low SOE). The sensitivity and specificity of troponin I ranged from 43% to 94% and from 48% to 100%, respectively (8 studies; low SOE). No studies examined how troponin levels affect management strategies. Twelve studies analyzed prognostic value. Elevated levels of troponin I or troponin T were associated with higher risk for short-term death and cardiac events (low SOE). A similar trend was observed for long-term mortality with troponin I (low SOE), but less evidence was found for long-term cardiac events for troponin I and long-term outcomes for troponin T (insufficient SOE). Patients with advanced CKD tended to have worse prognoses with elevated troponin I levels than those without them (moderate SOE). LIMITATION: Studies were heterogeneous in design and in ACS definitions and adjudication methods. CONCLUSION: In patients with CKD and suspected ACS, troponin levels can aid in identifying those with a poor prognosis, but the diagnostic utility is limited by varying estimates of sensitivity and specificity. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood , Troponin I/blood , Troponin T/blood , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Biomarkers/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Humans , Prognosis , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Risk , Sensitivity and Specificity
20.
Med Teach ; 37(2): 131-5, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24819726

ABSTRACT

Clinician Educators' (CEs) focus on patient care and teaching, yet many academic institutions require dissemination of scholarly work for advancement. This can be difficult for CEs. Our division developed the Clinician-Educator Mentoring and Scholarship Program (CEMSP) in an effort to assist CEs with scholarship, national reputation, recognition, promotion and job satisfaction. The key components are salary-supported director and co-director who coordinate the program and serve as overall mentors and link CEs and senior faculty, and a full-time Senior Research Coordinator to assist with all aspects of scholarship, a close relationship with the General Internal Medicine (GIM) Methods Core provides advanced statistical support. Funding for the program comes from GIM divisional resources. Perceived value was evaluated by assessing the number of manuscripts published, survey of faculty regarding usage and opinion of CEMSP, and a review of faculty promotions. Although impossible to attribute the contributions of an individual component, a program specifically aimed at helping GIM CE faculty publish scholarly projects, increase participation in national organizations and focus on career progression can have a positive impact.


Subject(s)
Faculty, Medical/organization & administration , Fellowships and Scholarships/organization & administration , Mentors , Peer Review, Research , Staff Development/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Career Mobility , Humans , Internal Medicine/education , Job Satisfaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL