SIIV position paper: clinical approach to vulval diseases. Need for quality standards.

This paper summarizes the position of the Italian Society of Vulvology on the clinical approach to vulval disease. A thorough history (general medical, gynaecological, and vulval history) is essential for a successful and fruitful vulvological examination. Characteristics of pruritus (itch) and pain, that are the two main vulval symptoms, should be collected and reported with precision, according to duration, temporal course, location, provocation, and intensity. Physical examination must consider both the general condition of the patient and the specific vulval region, that must be examined following a standardized methodology. The physical examination of the vulva is carried out with naked eye and adequate natural or halogen lighting. The subsequent use of instrumental magnification can be considered on particular parts of skin/mucosa, already highlighted with the first inspection. Also, palpation is essential, allowing to appreciate physical features of vulval lesions: consistency, surface, soreness, adherence to underlying plans. Finally, the five-step approach of the International Society for the Study of Vulvo-vaginal Disease about Terminology and Classification of Vulvar Dermatological Disorders (2012) is summarized. A vulval biopsy may be useful in the following situations: when clinical diagnosis is uncertain, lesion not responding to treatment; histologic confirmation for a clinical diagnosis and exclusion or confirmation of a suspected neoplastic intraepithelial or invasive pathology.

Unexpectedly high frequency of genital involvement in women with clinical and histological features of oral lichen planus.

The main aims of this cross-sectional study were: (i) to assess the frequency of genital (vulval) lichen planus (VLP) and vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) in women affected with oral lichen planus (OLP), regardless of the genital symptoms reported; and (ii) to verify whether any demographic, clinical, or histological features of OLP are associated with a higher risk of vulvo-vaginal involvement. Fifty-five women, presenting OLP, consecutively underwent gynaecological examination and, if they demonstrated positive clinical signs of VLP, underwent biopsy. After a drop-out of 14 subjects, 31/41 (75.6%) were found to have signs of genital involvement, of which 13/31 (44.0%) were asymptomatic. Following genital biopsy, 27/31 (87.1%) had histologically confirmed VLP or VLS. Following both univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, no significant association was found between gynaecological concomitance and demographic, clinical, histological features of OLP. This unpredictably common genital involvement in females with OLP emphasizes the importance of routinely performing both oral and gynaecological examinations, to facilitate an early and correct therapeutic approach.