ABSTRACT
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for all cancer sites, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), is meant to be dynamic, requiring periodic updates to optimize AJCC staging definitions. This entails the collaboration of experts charged with evaluating new evidence that supports changes to each staging system. GEP-NETs are the second most prevalent neoplasm of gastrointestinal origin after colorectal cancer. Since publication of the AJCC eighth edition, the World Health Organization has updated the classification and separates grade 3 GEP-NETs from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. In addition, because of major advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies for GEP-NETs, AJCC version 9 advocates against the use of serum chromogranin A for the diagnosis and monitoring of GEP-NETs. Furthermore, AJCC version 9 recognizes the increasing role of endoscopy and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and management of NETs, particularly in the stomach, duodenum, and colorectum. Finally, T1NXM0 has been added to stage I in these disease sites as well as in the appendix.
Subject(s)
Intestinal Neoplasms , Neoplasm Staging , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/therapy , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Intestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Intestinal Neoplasms/therapy , United StatesABSTRACT
Barrett's esophagus is an intestine-like metaplasia and precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Triggered by gastroesophageal reflux disease, the origin of this metaplasia remains unknown. p63-deficient mice, which lack squamous epithelia, may model acid-reflux damage. We show here that p63 null embryos rapidly develop intestine-like metaplasia with gene expression profiles similar to Barrett's metaplasia. We track its source to a unique embryonic epithelium that is normally undermined and replaced by p63-expressing cells. Significantly, we show that a discrete population of these embryonic cells persists in adult mice and humans at the squamocolumnar junction, the source of Barrett's metaplasia. We show that upon programmed damage to the squamous epithelium, these embryonic cells migrate toward adjacent, specialized squamous cells in a process that may recapitulate early Barrett's. Our findings suggest that certain precancerous lesions, such as Barrett's, initiate not from genetic alterations but from competitive interactions between cell lineages driven by opportunity.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophagus/pathology , Animals , Barrett Esophagus/embryology , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Intestine, Small/cytology , Metaplasia , Mice , Phosphoproteins/genetics , Phosphoproteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/genetics , Trans-Activators/metabolismABSTRACT
Inactivating alterations in the SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable (SWI/SNF) Chromatin Remodeling Complex subunits have been described in multiple tumor types. Recent studies focused on SMARC subunits of this complex to understand their relationship with tumor characteristics and therapeutic opportunities. To date, pancreatic cancer with these alterations has not been well studied, although isolated cases of undifferentiated carcinomas have been reported. Herein, we screened 59 pancreatic undifferentiated carcinomas for alterations in SWI/SNF complex-related (SMARCB1 [BAF47/INI1], SMARCA4 [BRG1], SMARCA2 [BRM]) proteins and/or genes using immunohistochemistry and/or next-generation sequencing. Cases with alterations in SWI/SNF complex-related proteins/genes were compared with cases without alterations, as well as with 96 conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). In all tumor groups, mismatch repair and PD-L1 protein expression were also evaluated. Thirty of 59 (51%) undifferentiated carcinomas had a loss of SWI/SNF complex-related protein expression or gene alteration. Twenty-seven of 30 (90%) SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas had rhabdoid morphology (vs 9/29 [31%] SWI-/SNF-retained undifferentiated carcinomas; P < .001) and all expressed cytokeratin, at least focally. Immunohistochemically, SMARCB1 protein expression was absent in 16/30 (53%) cases, SMARCA2 in 4/30 (13%), and SMARCA4 in 4/30 (13%); both SMARCB1 and SMARCA2 protein expressions were absent in 1/30 (3%). Five of 8 (62.5%) SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas that displayed loss of SMARCB1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry were found to have corresponding SMARCB1 deletions by next-generation sequencing. Analysis of canonical driver mutations for PDAC in these cases showed KRAS (2/5) and TP53 (2/5) abnormalities. Median combined positive score for PD-L1 (E1L3N) was significantly higher in the undifferentiated carcinomas with/without SWI/SNF deficiency compared with the conventional PDACs (P < .001). SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas were larger (P < .001) and occurred in younger patients (P < .001). Patients with SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma had worse overall survival compared with patients with SWI-/SNF-retained undifferentiated carcinoma (P = .004) and PDAC (P < .001). Our findings demonstrate that SWI-/SNF-deficient pancreatic undifferentiated carcinomas are frequently characterized by rhabdoid morphology, exhibit highly aggressive behavior, and have a negative prognostic impact. The ones with SMARCB1 deletions appear to be frequently KRAS wild type. Innovative developmental therapeutic strategies targeting this genomic basis of the SWI/SNF complex and the therapeutic implications of EZH2 inhibition (NCT03213665), SMARCA2 degrader (NCT05639751), or immunotherapy are currently under investigation.
ABSTRACT
Functional copy-number alterations (fCNAs) are DNA copy-number changes with concordant differential gene expression. These are less likely to be bystander genetic lesions and could serve as robust and reproducible tumor biomarkers. To identify candidate fCNAs in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), we integrated chromosomal microarray (CMA) and RNA-seq differential gene-expression data from 31 pancreatic (pNETs) and 33 small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors (sbNETs). Tumors were resected from 47 early-disease-progression (<24 months) and 17 late-disease-progression (>24 months) patients. Candidate fCNAs that accurately differentiated these groups in this discovery cohort were then replicated using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues in a larger validation cohort of 60 pNETs and 82 sbNETs (52 early- and 65 late-disease-progression samples). Logistic regression analysis revealed the predictive ability of these biomarkers, as well as the assay-performance metrics of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. Our results indicate that copy-number changes at chromosomal loci 4p16.3, 7q31.2, 9p21.3, 17q12, 18q21.2, and 19q12 may be used as diagnostic and prognostic NET biomarkers. This involves a rapid, cost-effective approach to determine the primary tumor site for patients with metastatic liver NETs and to guide risk-stratified therapeutic decisions.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , DNA Copy Number Variations , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Prognosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticABSTRACT
The assessment of the expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been controversial since its introduction. The methods of assessment and the range of assays and platforms contribute to confusion. Perhaps the most challenging aspect of PD-L1 IHC is the combined positive score (CPS) method of interpretation of IHC results. Although the CPS method is prescribed for more indications than any other PD-L1 scoring system, its reproducibility has never been rigorously assessed. In this study, we collected a series of 108 gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer cases, stained them using the Food and Drug Administration-approved 22C3 assay, scanned them, and then circulated them to 14 pathologists at 13 institutions for the assessment of interpretative concordance for the CPS system. We found that higher cut points (10 or 20) performed better than a CPS of <1 or >1. We used the Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests algorithm to assess how the CPS system might perform in the real-world setting and found that the cut points of <1 or >1 showed an overall percent agreement of only 30% among the pathologist raters, with a plateau occurring at 8 raters. The raters performed better at higher cut points. However, the best cut point of <20 versus that of >20 was still disappointing, with a plateau at an overall percent agreement of 70% (at 7 raters). Although there is no ground truth for CPS, we compared the score with quantitative messenger RNA measurement and showed no relationship between the score (at any cut point) and messenger RNA amount. In summary, we showed that CPS shows high subjective variability among pathologist readers and is likely to perform poorly in the real-world setting. This system may be the root cause of the poor specificity and relatively low predictive value of IHC companion diagnostic tests for PD-1 axis therapies that use the CPS system.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Apoptosis , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Immunohistochemistry , Ligands , Pathologists , Reproducibility of Results , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare, aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. The World Health Organization 2017 and 2019 classifications further subdivided G3 NENs into G3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Current guidelines favor medical management in most of these patients, and the role of surgical management is not well defined. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of surgical management versus nonsurgical management for G3 GEP NENs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (end-of-search date: 16 July 2021) was conducted. Individual patient survival data were reconstructed, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies comprising 1810 surgical and 910 nonsurgical patients were systematically reviewed. Publication bias adjusted meta-analysis of 12 studies (1788 surgical and 857 nonsurgical patients) showed increased overall survival (OS) after surgical compared with nonsurgical management for G3 GEP NENs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.53]. Subgroup meta-analyses showed increased OS after surgical management for both pancreatic and gastrointestinal primary sites separately. In another subgroup meta-analysis of G3 GEP NETs (not NECs), surgical management was associated with increased OS compared with nonsurgical management (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of G3 GEP NENs may provide a potential survival benefit in well-selected cases. Further research is needed to define which patients will benefit most from surgical versus nonsurgical management. The current literature is limited by inconsistent reporting of survival outcomes in surgical versus nonsurgical groups, tumor grade, differentiation, primary tumor site, and selection criteria for surgical and nonsurgical management.
Subject(s)
Neuroendocrine Tumors , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgeryABSTRACT
AIMS: Criteria for the interpretation of digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) continue to evolve. Although there are some literature recommendations regarding workup and diagnosis of these lesions, different practice patterns exist among pathologists when signing out these specimens. The aim of this study was to assess practice trends among pathologists worldwide when reporting these neoplasms. METHODS AND RESULTS: We created an online survey with multiple questions pertaining to digestive NENs. The results were analysed based on type of practice setting, years of sign-out experience, and practice location. Respondents included 384 practicing pathologists: 70% academic, 30% private practice; 63% gastrointestinal (GI) pathology-subspecialised, 37% not; 39% North American, 42% European, 19% others; 45% with ≤10 years in practice; 55% with >10 years. Some question responses were chosen by the majority (e.g. 85% use both mitotic count and Ki67 index for grading NENs, 82% complete a synoptic, and Ki67 stain even for small incidental appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours [NETs], and 96% utilize the diagnosis of grade 3 NET). However, some questions showed varying responses, including counting mitotic figures, Ki67 stain interpretation, and pancreatic grade 3 NEN workup. Pathologists also had some variability in interpreting regional metastatic foci of small bowel NETs and in choosing blocks for Ki67 staining in multifocal lesions. CONCLUSION: There existed scenarios wherein practice patterns varied despite recommendations in the literature, and there were also scenarios lacking clear guidelines wherein pathologists used varying judgement. This survey highlights current key grey areas in digestive system NEN evaluation, leading to variation in practice patterns.
Subject(s)
Digestive System Neoplasms , Ki-67 Antigen , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Humans , Appendiceal Neoplasms/genetics , Appendiceal Neoplasms/metabolism , Appendiceal Neoplasms/pathology , Intestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Intestinal Neoplasms/metabolism , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Ki-67 Antigen/genetics , Neoplasm Grading , Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics , Neuroendocrine Tumors/metabolism , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Digestive System Neoplasms/genetics , Digestive System Neoplasms/metabolism , Digestive System Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
Determining neuroendocrine tumor (NET) primary sites is pivotal for patient care as pancreatic NETs (pNETs) and small bowel NETs (sbNETs) have distinct treatment approaches. The diagnostic power and prioritization of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay biomarkers for establishing primary sites has not been thoroughly investigated using machine learning (ML) techniques. We trained ML models on FISH assay metrics from 85 sbNET and 59 pNET samples for primary site prediction. Exploring multiple methods for imputing missing data, the impute-by-median dataset coupled with a support vector machine model achieved the highest classification accuracy of 93.1% on a held-out test set, with the top importance variables originating from the ERBB2 FISH probe. Due to the greater interpretability of decision tree (DT) models, we fit DT models to ten dataset splits, achieving optimal performance with k-nearest neighbor (KNN) imputed data and a transformation to single categorical biomarker probe variables, with a mean accuracy of 81.4%, on held-out test sets. ERBB2 and MET variables ranked as top-performing features in 9 of 10 DT models and the full dataset model. These findings offer probabilistic guidance for FISH testing, emphasizing the prioritization of the ERBB2, SMAD4, and CDKN2A FISH probes in diagnosing NET primary sites.
Subject(s)
Intestinal Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Machine LearningABSTRACT
Diagnosis of Wilson disease (WD) can be difficult because of its protean clinical presentations, but early diagnosis is important because effective treatment is available and can prevent disease progression. Similarly, diagnosis of WD on liver biopsy specimens is difficult due to the wide range of histologic appearances. A stain that could help identify WD patients would be of great value. The goal of this study was to use mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify potential proteins that are differentially expressed in WD compared to controls, and could serve as potential immunohistochemical markers for screening. Several proteins were differentially expressed in WD and immunohistochemical stains for two (metallothionein (MT) and cytochrome C oxidase copper chaperone (COX17)) were tested and compared to other methods of diagnosis in WD including copper staining and quantitative copper assays. We found diffuse metallothionein immunoreactivity in all liver specimens from patients with WD (n = 20); the intensity of the staining was moderate to strong. This staining pattern was distinct from that seen in specimens from the control groups (none of which showed strong, diffuse staining), which included diseases that may be in the clinical or histologic differential of WD (steatohepatitis (n = 51), chronic viral hepatitis (n = 40), autoimmune hepatitis (n = 50), chronic biliary tract disease (n = 42), and normal liver (n = 20)). COX17 immunostain showed no significant difference in expression between the WD and control groups. MT had higher sensitivity than rhodanine for diagnosis of WD. While the quantitative liver copper assays also had high sensitivity, they require more tissue, have a higher cost, longer turnaround time, and are less widely available than an immunohistochemical stain. We conclude that MT IHC is a sensitive immunohistochemical stain for the diagnosis of WD that could be widely deployed as a screening tool for liver biopsies in which WD is in the clinical or histologic differential diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Hepatolenticular Degeneration , Coloring Agents/metabolism , Copper/metabolism , Hepatolenticular Degeneration/diagnosis , Hepatolenticular Degeneration/metabolism , Hepatolenticular Degeneration/pathology , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Liver/pathology , Metallothionein/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are aggressive tumors with poor survival outcomes for which medical management is generally recommended. This study sought to evaluate outcomes of surgically treated G3 GEP-NEN patients. METHODS: A single-institutional prospective NEN database was reviewed. Patients with G3 GEP-NENs based on World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 definitions included well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (G3NET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (G3NEC). Clinicopathologic factors were compared between groups. Overall survival from G3 diagnosis was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed for 463 patients (211 G1, 208 G2, 44 G3). Most had metastatic disease at presentation (54% G1, 69% G2, 91% G3; p < 0.001). The G3 cohort included 39 G3NETs and 5 G3NECs, 22 of pancreatic and 22 of midgut origin. Median overall survival (mOS; in months) was 268.1 for G1NETs, 129.9 for G2NETs, 50.5 for G3NETs, and 28.5 for G3NECs (p < 0.001). Over the same period, 31 G3 patients (12 G3NETs, 19 G3NECs) were treated non-surgically, with mOS of 19.0 for G3NETs and 12.4 for G3NECs. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of G3 GEP-NENs remains controversial due to poor prognosis, and surgical series are rare. This large, single-institutional study found significantly lower mOS in patients with resected G3NENs than those with G1/G2 tumors, reflecting more aggressive tumor biology and a higher proportion with metastatic disease. The mOS for resected G3NETs and G3NECs exceeded historical non-surgical G3NEN series (mOS 11-19 months), suggesting surgery should be considered in carefully selected patients with G3NENs, especially those with well-differentiated tumors.
Subject(s)
Intestinal Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Cohort Studies , Humans , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Management of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) is not standardized, with smaller lesions (< 1-2 cm) generally treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and larger DNETs by surgical resection (SR). This study reviewed how patients were selected for treatment and compared outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with DNETs undergoing resection were identified through institutional databases, and clinicopathologic data recorded. χ2 and Wilcoxon tests compared variables. Survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression tested association with survival. RESULTS: Among 104 patients, 64 underwent EMR and 40 had SR. Patients selected for SR had larger tumor size, younger age, and higher T, N, and M stage. There was no difference in progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between SR and EMR. In 1-2 cm DNETs, there was no difference in PFS between SR and EMR [median not reached (NR), P = 0.1]; however, longer OS was seen in SR (median NR versus 112 months, P = 0.03). In 1-2 cm DNETs, SR patients were more likely to be node-positive and younger. After adjustment for age, resection method did not correlate with survival. Comparison of surgically resected DNETs versus jejunoileal NETs revealed longer PFS (median NR versus 73 months, P < 0.001) and OS (median NR versus 119 months, P = 0.004) DISCUSSION: In 1-2 cm DNETs, there was no difference in survival between EMR and SR after adjustment for age. Recurrences could be salvaged, suggesting that EMR is a reasonable strategy. Compared with jejunoileal NETs, DNETs treated by SR had improved PFS and OS.
Subject(s)
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tumor biomarkers (TBMs) reflect disease burden and correlate with survival for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs). This study sought to determine the performance of chromogranin A (CgA), pancreastatin (PST), neurokinin A (NKA), and serotonin (5HT) during follow-up assessment of resected SBNETs. METHODS: An institutional database identified patients undergoing surgery for SBNETs. Tumor biomarker levels were assessed as categorical (normal vs elevated) and continuous variables for association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) via the Kaplan-Meier method with Cox multivariable models adjusted for confounders. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of TBM levels in identifying imaging-confirmed progression were calculated. RESULTS: In 218 patients (44% female, 92% node + , 73% metastatic, 97% G1 or G2), higher levels of CgA, PST, NKA, and 5HT correlated with higher-grade and metastatic disease at presentation (p < 0.05). Elevated pre- and postoperative CgA, PST, and NKA correlated with lower PFS and OS (p < 0.05; median follow-up period, 49.6 months). Normal CgA, PST, and NKA were present in respectively 20.3%, 16.9%, and 72.6% of the patients with progression, whereas elevated levels were present in respectively 69.5%, 24.8%, and 1.3% of the patients without progression. Using TBMs to determine progression showed superiority of PST (78.9% accuracy) over CgA (63.3% accuracy) or CgA and PST together (60.3% accuracy). CONCLUSION: Although specific for progression, NKA was rarely elevated, limiting its usefulness. Pre- and postoperative PST and CgA correlated with disease burden and survival, with PST providing better discrimination of outcomes. During the follow-up period, use of PST most accurately detected progression. These results suggest that PST should replace CgA for SBNET surveillance.
Subject(s)
Intestinal Neoplasms , Intestine, Small/surgery , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Biomarkers, Tumor , Chromogranin A , Female , Humans , Intestinal Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Stomach NeoplasmsABSTRACT
AIMS: The diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and the interpretation of glutamine synthetase (GS) staining can be challenging on biopsies. We aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of needle biopsy diagnosis of FNH, the effect of GS immunohistochemistry on FNH diagnosis, and which histological features are most useful for the diagnosis of FNH. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included virtual needle biopsies generated from 75 resection specimens (30 FNHs, 15 hepatocellular adenomas, 15 hepatocellular carcinomas, and 15 non-lesional liver specimens). Pathologists were reasonably accurate (83.1%) in the diagnosis of FNH with haematoxylin and eosin alone. Ductular reaction and nodularity had the highest sensitivity for a diagnosis of FNH (88.1% and 82.2%, respectively), whereas central scar was the most specific feature (90.6%). The presence of two or more of the classic histological features had 89.6% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity for a diagnosis of FNH. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher with the addition of a GS stain. A map-like GS staining pattern was highly specific (99.3%) for FNH. However, GS staining was interpreted as non-map-like in 14.4% of reviews of true FNH cases, and overall interobserver agreement for interpretation of the GS staining pattern was only moderate (kappa = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologists are reasonably accurate in the diagnosis of FNH on virtual biopsies, and GS staining improves accuracy. However, a subset of FNH cases remain challenging. Steatosis and a pseudo-map-like GS staining pattern were associated with increased difficulty. Therefore, although a map-like GS staining pattern is useful for confirmation of a diagnosis, the lack of a map-like GS staining pattern on needle biopsy does not necessarily exclude a diagnosis of FNH.
Subject(s)
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia , Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase/analysis , Liver Neoplasms , Adenoma, Liver Cell/diagnosis , Adenoma, Liver Cell/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Biopsy, Needle , Data Accuracy , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Focal Nodular Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Focal Nodular Hyperplasia/pathology , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Liver/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , MaleABSTRACT
Currarino syndrome (CS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome caused by mutations in MNX1 and characterized by anorectal abnormalities, partial sacral agenesis, and presacral masses. The presacral masses are typically benign; however, malignant degeneration can occur, and presacral neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have been reported in six cases. We report three individuals from two families affected by CS in which multiple individuals developed presacral NETs. The first family, 491, had six members with features of CS, including two siblings who presented with presacral, Grade 2 NETs, one of which had metastasized to bone and lymph nodes. A germline c.874C>T (p.Arg292Trp) mutation was found in a highly conserved region of MNX1 in three affected members who underwent sequencing. A second somatic variant/deletion in MNX1 was not detected in either patient's tumor. In the second family, 342, the proband presented with an incidentally discovered presacral NET. The proband's father had previously undergone resection of a presacral NET, and so genetic testing was performed, which did not reveal an MNX1 mutation or copy number variants. The lack of a second, somatic mutation in the tumors from family 491 argues against MNX1 acting as a tumor suppressor, and the absence of a germline MNX1 mutation in family 342 suggests that other genetic and anatomic factors contribute to the development of presacral NETs. These cases highlight the variable presentation of CS, and the potential for malignancy in these patients.
Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/genetics , Anal Canal/abnormalities , Digestive System Abnormalities/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Meningocele/genetics , Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics , Rectum/abnormalities , Sacrococcygeal Region/abnormalities , Sacrum/abnormalities , Syringomyelia/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Abnormalities, Multiple/pathology , Adult , Aged , Anal Canal/pathology , Anorectal Malformations/complications , Anorectal Malformations/genetics , Anorectal Malformations/pathology , Digestive System Abnormalities/complications , Digestive System Abnormalities/pathology , Female , Genetic Testing , Germ-Line Mutation/genetics , Humans , Male , Meningocele/complications , Meningocele/pathology , Middle Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/complications , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Rectum/pathology , Sacrococcygeal Region/pathology , Sacrum/pathology , Syringomyelia/complications , Syringomyelia/pathologyABSTRACT
Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 are now the standard of care in oncology across several hematologic and solid tumor types, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with metastatic or locally advanced TNBC with PD-L1 expression on immune cells occupying ≥1% of tumor area demonstrated survival benefit with the addition of atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel. However, concerns regarding variability between immunohistochemical PD-L1 assay performance and inter-reader reproducibility have been raised. High tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have also been associated with response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer (BC). TILs can be easily assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and have shown reliable inter-reader reproducibility. As an established prognostic factor in early stage TNBC, TILs are soon anticipated to be reported in daily practice in many pathology laboratories worldwide. Because TILs and PD-L1 are parts of an immunological spectrum in BC, we propose the systematic implementation of combined PD-L1 and TIL analyses as a more comprehensive immuno-oncological biomarker for patient selection for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition-based therapy in patients with BC. Although practical and regulatory considerations differ by jurisdiction, the pathology community has the responsibility to patients to implement assays that lead to optimal patient selection. We propose herewith a risk-management framework that may help mitigate the risks of suboptimal patient selection for immuno-therapeutic approaches in clinical trials and daily practice based on combined TILs/PD-L1 assessment in BC. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Subject(s)
B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/pathology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , Biomarkers, Tumor/immunology , Humans , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/immunology , Risk Management , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/immunologyABSTRACT
AIMS: Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a transcriptional regulator with critical roles in brain, craniofacial and skeletal development. It has emerged as a key marker of lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract columnar epithelial and osteoblastic differentiation. Transcription factor immunohistochemistry is useful in assigning site of origin in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), and has had a limited role in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). This study sought to evaluate the role of SATB2 in assigning site of origin in neuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tissue microarrays were constructed from the following: 317 NETs (37 thyroid, 46 lung, 16 stomach, 12 duodenum, 70 pancreas, 106 jejunoileum, 24 appendix, and six rectosigmoid), 44 phaeochromocytomas/paragangliomas, and 79 NECs (29 Merkel cell, 30 lung, and 20 extrapulmonary visceral); nine appendiceal and 19 rectal NETs were examined in whole sections. SATB2 immunohistochemistry was scored for extent (%) and intensity (0-3+), with an H-score being calculated. SATB2 was expressed by 96% of rectosigmoid NETs, 79% of appendiceal NETs, and only 7% of other well-differentiated neoplasms (P < 0.0001). Expression in lower GI tract NETs (median H-score of 255) was stronger than in other positive tumours (median H-score of 7) (P < 0.0001). Any SATB2 expression was 86% sensitive/93% specific for lower GI tract origin. SATB2 was expressed by 79% of Merkel cell carcinomas (median H-score of 300), 33% of lung NECs (median H-score of 23), and 60% of extrapulmonary visceral NECs (median H-score of 110), with stronger expression in Merkel cell carcinoma (P < 0.001). At an H-score cutoff of ≥150, SATB2 was 69% sensitive/90% specific for Merkel cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: SATB2 is frequently and strongly expressed by lower GI tract NETs; we have adopted it as our rectal NET marker. Relatively frequent and strong expression in Merkel cell carcinoma may have value in assigning NEC site of origin.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/metabolism , Matrix Attachment Region Binding Proteins/metabolism , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/metabolism , Neuroendocrine Tumors/metabolism , Rectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/metabolism , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/pathology , Cell Differentiation , Cohort Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Iowa , Lower Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , Lower Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Tissue Array AnalysisABSTRACT
Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Neoplasms/diagnosis , HumansABSTRACT
This review reflects a collaboration between the American Registry of Pathology (the publisher of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Fascicles) and Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. It is part of a series of expert recommendations on topics encountered in daily practice. The authors, three pathologists with expertise in gastrointestinal tract pathology and immunohistochemistry, met on 30 July 2019 tasked with developing expert recommendations for evaluating poorly differentiated and undifferentiated malignant neoplasms encountered on mucosal biopsies of the gastrointestinal tract. We focused on esophageal, gastric, small intestinal, colorectal, and anal (i.e., tubal gut) samples. When faced with diagnostic uncertainty on the initial H&E, it is best to begin by trying to assign the broad tumor class with screening markers such as pankeratin, S100 protein or SOX10, and CD20 or CD45. Once a broad tumor class is established, more specific differentiation markers can be pursued (e.g., lineage-restricted transcription factors for adenocarcinoma; p40 for squamous cell carcinoma; chromogranin A and synaptophysin or INSM1 for neuroendocrine neoplasms). Every small biopsy containing tumor should be considered a potential molecular pathology sample; cutting extra unstained slides with this testing in mind is strongly encouraged.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Biopsy , Cell Differentiation , Diagnosis, Differential , Expert Testimony , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/classification , Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Mucous Membrane/pathology , Neoplasms/classification , Registries , United StatesABSTRACT
Rectal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare tumor with unresolved etiology. Human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals and solid organ transplant recipients experience >30-fold and approximately 3-fold elevated rates of rectal SCC, respectively, suggesting immunosuppression plays a role.1 Human immunodeficiency virus-infected homosexual men have >60-fold higher rates of rectal SCC, similar to anal SCC. These patterns, which differ from the more common rectal adenocarcinoma (AdCA), raise the possibility of shared etiology between rectal and anal SCC, with human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) being a likely candidate.2.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/virology , Anus Neoplasms/metabolism , Anus Neoplasms/pathology , Anus Neoplasms/virology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Case-Control Studies , DNA, Viral/analysis , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Humans , In Situ Hybridization , Keratins/metabolism , Oncogene Proteins, Viral/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Rectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Rectal Neoplasms/virology , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolism , Viral Envelope Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The small bowel and pancreas are the most common primary sites of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) giving rise to metastatic disease. Some patients with small bowel NETs (SBNETs) present with synchronous or metachronous pancreatic NETs (PNETs), and it is unclear whether these are separate primaries or metastases from one site to the other. METHODS: A surgical NET database including patients undergoing operations for SBNETs or PNETs was reviewed. Patients with synchronous or metachronous tumors in both the small bowel and pancreas were identified, and available tissues from primary tumors and metastases were examined using a 4-gene quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel developed for evaluating NETs of unknown primary. RESULTS: Of 338 patients undergoing exploration, 11 had NETs in both the small bowel and pancreas. Tissues from 11 small bowel tumors, 9 pancreatic tumors, and 10 metastases were analyzed. qPCR and IHC data revealed that three patients had separate SBNET and PNET primaries, and five patients had SBNETs that metastasized to the pancreas. Pancreatic tissue was unavailable in two patients, and qPCR and IHC gave discrepant results in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: NETs in both the small bowel and pancreas were found in 3% of our patients. In nearly two-thirds of evaluable patients, the pancreatic tumor was a metastasis from the SBNET primary, while in the remaining one-third of patients it represented a separate primary. Determining the origin of these tumors can help guide the choice of systemic therapy and surgical management.