Epidural analgesia in ICU chest trauma patients with fractured ribs: retrospective study of pain control and intubation requirements.

BACKGROUND: Nonintubated chest trauma patients with fractured ribs admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk for complications and may require invasive ventilation at some point. Effective pain control is essential. We assessed whether epidural analgesia (EA) in patients with fractured ribs who were not intubated at ICU admission decreased the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We also looked for risk factors for IMV. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study conducted in 40 ICUs in France included consecutive patients with three or more fractured ribs who were not intubated at admission between July 2013 and July 2015. RESULTS: Of the 974 study patients, 788 were included in the analysis of intubation predictors. EA was used in 130 (16.5%) patients, and 65 (8.2%) patients required IMV. Factors independently associated with IMV were chronic respiratory disease (P = 0.008), worse SAPS II (P < 0.0001), flail chest (P = 0.02), worse Injury Severity Score (P = 0.0003), higher respiratory rate at admission (P = 0.02), alcohol withdrawal syndrome (P < 0.001), and noninvasive ventilation (P = 0.04). EA was not associated with decreases in IMV requirements, median numerical rating scale pain score, or intravenous morphine requirements from day 1 to day 7. CONCLUSIONS: EA was not associated with a lower risk of IMV in chest trauma patients with at least 3 fractured ribs, moderate pain, and no intubation on admission. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal pain control strategy in chest trauma patients admitted to the ICU, notably those with severe pain or high opioid requirements.

Epidemiology and outcome of thrombocytopenic patients in the intensive care unit: results of a prospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To assess the epidemiology of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with thrombocytopenia (TP). METHODS: All consecutive ICU-admitted patients with TP either on admission or acquired during ICU stay were included. TP was defined as either absolute (platelet count <100 × 10(9)/L) or relative (decrease in the platelet count >30 %). Extensive diagnostic workup of TP including bone marrow aspiration was performed. RESULTS: Absolute TP was diagnosed in 208 patients and relative TP in 93. In six patients (2 %), no cause of TP was identified. The median number of TP etiologies per patient was two, with sepsis being the leading cause. Bone marrow aspirates were analyzed in 238 patients. They showed a normal megakaryocyte number in 221 (93 %) and provided novel information for diagnosis in 52 (22 %). Results were susceptible to having an impact on patient management in 22 cases (11 %). The frequency of bone marrow aspiration with results susceptible to having an impact on management did not differ between patients with and without disseminated intravascular coagulation (P = 0.22) and with and without sepsis/septic shock (P = 0.7) but was significantly lower in patients with relative TP than in those with absolute TP (P < 0.01). A serious bleeding event was observed in 30 patients (14.9 %) and a nadir platelet count below 50 × 10(9)/L was an independent risk factor (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In thrombocytopenic patients, sepsis is the leading cause of TP. Bone marrow aspirates may yield significant information on TP mechanisms and contribute to the subsequent management of patients, especially those with absolute TP.

Comparison of acceptability, skin tolerance, and compliance between handwashing and alcohol-based handrub in ICUs: results of a multicentric study.

OBJECTIVE: We compared handwashing (HW) and alcohol-based handrub (ABH) for skin tolerance, acceptability, and hand hygiene compliance in health-care workers (HCWs) in a multicentric study. DESIGN AND SETTING: Before/after study over two periods (P1 and P2) in seven ICUs. Monitoring of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acquisition in two ICUs (U4 and U6). SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS: All HCWs of the seven ICUs, and the patients of U4 and U6 without MRSA carriage on admission. INTERVENTIONS: Handwashing was available in P1 and P2. ABH was introduced after P1 and available throughout P2. HCWs completed questionnaires on skin tolerance in P1 and P2, and on acceptability in P2. Compliance with hand hygiene was assessed in P1 and P2 using a standardized method. ICU-acquired MRSA colonization/infection in U4 and U6 was recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hand erythema was reported during P1 and P2 by 21.7 and 11% of HCWs, respectively (P = 0.01), itching by 15.8 and 7.1% (P = 0.02), oozing by 0.8 and 1.1% (P = 0.82), and bleeding by 4.2 and 1.1% (P = 0.1). ABH was considered easier and quicker than HW (P < 0.01), but overall acceptability did not differ between the two. Compliance increased from 51% (334/647) in P1 to 60% (251/418) in P2, P < 0.01. No significant reduction in MRSA colonization/infection between P1 and P2 (P = 0.30) was observed, but the study was underpowered. CONCLUSIONS: Self-report questionnaires show that when ABH is available in ICUs, fewer unpleasant skin sensations are reported. ABH is considered to be easier and quicker to use than HW and compliance is improved after glove removal.