Safety and benefit of using a virtual bolus during treatment planning for breast cancer treated with arc therapy.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the benefit of a virtual bolus method for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan optimization to compensate breast modifications that may occur during breast treatment. METHODS: Ten files were replanned with VMAT giving 50 Gy to the breast and 47 Gy to the nodes within 25 fractions. The planning process used a virtual bolus for the first optimization, then the monitors units were reoptimized without bolus, after fixing the segments shapes. Structures and treatment planning were exported on a second scanner (CT) performed during treatment as a consequence to modifications in patient's anatomy. The comparative end-point was clinical target volume's coverage. The first analysis compared the VMAT plans made using the virtual bolus method (VB-VMAT) to the plans without using it (NoVB-VMAT) on the first simulation CT. Then, the same analysis was performed on the second CT. Finally, the level of degradation of target volume coverage between the two CT using VB-VMAT was compared to results using a standard technique of forward-planned multisegment technique (Tan-IMRT). RESULTS: Using a virtual bolus for VMAT does not degrade dosimetric results on the first CT. No significant result in favor of the NoVB-VMAT plans was noted. The VB-VMAT method led to significant better dose distribution on a second CT with modified anatomies compared to NoVB-VMAT. The clinical target volume's coverage by 95% (V95%) of the prescribed dose was 98.9% [96.1-99.6] on the second CT for VB-VMAT compared to 92.6% [85.2-97.7] for NoVB-VMAT (P = 0.0002). The degradation of the target volume coverage for VB-VMAT is not worse than for Tan-IMRT: the median differential of V95% between the two CT was 0.9% for VMAT and 0.7% for Tan-IMRT (P = 1). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety and benefit of using a virtual bolus during the VMAT planning process to compensate potential breast shape modifications.

A novel lung SBRT treatment planning: Inverse VMAT plan with leaf motion limitation to ensure the irradiation reproducibility of a moving target.

This study exposed the implementation of a novel technique (VMATLSL) for the planning of moving targets in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This new technique has been compared to static conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA). The rationale of this study was to lower geometric complexity (54.9% lower than full VMAT) and hence ensure the reproducibility of the treatment delivery by reducing the risk for interplay errors induced by respiratory motion. Dosimetry metrics were studied with a cohort of 30 patients. Our results showed that leaf speed limitation provided conformal number (CN) close to the VMAT (median CN of VMATLSL is 0.78 vs 0.82 for full VMAT) and were a significant improvement on 3D-CRT and DCA with segment-weight optimized (respectively 0.55 and 0.57). This novel technique is an alternative to VMAT or DCA for lung SBRT treatments, combining independence from the patient's breathing pattern, from the size and amplitude of the lesion, free from interplay effect and with dosimetry metrics close to the best that could be achieve with full VMAT.

Flattening Filter Free vs. Flattened Beams for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess the clinical impact of high dose rate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with lung neoplastic lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2014 to June 2016, a single-center retrospective analysis was performed including all patients treated by either flattening filter free (FFF) beams or flattening filter beams (FF) three-dimensional (3D) SBRT for lung neoplastic lesions. RESULTS: A total of 99 SBRT were performed on 75 patients. Among these, 29 SBRT were performed using a FFF technique while 70 other SBRT were done using a FF technique. Median follow-up time was 12.9 months. Overall, no difference between the two groups was found except for the mean beam on time which was reduced by 3.3 to 0.9 minutes in the FFF group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: We report a low toxicity rate and a shortened beam on time in patients treated with 3D FFF SBRT for lung neoplastic lesions.