Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 53(4): 354-360, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30119789

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence and risk factors of depression among individuals given a glaucoma-related diagnosis at a screening program. DESIGN: Cross-sectional community-based in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteers from a community glaucoma-screening program. METHODS: After collecting sociodemographic information, participants were administered the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25). RESULTS: Participants were predominantly African American (73.5%), older than 65 years (65.7%), single (75.4%), and female (66.8%). Among 268 participants, 89 were diagnosed with glaucoma and 179 as glaucoma suspects. The frequency of depression among the glaucoma and glaucoma suspect participants was 18% and 16.2%, respectively. The mean GDS-15 score was 2.4 ± 2.7 with no difference between glaucoma and glaucoma suspect groups, p = 0.654. The mean VFQ-25 score was 78.6 ± 15.9 and was lower in glaucoma (74.7 ± 19.7) than glaucoma suspect participants (80.4 ± 13.6), p = 0.003. Risk factors for depression included difficulties with paying expenses (p = 0.017), Asian race (p < 0.001), and poorer scores on the VFQ-25 subscales of "General Health" (p < 0.001), "Distance Activities" (p = 0.024), and "Dependency" (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of depression in those diagnosed with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect was higher than previous estimates of the general population. Glaucoma-screening programs might benefit from including depression-screening protocols along with referral services or low-cost treatments of depression.


Subject(s)
Depression/epidemiology , Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological , Glaucoma/complications , Mass Screening/methods , Quality of Life , Visual Acuity , Visual Fields/physiology , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/etiology , Depression/psychology , Female , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Glaucoma/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Prevalence , Sickness Impact Profile
2.
J Comp Physiol B ; 188(1): 163-176, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28597237

ABSTRACT

The devastating bat fungal disease, white-nose syndrome (WNS), does not appear to affect all species equally. To experimentally determine susceptibility differences between species, we exposed hibernating naïve little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) and big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) to the fungus that causes WNS, Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd). After hibernating under identical conditions, Pd lesions were significantly more prevalent and more severe in little brown myotis. This species difference in pathology correlates with susceptibility to WNS in the wild and suggests that survival is related to different host physiological responses. We observed another fungal infection, associated with neutrophilic inflammation, that was equally present in all bats. This suggests that both species are capable of generating a response to cold tolerant fungi and that Pd may have evolved mechanisms for evading host responses that are effective in at least some bat species. These host-pathogen interactions are likely mediated not just by host physiological responses, but also by host behavior. Pd-exposed big brown bats, the less affected species, spent more time in torpor than did control animals, while little brown myotis did not exhibit this change. This differential thermoregulatory response to Pd infection by big brown bat hosts may allow for a more effective (or less pathological) immune response to tissue invasion.


Subject(s)
Ascomycota , Chiroptera/microbiology , Chiroptera/physiology , Disease Resistance/physiology , Mycoses/physiopathology , Torpor/physiology , Animals , Female , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Male , Mycoses/pathology , Mycoses/veterinary , Skin/microbiology , Skin/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL