Long-term effects of aromatase inhibitor withdrawal on bone mineral density in early breast cancer patients: 10-year follow-up results of the BREX study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to provide long-term bone mineral density (BMD) data on early breast cancer patients of the BREX (Breast Cancer and Exercise) study. The effects of exercise and adjuvant endocrine treatment 10 years after randomization were analyzed, with special emphasis on aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy discontinuation at 5 years. METHODS: The BREX study randomized 573 pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer patients into a 1-year supervised exercise program or a control group. 372 patients were included into the current follow-up analysis. BMD (g/cm2) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine (LS), left femoral neck (FN), and the total hip. Separate groups were displayed according to baseline menopausal status, and whether the patient had discontinued AI therapy at 5 years or not. RESULTS: The BMD change from 5 to 10 years did not significantly differ between the two randomized arms. AI discontinuation at 5 years had statistically significant BMD effects. The FN BMD continued to decrease in patients who discontinued AI therapy during the first 5-year off-treatment, but the decrease was three-fold less than in patients without AI withdrawal (- 1.4% v. - 3.8%). The LS BMD increased (+ 2.6%) in patients with AI withdrawal during the first 5 years following treatment discontinuation, while a BMD decrease (-1.3%) was seen in patients without AI withdrawal. CONCLUSION: This study is to our knowledge the first to quantify the long-term impact of AI withdrawal on BMD. Bone loss associated with AI therapy seems partially reversible after stopping treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ (Identifier Number NCT00639210).

Validation of primary and outcome data quality in a Swedish population-based breast cancer quality registry.

BACKGROUND: Population-based cancer quality registries are of great importance for the improvement of cancer care. However, little is known about the quality of recurrence data in cancer quality registries. The aim of this study was to evaluate data quality in the regional Breast Cancer Quality Registry of Central Sweden, with emphasis on the validity of recorded information on recurrence. METHODS: Validation by re-abstraction was performed on a random sample of 800 women with primary invasive breast cancer stage I-III diagnosed between 1993 and 2010, of which 400 had at least one registered recurrence and 400 had no registered recurrence. Registry data were compared with data from medical records. Exact agreement, correlation and kappa values, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-seven women (93%) were available for analysis. Exact agreement was high for diagnostics, tumor characteristics, surgery, and adjuvant oncological treatment (90% or more for most variables). The registry's sensitivity was low for regional recurrence (47%), but higher for local and distant recurrence (80% and 75%), whereas specificity was overall high (≥ 95%). Combining all recurrence categories irrespective of localization improved sensitivity to 90% with a specificity of 91%. In 87% of women, the date of first recurrence according to medical records fell within ± 90 days of the date recorded in the registry. CONCLUSIONS: While the quality of data in the regional Breast Cancer Quality Registry was generally high, data accuracy on recurrences was lower. The overall precision of identifying any recurrence, irrespective of localization, was high. However, the accuracy of classification of recurrences (local, regional or distant) was lower, with evidence of underreporting for each of the recurrence categories. Given the importance of recurrence-related outcomes in the assessment of quality of care, efforts should be made to improve the reporting of recurrences.

A Retrospective Analysis of Systemic Oncologic Treatment in Older Patients With Advanced Soft-tissue Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Almost half of all patients with soft-tissue sarcoma are over 65 years of age, and the proportion of older patients is increasing. Despite this, they have been underrepresented in clinical trials and only limited data are available to guide treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to investigate treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients over 50 years old treated for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma at the Helsinki University Hospital between January 2000 and July 2020 were included. Data on patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival were retrospectively collected. A total of 152 patients were included: 14.5% (n=22) were over 75 years old, 34.2% (n=52) were 65-74 and 51.3% (n=78) were 50-64 years old. RESULTS: The outcomes of the oldest group differed from those of younger patients; they were more likely to receive single-agent treatment as first-line therapy (90.9% vs. 28.8% and 24.4%, p<0.001) and had the lowest relative dose-intensity (70% vs. 88% and 95%, p<0.05). They experienced grade three to four hematological adverse events less frequently (38.1%, 56.9% and 72.7%, respectively, p=0.031), and received fewer lines of treatment (median of 1, 2 and 2, respectively, p=0.01). In patients aged ≥75 years, there was no association between further lines of therapy and improved survival. Compared to the youngest group, the oldest patients had a greater risk of dying (hazard ratio=1.7, 95% confidence interval=1.0-2.8, p=0.041) and their median overall survival was only 7.4 months, compared to 14.3 and 12.9 months in the two younger groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that older patients tolerate chemotherapy when treatment is tailored to their needs but may not benefit as much as younger patients.

Ultra-low-dose computed tomography and chest X-ray in follow-up of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma-a prospective comparative study.

Ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) may combine the high sensitivity of conventional computed tomography (CT) in detecting sarcoma pulmonary metastasis, with a radiation dose in the same magnitude as chest X-ray (CXR). Fifty patients with non-metastatic high-grade soft tissue sarcoma treated with curative intention were recruited. Their follow-up involved both CXR and ULD-CT to evaluate their different sensitivity. Suspected findings were confirmed by conventional CT if necessary. Patients with isolated pulmonary metastases were treated with surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with curative intent if possible. The median effective dose from a single ULD-CT study was 0.27 mSv (range 0.12 to 0.89 mSv). Nine patients were diagnosed with asymptomatic lung metastases during the follow-up. Only three of them were visible in CXR and all nine in ULD-CT. CXR had therefore only a 33% sensitivity compared to ULD-CT. Four patients were operated, and one had SBRT to all pulmonary lesions. Eight of them, however, died of the disease. Two patients developed symptomatic metastatic recurrence involving extrapulmonary sites+/-the lungs between two imaging rounds. ULD-CT has higher sensitivity for the detection of sarcoma pulmonary metastasis than CXR, with a radiation dose considerably lower than conventional CT.Clinical trial registration: NCT05813808. 04-14-2023.