ABSTRACT
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains the most common clinically significant infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Objectives: The present study was designed to describe and compare the incidence of untreated CMV reactivation (uCMVr), clinically significant infection (cs-CMVi) and disease (CMVd), as well as CMV-related hospitalization and outcome of allo-HCT patients, either treated with letermovir (LET) primary prophylaxis or managed with preemptive therapy (PET). Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study of adult CMV seropositive allo-HCT patients who either received primary prophylaxis with LET within the first 100 days after HCT or were managed with PET. Results: The study population comprised 105 patients (28 in the LET group and 77 in the PET group). Compared to the PET group, patients in the LET group received more allo-HCT from alternative donors (54.5% vs. 82.14%, P=0.012). More than half of the patients in both groups were classified as high risk for CMVd. In the LET vs. PET group, cs-CMVi and CMVd developed respectively in 0 vs. 50 (64.94%), P=<0.0001, and 0 vs. 6 (7.79%), P=0.18. In the LET group, uCMVr occurred in 5 (17.8%) and were all considered blips. Hospital admissions related to cs-CMVi or CMVd in the PET group vs. LET group were 47 (61.04%) vs. 0, respectively, P=<0.0001. No differences were observed in 100-day mortality. Conclusions: LET primary prophylaxis proved effective in preventing cs-CMVi and CMVd and reducing hospitalizations in allo-HCT adults. Blips can occur during prophylaxis and do not require LET discontinuation.
ABSTRACT
Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the Americas faced a significant decline in vaccination coverage as well as increased vaccine hesitancy. The objective of this paper is to summarize the challenges and opportunities outlined by the National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and prioritize targeted interventions. The exploratory survey included open-ended questions on two primary components: challenges, and opportunities. Free-text comments presented by each NITAG were collated and classified using indicators and sub-indicators of the NITAG Maturity Assessment Tool (NMAT). Opportunities were classified thematically, and priority actions were generated from the responses. All 21 NITAGs in LAC, representing 40 countries, 76 % of which have been active for over a decade, responded to the survey. The most common challenges were establishment and composition (62 %), integration into policymaking (62 %), resources and secretariat (52 %), and stakeholder recognition (48 %). The distribution of responses was seen across the whole sample and did not suggest a more pronounced need in relation to year of establishment. Opportunities included maximizing the Regional NITAG Network of the Americas (RNA) to facilitate collaboration, information sharing, visibility, and communication; existing global, regional, and systemic analyses; the World Health Organization/Pan American Health Organization (WHO/PAHO) templates for standard operating procedures; twinning programs with mature NITAGs; and NITAGs in governance structures. Action plans were outlined to formalize the establishment of NITAGs and broaden their composition; strengthen decision-making and access to data resources; and enhance the credibility of evidence-based recommendations and their uptake by policymakers and the public. NITAG challenges are not unique to LAC. NITAGs have outlined a short-term prioritized action plan which is critical to enhancing NITAG value and importance in countries.
Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , Pandemics , Humans , Latin America , Health Policy , Immunization Programs , Vaccination , Immunization , Caribbean RegionABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: La infección por citomegalovirus (CMV) sigue siendo la infección con relevancia clínica más frecuente luego del trasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos (TPHa), presentando alta morbilidad y mortalidad. Por este motivo, es importante implementar estrategias de prevención para reducir la frecuencia de la infección por CMV. OBJETIVO: Describir la frecuencia de infección, infección clínicamente significativa (ICS) y enfermedad por CMV en pacientes seropositivos que recibieron un TPHa y profilaxis primaria con letermovir. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo de cohorte longitudinal, en pacientes con TPHa seropositivos para CMV que recibieron profilaxis primaria con letermovir hasta el día 100 posTPH. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 25 pacientes adultos con una mediana de edad de 41 años, el 44% fue de donante no relacionado y 36% de donante haploidéntico. Ochenta por ciento tenía tres o más factores de riesgo para infección por CMV y a 52% se le estratificó como de alto riesgo para enfermedad por CMV. La profilaxis con letermovir tuvo una mediana de duración de 97 días. Durante los 100 días pos-TPH, 20% de los pacientes presentaron infección por CMV, con carga viral plasmática detectable no cuantificable, que se negativizó en el siguiente control semanal sin discontinuación del letermovir. Ningún paciente presentó ICS ni enfermedad por CMV durante este período. CONCLUSIÓN: La profilaxis con letermovir fue efectiva para prevenir la ICS y la enfermedad por CMV.
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains the most common clinically significant infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (aSCT), with a high morbidity and mortality rate. In order to reduce its frequency, prevention strategies should be implemented. AIM: To describe the frequency of infection, clinically significant infection (CSI) and CMV disease in seropositive patients who received aSCT and primary prophylaxis with letermovir. METHODS: Longitudinal descriptive cohort study in seropositive patients who received aSCT and primary prophylaxis with letermovir until day 100 post-SCT. RESULTS: Twenty-five adult patients with a median age of 41 years were included; 44% were unrelated donors, and 36% were haploidentical donors. Eighty percent had three or more risk factors for CMV infection, and 52% were stratified as high risk for CMV disease. Letermovir prophylaxis had a median duration of 97 days. Twenty percent of the patients developed CMV infection through day 100 post-SCT, with detectable non-quantifiable CMV viral load in plasma. This became negative in the following weekly control without discontinuation of letermovir. No patient developed CSI or CMV organ disease during this period. CONCLUSION: Letermovir prophylaxis proved to be effective in preventing CSI and CMV disease.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Quinazolines/administration & dosage , Longitudinal Studies , Chemoprevention , Acetates/administration & dosageABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: Las infecciones fúngicas invasoras (IFI) en pacientes con neoplasias hematológicas (NH) representan un desafío diagnóstico y terapéutico. OBJETIVOS: Describir la etiología, características clínicas, diagnóstico y evolución de los episodios de IFI probadas y probables en pacientes con NH y trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos (TPH). PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo y de cohorte que incluyó IFI probadas y probables en pacientes adultos con NH y TPH. Se realizó seguimiento hasta el día 90. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 80 episodios de IFI: 49% probadas y 51% probables, 67,5% por hongos filamentosos (HF), 30% por hongos levaduriformes (HL) y 2,5% por hongos dimorfos. Los tipos de IFI más frecuentes fueron aspergilosis invasoras pulmonares (AP) y candidiasis invasoras (CI), en su mayoría por Candida spp. no albicans. Todos los casos de AP se diagnosticaron por detección de galactomanano en sangre y/o lavado broncoalveolar, y solamente 22,2% presentaban nódulos con halo en la tomografía computada (TC) de tórax, siendo los infiltrados inespecíficos los hallazgos más frecuentes. Tuvieron coinfección bacteriana y viral el 30 y 17,5%, respectivamente. El 50% fueron IFI de brecha, y la mortalidad global y mortalidad relacionada a la IFI fue 51 y 24%, respectivamente. CONCLUSIÓN: Los HF fueron la principal causa de IFI, con una gran proporción de IFI de brecha, y presentaron elevada mortalidad. Para el diagnóstico, resulta importante la utilización de biomarcadores y jerarquizar cualquier imagen patológica en la TC.
BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. AIM: To describe the etiology, clinical characteristics, diagnosis and evolution of proven and probable IFI episodes in patients with HM and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, cohort study performed in adult patients with HM and HSCT, who developed proven and probable IFI. Follow-up was carried out until day 90. RESULTS: A total of 80 IFI episodes were included: 49% proven and 51% probable, 67,5% due to mold (M), 30% to yeast-like fungi (Y) and 2,5% to dimorphic fungi. The most frequent causes were probable pulmonary aspergillosis (PA) and invasive candidiasis (IC), mainly due to non-albicans Candida species. PA were all diagnosed by detection of galactomannan (GM) in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage, and only 22,2% presented halo sign on chest CT. Bacterial and viral coinfections were reported in 30% and 17,5% respectively. Breakthrough IFI occurred in 50%, and global and IFI-related mortality were 51% and 24% respectively. CONCLUSION: Mold was the main cause of IFI, with a large proportion of breakthrough IFI, presenting high mortality. The use of biomarkers and the classification of any pathological image on CT contribute to the diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Invasive Fungal Infections/diagnosis , Invasive Fungal Infections/etiology , Argentina , Clinical Evolution , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Invasive Fungal Infections/mortality , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Hospitals, University , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción : Es una enfermedad zoonótica cuyo agente etiológico es el virus de la viruela símica. Desde el 1 de enero de 2022, se han notificado casos de viruela símica a la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) en 110 Estados Miembros en las 6 regiones de la OMS. Métodos : El presente trabajo es un estudio observa cional descriptivo de cohorte retrospectivo en primera instancia, y prospectivo al final, donde se describen las características epidemiológicas, la presentación clínica, y las complicaciones recabadas mediante llamado telefó nico al día 28 en 75 pacientes con diagnóstico de viruela símica confirmado por RT-PCR (correspondientes al 7% de los casos notificados en Argentina). Fue desarrollado entre el 12 de julio de 2022 y el 6 de octubre de 2022. Resultados : La población afectada fue en su totalidad hombres cisgénero, 70 (93.3%) identificados como hom bres que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH). Cincuenta y uno (68%) estaban coinfectados con HIV, 50 (98%) esta ban recibiendo TARV. Todos los pacientes presentaron manifestaciones mucocutáneas. El exantema se mani festó con variedad de lesiones: papulares, vesiculares y pustulosas. En 26 (44.1%) los síntomas sistémicos se presentaron previos a la aparición del exantema, siendo el aumento de la temperatura corporal el más frecuente. Treinta y cuatro (45.3%) de los pacientes reportaron algu na complicación, siendo la proctitis la más frecuente se guida por edema de pene. Se observaron secuelas en 40 (53.3%), siendo la más frecuente las cicatrices cutáneas. Conclusión : En esta serie de casos pudimos observar mayormente cuadros leves, siendo las lesiones anogeni tales la presentación clínica más frecuente. La presencia de secuelas, el impacto social y emocional de esta enfer medad hacen necesario un enfoque multidisciplinario.
Abstract Introduction : Monkeypox It is a zoonotic disease. The etiologic agent is the monkeypox virus. Since January 1, 2022, monkeypox cases have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 110 Member States across 6 WHO regions. Methods : The present work is a descriptive-ob servational-retrospective cohort in the first instance, and prospective at the end, where the epidemiological characteristics, clinical presentation and complications collected by telephone call on day 28, are described 75 patients diagnosed with monkeypox, confirmed by RT-PCR (corresponding to 7% of the cases reported in Argentina). It was developed between July 12, 2022 and October 6, 2022. Results : The affected population was entirely cis gender men, 70 (93.3%) identified as men who have sex with men (MSM). Fifty-one (68%) were co-infected with HIV, 50 (98%) were receiving ART. All patients presented mucocutaneous manifestations. The rash manifested with a variety of lesions: papular, vesicular, and pustular. In 26 (44.1%) the systemic symptoms presented prior to the appearance of the rash, being the increase in body temperature the most frequent. Thirty-four (45.3%) of the patients reported some complication, with proctitis being the most frequent followed by penile edema. Se quelae were observed in 40 (53.3%), the most frequent being skin scars. Conclusion: In this case series we were able to ob serve mostly mild symptoms, with anogenital lesions being the most frequent clinical presentation. The pres ence of sequelae, the social and emotional impact of this disease make a multidisciplinary approach necessary.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: Las bacteriemias por Enterobacterales productores de carbapenemasa KPC (EPC-KPC) presentan una mortalidad elevada y opciones terapéuticas limitadas. OBJETIVOS: Describir y comparar la evolución de los pacientes con bacteriemia por EPC-KPC tratados con ceftazidima/avibactam (CA) frente a otros antimicrobianos (OA). PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo y retrospectivo de casos y controles. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos con bacteriemia por EPC-KPC, con una proporción entre casos tratados con CA y controles tratados con OA. de 1:2. Se analizaron variables clínicas, epidemiológicas y de evolución. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 48 pacientes (16 CA y 32 OA). Los casos se encontraban más frecuentemente neutropénicos (50 vs.16%, p = 0,012); asimismo, presentaron medianas de score de APACHE II más altas y de score de Pitt más bajas. El 65% de la cohorte total presentó un foco clínico y Klebsiellapneumoniae fue el microorganismo más frecuentemente aislado. Los casos recibieron una mayor proporción de tratamiento antimicrobiano empírico adecuado (81 vs. 53%, p = 0,05). La antibioterapia dirigida en casos y controles fue combinada en 38 y 91%, p = 0,009. Los casos presentaron menor mortalidad al día 7 y al día 30 relacionada a infección (0 vs. 22%, p = 0,04 y 0 vs. 34%, p = 0,008). Solo los controles desarrollaron shock, ingresaron a la unidad de cuidados intensivos y presentaron bacteriemia de brecha. CONCLUSIÓN: CA mostró beneficio clínico frente a OA para el tratamiento de pacientes con bacteriemia por EPC-KPC.
BACKGROUND: KPC-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia (KPCCPE) is associated with a high mortality rate and limited therapeutic options. AIM: To describe and compare the outcome of patients with KPC-CPE bacteremia treated with ceftazidime/avibactam (CA) versus other antibiotics (OA). METHODS: Prospective and retrospective cases and control study performed in adult patients with KPC-CPE bacteremia, with a 1:2 ratio between cases treated with CA. and controls treated with OA. Clinical, epidemiological, and outcome variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (16 CA and 32 OA) were included. Cases were more frequently neutropenic (50 vs. 16%, p = 0.012), presented higher median APACHE II score and lower Pitt score. Of the total cohort, 65% had a clinical source, and Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most frequently isolated microorganism. Cases received more adequate empirical antibiotic treatment (81 vs. 53%, p = 0.05). Targeted antibiotic therapy in cases and controls was combined in 38 and 91%, p = 0.009. Cases had a lower 7-day mortality and 30-day infection-related mortality (0 vs. 22%, p = 0.04 and 0 vs. 34%, p = 0.008). Only controls developed shock, were admitted to the intensive care unit, and had breakthrough bacteremia. CONCLUSION: CA. showed clinical benefit over OA in the treatment of patients with EPC-KPC bacteremia.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Proteins , beta-Lactamases , Case-Control Studies , Ceftazidime/administration & dosage , Clinical Evolution , Prospective Studies , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Drug Combinations , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/mortality , Azabicyclo Compounds/administration & dosage , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Aumento del riesgo de infecciones prevenibles y sus complicaciones en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inflamatorias crónicas (ERICA), con y sin tratamiento con inmunosupresores (IS), y beneficios de la vacunación.
Subject(s)
Rheumatic Diseases , Vaccines , Immunization , ConsensusABSTRACT
Resumen La infección por Clostridioides difficile (ICD) es una de las más importantes infecciones intrahospitalarias. Se realizó un estudio observacional que describe la incidencia, las características epi demiológicas y la evolución clínica de la ICD en un hospital universitario de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Los episodios, diagnosticados en 117 pacientes adultos consecutivos entre el 01/01/2017 y el 01/04/2020, fueron clasificados en ICD intrahospitalaria (IH) en 63 (53.9%), de inicio comunitario y asociada al ámbito de la salud (ICAAS) en 25 (21.4%) y comunitaria (CO) en 29 (24.8%) pacientes. La incidencia de ICD IH fue 3.1, 5.2 y 2.8 cada 10 000 días paciente en 2017, 2018 y 2019, respectivamente. El diagnóstico microbiológico se realizó mediante inmunocromatografía con glutamato deshidrogenasa y toxina positivas en 51 (43.6%) y mediante glutamato deshidrogenasa positiva, toxina negativa y PCR positiva en 66 (56.4%). Los pacientes con ICD IH e ICAAS presentaron mayor edad (p = 0.018), mayor frecuencia de insuficiencia renal crónica (p = 0.013) e inmu nosupresión (p = 0.021) y mayor puntaje en índice Charlson de comorbilidad (p = 0.001). No hubo diferencia significativa en la forma de presentación clínica entre los tres grupos. Durante la evolución de la ICD, 13 (11.1%) pacientes requirieron internación en terapia intensiva. Se registraron 10 recurrencias, que correspondieron al 8.5% de los episodios de ICD. La mortalidad a los 90 días fue 19.8%, significativamente mayor en los pacientes con ICD IH e ICAAS (p = 0.014). Estos hallazgos destacan la considerable carga de morbilidad de la ICD y la necesidad de implementar estrategias preventivas.
Abstract Clostridioides difficile infection (CDi) is one of the foremost hospital-acquired infections. We present an observa tional study aimed to describe the incidence, epidemiology, and clinical outcome of CDi in a tertiary university hospital in Buenos Aires. The episodes, diagnosed in 117 consecutive adult patients in the period 01/01/2017 to 01/04/2020, were distributed in three groups: 63 (53.9%) were classified as hospital-acquired infections (HA), 25 (21.4%) as community onset-health care-associated infections (CO-HCA) and 29 (24.8%) as community-associated infections (CA). The incidence of HA CDi infections was 3.1, 5. 2 and 2.8 every 10 000 patient days in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The microbiological diagnosis was made by immunochromatography with antigen GDH and C. difficile toxin positive in 51 episodes (43.6%) and by GDH positive, toxin negative and PCR positive in 66 episodes (56.4%). Older age (p = 0.018), chronic kidney disease (p = 0.013), immunosuppression (p = 0.021), and higher comorbidity Charlson score (p = 0.001) were observed in patients with IH and CA-HCA infections. No significant differences in clinical features were found among groups. During the hospital st ay, 13 patients (11.1%) required admission to the intensive care unit. Ten recurrences occurred, representing 8.5% of CDI episodes. The 90-day mortality was 19.8%, being significantly higher in HA and CO-HCA infections (p = 0.014). Our findings highlight both the local burden of CDi morbidity and mortality and the need for the implementation of preventive strategies.
ABSTRACT
Resumen La infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con neoplasias hematológicas y trasplantes de células progenitoras hematopoyéticas (TCPH) puede ser grave y con importante mortalidad. Llevamos a cabo un estudio prospectivo y observacional que tuvo como objetivo describir las características clínicas, epide miológicas y la evolución de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con neoplasias hematológicas y TCPH. Se incluyeron 20 pacientes adultos con una mediana de edad de 58 años y una mediana de score de Charlson de 3. Las infecciones fueron de adquisición comunitaria y nosocomial en el 60% y 40% respectivamente, y el 30% de los pacientes tenía antecedente de contacto con una persona infectada por SARS-CoV-2. El 65% pre sentó infiltrados pulmonares, mayormente con patrón de vidrio esmerilado en la tomografía computarizada de tórax. Casi la mitad de los pacientes tuvo enfermedad grave y crítica, y una alta proporción recibió plasma de convalecientes como tratamiento. Presentaron complicaciones e infecciones hospitalarias el 20% y 15% respec tivamente, y tuvieron una mediana de días de internación prolongada. La mortalidad a 30 días fue del 10%. La infección por SARS-CoV-2 en nuestra población tuvo considerable impacto clínico y epidemiológico.
Abstract. SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with hematological malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) can be severe and with significant mortality. We carried out a prospective and observational study to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with hematological malignancies and HSCT. Twenty adult patients were included with a median age of 58 years and a median Charlson score of 3. Infections were community-acquired and nosocomial in 60% and 40%, respectively, and 30% of the patients had a history of contact with a SARS-CoV-2 infected person. Sixty-five percent had pulmonary infiltrates, mostly with a ground-glass pattern on CT scan. Almost half of the patients had a severe and critical illness, and a high proportion received convalescent plasma as treatment. Twenty percent and 15% had complications and hospital infections, respectively, and had prolonged hospitalization expressed as median days of it. The 30-day mortality was 10%. SARS-CoV-2 infection in our population had a considerable clinical and epidemiological impact.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , COVID-19/therapy , Prospective Studies , Immunization, Passive , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
La infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con cáncer puede ser severa y con importante mortalidad. Diseñamos un estudio prospectivo observacional que tuvo como objetivo describir el impacto clínico y epidemiológico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con tumores sólidos. Se incluyeron 27 pacientes con neoplasias activas, con una mediana de edad de 72 años, y mediana de score de Charlson de 6. Las infecciones fueron de adquisición nosocomial en 18,5% de los pacientes, y el 74% tuvo infiltrados pulmonares, con una alta proporción de patrón mixto y consolidativo en imágenes. Casi la mitad de los pacientes tuvo enfermedad severa y crítica. Presentaron complicaciones e infecciones hospitalarias el 26% y 14,8% respectivamente. La mortalidad a 30 días fue de 25,9%, mayormente relacionada al COVID-19. La infección por SARS-CoV-2 en nuestra población tuvo considerable impacto clínico y epidemiológico
SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients can be severe, and with significant mortality. We performed a prospective observational study to describe the clinical and epidemiological impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid tumors patients. Twenty-seven patients with active neoplasms were included, with a median age of 72 and a median Charlson score of 6. Infections were nosocomially acquired in 18.5% of the patients, and 74% had pulmonary infiltrates, with a high proportion of mixed and consolidative pattern in images. Almost half of the patients had a severe and critical illness. Twenty-six percent and 14.8% had complications and hospital infections, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 25.9%, mostly related to COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection in our population had a considerable clinical and epidemiological impacto
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Epidemiologic Studies , Cross Infection , Prospective Studies , Mortality , Community-Acquired Infections , COVID-19/immunology , Neoplasms/complicationsABSTRACT
Resumen La pandemia de COVID-19, presentó desde su inicio elevada mortalidad, sin tratamiento efectivo para pacientes graves. Basados en experiencia previa con plasma de convaleciente en fiebre hemorrágica Argentina, incorporamos a un estudio multicéntrico 90 pacientes con COVID-19 de los que 87 fueron evaluables. Colectamos 397 donaciones de plasma de 278 convalecientes. El plasma fue suministrado con una concentración de IgG de 0.7-0.8 (medidos por quimioluminiscencia Abbott) por cada 10 kg/ peso. La supervivencia a 28 días fue la variable de resultado primario. El 77% fueron varones, edad 54 ± 15.6 años (rango: 27-85); índice de masa corporal de 29.7 ± 4.4; tenían hipertensión 39%, diabetes 20.7%; 19.5% tenían alguna condición de inmunosupresión, y el 23% era personal de salud. Se administró plasma a 55 (63%) en respiración espontánea con oxígeno (con máscara reservorio en 80%), y a 32 (37%) en ventilación mecánica. La supervivencia global a 28 días fue del 80%; 91% en quienes recibían oxígeno suplementario y 63% en los que permanecían en ventilación mecánica (p = 0.0002). Hubo mejora significativa en la escala clínica de neumonía de la OMS a los 7 y a los 14 días. La ferritina, LDH y PaO /FiO, mejoraron en la semana post-infusión. Observamos un episodio de sobrecarga de volumen circulatorio y una reacción febril, leves. Las infusiones de plasma de convaleciente son factibles, seguras y potencialmente efectivas, especialmente antes de requerir ventilación mecánica. Constituyen una opción clínica atractiva para tratar formas graves de COVID-19 hasta que estén disponibles otras terapias eficaces.
Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic presented high mortality from its beginning, without effective treatment for seriously ill patients. Build on the experience in Argentine hemorrhagic fever with convalescent plasma, we incorporated 90 patients with COVID-19, of which 87 were evaluable, into a multicenter study. We collected 397 plasma donations from 278 convalescent donors. Patients received plasma with an IgG concentration of 0.7-0.8 (measured by Abbott chemiluminescence) for every 10 kg of body weight. Survival during the first 28 days was the primary objective; 77% were male, age 54 ± 15.6 y/o (range 27-85), body mass index 29.7 ± 4.4; hypertension 39% and diabetes 20.7%; 19.5% had an immunosuppressive condition, 23% were health workers. Plasma was administered to 55 (63%) on spontaneous breathing with oxygen supplementation (mainly oxygen mask with reservoir bag in 80%), and to 32 patients (37%) on mechanical ventilation. The 28-day survival rate was 80%; 91% in patients infused on spontaneous breathing and 63% in those on mechanical ventilation (p = 0.0002). There was a significant improvement in the WHO pneumonia clinical scale at 7 and 14 days, and in PaO / FiO , ferritin and LDH, in the week post-infusion. We observed an episode of circulatory volume overload and a febrile reaction, both mild. Convalescent plasma infusions are feasible, safe, and potentially effective, especially before requiring mechanical ventilation. They are an attractive clinical option for treating severe forms of COVID-19 until other effective therapies become available.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Pandemics , COVID-19/therapy , Plasma , Immunization, Passive , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
La profilaxis con fluorquinolonas ha demostrado utilidad en la prevención de infecciones en pacientes neutropénicos de alto riesgo. Nuestro objetivo fue describir y comparar las características clínicas, microbiológicas, terapéuticas y la evolución en pacientes durante el primer episodio de neutropenia febril, según hubieran o no recibido profilaxis con levofloxacina. Fue un estudio prospectivo observacional, que incluyó los episodios de internados por neutropenia febril, (febrero 1997 a noviembre 2014), y los primeros episodios en un mismo paciente en diferentes internaciones; en total fueron 946 episodios. En 821 el episodio de neutropenia febril fue de alto riesgo, y en 264 (27.9%) se administró profilaxis con levofloxacina. Este grupo estaba compuesto por mayor proporción de neutropenias febriles de alto riesgo (99.2% vs. 82.3%, p = 0.0001) y casos con trasplante de células progenitoras hematopoyéticas (67.8% vs. 29.3%, p = 0.0001) comparado con los que no recibieron profilaxis, y presentó una frecuencia similar de infecciones clínicamente documentadas pero una menor proporción de infecciones microbiológicamente documentadas (28.8% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.012). Las bacteriemias en el grupo con quimioprofilaxis fueron más frecuentemente causadas por organismos multirresistentes (OMR) (34.5% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.007) y por enterobacterias productoras de beta lactamasas de espectro extendido (19.0% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.0001). En ese grupo con profilaxis la proporción que recibió tratamiento antibiótico empírico adecuado fue menor (69.7% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.009). La evolución fue similar en ambos grupos. Sugerimos que cuando se observe un aumento en la frecuencia de infecciones por OMR en esta población se considere la interrupción de la profilaxis antibiótica con levofloxacina.
Fluorquinolone-prophylaxis has proven useful in preventing infections in high risk neutropenic patients. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical, microbiological and therapeutic characteristics, and outcome of patients in the first episode of febrile neutropenia, comparing those who received levofloxacin prophylaxis with those who didn't. It was a prospective observational study that included all the episodes of inpatients with febrile neutropenia (February 1997- November 2014), also including the first episode in a same patient in different hospitalizations. Of 946 episodes here included, 821 presented high risk febrile neutropenia. A total of 264 cases (27.9%) received levofloxacin prophylaxis. This group consisted of a higher proportion of high risk febrile neutropenia (99.2% vs. 82.3%, p = 0.0001) and patients that had received an hematopoietic stem cell transplant (67.8% vs. 29.3%, p = 0.0001) compared to those who didn't receive prophylaxis. Those who received levofloxacin prophylaxis presented a similar frequency of clinically diagnosed but a lower proportion of microbiologically documented infections (28.8% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.012) than those who didn´t receive prophylaxis. The episodes of bacteremia that occurred in the first group were more frequently caused by multidrug resistant bacteria (MDRB) (34.5% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.007) and by extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (19% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.0001). The group that received prophylaxis had a lower proportion of adequate empirical antibiotic treatment (69.7% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.009), with similar outcomes in both groups. We suggest that levofloxacin prophylaxis should be stopped whenever there is a rise in the frequency of MDRB infections in this population.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Febrile Neutropenia/prevention & control , Levofloxacin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Febrile Neutropenia/microbiologyABSTRACT
A group of interdisciplinary experts (cardiologists, clinicians, infectologists met with the purpose of analyzing the evidence revealed by the relationship between respiratory diseases caused by influenza, pneumococcal diseases and cardiovascular events, and the role played by immunization strategies applied in cardiovascular prevention. The present statement summarizes the conclusions reached by the expertise of the aforementioned professionals. Systematic revisions imply consistent evidence that influenza and pneumococcal infection lead to acute myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Studies published during the last 15 years suggest that vaccination against influenza and S. pneumoniae reduce the risk of acute coronary syndromes. With the current evidence, and considering cost-effectiveness, reducing operating expenses and safety profile of the vaccines, scientific societies, national and international government health agencies strongly recommend incorporating immunization programs in those patients with chronic cardiovascular disease.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Vaccination/economics , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Acute Coronary Syndrome/prevention & control , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Argentina , Review Literature as Topic , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Immunization/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Government AgenciesABSTRACT
Influenza exacts a heavy burden on the elderly, a segment of the population that is estimated to experience rapid growth in the near future. In the past decade most developed and several developing countries have recommended influenza vaccination for those > 65 years of age. The World Health Organization (WHO) set a goal of 75% influenza vaccination coverage among the elderly by 2010, but it was not achieved. In 2011, the Technical Advisory Group at the Pan American Health Organization, Regional Office of WHO for the Americas, reiterated the influenza vaccine recommendation for older adults. Relatively little information has been compiled on the immunological aspect of aging or on reducing its impact, information particularly relevant for clinicians and gerontologist with firsthand experience confronting its effects. To fill this data gap, in 2012 the Americas Health Foundation (Washington, D.C., United States) and the nonprofit, Fighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries (Miami, Florida, United States), convened a panel of Latin American clinicians and gerontologists with expertise in influenza to discuss key issues and develop a consensus statement. The major recommendations were to improve influenza surveillance throughout Latin America so that its impact can be quantified; and to conduct laboratory confirmation of influenza for all patients who have flu-like symptoms and are frail, immunosuppressed, have comorbidities, are respiratory compromised, or have been admitted to a hospital. The panel also noted that: since evidence for antivirals in the elderly is unclear, their use should be handled on a case-by-case basis; despite decreased immunological response, influenza vaccination in older adults is still crucial; indirect immunization strategies should be encouraged; and traditional infection control measures are essential in long-term care facilities.
La gripe representa una fuerte carga para los ancianos, un segmento de la población que, según los cálculos, experimentará un rápido crecimiento en un futuro próximo. En el último decenio, la mayor parte de los países desarrollados y varios países en desarrollo han recomendado la vacunación antigripal de las personas mayores de 65 años de edad. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) estableció la meta de una cobertura de vacunación antigripal de 75% de los ancianos para el año 2010, pero no se alcanzó. En el 2011, el Grupo Consultivo Técnico de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Oficina Regional de la OMS para la Región de las Américas, reiteró la recomendación de la vacunación antigripal de los adultos mayores. Se ha recabado relativamente poca información sobre los aspectos inmunológicos del envejecimiento o sobre cómo reducir su repercusión, información particularmente pertinente para médicos clínicos y gerontólogos que deben afrontar de primera mano sus efectos. Para salvar esta brecha en materia de datos, en el 2012, la Americas Health Foundation (Washington, D.C., Estados Unidos) y la Fighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries (fundación sin ánimo de lucro para la lucha contra las enfermedades infecciosas en los países emergentes, con sede en Miami, Florida, Estados Unidos) convocaron un grupo de expertos, médicos clínicos y gerontólogos latinoamericanos con pericia en el tema de la gripe, con objeto de debatir aspectos clave y elaborar una declaración de consenso. Las principales recomendaciones fueron mejorar la vigilancia de la gripe en toda América Latina para que pudiera cuantificarse su repercusión; y llevar a cabo la confirmación de laboratorio en todos los pacientes con síntomas similares a los de la gripe debilitados, inmunodeprimidos, con comorbilidades, con compromiso respiratorio o que hubieran sido ingresados en un hospital. El grupo de expertos también señaló que, dado que no existen datos probatorios claros en relación con los antivíricos en los ancianos, su uso debe manejarse caso por caso; que, a pesar de la reducción de la respuesta inmunitaria, la vacunación antigripal en adultos mayores sigue siendo crucial; que se deben promover las estrategias de vacunación indirecta; y que, en los establecimientos de asistencia a largo plazo, las medidas tradicionales de control de las infecciones son esenciales.
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Americas , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/therapyABSTRACT
In Latin America, adult influenza is a serious disease that exacts a heavy burden in terms of morbidity, mortality, and cost. Although much has been written about the disease itself, relatively little information has been compiled on what could be done to reduce its impact across the region, particularly from the perspective of clinicians with firsthand experience in confronting its effects. To fill this data gap, in 2011, the Pan American Health and Education Foundation (PAHEF) and the U.S.-based nonprofit Fighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries (FIDEC) organized a conference and convened a panel of Latin American scientistclinicians with experience and expertise in adult influenza in the region tol) discuss the major issues related to the disease and 2) develop and produce a consensus statement summarizing its impact as well as current efforts to diagnose, prevent, and treat it. The consensus panel concluded a more concerted and better-coordinated effort was needed to reduce the adverse impact of seasonal influenza and future pandemics, including more surveillance, more active involvement by both governmental and nongovernmental organizations, and a much greater effort to vaccinate more adults, especially those at high risk of contracting the disease. In addition, a new approach for diagnosing influenza was recommended.
En América Latina, la gripe en adultos es una enfermedad grave que impone una carga importante en cuanto a la morbilidad, la mortalidad y el costo. Aunque se ha escrito mucho acerca de la enfermedad en sí, se ha recopilado relativamente escasa información sobre lo que podría hacerse para reducir su repercusión en la región, en particular desde la perspectiva de los médicos con experiencia directa en afrontar sus efectos. Para compensar esta falta de información, en 2011 la Fundación Panamericana de la Salud y Educación (PAHEF) y la organización sin fines de lucro establecida en los Estados Unidos Fighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries (FIDEC) organizaron una conferencia y convocaron a un panel de científicos y médicos latinoamericanos con experiencia y conocimientos especializados en la gripe en adultos en la región a fin de 1) analizar los temas principales relacionados con la enfermedad y 2) elaborar y emitir una declaración de consenso que resuma la repercusión, así como los logros actuales en el diagnóstico, la prevención y el tratamiento de la enfermedad. El panel de consenso llegó a la conclusión que se requieren esfuerzos más concertados y mejor coordinados para reducir la repercusión adversa de la gripe estacional y las pandemias futuras, que comprenden una mayor vigilancia, una participación más activa de las organizaciones gubernamentales y no gubernamentales y un esfuerzo mucho mayor para vacunar a más adultos, en especial a las personas que presentan un riesgo elevado de contraer la enfermedad. Además, se recomendó un nuevo enfoque para diagnosticar la gripe.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Forecasting , Latin AmericaABSTRACT
Tigecycline is the first of a new class of antibiotics named glycylcyclines and it was approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and complicated skin and skin structure infections. Notwithstanding this, tigecycline's pharmacological and microbiological profile which includes multidrug-resistant pathogens encourages physicians' use of the drug in other infections. We analyzed, during the first months after its launch, the tigecycline prescriptions for 113 patients in 12 institutions. Twenty-five patients (22 percent) received tigecycline for approved indications, and 88 (78 percent) for "off label" indications (56 percent with scientific support and 22 percent with limited or without any scientific support). The most frequent "off label" use was ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) (63 patients). The etiology of infections was established in 105 patients (93 percent). MDR-Acinetobacter spp. was the microorganism most frequently isolated (50 percent of the cases). Overall, attending physicians reported clinical success in 86 of the 113 patients (76 percent). Our study shows that the "off label" use of tigecycline is frequent, especially in VAP. due to MDR-Acinetobacter spp., where the therapeutic options are limited (eg: colistin). Physicians must evaluate the benefits/risks of using this antibiotic for indications that lack rigorous scientific support.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Minocycline/analogs & derivatives , Abdominal Cavity/microbiology , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Drug Labeling , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
We conducted a retrospective review of 130 occupational blood borne pathogens exposure (BBP-OE) records at Centro de Estudios Médicos e Investigaciones Clínicas, a university hospital with an ongoing educational program and a postexposure management program for healthcare workers (HCWs) since 1995, in order to evaluate adherence to a hospital BBP-OE management program. We compared HCWs from our institution (Group 1) and HCWs from independent institutions that contract our postexposure management program (Group 2). Compliance with standard precautions in Group 1 was inadequate in 77 percent, 23 percent, and 16 percent of nurses, physicians, and others, respectively. A greater proportion of HCWs in Group 1 (74 percent vs. 40 percent) reported occupational accidents within two hours after exposure (p = 0.0001). No difference was observed regarding compliance with adherence to schedule, partial adherence, and loss at follow-up (14 percent, 33 percent, and 53 percent; p > 0.05). Adherence to the standard of care for BBP-OE, including postexposure prophylaxis, was low (HIV: 53 percent and HBV: 63 percent). Knowledge of the seropositive status of the source patient did not improve adherence. We conclude that postexposure programs do not guarantee appropriate behavior by HCWs. General interventions and ongoing personnel education to modify individual attitudes are needed, as are continued efforts to assess HCWs' experiences with these programs, as well as the identification of strategies to improve adherence.