Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Birth ; 50(4): 773-780, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36939318

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Performing an episiotomy where clinically indicated is a key intervention in the Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle (OASI-CB) implemented across England and Wales to reduce the risk and increase the detection of severe perineal trauma after birth. Standards of consent provided to people in maternity care generally and for episiotomy specifically have been reported as suboptimal. Compromising birthing people's personal autonomy or sense of control has been linked to a dissatisfying birth experience, negative psychological sequelae, and litigation. METHODS: This study explored experienced midwives' practice of informed consent for episiotomy during a midwife-led birth. We sampled 43 midwives across eight NHS Trusts in England and Wales using online focus groups and telephone interviews about their experience of consent in episiotomy. Using qualitative content analysis and art-based co-analysis methods with eight midwives from across the research sites, we co-analyzed and co-constructed three themes and four practice recommendations from the data. RESULTS: Three themes were constructed from the data: Assent rather than consent, Change in culture to support best practice, and Standardized information. These themes informed the shaping of four recommendations for best practice in episiotomy informed consent. CONCLUSION: This study has shown how variations in midwifery practice and culture may impact birthing people's experience of informed consent in episiotomy. Midwives may not have the knowledge or skills to conduct a detailed consent conversation, leading to variation in practice and messages for birthing people. The use of antenatal discussion aids can offer women the opportunity to become informed and fully participate in the decision-making process.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services , Midwifery , Nurse Midwives , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Midwifery/methods , Episiotomy , Nurse Midwives/psychology , Informed Consent
2.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(2)2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816006

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This service evaluation describes the rapid implementation of self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) into maternity care at a tertiary referral centre during the COVID-19 pandemic. It summarises findings, identifies knowledge gaps and provides recommendations for further research and practice. INTERVENTION: Pregnant and postpartum women monitored their blood pressure (BP) at home, with instructions on actions to take if their BP exceeded pre-determined thresholds. Some also conducted proteinuria self-testing. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Maternity records, app data and staff feedback were used in interim evaluations to assess process effectiveness and guide adjustments, employing a Plan-Do-Study-Act and root cause analysis approach. RESULTS: Between March 2020 and August 2021, a total of 605 women agreed to self-monitor their BP, including 10 women with limited English. 491 registered for telemonitoring (81.2%). 21 (3.5%) took part in urine self-testing. Engagement was high and increased over time with no safety issues. Biggest concerns related to monitor supply and postnatal monitoring. In December 2020, SMBP was integrated into the standard maternity care pathway. CONCLUSIONS: This project demonstrated successful integration of SMBP into maternity care. Early stakeholder engagement and clear guidance were crucial and community midwifery support essential. Supplying BP monitors throughout pregnancy and post partum could improve the service and fully digitised maternity records would aid data collection. More research is needed on SMBP in the postnatal period and among non-English speakers. These findings support efforts to implement app-supported self-monitoring and guide future research.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quality Improvement , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adult , United Kingdom , State Medicine/organization & administration , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Pandemics , Self Care/methods , Telemedicine
3.
Women Birth ; 36(2): 217-223, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35941059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of four key points in the Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle, first piloted in the UK in 2016, was the directive to perform episiotomy when clinically indicated. Midwives are the primary health care professional for straightforward births in the UK and there is very little published literature that relates to their practice in this area. AIM: The aim of the study was to explore experienced midwives' decision-making processes in their assessments for episiotomy during birth. METHODS: 43 midwives self-identifying as confident in performing episiotomy were sampled across 8 NHS Trusts in England and Wales. Data collection was via online focus groups and 1:1 interviews. Primary thematic analysis was undertaken by the research team. Preliminary themes were used to structure a co-production analysis workshop where eight experienced midwives undertook a secondary analysis of the data resulting in four overall themes. FINDINGS: Four themes were identified, 'Optimising Perineal Function', 'Red Flags to Stimulate Decision-Making', 'The Midwives' Episiotomy' and 'Infiltration as a Catalyst for Birth'. DISCUSSION: Midwives use a number of visual, auditory and touch cues to inform their assessments for episiotomy during birth. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable insight into the cues that guide experienced midwives' decision-making in relation to episiotomy and contributes evidence related to performing episiotomy when clinically indicated in spontaneous vaginal birth.


Subject(s)
Midwifery , Nurse Midwives , Obstetric Labor Complications , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Episiotomy , Midwifery/methods , Perineum/injuries
4.
Midwifery ; 97: 102950, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684613

ABSTRACT

Trauma to the labia occurs in up to 49% of vaginal births1. Trauma to the perineal body resulting from childbirth is well defined using widely used categories, and recommended management of perineal body trauma is based on high level evidence. Currently no similar evidence exists to inform the classification or management of labial trauma. This is reflected in variation in clinical practice with some practitioners favouring suturing of labial trauma, whilst others favour healing by secondary intention. A survey of practice was undertaken in three NHS organisations, over a five-week period in 2019 with data collected on 332 vaginal births. Overall, 47.3% (n=157) of women sustained labial trauma, of whom 29.3% (n=46) sustained trauma described as involving skin and underlying tissues. Of the labial trauma which involved skin and underlying tissues 76.0% (n=35) was sutured and the remainder unsutured. The survey confirmed a lack of consistency in practice and the need for further research to inform care for women.


Subject(s)
Obstetric Labor Complications , Delivery, Obstetric , Episiotomy , Female , Humans , Obstetric Labor Complications/therapy , Parturition , Perineum/surgery , Pregnancy , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL