Severe speech impairment is a distinguishing feature of FOXP1-related disorder.

AIM: To delineate the speech and language phenotype of a cohort of individuals with FOXP1-related disorder. METHOD: We administered a standardized test battery to examine speech and oral motor function, receptive and expressive language, non-verbal cognition, and adaptive behaviour. Clinical history and cognitive assessments were analysed together with speech and language findings. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (17 females, 12 males; mean age 9y 6mo; median age 8y [range 2y 7mo-33y]; SD 6y 5mo) with pathogenic FOXP1 variants (14 truncating, three missense, three splice site, one in-frame deletion, eight cytogenic deletions; 28 out of 29 were de novo variants) were studied. All had atypical speech, with 21 being verbal and eight minimally verbal. All verbal patients had dysarthric and apraxic features, with phonological deficits in most (14 out of 16). Language scores were low overall. In the 21 individuals who carried truncating or splice site variants and small deletions, expressive abilities were relatively preserved compared with comprehension. INTERPRETATION: FOXP1-related disorder is characterized by a complex speech and language phenotype with prominent dysarthria, broader motor planning and programming deficits, and linguistic-based phonological errors. Diagnosis of the speech phenotype associated with FOXP1-related dysfunction will inform early targeted therapy. What this paper adds Individuals with FOXP1-related disorder have a complex speech and language phenotype. Dysarthria, which impairs intelligibility, is the dominant feature of the speech profile. No participants were receiving speech therapy for dysarthria, but were good candidates for therapy Features of speech apraxia occur alongside persistent phonological errors. Language abilities are low overall; however, expressive language is a relative strength.

Speech and language in bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria: a systematic review.

AIM: We aimed to systematically review the speech production, language, and oral function phenotype of bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria (BPP), and examine the correlation between the topography of polymicrogyria and the severity of speech, language, and oral functional impairment. METHOD: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases was completed on 26th October 2017 using Medical Subject Heading terms synonymous with BPP and speech, language, or oral motor impairment. In total, 2411 papers were identified and 48 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Expressive and receptive language impairment and oral structural and functional deficits are frequent in BPP. Expressive deficits are frequently more severe than receptive. Only one study used formal assessments to demonstrate the presence of speech disorder, namely dysarthria. Seven studies reported an association between diffuse BPP and more severe language impairment. INTERPRETATION: Findings confirmed that language deficits are common in BPP, though assessment of the specific speech phenotype is limited. The paucity of high quality studies detailing the specific communication phenotype of BPP highlights the need for further investigation. Improving understanding of this phenotype will inform the development of targeted therapies and lead to better long-term outcomes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Speech, language, and oral functional impairments are common in individuals with bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria. Posterior polymicrogyria is associated with a less severe language impairment than anterior polymicrogyria. Deeper investigation of speech is needed to understand implicated networks in this malformation.

Perisylvian and Hippocampal Anomalies in Individuals With Pathogenic GRIN2A Variants.

Background and Objectives: Pathogenic variants in GRIN2A are associated with a spectrum of epilepsy-aphasia syndromes (EASs). Seizures as well as speech and language disorders occur frequently but vary widely in severity, both between individuals and across the life span. The link between this phenotypic spectrum and brain characteristics is unknown. Specifically, altered brain networks at the root of speech and language deficits remain to be identified. Patients with pathogenic variants in GRIN2A offer an opportunity to interrogate the impact of glutamate receptor dysfunction on brain development. Methods: We characterized brain anomalies in individuals with pathogenic GRIN2A variants and EASs, hypothesizing alterations in perisylvian speech-language regions and the striatum. We compared structural MRI data from 10 individuals (3 children and 7 adults, 3 female) with pathogenic GRIN2A variants with data from age-matched controls (N = 51 and N = 203 in a secondary analysis). We examined cortical thickness and volume in 4 a priori hypothesized speech and language regions (inferior frontal, precentral, supramarginal, and superior temporal) and across the whole brain. Subcortical structures (hippocampus, basal ganglia, thalamus) and the corpus callosum were also compared. Results: Individuals with pathogenic GRIN2A variants showed increased thickness and volume in the posterior part of Broca's area (inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis). For thickness, the effects were bilateral but more pronounced in the left (large effect size, η2 = 0.37) than the right (η2 = 0.12) hemisphere. Both volume and thickness were also higher in the bilateral superior temporal region while the supramarginal region showed increased thickness only. Whole-brain analyses confirmed left-sided thickness increases in Broca's area, with additional increases in the occipital and superior frontal cortices bilaterally. Hippocampal volume was reduced in the left hemisphere. There were no age-dependent effects or corpus callosum group differences. Discussion: Anomalies in perisylvian regions, with largest differences in Broca's area, suggest an altered development of classical speech-language networks in GRIN2A-related EAS. Left hippocampal reduction suggests a role for this structure in early speech and language development and is consistent with GRIN2A gene expression in that region. Overall, elucidating the neural correlates of EAS provides insights into the impact of GRIN2A dysfunction, opening avenues for targeted intervention in developmental syndromes with compromised speech-language development.

Social motivation a relative strength in DYRK1A syndrome on a background of significant speech and language impairments.

Speech and language impairments are commonly reported in DYRK1A syndrome. Yet, speech and language abilities have not been systematically examined in a prospective cohort study. Speech, language, social behaviour, feeding, and non-verbal communication skills were assessed using standardised tools. The broader health and medical phenotype was documented using caregiver questionnaires, interviews and confirmation with medical records. 38 individuals with DYRK1A syndrome (23 male, median age 8 years 3 months, range 1 year 7 months to 25 years) were recruited. Moderate to severe intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), vision, motor and feeding impairments were common, alongside epilepsy in a third of cases. Speech and language was disordered in all participants. Many acquired some degree of verbal communication, yet few (8/38) developed sufficient oral language skills to rely solely on verbal communication. Speech was characterised by severe apraxia and dysarthria in verbal participants, resulting in markedly poor intelligibility. Those with limited verbal language (30/38) used a combination of sign and graphic augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. Language skills were low across expressive, receptive, and written domains. Most had impaired social behaviours (25/29). Restricted and repetitive interests were most impaired, whilst social motivation was a relative strength. Few individuals with DYRK1A syndrome use verbal speech as their sole means of communication, and hence, all individuals need early access to tailored, graphic AAC systems to support their communication. For those who develop verbal speech, targeted therapy for apraxia and dysarthria should be considered to improve intelligibility and, consequently, communication autonomy.

Speech, Language, and Oromotor Skills in Patients With Polymicrogyria.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether specific speech, language, and oromotor profiles are associated with different patterns of polymicrogyria, we assessed 52 patients with polymicrogyria using a battery of standardized tests and correlated findings with topography and severity of polymicrogyria. METHODS: Patients were identified via clinical research databases and invited to participate, irrespective of cognitive and verbal language abilities. We conducted standardized assessments of speech, oromotor structure and function, language, and nonverbal IQ. Data were analyzed according to normative assessment data and descriptive statistics. We conducted a correlation analysis between topographic pattern and speech and language findings. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (33 male, 63%) were studied at an average age of 12.7 years (range 2.5-36 years). All patients had dysarthria, which ranged from mild impairment to anarthria. Developmental speech errors (articulation and phonology), oral motor structure and function deficits, and language disorder were frequent. A total of 23/29 (79%) had cognitive abilities in the low average to extremely low range. In the perisylvian polymicrogyria group (36/52), speech, everyday language, and oral motor impairments were more severe, compared to generalized (1 patient), frontal (3), polymicrogyria with periventricular nodular heterotopia (3), parasagittal parieto-occipital (1), mesial occipital (1), and other (7) patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Dysarthria is a core feature of polymicrogyria, often accompanied by receptive and expressive language impairments. These features are associated with all polymicrogyria distribution patterns and more severe in individuals with bilateral polymicrogyria, particularly in the perisylvian region.

Clinical delineation of SETBP1 haploinsufficiency disorder.

SETBP1 haploinsufficiency disorder (MIM#616078) is caused by haploinsufficiency of SETBP1 on chromosome 18q12.3, but there has not yet been any systematic evaluation of the major features of this monogenic syndrome, assessing penetrance and expressivity. We describe the first comprehensive study to delineate the associated clinical phenotype, with findings from 34 individuals, including 24 novel cases, all of whom have a SETBP1 loss-of-function variant or single (coding) gene deletion, confirmed by molecular diagnostics. The most commonly reported clinical features included mild motor developmental delay, speech impairment, intellectual disability, hypotonia, vision impairment, attention/concentration deficits, and hyperactivity. Although there is a mild overlap in certain facial features, the disorder does not lead to a distinctive recognizable facial gestalt. As well as providing insight into the clinical spectrum of SETBP1 haploinsufficiency disorder, this reports puts forward care recommendations for patient management.

Severe childhood speech disorder: Gene discovery highlights transcriptional dysregulation.

OBJECTIVE: Determining the genetic basis of speech disorders provides insight into the neurobiology of human communication. Despite intensive investigation over the past 2 decades, the etiology of most speech disorders in children remains unexplained. To test the hypothesis that speech disorders have a genetic etiology, we performed genetic analysis of children with severe speech disorder, specifically childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). METHODS: Precise phenotyping together with research genome or exome analysis were performed on children referred with a primary diagnosis of CAS. Gene coexpression and gene set enrichment analyses were conducted on high-confidence gene candidates. RESULTS: Thirty-four probands ascertained for CAS were studied. In 11/34 (32%) probands, we identified highly plausible pathogenic single nucleotide (n = 10; CDK13, EBF3, GNAO1, GNB1, DDX3X, MEIS2, POGZ, SETBP1, UPF2, ZNF142) or copy number (n = 1; 5q14.3q21.1 locus) variants in novel genes or loci for CAS. Testing of parental DNA was available for 9 probands and confirmed that the variants had arisen de novo. Eight genes encode proteins critical for regulation of gene transcription, and analyses of transcriptomic data found CAS-implicated genes were highly coexpressed in the developing human brain. CONCLUSION: We identify the likely genetic etiology in 11 patients with CAS and implicate 9 genes for the first time. We find that CAS is often a sporadic monogenic disorder, and highly genetically heterogeneous. Highly penetrant variants implicate shared pathways in broad transcriptional regulation, highlighting the key role of transcriptional regulation in normal speech development. CAS is a distinctive, socially debilitating clinical disorder, and understanding its molecular basis is the first step towards identifying precision medicine approaches.