ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In 2017, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the inclusion of extracapsular nodal extension (ENE) into the N staging of nonviral head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), while retaining the traditional N classification based on the number and sizes of metastatic nodes. The extent of ENE was further defined as microscopic ENE (ENEmi) and major ENE (ENEma) based on extent of disease beyond the nodal capsule (≤ or > 2âmm). This article reviews the evidence and progress made since these changes were introduced. RECENT FINDINGS: The 'gold standard' for evaluation ENE is histopathologic examination, the current preferred primary treatment of patients with HNSCC is by radiation-based therapyâ±âchemotherapy or biotherapy. The current pretreatment staging is by imaging, which needs improved reliability of radiologic rENE assessment with reporting needs to consider both sensitivity and specificity (currently computed tomography images have high-specificity but low-sensitivity). Adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated for patients with ENEma to enhance disease control, whereas for patients with ENEmi, there is a need to assess the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Evidence that the presence of pENE in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma is an independent prognostic factor and should be considered for inclusion in future AJCC editions has recently emerged. SUMMARY: There remains a paucity of data on the reliability of imaging in the staging of rENE, more so the for the accurate assessment of ENEmi. Optimistic early results from use of artificial intelligence/deep learning demonstrate progress and may pave the way for better capabilities in tumor staging, treatment outcome prediction, resulting in improved survival outcomes.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Extranodal Extension/pathology , Artificial Intelligence , Reproducibility of Results , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Neoplasm Staging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid gland (pSCCP) has long been recognized as a separate entity and is included in the WHO classifications of salivary gland tumors. However, it is widely accepted among head and neck pathologists that pSCCP is exceptionally rare. Yet, there are many publications describing series of pSCCP and data from SEER and other cancer register databases indicate erroneously an increasing incidence of pSCCP. Importantly, pSCCP and metastatic (secondary) squamous cell carcinoma to the parotid gland (mSCCP) have nearly identical histological features, and the diagnosis of pSCCP should only be made after the exclusion of mSCCP. Moreover, all of the histological diagnostic criteria proposed to be in favor of pSCCP (such as, for example, dysplasia of ductal epithelium) can be encountered in unequivocal mSCCP, thereby representing secondary growth along preexistent ducts. Squamous cell differentiation has also been reported in rare genetically defined primary parotid carcinomas, either as unequivocal histological squamous features (e.g., NUT carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma), by immunohistochemistry (e.g., in NUT carcinoma, adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma, basal-type salivary duct carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma), or a combination of both. Another major issue in this context is that the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding system does not distinguish between primary or metastatic disease, resulting in a large number of patients with mSCCP being misclassified as pSCCP. Immunohistochemistry and new molecular biomarkers have significantly improved the accuracy of the diagnosis of many salivary gland neoplasms, but until recently there were no biomarkers that can accurately distinguish between mSCCP and pSCCP. However, recent genomic profiling studies have unequivocally demonstrated that almost all SCCP analyzed to date have an ultraviolet light (UV)-induced mutational signature typical of mSCCP of skin origin. Thus, mutational signature analysis can be a very useful tool in determining the cutaneous origin of these tumors. Additional molecular studies may shed new light on this old diagnostic and clinical problem. This review presents a critical view of head and neck experts on this topic.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Parotid Neoplasms , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Parotid Neoplasms/pathology , Parotid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/diagnosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Locally advanced oral cavity carcinoma (LAOCSCC) is primarily treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. METHODS: A review of literature using PubMED was performed for studies reporting the management of LAOCSCC. Based on the reviewed literature and opinions of experts in the field, recommendations were made. RESULTS: Studies have shown that outcomes following resection of T4a and infranotch (inferior to mandibular notch) T4b are comparable. We discuss the concept of compartmental resection of LAOCSCC and issues concerning the management of the neck. Further, patients who refuse or are unable to undergo surgery can be treated with chemoradiotherapy with uncertain outcomes. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown promise for organ (mandibular) preservation in a select subset of patients. CONCLUSION: The management strategy for LAOCSCC should be determined in a multidisciplinary setting with emphasis on tumor control, functional preservation, and quality of life of the patient.