ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to examine construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the Dutch translation of the Assessment of Preschool Children's Participation (APCP) a participation measure for children aged 2 to 5 years and 11 months with and without physical disabilities. Parents of 126 preschool children participated. Sixty-seven of the children had no physical disabilities (mean age three years two months, SD 1.2) and 59 children had physical disabilities (mean age two years nine months, SD 1.8). Validity was tested using three hypotheses regarding having a physical disability, gender and age differences. Most, but not all hypotheses were confirmed. Children with a physical disability participated in fewer activities and with lower intensity than children without physical disabilities (p < .001). Boys and girls participated in an equally wide variety of activities and with similar intensity except for skill development. Four- to five-year-old children in general participated in more activities than two- to three-year-old children and had a higher intensity score (p < .001). For activity types, age differences were found for skill development (p < .001) and social activities (p < .001). Internal consistency was sufficient for four out of 10 activity types. Intra Class Correlations for test-retest reliability ranged from 63 to .91. Our findings indicate that the Dutch APCP shows sufficient psychometric properties for some but not all aspects of the measure.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Diseases/psychology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Age Factors , Case-Control Studies , Central Nervous System Diseases/physiopathology , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Motor Activity , Motor Skills/physiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/physiopathology , Netherlands , Play and Playthings , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Social Participation , TranslatingABSTRACT
Purpose: Adolescents with cancer (aged 12-18 years) are at risk for impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Little is known about this population during treatment. This study aimed to (1) determine the HRQoL of adolescents with cancer during the first year of treatment and compare them with age-matched peers and (2) obtain insight into cancer-specific HRQoL of adolescents during the first year of treatment. Methods: Participants were part of a larger study focused on routine monitoring of electronic reported outcomes in standard pediatric oncology care. Adolescents completed the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 and the PedsQL Cancer Module 3.0. Mean generic HRQoL scale scores were compared between the groups using multivariate analysis of covariance. Cancer-specific item scores were dichotomized and percentages were calculated to determine the proportion of adolescents reporting presence or absence of problems. Results: A total of 73 (mean [M]age = 14.71, standard deviation [SD] = 1.85) adolescents with cancer (Mage = 14.71, SD = 1.85, Mtimesincediagnosis = 3.51 months, SD = 2.8) and 268 healthy peers (Mage = 14.23, SD = 1.51) participated. Adolescents with cancer reported significantly lower generic HRQoL scores on all domains than their peers (p's <0.05, η2 = 0.01-0.42). Most frequently reported cancer-specific HRQoL problems were pain (hurt joint/muscle, 42.9%), nausea (during medical treatments [47.1%]; food not tasting good [54.3%]; food and smells [61.4%]), worry (about relapse [45.7%]; about side effects [52.9%]), cognitive problems (paying attention [47.1%]), and physical appearance (not good looking [47.1%]). Conclusions: Adolescents with cancer showed impaired HRQoL during treatment on both physical and psychosocial domains. Close monitoring of physical and psychosocial symptoms during treatment is, therefore, important.