Patients' administration preferences: progesterone vaginal insert (Endometrin®) compared to intramuscular progesterone for Luteal phase support.

BACKGROUND: Administration of exogenous progesterone for luteal phase support has become a standard of practice. Intramuscular (IM) injections of progesterone in oil (PIO) and vaginal administration of progesterone are the primary routes of administration. This report describes the administration preferences expressed by women with infertility that were given progesterone vaginal insert (PVI) or progesterone in oil injections (PIO) for luteal phase support during fresh IVF cycles. METHODS: A questionnaire to assess the tolerability, convenience, and ease of administration of PVI and PIO given for luteal phase support was completed by infertile women diagnosed with PCOS and planning to undergo IVF. The women participated in an open-label study of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropins (HP-hMG) compared with recombinant FSH (rFSH) given for stimulation of ovulation. RESULTS: Most women commented on the convenience and ease of administration of PVI, while a majority of women who administered IM PIO described experiencing pain. In addition, their partners often indicated that they had experienced at least some anxiety regarding the administration of PIO. The most distinguishing difference between PVI and PIO in this study was the overall patient preference for PVI. Despite the need to administer PVI either twice a day or three times a day, 82.6% of the patients in the PVI group found it "very" or "somewhat convenient" compared with 44.9% of women in the PIO group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this comprehensive, prospective patient survey, along with findings from other similar reports, suggest that PVI provides an easy-to-use and convenient method for providing the necessary luteal phase support for IVF cycles without the pain and inconvenience of daily IM PIO. Moreover, ongoing pregnancy rates with the well-tolerated PVI were as good as the pregnancy rates with PIO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT00805935.

Clinical comparison of ovarian stimulation and luteal support agents in patients undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of agents used for ovarian stimulation and luteal support when applied in a population of women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. STUDY DESIGN: A phase 4, multicenter, randomized, open-label, exploratory clinical trial was performed at 7 assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States. Subjects included 173 women aged 18-42 years with a documented history of infertility who were undergoing IVF. Subjects were randomized to treatment with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) or recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) for ovarian stimulation and progesterone vaginal inserts (PVIs) or intramuscular injection of progesterone in oil (PIO) for luteal support. Protocols for IVF followed the standard practices of participating centers within the parameters of the study. RESULTS: Biochemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates were the main outcome measures. Ongoing pregnancy rates for individual treatment groups ranged from 44.0-46.9%. No statistically significant differences were observed in pregnancy outcomes for the comparisons of HP-hMG vs. rhFSH or PVI vs. PIO. All study medications were generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this study HP-hMG and rhFSH were equally effective for ovarian stimulation during GnRH antagonist IVF cycles. Both PVI and PIO are viable options for luteal support.

Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.

The design of drugs with selective tissue distribution can be an effective strategy for enhancing efficacy and safety, but understanding the translation of preclinical tissue distribution data to the clinic remains an important challenge. As part of a discovery program to identify next generation liver selective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors we report the identification of (3R,5R)-7-(4-((3-fluorobenzyl)carbamoyl)-5-cyclopropyl-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid (26) as a candidate for treating hypercholesterlemia. Clinical evaluation of 26 (PF-03491165), as well as the previously reported 2 (PF-03052334), provided an opportunity for a case study comparison of the preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics as well as pharmacodynamics of tissue targeted HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

Pregnancy outcomes from more than 1,800 in vitro fertilization cycles with the use of 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

OBJECTIVE: To measure in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes following 24-chromosome single‒nucleotide-polymorphism (SNP)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and euploid embryo transfer. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Fertility clinics and laboratory. PATIENT(S): Women 20-46 years of age undergoing IVF treatment. INTERVENTION(S): Twenty-four-chromosome SNP-based PGT-A of day 5/6 embryo biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Maternal age-stratified implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates per embryo transfer; miscarriage rates; and number of embryo transfers per patient needed to achieve a live birth. RESULT(S): An implantation rate of 69.9%, clinical pregnancy rate per transfer of 70.6%, and live birth rate per transfer of 64.5% were observed in 1,621 nondonor frozen cycles with the use of SNP-based PGT-A. In addition, SNP-based PGT-A outcomes, when measured per cycle with transfer, remained relatively constant across all maternal ages; when measured per cycle initiated, they decreased as maternal age increased. Miscarriage rates were ∼5% in women ≤40 years old. No statistically significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were found for single-embryo transfers (SET) versus double-embryo transfers with SNP-based PGT-A. On average, 1.38 embryo transfers per patient were needed to achieve a live birth in nondonor cycles. CONCLUSION(S): Our findings that SNP-based PGT-A can mitigate the negative effects of maternal age on IVF outcomes in cycles with transfer, and that pregnancy outcomes from SET cycles are not significantly different from those of double-embryo transfer cycles, support the use of SET when transfers are combined with SNP-based PGT-A.

Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists in women suppressed with GnRH agonist may avoid cycle cancellation in patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Forty-seven patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome because of markedly elevated serum E2 levels on either long-luteal or microdose flare leuprolide acetate regimens were treated with ganirelix acetate. Despite being pretreated with GnRH agonist and without withholding gonadotropins, serum E2 decreased by 49.5% and 41.0% of pretreatment values (long luteal and microdose flare, respectively) after initiation of ganirelix, and 68.1% of the patients became pregnant.