[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on thoracic surgery training in Spain]. / Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en la formación de los cirujanos torácicos en España.

In the more than 2 years since its emergence, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has prompted important changes in healthcare systems and their organization. The aim of this study is to determine the implications in specialized thoracic surgery training as well as the repercussions on thoracic surgery residents. With this objective, the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery has conducted a survey among all its trainees and those who had finished their residency during the last 3 years. It consisted of 24 multiple-answer closed questions about the impact of the pandemic on their services, their training, and their personal experience. The response rate was 42% (52 out of a target population of 120). The effect of the pandemic on thoracic surgery services was high or extreme according to 78.8% of the participants. Academic activities were completely cancelled in 42.3% of the cases, and 57.7% of the respondents were required to treat hospitalized COVID patients (25% part-time, and 32.7% full-time). More than 80% of the survey participants believed that changes during the pandemic negatively affected their training, and 36.5% would prefer to extend their training period. In sum, we observe how the pandemic has had deep negative effects on specialized training in thoracic surgery in Spain.

Implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system for thoracic surgery: first clinical evaluation of feasibility and performance.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the ability of the Versius surgical system to successfully and safely complete a range of thoracic procedures aligned with Stage 2a (Development) of the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term follow-up framework for surgical innovation. METHODS: This prospective study included the first 30 consecutive patients who underwent robotic surgery with Versius by 2 surgeons without prior robotic experience between 1 April 2023 and 30 December 2023 [25 lung resections (wedge, segmentectomy and lobectomy) and 5 thymectomies]. There were no specific predetermined selection criteria for each case. The primary outcome was safe completion of the procedure without unplanned conversion. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative complications, intraoperative device-related outcomes and pathology results. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (93.3%) cases were completed without conversion. Both conversions were to thoracoscopy, one due to a 'console alarm' and the other due to pulmonary artery bleeding. In lung resections, median console time was 103 (90-129) min. Five (20%) patients experienced postoperative complications, most frequent was persistent air leak (16%). Median length-of-stay was 3 (2-4) days. Neither readmissions nor mortality was observed. In thymectomies, no intraoperative or postoperative complications, readmissions, reinterventions or mortality were observed. Median console time was 77 (75-89) min and median length of stay was 1 (1-1) day. CONCLUSIONS: This phase 2a IDEAL-D study confirms lung resections and thymectomies are feasible with the use of Versius system, laying the foundation for larger phase 2b and 3 clinical studies within the IDEAL-D framework.

Impact of radiological follow-up frequency on resected lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Background: Despite advances in lung cancer treatment and the subsequent improvement in oncological outcomes, the optimal frequency of radiological follow-up remains unclear. Current recommendations lack consensus and do not consider individual patient characteristics and tumor factors. This study aimed to examine the impact of radiological follow-up frequency on oncological outcomes following lung cancer resection. Methods: A prospective multicenter study, involving patients who underwent anatomical lung resection in the GEVATS database between December 2016 and March 2018. The relationship between surveillance frequency and oncological outcomes was evaluated. Two groups were established based on follow-up frequency: low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor stage, histology, lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the groups. Results: A total of 1,916 patients were included in the study, LF 444 (23.17%), HF 1,472 (76.83%). Factors associated with HF surveillance included higher stage, adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Subanalyses were performed after PSM for various factors, revealing significant differences between LF and HF groups in cancer-specific survival among who received adjuvant therapy {LF 53.021 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 48.622-57.421] vs. HF 58.836 months (95% CI: 55.343-62.330); HR 0.453, 95% CI: 0.242-0.849; P=0.013}, as well as overall survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma [LF 54.394 months (95% CI: 51.424-57.364) vs. HF 61.578 months (95% CI: 59.091-64.065); HR 0.491, 95% CI: 0.299-0.806; P=0.005] and those who received adjuvant therapy LF 50.176 months [95% CI: 45.609-54.742) vs. HF 57.189 months (95% CI: 53.599-60.778); HR 0.503, 95% CI: 0.293-0.865; P=0.013]. Conclusions: Findings suggest that high-frequency surveillance only improves survival outcomes in lung cancer patients who received adjuvant treatment or had squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, future guidelines for lung cancer follow-up should consider individualizing the frequency of radiological surveillance based on patients' risk profiles.