Tolerability and efficacy of erythropoietin (EPO) treatment in traumatic spinal cord injury: a preliminary randomized comparative trial vs. methylprednisolone (MP).

The only available treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is high-dose methylprednisolone (MP) administered acutely after injury. However, as the efficacy of MP is controversial, we assessed the superiority of erythropoietin (EPO) versus MP in improving clinical outcome of acute TSCI. Patients aged 18 to 65 years after C5-T12 injury, and grade A or B of the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), admitted within 8 h, hemodynamically stable, were randomized to MP according to the NASCIS III protocol or EPO iv (500 UI/kg, repeated at 24 and 48 h). Patients were assessed by an investigator blind to treatment assignment at baseline and at day 3, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90. Primary end point: number of responders (reduction of at least one AIS grade). Secondary end points: treatment safety and the effects of drugs on a number of disability measures. Frequentistic and post hoc Bayesian analyses were performed. Eight patients were randomized to MP and 11 to EPO. Three patients (27.3 %) on EPO and no patients on MP reached the primary end point (p = 0.17). No significant differences were found for the other disability measures. No adverse events or serious adverse events were reported in both groups. The Bayesian analysis detected a 91.8 % chance of achieving higher success rates on the primary end point with EPO in the intention-to-treat population with a 95 % chance the difference between EPO and MP falling in the range (-0.10, 0.51) and a median value of 0.2. The results of Bayesian analysis favored the experimental treatment.

Determination by LC-MS/MS of colistins A and B in plasma and ultrafiltrate from critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Colistin is a 50-year-old antibiotic, the use of which was ceased in the 70s and recently resumed as a "salvage therapy" against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. The narrow therapeutic range of colistin makes the choice of its correct dosage crucial, and monitoring of blood concentration is occasionally necessary for critically ill patients, including intensive care patients subjected to continuous renal replacement therapy. METHODS: Two LC-MS/MS methods were developed and fully validated for the quantitative determination of colistins A and B in plasma and dialysis ultrafiltrate (UF) samples, ultimately arising from 4 patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). RESULTS: The developed methods proved to be both specific and selective. They showed good fit and linearity over the entire range of interest. Trueness and accuracy proved satisfactory. Both methods have excellent intraassay precision (percent coefficient of variations were lower than 10%) and limit of detection values in the range 20-100 ng/mL, about 1-2 orders of magnitude below the concentrations commonly detected in real samples. The mean sieving coefficient (SC) values, measured after 10 minutes of CVVHDF, were 0.42 for colistin A and 0.48 for colistin B. SC values proved to be quite stable for 24 hours, but then declined to 0.24 for colistin A and 0.32 for colistin B, respectively, after 48 hours. At the median blood flow and effluent flow rate of 120 and 28 mL/min, clearance values for colistin B were higher than 15 mL/min. During the entire duration of CVVHDF sessions, the SC and clearance values for colistin A were significantly lower than colistin B. CONCLUSIONS: Two simple methods for the simultaneous determination of colistins A and B have been developed and validated. Their application in the clinical setting demonstrates that CVVHDF treatment lasting 48 hours produces a relatively constant and efficient removal of the drug.

Urine volume as a predicting factor for furosemide clearance during continuous infusion in AKI septic shock patients on hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the contribution of intracorporeal (IC) and extracorporeal clearance (EC) of furosemide in patients with septic acute kidney injury (AKI), and the relationship between plasma concentrations and urine volume. METHODS: Prospective cohort observational study of 15 patients with septic AKI undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) divided according to urine volume (< 500 ml/12 h, Oliguria group, n = 5; > 500 ml/12 h, Diuresis group, n = 10) during continuous infusion of furosemide (120 mg/12 h) at steady-state condition. Plasma and effluent furosemide concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-mass spectrometry every 12 h for 48 h. RESULTS: Furosemide plasma concentrations and total body clearance (TBC) were 6.14 mg/l and 22.1 ml/min for the Oliguria group, and 2.63 mg/l and 54.4 ml/min for the Diuresis group, respectively (p < 0.05). When urine volume was < 500 ml/24 h, the furosemide plasma concentrations peaked at the potentially toxic value of 13.0 mg/l. Furosemide EC was not relevant for the Diuresis group, but it represented 18% of TBC for the Oliguria group. Furosemide plasma concentrations correlated positively with dose infusion for both groups (r = 0.728 and 0.685, p < 0.05), and negatively with urine volume only for the Diuresis (r = - 0.578, p < 0.01) but not for the Oliguria group (r = - 0.089, p = 0.715). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with urine volume > 500 ml/12 h continuous infusion of furosemide up to 480 mg/24 h leads to increasing urine volume, which can predict furosemide plasma levels within its safety range. When the urine volume is lower, the furosemide plasma levels are increased beyond any further diuretic efficacy.

Efficient removal of colistin A and B in critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF and sorbent technologies.

BACKGROUND: Colistin pharmacokinetics data are scarce regarding patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT), or even absent as in patients treated with sorbent technologies potentially capable of removing colistin by extensive absorption on many polymeric materials. METHODS: Twelve septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) undergoing RRT [continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) n = 7, coupled-plasma filtration adsorption-HF (CPFA-HF) n = 4, hemoperfusion n = 1] treated with colistin methanesulfonate at a dose of 4.5 × 10(6) U bid were studied. Colistin A (Col-A) and colistin B (Col-B) concentrations on plasma and effluent at time 0, 0.2, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h were determined by the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: With CVVHDF the sieving coefficient was lower for Col-A, peaked early (0.40 for Col-A at 10 min, and 0.59 for Col-B at 3 h) and declined after 48 h (0.22 and 0.30 for Col-A and Col-B, respectively). Colistin's filter clearance showed a similar pattern, with the highest clearance value of 18.7 ml/min for Col-B at 1 h. With CPFA-HF after the cartridge the Col-A and Col-B levels were negligible (<0.2 mg/l) or not detectable. The sum of the effluent and cartridge clearances reached values of 30 and 40 ml/min for Col-A and Col-B, respectively. With hemoperfusion the postcartridge concentrations for Col-A and Col-B were about 30 % lower than those determined precartridge. CONCLUSIONS: During CPFA-HF and CVVHDF, the extent of colistin removal is high, and patients should receive an unreduced dosage. However, due to risk of accumulation in long-term administration colistin plasma levels determination is recommended.