Family Pediatrician and Public Health collaboration, an alliance to increase vaccination coverage: an experience with MenB vaccination in Italy.

Background: Invasive Meningococcal Disease is a severe disease mainly affecting infants and young children. Most infections are caused by serogroups A, B, C, W, X, and Y. In the last 10 years, serogroup B has been the main cause of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Europe. Recent data resulting from an observational study conducted in Italy show a significant reduction in the number of Invasive Meningococcal Disease cases due to Neisseria meningitidis B after the introduction of vaccine 4CMenB. Thus, the Naples Team of Federation of Italian Primary Care Pediatricians and the Public Health Department started an active collaboration focused on vaccination process management (named "Progetto Via") with the aim of increasing Meningococcal B vaccination coverage. Study design: Source of data is the regional platform "GE.VA.". Every Primary care Pediatrician uses daily to record vaccination activity. This platform is integrated with data entered by operators of the District/Vaccination Center. Methods: Time: January 2019 - December 2019. The Federation of Italian Primary Care Pediatricians/Naples organized a meeting to identify six coordinators. The pediatricians could choose to counsel in their own offices and send children to the vaccination center or to counsel and vaccinate directly in their own clinics. Results: A total of 78 pediatricians took part in the project: 46 did only counseling and 32 did both counseling and vaccination in their medical clinic. Data obtained show an overall average vaccination coverage growth of about 13% in the first 4 months of the survey, and a further growth of about 11% in the following seven months, with a total growth in the entire period of 24%. The pediatricians' counseling is essential to recover non-compliant subjects, considering both the relationship of trust with the families and the visits already scheduled as an ideal moment for vaccinations' status check. Conclusions: The project highlights how an effective collaboration between family pediatricians and the Local Health Authority becomes valuable in getting closer to reach the Ministerial goal of 95%. Vaccination coverage increased significantly when family pediatricians supported the activity of vaccine centers in distress in many regional situations. The trust relationship, the hourly availability and the capillary network of family pediatricians' clinics were key elements for the success of this project and were also recognized by parents.

Assessment of nutritional status and therapy in emergency Medicine settings.

Hospital malnutrition is becoming a clinical concern. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of hospital malnutrition through Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS) and to evaluate nutritional risk through a prospective study. Nutritional status was assessed collecting anthropometric parameters together with the data relating to the diseases in the medical records of patients admitted to the Department of Emergency Medicine of the "Sant'Eugenio" Hospital. One hundred and sixty patients were retrospectively enrolled during a 3-month observational period. The risk of malnutrition was detected in 52% of patients (of whom 38% at risk and 62% at serious risk). The NRS score was positively correlated with patient age, days between hospital admission and nutritional assessment, disease severity, length of hospital stay and catabolism (p less than 0.05); Basal Energy Expenditure (BEE) and mean arm circumference (MUAC) were negatively correlated with positive outcome (p less than 0.05). No correlations were found in the NRS score, gender, height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI) and Total Energetic Expenditure (TEE) (p=n.s). A high prevalence of the risk of malnutrition may be detected in the emergency medicine setting, particularly in the geriatric population. The NRS score is not strictly related to BMI, but rather is an excellent tool for disease prognosis, as well as nutritional screening.

Pharmacoeconomic management of patient with severe asthma in the Emergency Department: retrospective multicentric and cost of illness study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to develop a cost-of-illness model that would investigate the costs associated with the management of patients suffering from asthma and severe asthma in the context of acute episodes managed in the emergency room. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 795 records were collected between adults and paediatric patients. The data collection form reported an identification code for each patient included, gender, age, main discharge diagnosis, medical examinations carried out in the emergency room, the hospitalizations, and, if required by the patient condition, an outpatient visit performed by a pneumologist after the acute event that led the patient to the emergency room. In addition, the data collection form included information related to the pharmacological therapy taken by the patient. RESULTS: Among adult patients who had an admission with an asthma diagnosis, the average cost for the management of an adult patient in a green code in the emergency room is €330.39. As for the yellow code and the red code, the cost rises respectively to €444.04 and €808.25. The paediatric population has a slightly higher cost. As for the green code, the average cost stands at €355.87, for the yellow code €562.34 and €1,041.96 for the red code. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma and severe asthma impose a high burden on patients and society due to its chronicity, losses of productivity, and an increase in use of healthcare resources. We carried out the present observational retrospective analysis on asthma and severe asthma patients with the aim of assessing the economic impact from the Italian NHS perspective focusing also on the prescribed pharmacological therapies in the target conditions.

Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Gastric Cancer following Gastrectomy and Extended Lymphadenectomy.

Purpose. Although randomized trials suggest a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (XRT) for gastric adenocarcinoma, its use in patients who undergo an extended lymphadenectomy is less clear. The purpose of this study was to determine if a survival benefit exists in gastric cancer patients who receive adjuvant XRT following resection with extended lymphadenectomy. Methods. The SEER registry was queried for records of patients with resected gastric adenocarcinoma from 1988 to 2007. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess independent prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results. Of 15,060 patients identified, 3,208 (21%) received adjuvant XRT. Adjuvant XRT was independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.67, CI 0.64-0.71) and DSS (HR 0.69, CI 0.65-0.73) in stages IB through IV (M0). This OS and DSS benefit persisted regardless of the extent of lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, lymphadenectomy with >25 LN resected was associated with improved OS and DSS compared with <15 LN or 15-25 LN. Conclusion. This population-based study shows a survival benefit of adjuvant XRT following gastrectomy that persists in patients who have an extended lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, removal of >25 LNs results in improved OS and DSS compared with patients who have fewer LNs resected.

Profile of health-related quality of life outcomes after liver transplantation: univariate effects and multivariate models.

AIM: To test the effects of pre- and post-transplant clinical covariates on post-transplant health-related quality of life (HRQOL) score profiles in liver transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: HRQOL was measured before and after transplantation using the SF-36 Health Survey. Clinical data [diagnosis, model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, post-transplant rejection and infection episodes], pre-transplant functional performance (FP), and demographics were collected. Multivariate models for the eight SF-36 scales and two summary components were developed using multiple regression. Discriminant analysis was used to test whether the score profiles differentiated among recipients with and without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. RESULTS: 104 adults reported pre- and post-transplant HRQOL. Time post-transplant averaged 9+/-8 months (range 1-39). Scores on all SF-36 measures improved from pre- to post-transplant (p<0.001), and 7 of 10 models were significant (p<0.05). After controlling for pre-transplant HRQOL and time post-transplant, HCV infection had a negative effect on the role physical, bodily pain, and role emotional scales. History of a rejection episode had a negative effect on the bodily pain and vitality scales. MELD scores > or = 18 had a positive effect on the role physical scale. Pre-transplant FP and post-transplant infection episodes did not affect post-transplant HRQOL. HCV infection had a significant effect on the SF-36 score profile (canonical correlation=0.50; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-transplant HCV infection, MELD score, and post-transplant rejection episodes have significant independent effects on HRQOL after liver transplantation. Their specific effects vary among the individual SF-36 scales, and HRQOL score profiles differ among HCV+ and HCV- recipients.