Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Eur Radiol ; 32(2): 912-922, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34345947

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate whether the presence of enhancing capsule can be applied to establish a modified Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC malignancies in extracellular contrast agent (ECA)-enhanced and hepatobiliary agent (HBA)-enhanced MRI. METHODS: We enrolled 198 participants (161 men; mean age, 56.3 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI before surgery for de novo hepatic nodule(s). Two reviewers assigned LI-RADS categories (v2018). We defined a "modified LR-5 category, which emphasizes enhancing capsule (mLR-5C)" over targetoid features and classifies tumors with both targetoid appearance and enhancing capsule as HCC instead of LR-M. We compared the diagnostic performance of conventional LI-RADS and modified LI-RADS criteria for both MRIs. RESULTS: A total of 258 hepatic nodules (194 HCCs, 43 benign lesions, and 21 non-HCC malignancies; median size, 19 mm) were analyzed. By conventional LI-RADS, 47 (18.2%) nodules (31 HCCs and 16 non-HCC malignancies) were categorized as LR-M. The mLR-5C criterion showed superior sensitivity (ECA-MRI, 76.6% vs. 67.0%; HBA-MRI, 60.4% vs. 56.3%; both p < 0.05) while maintaining high specificity (ECA-MRI, 93.8% vs. 98.4%; HBA-MRI, 95.3% vs. 98.4%; both p > 0.05) compared with the LR-5 criterion. Using the mLR-5C criterion, ECA-MRI exhibited higher sensitivity than HBA-MRI (76.6% vs. 60.4%, p < 0.001) and similar specificity (93.8% vs. 95.3%, p > 0.99). CONCLUSION: Our modified LI-RADS achieved superior sensitivity for diagnosing HCC, without compromising specificity compared with LR-5. ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC than HBA-MRI by applying the mLR-5C for LR-M lesions. KEY POINTS: • By conventional LI-RADS, 31 (16.0%) of 194 HCCs were categorized as LR-M. • Among 31 HCCs categorized as LR-M, 19 HCCs or 8 HCCs were recategorized as HCC on ECA-MRI or HBA-MRI, respectively, after applying the modified LR-5 category, which allocates targetoid lesions with enhancing capsule as mLR-5C instead of LR-M. • The mLR-5C showed superior sensitivity compared with the LR-5 in both MRIs (ECA-MRI, 76.6% vs. 67.0%; HBA-MRI, 60.4% vs. 56.3%, both p < 0.05), while maintaining high specificity (ECA-MRI, 93.8% vs. 98.4%; HBA-MRI, 95.3% vs. 98.4%; both p > 0.05).


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Clin Imaging ; 101: 206-214, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37421716

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abbreviated MRI for surveillance in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently gained interest. PURPOSE: To compare the performance among the three types of abbreviated MRI protocols for the detection of hepatic malignancies in patients at risk for HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective review using data from a prospective-registry study included 221 patients with one or more hepatic nodules detected during surveillance for chronic liver disease. Patients underwent MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI) and MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI) before surgery. Sequences from each MRI were extracted to create three simulated abbreviated MRI (aMRI) sets: noncontrast aMRI (NC-aMRI), dynamic aMRI (Dyn-aMRI), and hepatobiliary phase aMRI (HBP-aMRI). Two readers evaluated each set and reported the probability of malignancy and possibility of non-HCC malignancy per lesion. Using the pathology report as reference, the diagnostic performance of each aMRI was compared. RESULTS: This study included 289 observations (219 HCCs, 22 non-HCC malignancies, and 48 benign lesions). Defining category definite malignancy as test positive, the performance of each aMRI was as follows: sensitivity, 94.6%, 88.8%, and 92.5%; and specificity, 83.3%, 91.7%, and 85.4% for HBP-aMRI, Dyn-aMRI, and NC-aMRI, respectively. Pairwise comparison revealed higher sensitivity of HBP-aMRI than both Dyn-aMRI (P = 0.003) and NC-aMRI (P = 0.025), and higher specificity of Dyn-aMRI than HBP-aMRI (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: HBP-aMRI showed better sensitivity than Dyn-aMRI or NC-aMRI, whereas the sensitivity of NC-aMRI was comparable to Dyn-aMRI in the detection of malignancy in high-risk patients. Dyn-aMRI showed better specificity than HBP-aMRI.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Prospective Studies , Gadolinium DTPA , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Contrast Media , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Br J Radiol ; 89(1062): 20150860, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27043480

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of dual-energy CT (DECT) for differentiating between solid and benign cystic lesions presenting as hyperdense renal lesions incidentally detected on single-phase post-contrast CT. METHODS: 90 hyperdense renal lesions incidentally detected on single-phase post-contrast CT were evaluated with follow-up DECT. DECT protocols included true non-contrast (TNC), DE corticomedullary and DE late nephrographic phase imaging. The CT numbers of hyperdense renal lesions were calculated on linearly blended and iodine overlay (IO) images, and the results were compared. RESULTS: In total, 47 benign cystic and 43 solid renal lesions were analyzed. For differentiating between solid and benign cystic lesions on the two phases, the specificity and accuracy of all lesions and lesions <1.5 cm were statistically lower in IO images than in linearly blended images (p < 0.05), while those for lesions ≥1.5 cm were not statistically different between them (p > 0.05). For all types of lesions ≥1.5 cm, the CT numbers between linearly blended and IO images and between TNC and virtual non-contrast images were not statistically different (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: DECT may be useful for differentiating between solid and benign cystic lesions presenting as hyperdense renal lesions incidentally detected on single-phase post-contrast CT, particularly with the size ≥1.5 cm. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DECT may be used to characterize hyperdense renal lesions ≥1.5 cm incidentally detected on single-phase post-contrast CT, without the use of TNC images.


Subject(s)
Kidney Diseases, Cystic/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Incidental Findings , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
4.
Magn Reson Imaging ; 33(4): 407-12, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25527395

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the usefulness of multiparametric MR imaging (mp-MRI) at 3T for evaluating suspected soft tissue lesion in the prostate bed after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) who received RP underwent mp-MRI at 3T with a phased-array coil, including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE-MRI) and were enrolled in this study. All patients with BCR had a suspected soft tissue lesion in the prostate bed, followed by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. As a control group, 14 consecutive patients without BCR who received RP were also enrolled. Two experienced radiologists independently analyzed four different imaging datasets. RESULTS: For predicting local recurrence, the specificity, accuracy and area under the curve for both readers were significantly greater on all combined imaging datasets than on T2WI alone (P<0.05). The sensitivity of all combined imaging datasets in both readers was not statistically different with T2WI alone (P>0.05), except for combined T2WI and DWI. Inter-reader agreements for the four different imaging datasets were moderate. CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI or DWI in combination with T2WI at 3T with a phased-array coil appears to be more useful than T2WI alone in evaluating suspected soft tissue lesion of the prostate bed after RP.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging/methods , Neoplasm, Residual , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL