Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 57
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 29(8): 1965-1973, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36895185

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe and quantify independent prescribing of oncology pharmacists working in adult, ambulatory cancer centers in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of oncology pharmacists prescribing in the electronic health record, ARIA® was conducted. Prescriptions from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018 were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify prescription volume and class of medications prescribed. A cross-sectional analysis was then performed on a random sample to determine the type of prescription intervention and evaluate pharmacist documentation. RESULTS: Over 6 months, 3474 prescriptions were ordered by 33 clinically deployed pharmacists. The median number of medications prescribed was 7 per month (interquartile range: 1.50-27.00; Range: 0.17-79.5). When prescribing was standardized by pharmacist's time clinically deployed, the median was 21.67 (interquartile range: 5.00-79.67; range: 0.67-216.67) prescriptions per month per full-time equivalent. The most prescribed class of medication was antiemetic (24.1%). From a sample of 346 prescriptions, 172 (50%) were new medications initiated, 160 (46%) were the continuation of existing prescriptions and 14 (4%) were prescription dosage adjustments. Adherence to the specified documentation standards was 47%. CONCLUSIONS: Oncology pharmacists utilize their independent prescribing to initiate and continue supportive care medications for cancer patients. The prescribing volume varied greatly among pharmacists. Opportunities exist to further engage pharmacist prescribing.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Pharmacists , Adult , Humans , Alberta , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Drug Prescriptions , Neoplasms/drug therapy
2.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 29(8): 1816-1824, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924415

ABSTRACT

Surveillance for environmental contamination of antineoplastic drugs has been recommended by authoritative bodies such as the United States Pharmacopeia and the National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities. Clear guidance is needed on how to develop sampling strategies that align with surveillance objectives efficiently and effectively. We conducted a series of simulations using previously collected surveillance data from nine cancer treatment centers to evaluate different sampling strategies. We evaluated the impact of sampling 2, 5, 10, or 20 surfaces, at monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, and annual frequencies, while employing either a random or sentinel surface selection strategy to assess contamination by a single antineoplastic drug (AD) or by a panel of three ADs. We applied two different benchmarks: a binary benchmark of above or below the limit of detection and AD-specific hygienic guidance values, based on 90th percentile values as quantitative benchmarks. The use of sentinel surfaces to evaluate a three-drug panel relative to 90th percentile hygienic guidance values (HGVs) resulted in the most efficient and effective surveillance strategy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Occupational Exposure , Pharmacies , Humans , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/analysis
3.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 28(2): 457-461, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34565254

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life of patients with a life-limiting or life-threatening illness and is multifaceted involving comprehensive interdisciplinary assessments and interventions. Interdisciplinary palliative care in the setting of untreatable cancer diagnoses is of particular importance due to additional considerations that must be taken as patients are often undergoing palliative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. These patients' complexity warrants special considerations and attentiveness to drug-related problems. CASE REPORT: The purpose of this case report is to highlight the importance of both complete and comprehensive medication histories in cancer care and the impact of proton pump inhibitors on pancreatic enzyme insufficiencies secondary to pancreatic cancers. This case involves a drug-related problem involving three medications that are commonly used in pancreatic cancer patients: pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, a proton pump inhibitor, and a fluoroquinolone antibiotic. The patient presented in this case report is an 80-year-old man diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic cancer with a history of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease managed with a proton pump inhibitor, specifically tablets of the 40 mg strength of pantoprazole magnesium taken orally once daily. During the patient's first of five 28-day cycles of palliative-intent chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, the patient presented to the emergency department due to fever and, although not severely neutropenic, was prescribed amoxicillin/clavulanate and ciprofloxacin due to his advanced age. After reading a patient advisory on a ciprofloxacin patient information sheet that advised avoidance of concomitant administration of ciprofloxacin and magnesium, the patient self-discontinued his pantoprazole as it was a magnesium salt formulation. This discontinuation was followed by two weeks of persistent foul-smelling diarrhea, flatulence, and abdominal pain. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: The patient's healthcare team symptomatically managed the patient with oral and intravenous rehydration unaware of the cause of the symptoms. A trial of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy was initiated; however, it was unsuccessful in resolving his symptoms. After further investigation and a more in-depth patient interview, it was discovered that the discontinued proton pump inhibitor was likely the cause of the patient's new symptoms and was subsequently re-initiated. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in combination with re-initiation of pantoprazole therapy essentially resolved all symptoms. DISCUSSION: Before his diagnosis of unresectable pancreatic cancer, the patient had been on proton pump inhibitor therapy for nearly a decade. He had significant atrophy of the pancreas and an undoubtedly decreased pancreatic enzyme and bicarbonate production; however, he did not experience foul-smelling diarrhea indicative of pancreatic enzyme insufficiency while he was on his proton pump inhibitor. We believe that with his proton pump inhibitor therapy, he was unknowingly being partially treated for his worsening pancreatic enzyme insufficiency, specifically the component related to his lack of bicarbonate production and secretion. His discontinuation of his proton pump inhibitor led to a decrease in gastric acid, small bowel, and normal intraduodenal pH, which resulted in any remaining pancreatic enzyme reserve to become non-functional, unmasking his pancreatic enzyme insufficiency. An initial empiric trial of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy failed in the absence of a proton pump inhibitor; however, within days of restarting his proton pump inhibitor along with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, his gastrointestinal symptoms completely resolved. This is due to the decrease of gastric and intraduodenal acidity, which better enabled the function of pancreatic enzymes present in pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Pancreas , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Quality of Life
4.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 28(6): 1332-1339, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34134569

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Our objective was to determine what vial sharing techniques and other strategies were being used globally to reduce wastage from partially used single-use drug vials, what barriers are preventing these strategies being employed, and what savings are being achieved. METHODS: A survey, comprising 19 questions, was distributed to the membership of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners and British Oncology Pharmacy Association. Questions asked included how parenteral cancer drugs are obtained and prepared, what vial sharing strategies are used, what means are employed to extend stability, how prepared products are reused and what cost savings are achieved. RESULTS: In all, 74 responses were received from 20 countries, most from the United Kingdom. Some manufacturing is done by 60.8% of institution, with 41.9% making all products. Vial sharing strategies, for frequently used drugs, were employed in 53% of cases. Barriers preventing vial sharing being used included government legislation, USP 797 guidelines, and health insurance companies. Extension of stability was possible for 70.2% of centres. Most respondents reported reduction in cytotoxic and biological waste, and alleviation of drug shortages from vial sharing utilisation. Cost savings were achieved in 74% of cases and was significant in one third. CONCLUSIONS: The survey has determined that drug vial wastage and expenditure can be reduced, and vial sharing facilitates this. International collaboration plus the assistance of governments and the pharmaceutical industry is vital in achieving this aim. These findings can hopefully guide oncology pharmacy in establishing appropriate strategies to reduce wastage internationally.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Neoplasms , Pharmacy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Costs , Health Expenditures , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 28(7): 1594-1602, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34612732

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical trial (MPACT) trial established gemcitabine (gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab) as a standard treatment for pancreatic cancer utilizing granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to manage neutropenia. This was a challenge for jurisdictions that do not use granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in palliative settings. We developed dosage guidelines to dose modify gem and nab without granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the efficacy and safety of these dose adjustment guidelines in the real world. METHODS: A multi-centered, retrospective chart review was performed on pancreatic patients between December 1, 2014, and August 21, 2018. Provincial electronic medical health records were reviewed. Using Log-rank statistics we determined the patient's progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 248 patients, 209 met patient selection criteria. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, on gem alone prior to nab/gem combination therapy or did not receive nab or gem. Patients who received nab/gem as first-line therapy had a median progression-free survival of 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.1-7.4), and median overall survival of 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.5-12.8). Those who received gem/nab in the second line had a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8-6.5), and median overall survival of 19.3 months (95% CI, 12.6-26.0). CONCLUSIONS: The patient's progression-free survival and overall survival taking nab/gem using our dose modification algorithm were equivalent or superior to the MPACT trial's progression-free survival and overall survival. Gem/nab can be given by our dose modification scheme without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Albumins/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Colony-Stimulating Factors/therapeutic use , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Granulocytes/pathology , Humans , Paclitaxel , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Gemcitabine , Pancreatic Neoplasms
6.
Rev Invest Clin ; 74(1): 16-22, 2022 01 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34495948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of coronavirus disease-19 on the management of multiple myeloma (MM) has been recognized. However, the real effect on clinical outcomes remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We describe a local experience of the management of MM patients and report their outcomes during the current pandemic. METHODS: All consecutive symptomatic MM patients seen at our center since 03/20 were evaluated. RESULTS: A cohort of 156 patients diagnosed from 01/19 to 12/20 was analyzed to interrogate differences in presentation patterns. A total of 553 MM patients were seen and/or treated at Tom Baker Cancer Center in the year of 2020. From those, 47.1% (n = 261) were tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Sixteen patients tested positive and data are presented. In addition, a decrease of 21.7% in the rate of new smoldering MM/MM diagnosis was observed in 2020 as compared to 2019. Further, an increase in deaths was also observed in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms an increase lethality for MM patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. A balance between safety and need for cancer control should be emphasized.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Canada/epidemiology , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(5): 1189-1194, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33896268

ABSTRACT

Medication errors involving look alike sound alike (LASA) medications have widely been recognized to contribute to patient harm. Oncology biosimilars are considered to be LASA medications and require additional measures for operational safety. The Cancer Care Alberta (CCA) Pharmacy Educators developed an education strategy to ensure operational and patient safety during the implementation phase for oncology biosimilars in Alberta, Canada. This resulted in a smooth adoption of oncology biosimilars. As future oncology biosimilars are introduced, this framework will serve as the foundation to educate and train oncology pharmacy staff.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Education, Pharmacy , Medical Oncology/education , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Patient Safety , Humans , Medication Errors/prevention & control
8.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(2): 477-479, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32588749

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies diagnosed in Canada. Currently, adjuvant colorectal cancer treatment primarily includes chemotherapeutic regimens such as FOLFOX6 (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin), as well as alternative regimens such as TOMOX (raltitrexed, oxaliplatin). However, the prevalence of drug shortages in today's society may make these preferred regimens inaccessible. The purpose of this case report is to highlight the tolerability of an alternative adjuvant regimen (pemetrexed plus oxaliplatin) that has undergone both phase I and II clinical trials for the treatment of colorectal cancer. The patient presented in this case report is a 57-year-old female diagnosed with Stage III colon cancer. This patient received seven cycles of pemetrexed plus oxaliplatin and experienced several adverse events, with the majority of them being mild in nature including fatigue and cold dysesthesia. However, the patient also experienced progressive neuropathy which required a dose reduction and subsequent discontinuation of oxaliplatin. Overall, pemetrexed and oxaliplatin's tolerability seems comparable to other regimens used to treat colorectal cancer and could potentially be an option to consider in the future for alternative treatment of colorectal cancer pending further trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quinazolines/supply & distribution , Thiophenes/supply & distribution , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Canada , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Middle Aged , Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage , Pemetrexed/administration & dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(7): 1637-1643, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33070759

ABSTRACT

Medication Reconciliation (MedRec) is an essential part of safe medication management and plays a key role in ensuring patient safety. A variety of methods and a number of different healthcare disciplines can be involved in the MedRec process and the timing and location of conducting MedRec can vary. In an effort to streamline the process in ambulatory oncology new patient clinics, a pilot of an alternative approach was undertaken whereby pharmacists with advanced prescribing privileges completed MedRec with patients prior to their clinic visit. Evaluation of the pilot was completed through the collection of various metrics, a pharmacist focus group, healthcare staff and patient surveys. Overall the evaluation indicated that there are multiple factors to consider regarding the timing and method of MedRec completion. The various phases of the pilot demonstrated that flexibility to the process is key and ongoing efforts are required at reducing duplication.


Subject(s)
Medication Reconciliation , Pharmacists , Ambulatory Care , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Humans , Patient Safety
10.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(7): 1723-1729, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33121351

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adult glioblastoma patients receiving standard radiation therapy and concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy have a median survival of 14.6 months. Based on the pivotal trial data by Stupp et al., temozolomide doses were calculated based on body surface area. However, no details regarding the weight used to calculate body surface area was included in the study. As a result, temozolomide doses have been variable across the province. METHODS: This retrospective chart review was conducted to determine the correlation between dose of first line temozolomide with overall survival. Patients between January 1st, 2009 and December 31st, 2014 who were newly diagnosed, pathology confirmed glioblastoma treated first line with temozolomide within Alberta Health Services were included in the study. Temozolomide doses above and below determined cut points were compared through the Kaplan-Meier method, then assessed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A cut point of 97.8% of actual body weight calculated body surface area dosing was determined for concurrent phase temozolomide. At doses above this cut point, there was a statistically significant (p = 0.0158) increase of 0.3 years in median overall survival. As for toxicity concerns, there was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of temozolomide dose reductions due to toxicity in patients dosed above the cut point. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide doses at full actual body weight calculated body surface area dosing during the concurrent phase is required to achieve a similar median OS as seen in the pivotal trial by Stupp et al.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Body Weight , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Temozolomide/therapeutic use
11.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(4): 785-801, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34024179

ABSTRACT

The Oncology Pharmacy Team (OPT), consisting of specialty-trained pharmacists and/or pharmacy technicians, is an integral component of the multidisciplinary healthcare team (MHT) involved with all aspects of cancer patient care. The OPT fosters quality patient care, safety, and local regulatory compliance. The International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) developed this position statement to provide guidance on five key areas: 1) oncology pharmacy practice as a pharmacy specialty; 2) contributions to patient care; 3) oncology pharmacy practice management; 4) education and training; and 5) contributions to oncology research and quality initiatives to involve the OPT. This position statement advocates that: 1) the OPT be fully incorporated into the MHT to optimize patient care; 2) educational and healthcare institutions develop programs to continually educate OPT members; and 3) regulatory authorities develop certification programs to recognize the unique contributions of the OPT in cancer patient care.


Subject(s)
Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Societies, Pharmaceutical , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Education, Pharmacy , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Patient Care , Patient Safety , Pharmaceutical Services , Pharmacists , Pharmacy Technicians , Research , Specialization
12.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(9): 4107-4113, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31867703

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The transition from active cancer treatment to palliative care often results in a shift in drug risk-benefit assessment which requires the deprescribing of various medications. Deprescribing in palliative cancer patients can benefit patients by reducing their pill burden, decrease potential side effects, and potentially decrease healthcare costs. In addition, a change in patients' goals of care (GOC) necessitates the alteration of drug therapy which includes both deprescribing and the addition of medications intended to improve quality of life. Depending on a patient's GOC, a medication can be considered as inappropriate. OBJECTIVES: Primary: Comparison between potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prior to the palliative care consult (PCC) versus after the PCC. Secondary: Association between PIMs and GOC. METHODS: The study was a 1-year retrospective database review. The study included cancer patients seen by the PCC team at the University of Alberta Hospital. The OncPal guidelines were used to identify and determine the number of PIMs prior to the PCC and after the PCC. RESULTS: The reduction in PIMs prior to PCC versus after the PCC was statistically significant (p value < 0.001), demonstrating the PCC has a positive significant impact on deprescribing PIMs. For our secondary outcome, an overall decrease in PIMs was observed with the changes of GOC. The strength of the correlations was low (r < 0.1), and the p value was 0.056. CONCLUSION: This study shows the positive impact a PCC has on deprescribing and reveals the importance of using guidelines for deprescribing in palliative cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Deprescriptions , Inappropriate Prescribing/trends , Palliative Care/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
13.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 25(5): 1174-1181, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30370803

ABSTRACT

Increasingly stringent pharmacy standards for preparation of sterile products necessitated a review of the feasibility of continuing to maintain chemotherapy sterile production facilities across the provincial cancer programme. The concept of centrally produced chemotherapy that could be shipped to various locations as a remote service delivery model was explored. Key planning principles were established and detailed processes were developed to test this change in service delivery at one small cancer centre. Following the successful implementation and evaluation of the remote service delivery model at one centre, the programme was rolled out to an additional four centres.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Pharmaceutical Services/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care , Humans
14.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 25(3): 584-598, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29338572

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the practice settings and prescribing practices of oncology pharmacists with additional prescribing authorization. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey of all oncology pharmacists in Alberta was conducted using a web-based questionnaire over four weeks between March and April 2016. Pharmacists were identified from the Cancer Services Pharmacy Directory and leadership staff in Alberta Health Services. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the practice setting, prescribing practices, motivators to apply for additional prescribing authorization, and the facilitators and barriers of prescribing. Logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with having additional prescribing authorization. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 41% (71 of 175 pharmacists). Oncology pharmacists with additional prescribing authorization made up 38% of respondents. They primarily worked in urban, tertiary cancer centers, and practiced in ambulatory care. The top 3 clinical activities they participated in were medication reconciliation, medication counseling/education, and ambulatory patient assessment. Respondents thought additional prescribing authorization was most useful for ambulatory patient assessment and follow-up. Antiemetics were prescribed the most often. The median number of prescriptions written in an average week of clinical work was 5. Competence, self-confidence, and the potential impact on patient care/perceived impact on work environment were the strongest facilitators of prescribing. The strongest motivators to apply for additional prescribing authorization were relevancy to practice, the potential for increased efficiency, and advancing the profession. CONCLUSION: The current majority of oncology pharmacist prescribing in Alberta occurs in ambulatory care with a large focus on antiemetic prescribing. Pharmacists found additional prescribing authorization most useful for ambulatory patient assessment and follow-up.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pharmaceutical Services/organization & administration , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Adult , Alberta , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medication Reconciliation , Perception , Professional Role , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
15.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 25(8): 1987-1994, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31390959

ABSTRACT

Chemotherapy checking is a complex task and requires a high level of alertness and attention to detail. Learning tools are required to teach the fundamental principles of chemotherapy checking. In conjunction with a graphic design team and with input from Human Factors specialists, an online chemotherapy checking training module was created. A variety of learning methods were incorporated including pre-reading, hands on training, case scenarios, and exam questions. The necessary skills to safely complete chemotherapy checking can be enhanced by the use of this training module.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/standards , Clinical Competence , Computer-Assisted Instruction , Humans , Scope of Practice
16.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 25(6): 1366-1373, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30124122

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cotrimoxazole is associated with the development of hyponatremia, hyperkalemia and elevated serum creatinine, especially when combined with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis is the standard of care for high-grade glioma (HGG) patients receiving temozolomide concurrently with radiotherapy, low-dose cotrimoxazole being the preferred agent. Many of these patients are also taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, however the risk of significant laboratory disturbance in these patients remains undescribed. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether high-grade glioma patients taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors receiving low-dose cotrimoxazole for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis are at additional risk of laboratory disturbances in comparison with their non-renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system counterparts. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult neuro-oncology patients treated for WHO Grade III or IV glioma between 2013 and 2016. Patient serum Na, K, creatinine, and eGFR were compared (renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system vs. non-renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system) using the chi-square test. Binary logistic regression analysis was then performed to account for differences between cohorts. RESULTS: Of 63 patients (35 non-renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, 28 renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system), patients in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system cohort were more likely to experience a laboratory disturbance (odds ratio=3.17, p = 0.03). Overall, these disturbances were moderate, but were slightly more common and slightly more severe in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system cohort. CONCLUSION: Adding low-dose cotrimoxazole for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis to the regimens of patients with high-grade glioma taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors increases the risk of laboratory disturbances. While these are generally moderate, some patients are at risk of significant electrolyte abnormalities requiring intervention.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Glioma/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/prevention & control , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Creatinine/blood , Drug Interactions , Female , Glioma/pathology , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Hyperkalemia , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Potassium/blood , Renin-Angiotensin System , Retrospective Studies , Sodium/blood , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/administration & dosage
17.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 25(6): 1293-1300, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29945535

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The COU-AA-301 trial demonstrated that in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer using abiraterone post-docetaxel increased overall survival. This study aims to assess this conclusion in a real world context. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of a provincial Pharmacy BDM Database (a pharmacy dispensing software) and a provincial Electronic Chart (ARIA). Dispensing data, information on the state of the disease before and after abiraterone use, and information regarding effects of abiraterone were gathered. SETTING: Cancer centers in Alberta, Canada. PATIENTS: Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients on abiraterone outside of a clinical trial who have previously had docetaxel chemotherapy for CRPC between February 2012 and May 2014. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Overall survival from the time of abiraterone initiation. RESULTS: Overall survival increase of 17 months was consistent with the survival increase of 14.8 months observed in the pivotal trial. CONCLUSION: Abiraterone is a valuable therapy post-docetaxel for metastatic CRPC, as in a real world context it demonstrated an increase in overall survival that was consistent with the findings of the clinical trial despite including a patient population of older age and lower performance status.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Aged , Androstenes/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Disease Progression , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
18.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 24(3): 163-169, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28077048

ABSTRACT

Purpose Elastomeric pumps are used to administer 46-hour infusions of 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Baxter suggests patients visually monitor their pumps to ensure that infusions are proceeding correctly. This can be confusing and lead to concerns about under- or over-dosing. Baxter has not considered weighing pumps as a validated method for monitoring. This study aims to validate weighing as a more accurate method for patients and healthcare professionals, and describe real life Baxter Infusor™ variability. Methods Patients who had been started on a 46-hour 5FU infusion returned to the clinic approximately 24 h after starting treatment. The pump was weighed on a StarFrit kitchen scale, and date, time, and weights recorded. Patients were asked if they had a preference for weighing or visually inspecting their pump. Results Pumps ( n = 103) were weighed between 17.25 and 27.5 h after connection. The average weight of a pump was 189 g. Of 103 pumps weighed, 99 weighed less than expected, corresponding to average flow rates of 5.69 mL/h over the elapsed time. The expected flow rate is 5 mL/h with 10% variability. Average flow rates within the 17.25- to 27.5-hour window were 4.561 mL/h, which is 8.78% slower than expected, but within the 10% known variability. Forty-seven percent of patients didn't have a preference for either method, but for those who did have a preference, more than twice as many preferred weighing. Conclusion With proper education, weighing Baxter Infusors at home with kitchen scales can be an accepted and objective alternative to the current recommendation of visual inspection.


Subject(s)
Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Infusion Pumps/standards , Polymers/standards , Visual Perception , Weights and Measures/standards , Adult , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Elastomers , Female , Humans , Male
19.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 24(5): 323-331, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28358279

ABSTRACT

Reversible late onset neutropenia associated with rituximab has been reported with incidence rates varying from 15 to 70% in B cell lymphoma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study at one tertiary care center in adult B cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab and autologous stem cell transplantation between 1 January 2004 and 30 June 2014. Late onset neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count <1.0 × 109 cells/L after neutrophil engraftment and less than six months post autologous stem cell transplantation. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of late onset neutropenia. The secondary objectives were to examine whether the use of rituximab with re-induction therapy, mobilization or high dose chemotherapy regimens increased the risk for late onset neutropenia, and to evaluate infectious complications. Of 315 subjects, 92 (29.2%) developed late onset neutropenia. Mobilization regimens containing rituximab (OR 2.90 95% CI: 1.31-6.40), high dose chemotherapy containing rituximab (OR 1.87 95% CI: 1.14-3.05), and exposure to rituximab in either or both regimens (OR 3.05 95% CI: 1.36-6.88) significantly increased the risk of late onset neutropenia. While neutropenic, 17.4% experienced an infection, 7.6% experienced febrile neutropenia, and 5.4% were hospitalized. In conclusion, rituximab with mobilization or high dose chemotherapy may increase the risk of late onset neutropenia post autologous stem cell transplantation.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Lymphoma, B-Cell/therapy , Neutropenia/epidemiology , Rituximab/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Transplantation, Autologous , Young Adult
20.
Future Oncol ; 13(15): 1311-1322, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28589775

ABSTRACT

AIM: To identify cancer drugs amenable to strategies for reducing expenditure and avoiding drug wastage. METHODS: Information was sourced from product information in 20 countries on parenteral cytotoxic agents, and cancer and noncancer monoclonal antibodies. Data were collected on vial sizes, overage, stability and presentation forms. RESULTS: Vial size availability varied significantly between countries, with often only single vial sizes for numerous medications. Overage was poorly reported. Stability data were inconsistent and variable between countries, with most drugs only having a 24 h expiry. Three cancer-indicated monoclonal antibodies, thought suitable for prefilled syringe administration, were only available as vials. CONCLUSION: Many expensive cancer drugs are suitable for global cost-reduction strategies. Collaboration is vital to affecting change and reducing expenditure.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/economics , Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Cost Savings/methods , Health Expenditures , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Dosage Forms , Drug Packaging/economics , Drug Packaging/methods , Drug Stability , Humans , Neoplasms/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL