La judicialización del derecho a la protección de la salud desde la óptica de los actores clave.

 Objetivo. Conocer la opinión de actores clave respecto del proceso de judicialización del derecho a la protección de la salud en México. Material y métodos. Se realizaron 30 entrevistas semiestructuradas a representantes de los pode-res Judicial (PJ), Legislativo (PL), Sector Salud (SS), industria farmacéutica, academia y organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC) durante mayo de 2017 a agosto de 2018, en distintos lugares de la Ciudad de México. Se transcribieron las graba-ciones y se analizó el contenido con base en categorías de interés. Resultados. Las posturas respecto al fenómeno de la judicialización del derecho a la salud son disímiles. Hay tensiones entre quienes ven su potencial efecto como agente de cambio del sector y quienes la perciben como una interferencia ilegítima del PJ. No existe una estrategia coordinada entre los sectores para promover un cambio en el SS. Conclusiones. Las posturas respecto al fenómeno de la judicialización en México son disímiles. Hay tensiones entre quienes ven su potencial efecto como agente de cam-bio del sector y quienes la perciben como una interferencia ilegítima del PJ en el SS. Otros argumentan que no existe una estrategia coordinada entre los sectores para promover un cambio en el SS.

[Vaccination in Mexico: imprecise coverages and deficiency in the follow-up of children with incomplete immunization]. / Vacunación en México: coberturas imprecisas y deficiencia en el seguimiento de los niños que no completan el esquema.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the validity of the official vaccination figures according to the available information and to identify opportunities for improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We estimated vaccination coverage and dropout rates (for multi-dose vaccines) for one-year-old children, based on public information from the dynamic cubes of the Ministry of Health, for the years 2015 to 2017. R. RESULTS: We observed variations in the vaccination monthly reports, which indicate low rates of vaccination, as well as high dropout rates when comparing first and third doses applied. For children 1 year of age, the national complete coverage was estimated at 48.9. CONCLUSIONS: There is no reliable information to estimate the actual vaccination coverage. Government documents report a constant overestimation of vaccination coverage that creates a "false sense of security". This has become a barrier for the critical analysis of the Universal Vaccination Program.

OBJETIVO: Analizar la veracidad de las cifras oficiales de acuerdo con la información disponible e identificar oportunidades de mejora. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estimamos las coberturas de vacunación y tasas de deserción (para las vacunas administradas en multidosis) del esquema básico para niños menores de un año de edad, con base en la información de cubos dinámicos de la Secretaría de Salud de 2015 a 2017. RESULTADOS: Observamos variaciones en los reportes mensuales de vacunación que indican bajas tasas de vacunación, así como índices altos de deserción al comparar primeras y terceras dosis aplicadas. La cobertura nacional de esquema completo se estimó en 48.9 por ciento. CONCLUSIONES: No se cuenta con información confiable que permita estimar las coberturas reales de vacunación. En los reportes oficiales hay una constante sobrestimación de las coberturas que ha creado a una "falsa sensación de seguridad". Esto se ha constituido en una barrera que impide el análisis crítico del Programa Universal de Vacunación.

[Needs in coverage and care for lung cancer in Mexico]. / Necesidades de cobertura y atención del cáncer pulmonar en México.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the coverage of lung cancer in Mexico and offer recommendations in this regard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By means of the conformation of a multidisciplinary group, we analyze the burden of the disease relative to the lung cancer and the access to the medical treatment offered by the different public health subsystems in Mexico. RESULTS: Important inequalities in lung cancer care are documented among the different public health subsystems. Our data suggest differential access and coverage to both traditional treatments and existing therapeutic innovations and differences in the capacity of health service providers to guarantee the right to health protection without distinction. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations are made on the need to improve actions for tobacco control, early diagnosis for lung cancer and inclusion of innovative therapies and homologation among different public health service providers through financing via tobacco taxes.

OBJETIVO: Analizar la cobertura en salud de cáncer pulmonar en México y ofrecer recomendaciones al respecto. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Mediante la conformación de un grupo multidisciplinario se analizó la carga de la enfermedad relativa al cáncer de pulmón y el acceso al tratamiento médico que ofrecen los diferentes subsistemas de salud en México. RESULTADOS: Se documentan desigualdades importantes en la atención del cáncer de pulmón entre los distintos subsistemas de salud que sugieren acceso y cobertura en salud variable, tanto a los tratamientos tradicionales como a las innovaciones terapéuticas existentes, y diferencias en la capacidad de los prestadores de servicios de salud para garantizar el derecho a la protección de la salud sin distinciones. CONCLUSIONES: Se hacen recomendaciones sobre la necesidad de mejorar las acciones para el control del tabaco, el diagnóstico temprano y la inclusión de terapias innovadoras y la homologación entre los diferentes prestadores públicos de servicios de salud a través del financiamiento con la recaudación de impuestos al tabaco.

[Performance based regulation: a strategy to increase breastfeeding rates]. / La regulación basada en desempeño: estrategia para incrementar las tasas de lactancia materna.

The decreasing breastfeeding rate in México is of public health concern. In this paper we discus an innovative regulatory approach -Performance Based Regulation- and its application to improve breastfeeding rates. This approach, forces industry to take responsibility for the lack of breastfeeding and its consequences. Failure to comply with this targets results in financial penalties. Applying performance based regulation as a strategy to improve breastfeeding is feasible because: the breastmilk substitutes market is an oligopoly, hence it is easy to identify the contribution of each market participant; the regulation's target population is clearly defined; it has a clear regulatory standard which can be easily evaluated, and sanctions to infringement can be defined under objective parameters. RECOMMENDATIONS: modify public policy, celebrate concertation agreements with the industry, create persuasive sanctions, strengthen enforcement activities and coordinate every action with the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes.

[Law and health in Mexico: proposals for an effective relationship]. / Derecho y salud en México: propuestas para una relación eficaz.

This article pursues three goals: to describe the obstacles that in Mexico faces the complete exigibility of the right to health, to present the main problems arising in what, generally speaking, could be referred to as "relations between law and health", and finally to offer some proposals in order to reach a working relation between the aforementioned disciplines.

Challenges in Priority Setting from a Legal Perspective in Brazil, Costa Rica, Chile, and Mexico.

Priority setting is the process through which a country's health system establishes the drugs, interventions, and treatments it will provide to its population. Our study evaluated the priority-setting legal instruments of Brazil, Costa Rica, Chile, and Mexico to determine the extent to which each reflected the following elements: transparency, relevance, review and revision, and oversight and supervision, according to Norman Daniels's accountability for reasonableness framework and Sarah Clark and Albert Wale's social values framework. The elements were analyzed to determine whether priority setting, as established in each country's legal instruments, is fair and justifiable. While all four countries fulfilled these elements to some degree, there was important variability in how they did so. This paper aims to help these countries analyze their priority-setting legal frameworks to determine which elements need to be improved to make priority setting fair and justifiable.

La judicialización del derecho a la protección de la salud desde la óptica de los actores clave / The judicialization of the right to health in México from the stakeholders' perspective

Resumen: Objetivo: Conocer la opinión de actores clave respecto del proceso de judicialización del derecho a la protección de la salud en México. Material y métodos: Se realizaron 30 entrevistas semiestructuradas a representantes de los poderes Judicial (PJ), Legislativo (PL), Sector Salud (SS), industria farmacéutica, academia y organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC) durante mayo de 2017 a agosto de 2018, en distintos lugares de la Ciudad de México. Se transcribieron las grabaciones y se analizó el contenido con base en categorías de interés. Resultados: Las posturas respecto al fenómeno de la judicialización del derecho a la salud son disímiles. Hay tensiones entre quienes ven su potencial efecto como agente de cambio del sector y quienes la perciben como una interferencia ilegítima del PJ. No existe una estrategia coordinada entre los sectores para promover un cambio en el SS. Conclusiones: Las posturas respecto al fenómeno de la judicialización en México son disímiles. Hay tensiones entre quienes ven su potencial efecto como agente de cambio del sector y quienes la perciben como una interferencia ilegítima del PJ en el SS. Otros argumentan que no existe una estrategia coordinada entre los sectores para promover un cambio en el SS. Todos coinciden en que la judicialización en México es una realidad.

Abstract: Objective: Understand what Mexican key stakeholders think about the judicialization of the right to health in Mexico. Materials and methods: 30 semi-structured interviews were conducted at different settings in Mexico City with representatives of the judiciary, legislative power, Health Sector (HS), pharmaceutical industry, academia and non-governmental organizations from May 2017 to August 2018. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed based on different categories of interest. Results: There are different opinions regarding judicialization of the right to health. Tensions exist between those who see its potential effect as a game changer for the HS and those who perceive it as an illegitimate interference of the judiciary. There is no coordinated strategy between sectors to promote change in the HS. Conclusions: There are different opinions regarding judicialization of the right to health in Mexico. There are tensions between those who see its potential effect as a game changer for the HS and those who perceive it as an illegitimate interference of the judiciary. Others argue that there is no coordinated strategy between sectors to promote change in the HS. All agree that judicialization in Mexico is a reality.

A process to establish nutritional guidelines to address obesity: Lessons from Mexico.

In 2010, the Mexican government implemented a multi-sector agreement to prevent obesity. In response, the Ministries of Health and Education launched a national school-based policy to increase physical activity, improve nutrition literacy, and regulate school food offerings through nutritional guidelines. We studied the Guidelines' negotiation and regulatory review process, including government collaboration and industry response. Within the government, conflicting positions were evident: the Ministries of Health and Education supported the Guidelines as an effective obesity-prevention strategy, while the Ministries of Economics and Agriculture viewed them as potentially damaging to the economy and job generation. The food and beverage industries opposed and delayed the process, arguing that regulation was costly, with negative impacts on jobs and revenues. The proposed Guidelines suffered revisions that lowered standards initially put forward. We documented the need to improve cross-agency cooperation to achieve effective policymaking. The 'siloed' government working style presented a barrier to efforts to resist industry's influence and strong lobbying. Our results are relevant to public health policymakers working in childhood obesity prevention.

Role of the Courts in the Progressive Realization of the Right to Health: Between the Threat and the Promise of Judicialization in Mexico.

Abstract-A moral right to health or health care, given reasonable resource constraints, implies a reasonable array of services, as determined by a fair deliberative process. Such a right can be embodied in a constitution where it becomes a legal right with similar entitlements. What is the role of the courts in deciding what these entitlements are? The threat of "judicialization" is that the courts may overreach their ability if they attempt to carry out this task; the promise of judicialization is that the courts can do better than health systems have done at determining such entitlements. We propose a middle ground that requires the health system to develop a fair, deliberative process for determining how to achieve the progressive realization of the same right to health or health care and that also requires the courts to develop the capacity to assess whether the deliberative process in the health system is fair.

Vacunación en México: coberturas imprecisas y deficiencia en el seguimiento de los niños que no completan el esquema / Vaccination in Mexico: imprecise coverages and deficiency in the follow-up of children with incomplete immunization

Resumen: Objetivo: Analizar la veracidad de las cifras oficiales de acuerdo con la información disponible e identificar oportunidades de mejora. Material y métodos: Estimamos las coberturas de vacunación y tasas de deserción (para las vacunas administradas en multidosis) del esquema básico para niños menores de un año de edad, con base en la información de cubos dinámicos de la Secretaría de Salud de 2015 a 2017. Resultados: Observamos variaciones en los reportes mensuales de vacunación que indican bajas tasas de vacunación, así como índices altos de deserción al comparar primeras y terceras dosis aplicadas. La cobertura nacional de esquema completo se estimó en 48.9 por ciento. Conclusión: No se cuenta con información confiable que permita estimar las coberturas reales de vacunación. En los reportes oficiales hay una constante sobrestimación de las coberturas que ha creado a una "falsa sensación de seguridad". Esto se ha constituido en una barrera que impide el análisis crítico del Programa Universal de Vacunación.

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the validity of the official vaccination figures according to the available information and to identify opportunities for improvement. Materials and methods: We estimated vaccination coverage and dropout rates (for multi-dose vaccines) for one-year-old children, based on public information from the dynamic cubes of the Ministry of Health, for the years 2015 to 2017. Results: We observed variations in the vaccination monthly reports, which indicate low rates of vaccination, as well as high dropout rates when comparing first and third doses applied. For children 1 year of age, the national complete coverage was estimated at 48.9%. Conclusion: There is no reliable information to estimate the actual vaccination coverage. Government documents report a constant overestimation of vaccination coverage that creates a "false sense of security". This has become a barrier for the critical analysis of the Universal Vaccination Program.

Necesidades de cobertura y atención del cáncer pulmonar en México / Needs in coverage and care for lung cancer in Mexico

Resumen: Objetivo: Analizar la cobertura en salud de cáncer pulmonar en México y ofrecer recomendaciones al respecto. Material y métodos: Mediante la conformación de un grupo multidisciplinario se analizó la carga de la enfermedad relativa al cáncer de pulmón y el acceso al tratamiento médico que ofrecen los diferentes subsistemas de salud en México. Resultados: Se documentan desigualdades importantes en la atención del cáncer de pulmón entre los distintos subsistemas de salud que sugieren acceso y cobertura en salud variable, tanto a los tratamientos tradicionales como a las innovaciones terapéuticas existentes, y diferencias en la capacidad de los prestadores de servicios de salud para garantizar el derecho a la protección de la salud sin distinciones. Conclusión: Se hacen recomendaciones sobre la necesidad de mejorar las acciones para el control del tabaco, el diagnóstico temprano y la inclusión de terapias innovadoras y la homologación entre los diferentes prestadores públicos de servicios de salud a través del financiamiento con la recaudación de impuestos al tabaco.

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the coverage of lung cancer in Mexico and offer recommendations in this regard. Materials and methods: By means of the conformation of a multidisciplinary group, we analyze the burden of the disease relative to the lung cancer and the access to the medical treatment offered by the different public health subsystems in Mexico. Results: Important inequalities in lung cancer care are documented among the different public health subsystems. Our data suggest differential access and coverage to both traditional treatments and existing therapeutic innovations and differences in the capacity of health service providers to guarantee the right to health protection without distinction. Conclusions: Recommendations are made on the need to improve actions for tobacco control, early diagnosis for lung cancer and inclusion of innovative therapies and homologation among different public health service providers through financing via tobacco taxes.

La regulación basada en desempeño: estrategia para incrementar las tasas de lactancia materna / Performance based regulation: a strategy to increase breastfeeding rates

Resumen: La disminución de la tasa de lactancia materna en México es un problema de salud pública. En este artículo discutimos un enfoque regulatorio -Regulación Basada en Desempeño- y su aplicación para mejorar las tasas de lactancia materna. Este enfoque obliga a la industria a asumir su responsabilidad por la falta de lactancia materna y sus consecuencias. Se considera una estrategia factible de ser aplicada al caso, ya que el mercado de sucedáneos tiene una estructura oligopólica, donde es relativamente fácil fijar la contribución de cada participante del mercado en el problema; incide en un grupo poblacional definido; tiene un objetivo regulatorio que puede ser fácilmente evaluado, y se pueden definir las sanciones bajo criterios objetivos. Para su aplicación se recomienda: modificar la política pública, crear convenios de concertación con la industria, establecer sanciones disuasorias, fortalecer los mecanismos de supervisión y alinear lo anterior al Código Internacional de Comercialización de Sucedáneos.

Abstract: The decreasing breastfeeding rate in México is of public health concern. In this paper we discus an innovative regulatory approach -Performance Based Regulation- and its application to improve breastfeeding rates. This approach, forces industry to take responsibility for the lack of breastfeeding and its consequences. Failure to comply with this targets results in financial penalties. Applying performance based regulation as a strategy to improve breastfeeding is feasible because: the breastmilk substitutes market is an oligopoly, hence it is easy to identify the contribution of each market participant; the regulation's target population is clearly defined; it has a clear regulatory standard which can be easily evaluated, and sanctions to infringement can be defined under objective parameters. Recommendations: modify public policy, celebrate concertation agreements with the industry, create persuasive sanctions, strengthen enforcement activities and coordinate every action with the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes.