ABSTRACT
Cardiac sarcoidosis is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy that results from granulomatous inflammation of the myocardium and may present with high-grade conduction disease, ventricular arrhythmias, and right or left ventricular dysfunction. Over the past several decades, the prevalence of cardiac sarcoidosis has increased. Definitive histological confirmation is often not possible, so clinicians frequently face uncertainty about the accuracy of diagnosis. Hence, the likelihood of cardiac sarcoidosis should be thought of as a continuum (definite, highly probable, probable, possible, low probability, unlikely) rather than in a binary fashion. Treatment should be initiated in individuals with clinical manifestations and active inflammation in a tiered approach, with corticosteroids as first-line treatment. The lack of randomized clinical trials in cardiac sarcoidosis has led to treatment decisions based on cohort studies and consensus opinions, with substantial variation observed across centers. This scientific statement is intended to guide clinical practice and to facilitate management conformity by providing a framework for the diagnosis and management of cardiac sarcoidosis.
Subject(s)
American Heart Association , Cardiomyopathies , Sarcoidosis , Humans , Sarcoidosis/therapy , Sarcoidosis/diagnosis , Cardiomyopathies/therapy , Cardiomyopathies/diagnosis , United States/epidemiology , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Disease ManagementABSTRACT
There is waning interest among cardiology trainees in pursuing an Advanced Heart Failure/Transplant Cardiology (AHFTC) fellowship as evidenced by fewer applicants in the National Resident Matching Program match to this specialty. This trend has generated considerable attention across the heart failure community. In response, the Heart Failure Society of America convened the AHFTC Fellowship Task Force with a charge to develop strategies to increase the value proposition of an AHFTC fellowship. Subsequently, the HFSA sponsored the AHFTC Fellowship Consensus Conference April 26-27, 2023. Before the conference, interviews of 44 expert stakeholders diverse across geography, site of practice (traditional academic medical center or other centers), specialty/area of expertise, sex, and stage of career were conducted virtually. Based on these interviews, potential solutions to address the declining interest in AHFTC fellowship were categorized into five themes: (1) alternative training pathways, (2) regulatory and compensation, (3) educational improvements, (4) exposure and marketing for pipeline development, and (5) quality of life and mental health. These themes provided structure to the deliberations of the AHFTC Fellowship Consensus Conference. The recommendations from the Consensus Conference were subsequently presented to the HFSA Board of Directors to inform strategic plans and interventions. The HFSA Board of Directors later reviewed and approved submission of this document. The purpose of this communication is to provide the HF community with an update summarizing the processes used and concepts that emerged from the work of the HFSA AHFTC Fellowship Task Force and Consensus Conference.
Subject(s)
Cardiology , Heart Failure , Humans , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/surgery , Fellowships and Scholarships , Quality of Life , ConsensusABSTRACT
Importance: Individual cohort studies concur that the amyloidogenic V142I variant of the transthyretin (TTR) gene, present in 3% to 4% of US Black individuals, increases heart failure (HF) and mortality risk. Precisely defining carrier risk across relevant clinical outcomes and estimating population burden of disease are important given established and emerging targeted treatments. Objectives: To better define the natural history of disease in carriers across mid to late life, assess variant modifiers, and estimate cardiovascular burden to the US population. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 23â¯338 self-reported Black participants initially free from HF were included in 4 large observational studies across the US (mean [SD], 15.5 [8.2] years of follow-up). Data analysis was performed between May 2023 and February 2024. Exposure: V142I carrier status (n = 754, 3.2%). Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitalizations for HF (including subtypes of reduced and preserved ejection fraction) and all-cause mortality. Outcomes were analyzed by generating 10-year hazard ratios for each age between 50 and 90 years. Using actuarial methods, mean survival by carrier status was estimated and applied to the 2022 US population using US Census data. Results: Among the 23â¯338 participants, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 62 (9) years and 76.7% were women. Ten-year carrier risk increased for HF hospitalization by age 63 years, predominantly driven by HF with reduced ejection fraction, and 10-year all-cause mortality risk increased by age 72 years. Only age (but not sex or other select variables) modified risk with the variant, with estimated reductions in longevity ranging from 1.9 years (95% CI, 0.6-3.1) at age 50 to 2.8 years (95% CI, 2.0-3.6) at age 81. Based on these data, 435â¯851 estimated US Black carriers between ages 50 and 95 years are projected to cumulatively lose 957â¯505 years of life (95% CI, 534â¯475-1â¯380â¯535) due to the variant. Conclusions and Relevance: Among self-reported Black individuals, male and female V142I carriers faced similar and substantial risk for HF hospitalization, predominantly with reduced ejection fraction, and death, with steep age-dependent penetrance. Delineating the individual contributions of, and complex interplay among, the V142I variant, ancestry, the social construct of race, and biological or social determinants of health to cardiovascular disease merits further investigation.
Subject(s)
Amyloidosis , Black or African American , Cardiomyopathies , Heart Failure , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Amyloidosis/ethnology , Amyloidosis/genetics , Black or African American/genetics , Cardiomyopathies/ethnology , Cardiomyopathies/genetics , Disease Progression , Heart Failure/ethnology , Heart Failure/genetics , Heart Failure/mortality , Heterozygote , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Prealbumin/genetics , Stroke Volume , United States/epidemiology , Cost of IllnessABSTRACT
With the advent of novel cancer therapeutics and improved screening, more patients are surviving a cancer diagnosis or living longer with advanced disease. Many of these treatments have associated cardiovascular toxicities that can manifest in both an acute and a delayed fashion. Arrhythmias are an increasingly identified complication with unique management challenges in the cancer population. The purpose of this scientific statement is to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding arrhythmia identification and treatment in patients with cancer. Atrial tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, are most common, but ventricular arrhythmias, including those related to treatment-induced QT prolongation, and bradyarrhythmias can also occur. Despite increased recognition, dedicated prospective studies evaluating true incidence are lacking. Moreover, few studies have addressed appropriate prevention and treatment strategies. As such, this scientific statement serves to mobilize the cardio-oncology, electrophysiology, and oncology communities to develop clinical and scientific collaborations that will improve the care of patients with cancer who have arrhythmias.
Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/complications , Neoplasms/complications , Algorithms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Cardiotoxicity/diagnosis , Cardiotoxicity/etiology , Cardiotoxicity/prevention & control , Cardiotoxicity/therapy , Clinical Decision-Making , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Management , Disease Susceptibility , Electrocardiography , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Signal Transduction , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/prevention & controlABSTRACT
PURPOSE: While clinical heart failure (HF) is recognized as an adverse effect from breast cancer (BC) treatment, sparse data exist on specific HF phenotypes in affected BC survivors. We examined risk of HF by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) status in women with a history of BC. METHODS: 14,804 women diagnosed with all stages of invasive BC from 2005 to 2013 and with no history of HF were matched 1:5 to 74,034 women without BC on birth year, race, and ethnicity. LVEF values were extracted from echocardiography studies within 30 days before through 90 days after the HF clinical encounter. HF was stratified into HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, LVEF ≥ 45%) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF < 45%). Cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) were estimated with competing risk of overall death. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Mean time to HF diagnosis was 5.31 years (range 0.03-13.03) in cases and 5.25 years (range 0.01-12.94) in controls. 10-year CIRs were 1.2% and 0.9% for overall HF, 0.8% and 0.7% for HFpEF, and 0.4% and 0.2% for HFrEF in cases and controls, respectively. In fully adjusted models, an overall significant increased risk of HF in cases versus controls was observed (HR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.14, 1.51). The increased risk was seen for both HFrEF (HR: 1.59, 95% CI 1.22, 2.08) and HFpEF (HR: 1.22; 95% CI 1.03, 1.45). CONCLUSION: BC survivors experienced higher risk of HF compared with women without BC, and the risk persisted across LVEF phenotypes. Systematic cardio-oncology surveillance should be considered to mitigate this risk in BC patients.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Heart Failure , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/etiology , Humans , Prognosis , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
We aim to determine the cumulative and comparative risk of cardiovascular events associated with different Immunomodulatory Drugs (iMiDs) and Proteasome Inhibitor (PIs) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients through pairwise and network meta-analysis. Electronic searches were conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Clinical Trial Registry (Clinical Trials.gov) up to May 2021. Phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting cardiotoxicity in MM patients (newly diagnoses and/or relapsed) treated with iMiD and/or PI. Studies, where iMiD or PI was used alongside the chemotherapy versus placebo or no additional drugs (control) in the other arm were included. The primary outcome was the presence of cardiotoxicity after follow-up. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed using the frequentist's approach to estimate the odds ratio (OR). Twenty RCTs with 10,373 MM patients were included in this analysis. Eleven studies compared iMiDs with control, seven studies compared PIs with control, and two studies compared bortezomib against carfilzomib. CTACE high-grade (≥grade 3) cardiotoxic events were increased with iMiDs compared to their control counterpart (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.30-3.26). Similar high-grade cardiotoxicity was also noted more frequently with PI use when compared to the control group (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.17-2.40). Among the PIs, carfilzomib was associated with a maximum risk of cardiotoxicity (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.63-4.40). There was no evidence of publication bias among studies. iMiDs and PIs, particularly carfilzomib, appear to be associated with increased risk of high-grade cardiovascular events in MM patients.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Proteasome Inhibitors , Cardiotoxicity/drug therapy , Cardiotoxicity/etiology , Humans , Immunomodulating Agents , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Network Meta-Analysis , Proteasome Inhibitors/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Cardiometabolic disease (CMD) is the most common preventable cause of death in the world. A number of components are included in the spectrum of CMD, such as metabolic syndrome/obesity, hyperglycemia/diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, which are independently associated with cardiovascular disease risk. These conditions often occur together, and patients with cancer frequently undergo treatments that can generate or worsen CMD. This review highlights and presents mechanistic and epidemiological evidence regarding CMD in 4 categories of anticancer medications, namely, mTOR/PI3K-Akt inhibitors, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and endocrine therapy. Patients taking these medications need careful monitoring during therapy. There is a role for cardio-oncology and onco-primary care specialists in optimally managing patients at risk to mitigate CMD during treatment with these and other investigational anticancer medications.
Subject(s)
Hypertension , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt , TOR Serine-Threonine KinasesABSTRACT
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in cancer survivors, after recurrence of the primary tumor or occurrence of a secondary malignancy. Consequently, the interdisciplinary field of cardio-oncology has grown rapidly in recent years to address the cardiovascular care needs of this unique population through clinical care and research initiatives. Here, the authors discuss the ideal infrastructure for training and career development in cardio-oncology translational and implementation science and emphasize the importance of the multidisciplinary cardiovascular team for both research and patient care. Cardio-oncology training opportunities in general cardiology, hematology/oncology, and specialized cardio-oncology clinical and research fellowships are also considered.
Subject(s)
Cardiology , Cardiovascular Diseases , Neoplasms , Cardiology/education , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Implementation Science , Medical Oncology/education , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
Malignancy has historically prohibited solid organ transplant; however, patients with effectively treated, favorable-risk cancers should not necessarily be eliminated as transplant candidates. These cases require careful review by a multidisciplinary team. Here, we report the case of a woman with end-stage heart failure undergoing heart transplant evaluation during the COVID pandemic who was found to have early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Given her favorable cancer-related prognosis, a multidisciplinary committee recommended lumpectomy, accelerated partial breast irradiation, and adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for definitive treatment to allow for consideration of orthotopic heart transplant.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/complications , COVID-19/complications , Cardiomyopathies/complications , Heart Failure/complications , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Heart Transplantation , Humans , Middle Aged , PandemicsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the patient characteristics and the reason for admission of patients with malignancy by malignancy, and to study mortality rates for the different causes of admissions among the different types of cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the nationwide Inpatient Sampling (2015-2017) we examined the cause of admission and associated in-hospital mortality, stratified by presence and type of malignancy. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between in-hospital mortality and malignancy sites for different primary admission causes. RESULTS: Out of 67 819 693 inpatient admissions, 8.8% had malignancy. Amongst those with malignancy, haematological malignancy was the most common (20.2%). The most common cause of admission amongst all cancers were malignancy-related admissions, where up to 57% of all colorectal admissions were malignancy-related. The most common non-malignancy cause of admission was infectious causes, which were most frequent among patients with haematological malignancy (18.4%). Patients with malignancy had higher crude mortality rates (5.7% vs 1.9%). Mortality rates were highest among patients with lung cancer (8.7%). Among all admissions, the adjusted rates of mortality were higher for patients with lung (OR 3.65, 95% CI [3.59-3.71]), breast (OR 2.06, 95% CI [1.99-2.13]), haematological (OR 1.79, 95% CI [1.76-1.82]) and colorectal (OR 1.71, 95% CI [1.66-1.76]) malignancies compared with patients with no malignancy. CONCLUSION: Our work highlights the need to consider the burden of cancer on our hospital services and consider how the prognostic impact of different types of admissions may relate to the type of cancer diagnosis and understand whether these differences relate to disparities in clinical care/treatments.
Subject(s)
Inpatients , Lung Neoplasms , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Logistic Models , Patient AdmissionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cancer is the second most common cause of death globally after cardiovascular disease, and cancer patients are at an increased risk of CV death. This recognition has led to publication of cardio-oncological guidelines and to the widespread adoption of dedicated cardio-oncology services in many institutes. However, it is unclear whether there has been a change in the incidence of CV death in cancer patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging, Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) Multiple Cause of Death dataset, we determined national trends in age-standardised mortality rates attributed to cardiovascular diseases in patients with and without cancer, from 1999 to 2019, stratified by cancer type, age, gender, race, and place of residence (state and urbanisation status). Among more than 17.8 million cardiovascular deaths in the United States, 13.6% were patients with a concomitant cancer diagnosis. During the study period, among patients with cancer, the age-adjusted mortality rate dropped by 52% (vs 38% in patients with no cancer). In cancer patients, age-adjusted mortality rate dropped more significantly among patients with gastrointestinal, breast, and prostate malignancy than among patients with haematological malignancy (59%-63% vs. 41%). Similar reduction was observed in both genders (53%-54%), but more prominent reduction was observed in older patients and in those living in metro areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasise the role of multidisciplinary management of cancer patients. Widespread adoption of cardio oncology services have the potential to impact the inherent risk of increased CV mortality in both cancer patients and survivors.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Neoplasms , Aged , Cause of Death , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mortality , Survivors , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and history of heart failure (HF) are at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. We explored the effects of rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in these patients. METHODS: The COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) randomized 27 395 participants with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily alone, or aspirin 100 mg alone. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF or left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <30% were excluded. The primary major adverse cardiovascular events outcome comprised cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding using modified International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Investigators recorded a history of HF and EF at baseline, if available. We examined the effects of rivaroxaban on major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding in patients with or without a history of HF and an EF <40% or ≥40% at baseline. RESULTS: Of the 5902 participants (22%) with a history of HF, 4971 (84%) had EF recorded at baseline, and 12% had EF <40%. Rivaroxaban and aspirin had similar relative reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared with aspirin in participants with HF (5.5% versus 7.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86) and those without HF (3.8% versus 4.7%; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93; P for interaction 0.28) but larger absolute risk reduction in those with HF (HF absolute risk reduction 2.4%, number needed to treat=42; no HF absolute risk reduction 1.0%, number needed to treat=103). The primary major adverse cardiovascular events outcome was not statistically different between those with EF <40% (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.55-1.42) and ≥40% (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98; P for interaction 0.36). The excess hazard for major bleeding was not different in participants with HF (2.5% versus 1.8%; HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.88-2.09) than in those without HF (3.3% versus 1.9%; HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.45-2.21; P for interaction 0.26). There were no significant differences in the primary outcomes with rivaroxaban alone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and a history of mild or moderate HF, combination rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone produces similar relative but larger absolute benefits than in those without HF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01776424.
Subject(s)
Aspirin/administration & dosage , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Aged , Chronic Disease , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trials have evaluated angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEis), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta blockers (BBs) in relation to cardiotoxicity in patients with cancer, typically defined by ejection fraction declines. However, these trials have not examined long-term, hard clinical endpoints. Within a prospective study, we examined the risk of heart failure (HF) and coronary heart disease (CHD) events in relation to use of commonly used antihypertensive medications, including ACEis/ARBs, BBs, calcium channel blockers (CCB), and diuretics, comparing women with and without cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cohort of 56,997 Women's Health Initiative study participants free of cardiovascular disease who received antihypertensive treatment, we used multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) of developing CHD, HF, and a composite outcome of cardiac events (combining CHD and HF) in relation to use of ACEis/ARBs, CCBs, or diuretics versus BBs, separately in women with and without cancer. RESULTS: Whereas there was no difference in risk of cardiac events comparing ACEi/ARB with BB use among cancer-free women (HR = 0.99 [0.88-1.12]), among cancer survivors ACEi/ARB users were at a 2.24-fold risk of total cardiac events (1.18-4.24); p-interaction = .06). When investigated in relation to CHD only, an increased risk was similarly observed in ACEi/ARB versus BB use for cancer survivors (HR = 1.87 [0.88-3.95]) but not in cancer-free women (HR = 0.91 [0.79-1.06]; p-interaction = .04). A similar pattern was also seen in relation to HF but did not reach statistical significance (p-interaction = .23). CONCLUSION: These results from this observational study suggest differing risks of cardiac events in relation to antihypertensive medications depending on history of cancer. Although these results require replication before becoming actionable in a clinical setting, they suggest the need for more rigorous examination of the effect of antihypertensive choice on long-term cardiac outcomes in cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although additional research is needed to replicate these findings, these data from a large, nationally representative sample of postmenopausal women indicate that beta blockers are favorable to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in reducing the risk of cardiac events among cancer survivors. This differs from the patterns observed in a noncancer cohort, which largely mirrors what is found in the randomized clinical trials in the general population.
Subject(s)
Hypertension , Neoplasms , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Women's HealthABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cancer and cardiovascular disease are the leading causes of mortality in the USA. In this review, we highlight these shared disease pathways and provide a framework for a systems-based approach to reduce overall risk burden. RECENT FINDINGS: From traditional risk factors such as age and tobacco use to more recently recognized entities including clonal hematopoiesis, we are gaining insights into shared mechanisms. Because of these overlapping risks, providers on each level of patient care (primary care providers, cardiologists, oncologists) need to recognize and reduce these underlying risk factors. There is significant overlap in the epidemiology and risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease and cancer, providing opportunities for joint risk factor modification.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Cardiotoxicity/prevention & control , Humans , Physician's Role , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction BehaviorABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The timing of transplant listing after implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remains uncertain, given high device complication rates and apparent stability of some LVAD-supported patients. This investigation quantifies the effect of delayed transplant listing and transplantation rates on medium-term survival and LVAD complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: A Markov model was used to simulate the effects of delaying initial transplant listing after LVAD implantation. Modeled parameters were derived from the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file. When transplant listing was delayed and 5-year results were examined, fewer persons underwent transplantation (53% in base model vs 51% in 180-day-delay model) and the fraction of deaths while waiting increased (17% in base model vs 21% in 180-day delay model). Life expectancy changed minimally from the base model (3.50 y) when initial listing was delayed by 180 days (3.51 y). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying initial transplant listing increased the likelihood of death while waiting for a transplant and decreased the likelihood of transplantation. In aggregate, life expectancy was unchanged by delays in listing. This study suggests that delaying transplant listing with the expectation of providing additional life expectancy is not likely with current LVAD technology.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices , Time-to-Treatment/trends , Waiting Lists/mortality , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Outcomes of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients after heart transplantation have not been well studied. Diagnostic criteria were established in 1994 and subsequently revised in 2010. We sought to better characterize this population in a national cohort. METHODS: A total of 35,138 heart transplant-only recipients were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Thoracic Registry (1994-2011); 73 had ARVC. The non-ARVC group included ischemic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and other. Survival was censored at 12 years. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was adjusted for age, sex, DM, race, ischemia time, dialysis, life support, wait time, and HLA mismatch. RESULTS: There were 73 ARVC and 35,065 non-ARVC patients. The ARVC cohort was associated with less ventricular assist device use (P = .001) and significantly decreased pulmonary arterial and capillary wedge pressures (P < .001). Survivals at 1, 5, and 10 years were, respectively, ARVC 87%, 81%, and 77%, and non-ARVC 87%, 72%, and 53% (log rank P = .07). The ARVC unadjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-1.04; P = .073). Multivariate analysis yielded a hazard ratio of 0.68 (95% CI 0.35-1.30; P = .25). ARVC survival was similar to restrictive, hypertrophic, and dilated cardiomyopathies and significantly better than ischemic cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported series of ARVC after heart transplantation, of which 11% were pediatric. Survival was similar to the non-ARVC cohort, with improved survival over ischemic and restrictive etiologies.
Subject(s)
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/mortality , Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/surgery , Cause of Death , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Heart Transplantation/methods , Registries , Adult , Age Factors , Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Proportional Hazards Models , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , United StatesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Mechanical circulatory support for heart failure, including the Total Artificial Heart (TAH, Syncardia, Tucson, AZ, USA) has increased in recent years. This report describes bleeding complications associated with the device. METHODS: A single institution prospectively maintained quality improvement database was reviewed encompassing the first year of clinical experience with the TAH. Patients who underwent TAH implantation were identified, and a review of complications and outcomes was undertaken. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent TAH implant. Four patients experienced delayed postoperative bleeding. In three patients the manifestation of bleeding was tamponade and evidenced by TAH decreased cardiac output. In two patients, at postoperative days 31 and 137, there was a partial disruption of the aortic anastomosis along the outer curvature with pseudoaneurysm formation. Both were repaired by primary suture closure, without use of cardiopulmonary bypass. There was no mortality attributable to bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: TAH patients are at risk for delayed postoperative bleeding, often manifest as an acute decrease in cardiac output. Due to pulsatility and high dP/dT, bleeding from the aortic anastomosis should be considered in the differential of a patient with low flow and/or tamponade.
Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart, Artificial/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Cardiac Output, Low , Cardiac Tamponade , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies on outcomes among patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF), borderline left ventricular ejection fraction (HFbEF), and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) remain limited. We sought to characterize mortality and readmission in patients with HF in the contemporary era. METHODS: Get With The Guidelines-HF was linked to Medicare data for longitudinal follow-up. Patients were grouped into HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [EF] ≥ 50%), HFbEF (40% ≤ EF < 50%), and HFrEF (EF < 40%). Multivariable models were constructed to examine the relationship between EF and outcomes at 30 days and 1 year and to study trends over time. RESULTS: A total of 40,239 patients from 220 hospitals between 2005 and 2011 were included in the study: 18,897 (47%) had HFpEF, 5,626 (14%) had HFbEF, and 15,716 (39%) had HFrEF. In crude survival analysis, patients with HFrEF had slightly increased mortality compared with HFbEF and HFpEF. After risk adjustment, mortality at 1 year was not significantly different for HFrEF, HFbEF, and HFpEF (HFrEF vs HFpEF, hazard ratio [HR] 1.040 [95% CI 0.998-1.084], and HFbEF vs HFpEF, HR 0.967 [95% CI 0.917-1.020]). Patients with HFpEF had increased risk of all-cause readmission compared with HFrEF. Conversely, risk of cardiovascular and HF readmissions were higher in HFrEF and HFbEF compared with HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with HF, patients with HFpEF and HFbEF had slightly lower mortality and higher all-cause readmission risk than patients with HFrEF, although the mortality differences did not persist after risk adjustment. Irrespective of EF, these patients experience substantial mortality and readmission highlighting the need for new therapeutic strategies.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure/physiopathology , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Male , Medicare , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , United States , Ventricular Dysfunction/mortalityABSTRACT
Our insights into different system levels of mechanisms by left ventricular assist device support are increasing and suggest a complex regulatory system of overlapping biological processes. To develop novel decision-making strategies and patient selection criteria, heart failure and reverse cardiac remodeling should be conceptualized and explored by a multifaceted research strategy of transcriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, molecular biology, and bioinformatics. Knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of reverse cardiac remodeling is in its early stages, and comprehensive reconstruction of the underlying networks is necessary.