Comparison of Two Intracranial Pressure Calculation Methods and Their Effects on the Mean Intracranial Pressure and Intracranial Pressure Dose.

This study compared two methods of calculating the intracranial pressure (ICP) in a patient: end-hour ICP and hour-averaged ICP. A total of 1060 patients with traumatic brain injury and a known clinical outcome were studied. For each patient, the end-hour ICP and hour-averaged ICP were calculated. The mean ICP and the ICP dose above 20 mmHg were evaluated using both calculation methods. The results for patients who survived and those who died were compared using a Student's t test. The average correlation between the end-hour and hour-averaged mean ICP was 0.747, indicating that the end-hour ICP method agrees moderately with the hour-averaged method. However, the comparison between surviving and dead patients did not present significant differences between ICP values averaged with these two different methods. The Student's t test gave similar results for both the mean ICP and ICP dose. The results suggest that the end-hour and hour-averaged methods have similar predictive power for patients' clinical outcome.

Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Assessed with a Multi-Window Weighted Approach Adapted for Prospective Use: A Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Pressure reactivity index (PRx)-cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) relationships over a given time period can be used to detect a value of CPP at which PRx shows the best autoregulation (optimal CPP, or CPPopt). Algorithms for continuous assessment of CPPopt in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients reached the desired high yield with a multi-window approach (CPPopt_MA). However, the calculations were tested on retrospective manually cleaned datasets. Moreover, CPPopt false-positive values can be generated from non-physiological variations of intracranial pressure (ICP) and arterial blood pressure (ABP). Therefore, the algorithm robustness was improved, making it suitable for prospective bedside application (COGiTATE trial). OBJECTIVE: To validate the CPPopt revised algorithm in a large single-centre retrospective cohort of TBI patients. METHODS: 840 TBI patients were included. CPPopt yield, stability and ability to discriminate outcome groups were compared to CPPopt_MA and the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guideline reference. RESULTS: CPPopt yield was lower than CPPopt_MA yield (85% and 90%, p < 0.001), but, importantly, with increased stability (p < 0.0001). The ∆(CPP-CPPopt) could distinguish the mortality and survival outcome (t = -6.7, p < 0.0001) with a statistical significance higher than the ∆CPP calculated with the guideline reference (CPP-60) (t = -4.5, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study validates, on a large cohort of patients, the new algorithm proposed for prospective use of CPPopt as a CPP target at bedside.

Mathematical modelling of cerebral haemodynamics and their effects on ICP.

Introduction: Electrical-equivalence mathematical models that integrate vascular and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments perform well in simulations of dynamic cerebrovascular variations and their transient effects on intracranial pressure (ICP). However, ICP changes due to sustained vascular diameter changes have not been comprehensively examined. We hypothesise that changes in cerebrovascular resistance (CVR) alter the resistance of the bulk flow of interstitial fluid (ISF). Research question: We hypothesise that changes in CVR alter the resistance of the bulk flow of ISF, thus allowing simulations of ICP in response to sustained vascular diameter changes. Material and methods: A lumped parameter model with vascular and CSF compartments was constructed and converted into an electrical analogue. The flow and pressure responses to transient hyperaemic response test (THRT) and CSF infusion test (IT) were observed. Arterial blood pressure (ABP) was manipulated to simulate ICP plateau waves. The experiments were repeated with a modified model that included the ISF compartment. Results: Simulations of the THRT produced identical cerebral blood flow (CBF) responses. ICP generated by the new model reacted in a similar manner as the original model during ITs. Plateau pressure reached during ITs was however higher in the ISF model. Only the latter was successful in simulating the onset of ICP plateau waves in response to selective blood pressure manipulations. Discussion and conclusion: Our simulations highlighted the importance of including the ISF compartment, which provides mechanism explaining sustained haemodynamic influences on ICP. Consideration of such interactions enables accurate simulations of the cerebrovascular effects on ICP.

Exploration of uncertainty of PRx time trends.

Introduction: PRx can be used as surrogate measure of Cerebral Autoregulation (CA) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. PRx can provide means for individualising cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets, such as CPPopt. However, a recent Delphi consensus of clinicians concluded that consensus could not be reached on the accuracy, reliability, and validation of any current CA assessment method. Research question: We aimed to quantify the short-term uncertainty of PRx time-trends and to relate this to other physiological measurements. Material and methods: Intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial blood pressure (ABP), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) high-resolution recordings of 911 TBI patients were processed with ICM + software. Hourly values of metrics that describe the variability within modalities derived from ABP, ICP and EtCO2, were calculated for the first 24h of neuromonitoring. Generalized additive models were used to describe the time trend of the variability in PRx. Linear correlations were studied for describing the relationship between PRx variability and the other physiological modalities. Results: The time profile of variability of PRx decreases over the first 12h and was higher for average PRx ∼0. Increased variability of PRx was not linearly linked with average ABP, ICP, or CPP. For coherence between slow waves of ABP and ICP >0.7, the variability in PRx decreased (R = -0.47, p < 0.001). Discussion and conclusion: PRx is a highly variable parameter. PRx short-term dispersion was not related to average ICP, ABP or CPP. The determinants of uncertainty of PRx should be investigated to improve reliability of individualised CA assessment in TBI patients.

Reliability and variability of pressure reactivity index (prx) during oscillatory pattern in arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injured patients.

Introduction: Pressure reactivity index (PRx) is used for continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, PRx has a noisy character. Oscillations in arterial blood pressure (ABP) introduced by cyclic positive end-expiratory pressure adjustment, can make PRx more reliable. However, if oscillations are introduced by the cycling process of an anti-decubitus-mattress the effect on PRx is confounding, as they affect directly also intracranial pressure (ICP). In our routine monitoring in TBI patients we noticed periods of highly regular, slow, spontaneous oscillations in ABP and ICP signals. Research question: We set out to explore the nature of these oscillations and establish if PRx remains reliable during the oscillations. Materials and methods: 10 TBI patients' recordings with oscillations in ICP and ABP were analysed. We computed PRx, PRx variability (hourly-average of standard-deviation, SD), phase-shift and coherence between ABP and ICP in the slow frequency range. Metrics were compared between oscillation and peri-oscillation periods. Results: During oscillations (frequency 0.006 ± 0.002Hz), a significantly lower variability of PRx (SD 0.185vs0.242) and higher coherence ABP-ICP (0.618 ± 0.09 vs 0.534 ± 0.09) were observed. No external oscillations sources could be identified. 34 out of 48 events showed signs of 'active' transmission associated with negative PRx, indicating a potential positive impact on PRx reliability. Discussion and conclusions: Spontaneous oscillations observed in ABP and ICP signals were found to enhance rather than confound PRx reliability. Further research is warranted to elucidate the nature of these oscillations and develop strategies to leverage them for enhancing PRx reliability in TBI monitoring.

Embracing uncertainty in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics: A Bayesian approach to analysing infusion studies.

Introduction: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) infusion test analysis allows recognizing and appropriately evaluating CSF dynamics in the context of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), which is crucial for effective diagnosis and treatment. However, existing methodology possesses drawbacks that may compromise the precision and interpretation of CSF dynamics parameters. Research question: This study aims to circumvent these constraints by introducing an innovative analysis method grounded in Bayesian inference. Material and methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted on 858 patients who underwent a computerized CSF infusion test between 2004 and 2020. We developed a Bayesian framework-based method for parameter estimation and compared the results to the current, gradient descent-based approach. We evaluated the accuracy and reliability of both methods by analysing erroneous prediction rates and curve fitting errors. Results: The Bayesian method surpasses the gradient descent approach, reflected in reduced inaccurate prediction rates and an improved goodness of model fit. On whole cohort level both techniques produced comparable results. However, the Bayesian method holds an added advantage by providing uncertainty intervals for each parameter. Sensitivity analysis revealed significance of the CSF production rate parameter and its interplay with other variables. The resistance to CSF outflow demonstrated excellent robustness. Discussion and conclusion: The proposed Bayesian approach offers a promising solution for improving robustness of CSF dynamics assessment in NPH, based on CSF infusion tests. Additional provision of the uncertainty measure for each diagnostic metric may perhaps help to explain occasional poor diagnostic performance of the test, offering a robust framework for improved understanding and management of NPH.

An iPSC model of hereditary sensory neuropathy-1 reveals L-serine-responsive deficits in neuronal ganglioside composition and axoglial interactions.

Hereditary sensory neuropathy type 1 (HSN1) is caused by mutations in the SPTLC1 or SPTLC2 sub-units of the enzyme serine palmitoyltransferase, resulting in the production of toxic 1-deoxysphingolipid bases (DSBs). We used induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from patients with HSN1 to determine whether endogenous DSBs are neurotoxic, patho-mechanisms of toxicity and response to therapy. HSN1 iPSC-derived sensory neurons (iPSCdSNs) endogenously produce neurotoxic DSBs. Complex gangliosides, which are essential for membrane micro-domains and signaling, are reduced, and neurotrophin signaling is impaired, resulting in reduced neurite outgrowth. In HSN1 myelinating cocultures, we find a major disruption of nodal complex proteins after 8 weeks, which leads to complete myelin breakdown after 6 months. HSN1 iPSC models have, therefore, revealed that SPTLC1 mutation alters lipid metabolism, impairs the formation of complex gangliosides, and reduces axon and myelin stability. Many of these changes are prevented by l-serine supplementation, supporting its use as a rational therapy.