Predictors of mortality at 30 days in high-risk patients treated with direct or rescue stenting for acute myocardial infarction: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with a very low adverse event rate when performed at selected centers in clinical trials. However, because of exclusion criteria, a low-risk population is usually selected, while potential benefits of stenting should be investigated in an unselected population, including a larger proportion of high-risk patients. METHODS: We analyzed results obtained in 120 consecutive high-risk patients (mean age, 64 years; range, 38-95 years; 76% male), so defined according to the presence of 1 of the following: age > 75 years; Killip class 3; cardiogenic shock; 3-vessel or left main disease; ejection fraction < 45%; anterior AMI; previous bypass surgery; and/or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A primary procedure was performed in 63 patients and a rescue procedure in 57 patients. Stenting was attempted in all patients in which coronary occlusion could be crossed with the guidewire (117/120) and was successful in 115/117 (98%). RESULTS: Procedural success (TIMI 3 flow and residual stenosis < 20%) was obtained in 105 patients (88%), while a suboptimal result (TIMI 2 flow) was achieved in 9 patients (8%). At 30 days, twenty patients had died (17% mortality). For patients non in cardiogenic shock, 30-day mortality was 3.2%. At multivariate analysis, cardiogenic shock (p < 0.0001), peak CK-MB mass (p = 0.01), and suboptimal result (p = 0.018) were significant independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Rescue procedures were associated with a significant protective effect with respect to mortality (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: In our series, high-risk patients treated with percutaneous intervention for AMI had a very high mortality rate in the presence of cardiogenic shock, despite the use of stents, intra-aortic balloon pumping and abciximab. In the remaining patients, acceptable results were obtained even in the presence of 1 or more risk factors. Rescue stenting does not seem to be associated with increased risk compared to primary stenting.

Abciximab in rescue coronary angioplasty after full-dose tissue-type plasminogen activator.

BACKGROUND: Rescue angioplasty is a complex procedure because of frequent reocclusions secondary to a paradoxical pro-thrombotic effect brought about by thrombolytic therapy. Administration of abciximab may improve procedural results but its utilization in this setting is limited by the potential hemorrhagic risk. Very few data on this approach are currently available in the medical literature. METHODS: After failed full-dose tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), 30 patients (23 males, 7 females, mean age 64 +/- 13 years) referred for rescue angioplasty received abciximab (0.25 mg/kg bolus + 0.125 mcg/kg/min x 12 hour infusion) (Abc+ group). The procedural results, hemorrhagic complications and in-hospital outcome observed in these patients were compared to those of 35 patients submitted to rescue angioplasty in the same time period (1997-1999) who did not receive abciximab (Abc- group). RESULTS: In the Abc+ group, 11 patients (37%) were in Killip class 3-4, 14 (47%) had multivessel disease, and 4 (13%) had previous bypass surgery. In all Abc+ patients, factors suggestive of procedural failure were present (i.e. saphenous vein graft occlusion, intraluminal thrombus, dissection, reocclusion, slow flow). The periprocedural heparin dose was 5,000 IU in Abc+ and 100 IU/kg in Abc-patients (range 5,000-10,000 IU). The procedure was successful in 29 Abc+ (97%) and in 34 Abc- patients (97%). A hemoglobin drop > 5 g occurred in 3 Abc+ (10%) and in 4 Abc- patients (11%) with a similar incidence of blood transfusion in the two groups. In all these cases, significant bleeding occurred at the vascular access site. There were 2 in-hospital deaths in Abc+ and 1 in Abc- patients. CONCLUSIONS. Selected patients undergoing rescue angioplasty may be treated with abciximab without an undue increase in hemorrhagic complications. Larger studies are needed to confirm the feasibility of this approach and to assess its potential benefits.