CD4+ T cell activation distinguishes response to anti-PD-L1+anti-CTLA4 therapy from anti-PD-L1 monotherapy.

Cancer patients often receive a combination of antibodies targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4). We conducted a window-of-opportunity study in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to examine the contribution of anti-CTLA4 to anti-PD-L1 therapy. Single-cell profiling of on- versus pre-treatment biopsies identified T cell expansion as an early response marker. In tumors, anti-PD-L1 triggered the expansion of mostly CD8+ T cells, whereas combination therapy expanded both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Such CD4+ T cells exhibited an activated T helper 1 (Th1) phenotype. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells co-localized with and were surrounded by dendritic cells expressing T cell homing factors or antibody-producing plasma cells. T cell receptor tracing suggests that anti-CTLA4, but not anti-PD-L1, triggers the trafficking of CD4+ naive/central-memory T cells from tumor-draining lymph nodes (tdLNs), via blood, to the tumor wherein T cells acquire a Th1 phenotype. Thus, CD4+ T cell activation and recruitment from tdLNs are hallmarks of early response to anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA4 in HNSCC.

Single-cell molecular profiling using ex vivo functional readouts fuels precision oncology in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Functional profiling of freshly isolated glioblastoma (GBM) cells is being evaluated as a next-generation method for precision oncology. While promising, its success largely depends on the method to evaluate treatment activity which requires sufficient resolution and specificity. METHODS: Here, we describe the 'precision oncology by single-cell profiling using ex vivo readouts of functionality' (PROSPERO) assay to evaluate the intrinsic susceptibility of high-grade brain tumor cells to respond to therapy. Different from other assays, PROSPERO extends beyond life/death screening by rapidly evaluating acute molecular drug responses at single-cell resolution. RESULTS: The PROSPERO assay was developed by correlating short-term single-cell molecular signatures using mass cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) to long-term cytotoxicity readouts in representative patient-derived glioblastoma cell cultures (n = 14) that were exposed to radiotherapy and the small-molecule p53/MDM2 inhibitor AMG232. The predictive model was subsequently projected to evaluate drug activity in freshly resected GBM samples from patients (n = 34). Here, PROSPERO revealed an overall limited capacity of tumor cells to respond to therapy, as reflected by the inability to induce key molecular markers upon ex vivo treatment exposure, while retaining proliferative capacity, insights that were validated in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. This approach also allowed the investigation of cellular plasticity, which in PDCLs highlighted therapy-induced proneural-to-mesenchymal (PMT) transitions, while in patients' samples this was more heterogeneous. CONCLUSION: PROSPERO provides a precise way to evaluate therapy efficacy by measuring molecular drug responses using specific biomarker changes in freshly resected brain tumor samples, in addition to providing key functional insights in cellular behavior, which may ultimately complement standard, clinical biomarker evaluations.

The prognostic effect of radiological extranodal extension in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: a retrospective cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: Radiological extranodal extension (rENE) is a well-known negative prognosticator in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, controversy remains regarding the prognostic effect of rENE in HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCCs (OPSCC). This single-center retrospective cohort analysis assessed the prognostic role of rENE in an HPV + OPSCC population and tried to validate a recently proposed modification of the TNM8 N-classification. METHODS: 129 patients with HPV + OPSCC, of whom 106 cN + patients, were included. Radiological imaging (CT, MRI or both) was reanalyzed by a senior head and neck radiologist. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated. Cox proportional hazard models were used for estimating hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS: A non-significant trend towards better outcomes in the rENE- group, as compared to the rENE + population, was observed for 5 year OS [80.99% vs 68.70%, HR: 2.05, p = 0.160], 5 year RFS [78.81% vs 67.87%, HR: 1.91, p = 0.165], 5 year DFS [77.06% vs 60.16%, HR: 2.12, p = 0.0824] and 5 year DSS [88.83% vs 81.93%, HR: 2.09, p = 0.195]. OS declined with ascending levels of rENE (p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis identified cT-classification and smoking as independent negative predictors for OS/DFS. The proposed modification of the TNM8 N-classification could not be validated. CONCLUSIONS: Although rENE could not be identified as an independent negative prognosticator for outcome in our HPV + OPSCC population, outcomes tend to deteriorate with increasing rENE.

Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy (HITHOC) for Pleural Disseminated Thymoma: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment for thymoma with pleural dissemination (TPD) remains unclear. Extended radical resection is the cornerstone for local treatment but the need for pleuro-pneumonectomy is debatable. Cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) provides an alternative strategy to reduce tumor load and prevent pleural recurrence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to provide an overview of current literature regarding HITHOC for TPD. METHODS: A systematic literature review (PRISMA) was performed in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Web of Science databases, resulting in 154 papers selected for screening (PROSPERO: CRD42020208242). Title, abstract, and full-text screening resulted in 13 papers subjected to structured data extraction and methodological quality assessment. One additional case from our department was included. Inclusion criteria were original research reporting on patients diagnosed with TPD; oncological outcome reporting; intraoperative HITHOC; and papers written in English, Dutch or German. Methodological quality was assessed using the Risk-of-Bias (RoB)-2 Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: HITHOC for TPD was reported in 171 cases. HITHOC-related mortality was absent and morbidity was reported in three cases. Intrathoracic perfusion of a platinum-derivative, often combined with other chemotherapeutic drugs at >40°C for 60 min or longer was always used. Post-HITHOC recurrence was reported in 37/120 cases (31%). In patients with a minimal 1-year follow-up, average time to recurrence was 68.5 months. CONCLUSION: Combining cytoreductive surgery and HITHOC is feasible and safe for TPD. The strong heterogeneity in the literature impedes proper outcome analysis. More research is needed to better understand the additional benefit of HITHOC in the TPD setting.

[18F] MFBG PET imaging: biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and comparison with [123I] MIBG in neural crest tumour patients.

PURPOSE: Despite its limitations, [123I]MIBG scintigraphy has been the standard for human norepinephrine transporter (hNET) imaging for several decades. Recently, [18F]MFBG has emerged as a promising PET alternative. This prospective trial aimed to evaluate safety, biodistribution, tumour lesion pharmacokinetics, and lesion targeting of [18F]MFBG and perform a head-to-head comparison with [123I]MIBG in neural crest tumour patients. METHODS: Six neural crest tumour patients (4 phaeochromocytoma, 1 paraganglioma, 1 neuroblastoma) with a recent routine clinical [123I]MIBG scintigraphy (interval: - 37-75 days) were included. Adult patients (n = 5) underwent a 30-min dynamic PET, followed by 3 whole-body PET/CT scans at 60, 120, and 180 min after injection of 4 MBq/kg [18F]MFBG. One minor participant underwent a single whole-body PET/CT at 60 min after administration of 2 MBq/kg [18F]MFBG. Normal organ uptake (SUVmean) and lesion uptake (SUVmax; tumour-to-background ratio (TBR)) were measured. Regional distribution volumes (VT) were estimated using a Logan graphical analysis in up to 6 lesions per patient. A lesion-by-lesion analysis was performed to compare detection ratios (DR), i.e. fraction of detected lesions, between [18F]MFBG and [123I]MIBG. RESULTS: [18F]MFBG was safe and well tolerated. Its biodistribution was overall similar to that of [123I]MIBG, with prominent uptake in the salivary glands, liver, left ventricle wall and adrenals, and mainly urinary excretion. In the phaeochromocytoma subgroup, the median VT was 37.4 mL/cm3 (range: 18.0-144.8) with an excellent correlation between VT and SUVmean at all 3 time points (R2: 0.92-0.94). Mean lesion SUVmax and TBR at 1 h after injection were 19.3 ± 10.7 and 23.6 ± 8.4, respectively. All lesions detected with [123I]MIBG were also observed with [18F]MFBG. The mean DR with [123I]MIBG was significantly lower than with [18F]MFBG (61.0% ± 26.7% vs. 99.8% ± 0.5% at 1 h; p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: [18F]MFBG is a promising hNET imaging agent with favourable imaging characteristics and improved lesion targeting compared with [123I]MIBG scintigraphy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT04258592 (Registered: 06 February 2020), EudraCT: 2019-003872-37A.

Role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic uveal melanoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma is an orphan malignancy with very limited data on treatment options in metastatic setting. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we describe real-world epidemiological and survival data on 121 metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) patients registered in our institution. As a large tertiary referral center, almost 30% of all diagnoses in the Flemish region of Belgium were covered. Primarily, we determined whether introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) led to improved overall survival (OS) in MUM patients. Secondarily, response rates to ICI were assessed and we evaluated whether first-line ICI could be a valid alternative to liver-directed therapy (LDT) in liver-only disease. RESULTS: The initially perceived 10.8 months survival benefit from treatment with ICI disappeared after correction for immortality bias. By analyzing treatment type as time-varying covariate on OS, no significant benefit of ICI over other systemic therapies (HR = 0.771) or best supportive care (BSC) (HR = 0.780) was found. Also comparison of the pre-ICI versus ICI era showed no OS improvement after introduction of ICI in our center (p = 0.7994). Only liver-directed and local oligometastatic approaches were associated with a lower chance of mortality when compared to ICI (p = 0.0025), other systemic therapies (p = 0.0001) and BSC (p = 0.0003), yet without correction for selection bias. We reported overall response rates on ICI ranging from 8-15% and we found some support for neoadjuvant strategies with ICI resulting in remission or downsizing, allowing oligometastatic approaches later on. In first-line liver-only disease, median real-world progression-free survival and OS did not significantly differ between patients treated with LDT or ICI upfront (p = 0.2930 and p = 0.5461 respectively). CONCLUSION: Although we documented responses to ICI, our analyses do not demonstrate an OS benefit of ICI over alternative treatment strategies for MUM. However, local treatment options, whether liver-directed or for oligometastatic disease, may be beneficial and should be considered.

Overall survival improvement in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma between 2000 and 2020: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Only a few recent phase III trials with targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit compared to standard of care. We aimed to study the evolution of OS since the start of systemic therapy from 2000 to 2020. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study on all consecutively treated m-ccRCC patients in three Belgian hospitals starting with systemic therapy. The study outcome was OS since the start of systemic therapy. We used a univariable Cox model for OS with year of the start of therapy as a predictor, and a multivariable analysis including known prognostic factors. Linear and non-linear trends of time were tested. RESULTS: Five hundred patients were included. In a linear model, the HR for OS depending on the year of the start of therapy was 0.95 (95%CI 0.93-0.97; p < 0.0001), estimated for an increase with 1 year in time. In a non-linear model, OS started to improve from 2006 on, when vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) replaced interferon alfa (IFNa) as a standard of care and continued to increase steadily during the following years. On multivariable analysis, the year of the start of therapy remained an independent prognostic factor for OS. Two-year OS after the start of systemic therapy was 23%, 34%, 50% and 59% for patients who started treatment in 2000-2005, 2006-2011, 2012-2017, and 2018-2020, respectively. The five-year OS of the first three groups was 7%, 14% and 24%. The mean number of administered lines of therapy increased over time, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.07 (95%CI 1.05-1.08; p < 0.0001) per year increase for the period 2000-2016. CONCLUSION: OS of m-ccRCC patients has been improving significantly over the last 15 years since the introduction of VEGFR-TKIs and ICIs.

Somatostatin analogues in treatment-refractory meningioma: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Treatment-refractory meningiomas have a dismal prognosis and limited treatment options. Meningiomas express high-densities of somatostatin receptors (SSTR), thus potentially susceptible to antitumorigenic effects of somatostatin analogues (SSA). Evidence for SSA in meningiomas is scarce, and it is unclear if published literature would either (1) support wider use of SSA, if (2) more evidence is desirable, or if (3) available evidence is sufficient to discard SSA. We addressed the need for more evidence with a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Main outcomes were toxicity, best radiological response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. We applied multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the effect of SSA on the probability of obtaining radiological disease control. The predictive performance was evaluated using area under the curve and Brier scores. We included 16 studies and compiled IPD from 8/9 of all previous cohorts. Quality of evidence was overall ranked "very low." Stable disease was reported in 58% of patients as best radiological response. Per 100 mg increase in total SSA dosage, the odds ratios for obtaining radiological disease control was 1.42 (1.11 to 1.81, P = 0.005) and 1.44 (1.00 to 2.08, P = 0.05) for patients treated with SSA as monodrug therapy vs SSA in combination with everolimus, respectively. Low quality of evidence impeded exact quantification of treatment efficacy, and the association between response and treatment may represent reverse causality. Yet, the SSA treatment was well tolerated, and beneficial effect cannot be disqualified. A prospective trial without bias from inconsistent study designs is warranted to assess SSA therapy for well-defined meningioma subgroups.

Adjuvant and concurrent temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma (CATNON; EORTC study 26053-22054): second interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: The CATNON trial investigated the addition of concurrent, adjuvant, and both current and adjuvant temozolomide to radiotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas. The benefit of concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy and relevance of mutations in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes remain unclear. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done in 137 institutions across Australia, Europe, and North America included patients aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas and a WHO performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) centrally using a minimisation technique to radiotherapy alone (59·4 Gy in 33 fractions; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy), radiotherapy with concurrent oral temozolomide (75 mg/m2 per day), radiotherapy with adjuvant oral temozolomide (12 4-week cycles of 150-200 mg/m2 temozolomide given on days 1-5), or radiotherapy with both concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Patients were stratified by institution, WHO performance status score, age, 1p loss of heterozygosity, the presence of oligodendroglial elements on microscopy, and MGMT promoter methylation status. The primary endpoint was overall survival adjusted by stratification factors at randomisation in the intention-to-treat population. A second interim analysis requested by the independent data monitoring committee was planned when two-thirds of total required events were observed to test superiority or futility of concurrent temozolomide. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00626990. FINDINGS: Between Dec 4, 2007, and Sept 11, 2015, 751 patients were randomly assigned (189 to radiotherapy alone, 188 to radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide, 186 to radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide, and 188 to radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide). Median follow-up was 55·7 months (IQR 41·0-77·3). The second interim analysis declared futility of concurrent temozolomide (median overall survival was 66·9 months [95% CI 45·7-82·3] with concurrent temozolomide vs 60·4 months [45·7-71·5] without concurrent temozolomide; hazard ratio [HR] 0·97 [99·1% CI 0·73-1·28], p=0·76). By contrast, adjuvant temozolomide improved overall survival compared with no adjuvant temozolomide (median overall survival 82·3 months [95% CI 67·2-116·6] vs 46·9 months [37·9-56·9]; HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·52-0·79], p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities were haematological, occurring in no patients in the radiotherapy only group, 16 (9%) of 185 patients in the concurrent temozolomide group, and 55 (15%) of 368 patients in both groups with adjuvant temozolomide. No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy, but not concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy, was associated with a survival benefit in patients with 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma. Clinical benefit was dependent on IDH1 and IDH2 mutational status. FUNDING: Merck Sharpe & Dohme.

Non-IDH1-R132H IDH1/2 mutations are associated with increased DNA methylation and improved survival in astrocytomas, compared to IDH1-R132H mutations.

Somatic mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase genes IDH1 and IDH2 occur at high frequency in several tumour types. Even though these mutations are confined to distinct hotspots, we show that gliomas are the only tumour type with an exceptionally high percentage of IDH1R132H mutations. Patients harbouring IDH1R132H mutated tumours have lower levels of genome-wide DNA-methylation, and an associated increased gene expression, compared to tumours with other IDH1/2 mutations ("non-R132H IDH1/2 mutations"). This reduced methylation is seen in multiple tumour types and thus appears independent of the site of origin. For 1p/19q non-codeleted glioma (astrocytoma) patients, we show that this difference is clinically relevant: in samples of the randomised phase III CATNON trial, patients harbouring tumours with IDH mutations other than IDH1R132H have a better outcome (hazard ratio 0.41, 95% CI [0.24, 0.71], p = 0.0013). Such non-R132H IDH1/2-mutated tumours also had a significantly lower proportion of tumours assigned to prognostically poor DNA-methylation classes (p < 0.001). IDH mutation-type was independent in a multivariable model containing known clinical and molecular prognostic factors. To confirm these observations, we validated the prognostic effect of IDH mutation type on a large independent dataset. The observation that non-R132H IDH1/2-mutated astrocytomas have a more favourable prognosis than their IDH1R132H mutated counterpart indicates that not all IDH-mutations are identical. This difference is clinically relevant and should be taken into account for patient prognostication.

Lomustine and Bevacizumab in Progressive Glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab is approved for the treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma on the basis of uncontrolled data. Data from a phase 2 trial suggested that the addition of bevacizumab to lomustine might improve overall survival as compared with monotherapies. We sought to determine whether the combination would result in longer overall survival than lomustine alone among patients at first progression of glioblastoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with progression after chemoradiation in a 2:1 ratio to receive lomustine plus bevacizumab (combination group, 288 patients) or lomustine alone (monotherapy group, 149 patients). The methylation status of the promoter of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) was assessed. Health-related quality of life and neurocognitive function were evaluated at baseline and every 12 weeks. The primary end point of the trial was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 437 patients underwent randomization. The median number of 6-week treatment cycles was three in the combination group and one in the monotherapy group. With 329 overall survival events (75.3%), the combination therapy did not provide a survival advantage; the median overall survival was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1 to 10.1) in the combination group and 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 10.4) in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.21; P=0.65). Locally assessed progression-free survival was 2.7 months longer in the combination group than in the monotherapy group: 4.2 months versus 1.5 months (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.61; P<0.001). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events occurred in 63.6% of the patients in the combination group and 38.1% of the patients in the monotherapy group. The addition of bevacizumab to lomustine affected neither health-related quality of life nor neurocognitive function. The MGMT status was prognostic. CONCLUSIONS: Despite somewhat prolonged progression-free survival, treatment with lomustine plus bevacizumab did not confer a survival advantage over treatment with lomustine alone in patients with progressive glioblastoma. (Funded by an unrestricted educational grant from F. Hoffmann-La Roche and by the EORTC Cancer Research Fund; EORTC 26101 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01290939 ; Eudra-CT number, 2010-023218-30 .).

Influence of pretreatment with everolimus or sunitinib on the subacute hematotoxicity of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT.

Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a validated treatment for somatostatin receptor overexpressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The NETTER-1 trial demonstrated a pronounced positive effect on progression-free-survival compared to high dose somatostatin analogs (SSAs), with a strong tendency toward overall survival benefit. Our aim was to investigate the influence of pretreatment with everolimus and/or sunitinib on subacute hematotoxicity of PRRT. To assess the influence of prior treatment with everolimus/sunitinib might be of clinical relevance due to the link between short-term hematotoxicity and increased incidence of late hematotoxicity.Material and methods: Our single-center retrospective study enrolled all patients treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT (1-4 cycles of 7.4 GBq), between November 2013 and July 2018. Patients were assigned to two groups according to their pretreatment: no targeted agents (N = 41), or targeted agents (everolimus, sunitinib or both; N = 41). The end point was subacute hematotoxicity, defined as the nadir value between the first administration until 3 months after the last administration, using the CTCAE 4.03 classification. The impact of splenectomy was also explored.Results: Eighty percent of patients had a primary gastroenteropancreatic NET. No statistically significant differences in severe subacute hematotoxicity were seen in the pretreated group vs. the naive group for hemoglobin (grade 3/4: 12% vs. 22%), neither for leucocytes (grade 3/4: 10% vs. 7%), neutrophils (grade 3/4: 5% vs. 7%), lymphocytes (grade 3/4: 49% vs. 37%) and platelets (grade 3/4: 15% vs. 15%). Furthermore, we observed significantly lower toxicity for total white blood cells, lymphocytes and platelets in the subgroup that had splenectomy (N = 12). Limitations of this study include the potential bias in lack of use of targeted agents in patients more susceptible to toxicity, and the limited number of patients and events.Conclusions: In a patient cohort with NET pretreated with everolimus and/or sunitinib, we could not demonstrate a significant effect of prior/pretreatment with everolimus and/or sunitinib on the subacute hematotoxicity of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT.

Bevacizumab and temozolomide in patients with first recurrence of WHO grade II and III glioma, without 1p/19q co-deletion (TAVAREC): a randomised controlled phase 2 EORTC trial.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab is frequently used in the treatment of recurrent WHO grade II and III glioma, but without supporting evidence from randomised trials. Therefore, we assessed the use of bevacizumab in patients with first recurrence of grade II or III glioma who did not have 1p/19q co-deletion. METHODS: The TAVAREC trial was a randomised, open-label phase 2 trial done at 32 centres across Europe in patients with locally diagnosed grade II or III glioma without 1p/19q co-deletion, with a first and contrast-enhancing recurrence after initial radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or both. Previous chemotherapy must have been stopped at least 6 months before enrolment and radiotherapy must have been stopped at least 3 months before enrolment. Random group assignment was done electronically through the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer web-based system, stratified by a minimisation procedure using institution, initial histology (WHO grade II vs III), WHO performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), and previous treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or both). Patients were assigned to receive either temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2, orally) monotherapy on days 1-5 every 4 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles, or the same temozolomide regimen in combination with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, intravenously) every 2 weeks until progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival at 12 months in the per-protocol population. Safety analyses were done in all patients who started their allocated treatment. The study is registered at EudraCT (2009-017422-39) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01164189), and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Feb 8, 2011, and July 31, 2015, 155 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either monotherapy (n=77) or combination therapy (n=78). Overall survival in the per-protocol population at 12 months was achieved by 44 (61% [80% CI 53-69]) of 72 patients in the temozolomide group and 38 (55% [47-69]) of 69 in the combination group. The most frequent toxicity was haematological: 17 (23%) of 75 patients in the monotherapy group and 25 (33%) of 76 in the combination group developed grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity. Other than haematological toxicities, the most common adverse events were nervous system disorders (59 [79%] of 75 patients in the monotherapy group vs 65 [86%] of 76 in the combination group), fatigue (53 [70%] vs 61 [80%]), and nausea (39 [52%] vs 43 [56%]). Infections were more frequently reported in the combination group (29 [38%] of 76 patients) than in the monotherapy group (17 [23%] of 75). One treatment-related death was reported in the combination group (infection after intratumoral haemorrhage during a treatment-related grade 4 thrombocytopenia). INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence of improved overall survival with bevacizumab and temozolomide combination treatment versus temozolomide monotherapy. The findings from this study provide no support for further phase 3 studies on the role of bevacizumab in this disease. FUNDING: Roche Pharmaceuticals.

Interim results from the CATNON trial (EORTC study 26053-22054) of treatment with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma: a phase 3, randomised, open-label intergroup study.

BACKGROUND: The role of temozolomide chemotherapy in newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas, which are associated with lower sensitivity to chemotherapy and worse prognosis than 1p/19q co-deleted tumours, is unclear. We assessed the use of radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in adults with non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas. METHODS: This was a phase 3, randomised, open-label study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma with WHO performance status scores of 0-2. The randomisation schedule was generated with the electronic EORTC web-based ORTA system. Patients were assigned in equal numbers (1:1:1:1), using the minimisation technique, to receive radiotherapy (59·4 Gy in 33 fractions of 1·8 Gy) alone or with adjuvant temozolomide (12 4-week cycles of 150-200 mg/m2 temozolomide given on days 1-5); or to receive radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide 75 mg/m2 per day, with or without adjuvant temozolomide. The primary endpoint was overall survival adjusted for performance status score, age, 1p loss of heterozygosity, presence of oligodendroglial elements, and MGMT promoter methylation status, analysed by intention to treat. We did a planned interim analysis after 219 (41%) deaths had occurred to test the null hypothesis of no efficacy (threshold for rejection p<0·0084). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00626990. FINDINGS: At the time of the interim analysis, 745 (99%) of the planned 748 patients had been enrolled. The hazard ratio for overall survival with use of adjuvant temozolomide was 0·65 (99·145% CI 0·45-0·93). Overall survival at 5 years was 55·9% (95% CI 47·2-63·8) with and 44·1% (36·3-51·6) without adjuvant temozolomide. Grade 3-4 adverse events were seen in 8-12% of 549 patients assigned temozolomide, and were mainly haematological and reversible. INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma. Further analysis of the role of concurrent temozolomide treatment and molecular factors is needed. FUNDING: Schering Plough and MSD.

Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma (EORTC 22033-26033): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study.

BACKGROUND: Outcome of low-grade glioma (WHO grade II) is highly variable, reflecting molecular heterogeneity of the disease. We compared two different, single-modality treatment strategies of standard radiotherapy versus primary temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with low-grade glioma, and assessed progression-free survival outcomes and identified predictive molecular factors. METHODS: For this randomised, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study (EORTC 22033-26033), undertaken in 78 clinical centres in 19 countries, we included patients aged 18 years or older who had a low-grade (WHO grade II) glioma (astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, or oligodendroglioma) with at least one high-risk feature (aged >40 years, progressive disease, tumour size >5 cm, tumour crossing the midline, or neurological symptoms), and without known HIV infection, chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection, or any condition that could interfere with oral drug administration. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either conformal radiotherapy (up to 50·4 Gy; 28 doses of 1·8 Gy once daily, 5 days per week for up to 6·5 weeks) or dose-dense oral temozolomide (75 mg/m2 once daily for 21 days, repeated every 28 days [one cycle], for a maximum of 12 cycles). Random treatment allocation was done online by a minimisation technique with prospective stratification by institution, 1p deletion (absent vs present vs undetermined), contrast enhancement (yes vs no), age (<40 vs ≥40 years), and WHO performance status (0 vs ≥1). Patients, treating physicians, and researchers were aware of the assigned intervention. A planned analysis was done after 216 progression events occurred. Our primary clinical endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat; secondary outcomes were overall survival, adverse events, neurocognitive function (will be reported separately), health-related quality of life and neurological function (reported separately), and correlative analyses of progression-free survival by molecular markers (1p/19q co-deletion, MGMT promoter methylation status, and IDH1/IDH2 mutations). This trial is closed to accrual but continuing for follow-up, and is registered at the European Trials Registry, EudraCT 2004-002714-11, and at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00182819. FINDINGS: Between Sept 23, 2005, and March 26, 2010, 707 patients were registered for the study. Between Dec 6, 2005, and Dec 21, 2012, we randomly assigned 477 patients to receive either radiotherapy (n=240) or temozolomide chemotherapy (n=237). At a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR 31-56), median progression-free survival was 39 months (95% CI 35-44) in the temozolomide group and 46 months (40-56) in the radiotherapy group (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·9-1·5, p=0·22). Median overall survival has not been reached. Exploratory analyses in 318 molecularly-defined patients confirmed the significantly different prognosis for progression-free survival in the three recently defined molecular low-grade glioma subgroups (IDHmt, with or without 1p/19q co-deletion [IDHmt/codel], or IDH wild type [IDHwt]; p=0·013). Patients with IDHmt/non-codel tumours treated with radiotherapy had a longer progression-free survival than those treated with temozolomide (HR 1·86 [95% CI 1·21-2·87], log-rank p=0·0043), whereas there were no significant treatment-dependent differences in progression-free survival for patients with IDHmt/codel and IDHwt tumours. Grade 3-4 haematological adverse events occurred in 32 (14%) of 236 patients treated with temozolomide and in one (<1%) of 228 patients treated with radiotherapy, and grade 3-4 infections occurred in eight (3%) of 236 patients treated with temozolomide and in two (1%) of 228 patients treated with radiotherapy. Moderate to severe fatigue was recorded in eight (3%) patients in the radiotherapy group (grade 2) and 16 (7%) in the temozolomide group. 119 (25%) of all 477 patients had died at database lock. Four patients died due to treatment-related causes: two in the temozolomide group and two in the radiotherapy group. INTERPRETATION: Overall, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival in patients with low-grade glioma when treated with either radiotherapy alone or temozolomide chemotherapy alone. Further data maturation is needed for overall survival analyses and evaluation of the full predictive effects of different molecular subtypes for future individualised treatment choices. FUNDING: Merck Sharpe & Dohme-Merck & Co, Canadian Cancer Society, Swiss Cancer League, UK National Institutes of Health, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, US National Cancer Institute, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Research Fund.

Phase Ib study of duligotuzumab (MEHD7945A) plus cisplatin/5-fluorouracil or carboplatin/paclitaxel for first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: This open-label, multicenter, phase Ib study assessed the safety and preliminary activity of duligotuzumab, a dual-action antibody that blocks ligand binding to human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) and epidermal growth factor receptor, in combination with chemotherapy, in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. METHODS: On day 1, duligotuzumab at a dose of 1650 mg intravenously was combined with cisplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 /day on days 1 to 4 in treatment arm A, or carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg/mL/min) and paclitaxel (at a dose of 200 mg/m2 ) in treatment arm B. Up to 6 cycles (21 days/cycle) were followed by duligotuzumab maintenance until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: Nine patients in arm A and 15 patients in arm B received a median of 6 cycles of chemotherapy, and a median of 11 cycles (arm A) and 9 cycles (arm B) of duligotuzumab. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 3 patients in arm A and 1 patient in arm B. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (graded according to graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]) in ≥ 3 patients were neutropenia (5 patients), hypokalemia (4 patients), dehydration (3 patients), anemia (3 patients), and diarrhea (3 patients) in arm A, and neutropenia (8 patients), anemia (5 patients), febrile neutropenia (4 patients), leukopenia (3 patients), thrombocytopenia (3 patients), and hypomagnesemia (3 patients) in arm B. The chemotherapy dose was reduced in 19 of 24 patients. Sixteen patients (67%) demonstrated objective responses regardless of human papillomavirus status or neuregulin 1 (NRG1) mRNA expression (arm A: 2 confirmed complete responses and 4 confirmed partial responses; arm B: 2 confirmed complete responses and 8 confirmed partial responses). CONCLUSIONS: Duligotuzumab in combination with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil or carboplatin/paclitaxel demonstrated encouraging activity in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck; an association with increased frequency and severity of select adverse events relative to historical data was suggestive of the potentiation of chemotherapy-related adverse events. Cancer 2016;122:3803-3811. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Palliative endovascular treatment of cancer-related iliocaval obstructive disease: technical and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related obstruction of large abdominal and pelvic veins might become symptomatic with clinical signs of lower limb venous congestion. Technical and clinical outcome after interventional treatment is not well studied yet. PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the technical and clinical outcome of endovascular management of symptomatic cancer-related iliocaval venous obstructive disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2013, 19 patients (15 men, 4 women; mean age, 63.6 years) referred for interventional treatment of cancer-related iliocaval obstructive disease were identified. Patients' symptoms included unilateral (n = 16; 84%) or bilateral (n = 3; 16%) painful swelling of the lower limbs. Patients' demographics as well as interventional and clinical outcome data were collected. RESULTS: All 19 patients underwent, under local anesthesia, stenting of the iliac vein (n = 16; 84%) or inferior vena cava (n = 3; 16%). Immediate technical success (n = 19) was 100%; immediate clinical success (n = 18) was 94.7%. During follow-up, seven patients (36.8%) presented with recurrent symptoms of painful limb swelling. Estimated survival after 3 and 6 months was 68.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.8-82.3%) and 19.8% (95% CI, 11.9-29.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Endovascular stenting of cancer-related iliocaval venous obstructive disease is safe and results in immediate relief of symptoms. However, recurrent venous obstruction is common. At 3 months follow-up, the majority of patients with iliac vein stenting were still alive.

Afatinib versus methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum-based therapy (LUX-Head & Neck 1): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) progressing after first-line platinum regimens have a poor prognosis and few treatment options. Afatinib, an irreversible ERBB family blocker, has shown efficacy in a phase 2 study in this setting. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib compared with methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC progressing on or after platinum-based therapy. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial conducted in 101 centres in 19 countries, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed HNSCC that was recurrent, metastatic, or both who had progressed on or after first-line platinum-based therapy, were not amenable for salvage surgery or radiotherapy, and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Previous treatment with more than one systemic regimen in this setting was not allowed; previous treatment with EGFR-targeted antibody therapy (but not EGFR-targeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitors) was allowed. We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral afatinib (40 mg/day) or intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m(2) per week), stratified by ECOG performance status and previous EGFR-targeted antibody therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive voice or web-based response system. Clinicians and patients were not masked to treatment allocation; independent review of tumour response was done in a blinded manner. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent, central imaging review committee. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01345682. FINDINGS: Between Jan 10, 2012, and Dec 12, 2013, we enrolled 483 patients and randomly assigned 322 to afatinib and 161 to methotrexate. After a median follow-up of 6·7 months (IQR 3·1-9·0), progression-free survival was longer in the afatinib group than in the methotrexate group (median 2·6 months [95% CI 2·0-2·7] for the afatinib group vs 1·7 months [1·5-2·4] for the methotrexate group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·80 [95% CI 0·65-0·98], p=0·030). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were rash or acne (31 [10%] of 320 patients in the afatinib group vs none of 160 patients in the methotrexate group), diarrhoea (30 [9%] vs three [2%]), stomatitis (20 [6%] vs 13 [8%]), fatigue (18 [6%] vs five [3%]), and neutropenia (1 [<1%] vs 11 [7%]); serious adverse events occurred in 44 (14%) of afatinib-treated patients and 18 (11%) of methotrexate-treated patients. INTERPRETATION: Afatinib was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival and had a manageable safety profile. These findings provide important new insights into the treatment of this patient population and support further investigations with irreversible ERBB family blockers in HNSCC. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.