Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 77(6): 1508-1524, 2022 05 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35301533

ABSTRACT

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) remains a common and serious complication in children treated for leukaemia. Antifungal prescription in children with leukaemia presents unique challenges, particularly due to variation in IFD risk between and within leukaemia treatment protocols, drug toxicities and interactions between antifungals and chemotherapeutic agents. With recent advances in the understanding of IFD epidemiology and large clinical trials in adults assessing antifungals for IFD treatment and prophylaxis, together with paediatric clinical and pharmacokinetic studies, there is a growing body of data to inform optimal antifungal use in children. A panel of infectious diseases and haematology-oncology clinicians with expertise in IFD management compiled a list of 10 key clinical questions following development of the 2021 Australia and New Zealand Mycology Antifungal Consensus Guidelines. A focused literature review was conducted to explore available evidence and identify gaps in knowledge to direct future research. With the changing epidemiology of IFD globally, the ongoing evolution of paediatric leukaemia treatment and the increasing availability of novel antifungal agents, advocacy for paediatric clinical studies will remain vital to optimize IFD prevention and treatment in children with leukaemia.


Subject(s)
Hematology , Invasive Fungal Infections , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Humans , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Invasive Fungal Infections/epidemiology , Invasive Fungal Infections/prevention & control , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Mycology
3.
Med J Aust ; 201(11): 657-62, 2014 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495311

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe antimicrobial use in hospitalised Australian children and to analyse the appropriateness of this antimicrobial use. DESIGN: Multicentre single-day hospital-wide point prevalence survey, conducted in conjunction with the Antimicrobial Resistance and Prescribing in European Children study. SETTING: Eight children's hospitals across five Australian states, surveyed during late spring and early summer 2012. PATIENTS: Children and adolescents who were inpatients at 8 am on the day of the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantity and quality of antimicrobial prescribing. RESULTS: Of 1373 patients, 631 (46%) were prescribed at least one antimicrobial agent, 198 (31%) of whom were < 1 year old. The highest antimicrobial prescribing rates were in haematology and oncology wards (76% [95/125]) and paediatric intensive care units (55% [44/80]). Of 1174 antimicrobial prescriptions, 550 (47%) were for community-acquired infections, 175 (15%) were for hospital-acquired infections and 437 (37%) were for prophylaxis. Empirical treatment accounted for 72% of antimicrobial prescriptions for community-acquired infections and 58% for hospital-acquired infections (395 and 102 prescriptions, respectively). A total of 915 prescriptions (78%) were for antibacterials; antifungals and antivirals were predominantly used for prophylaxis. The most commonly prescribed antibacterials were narrow-spectrum penicillins (18% [164 prescriptions]), ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (15% [136]) and aminoglycosides (14% [128]). Overall, 957 prescriptions (82%) were deemed appropriate, but this varied between hospitals (range, 66% [74/112]) to 95% [165/174]) and specialties (range, 65% [122/187] to 94% [204/217]). Among surgical patients, 65 of 187 antimicrobial prescriptions (35%) were deemed inappropriate, and a common reason for this was excessive prophylaxis duration. CONCLUSION: A point prevalence survey is a useful cross-sectional method for quantifying antimicrobial use in paediatric populations. The value is significantly augmented by adding assessment of prescribing quality.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Australia/epidemiology , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Care Surveys , Hospitals/standards , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 87(4): 271-276, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27599307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Standardized post-operative protocols reduce variation and enhance efficiency in patient care. Patients may benefit from these initiatives by improved quality of care. This matched case-control study investigates the effect of a multidisciplinary criteria-led discharge protocol for uncomplicated appendicitis in children. METHODS: Key protocol components included limiting post-operative antibiotics to two intravenous doses, avoidance of intravenous opioid analgesia, prompt resumption of diet, active encouragement of early ambulation and nursing staff autonomy to discharge patients that met assigned criteria. The study period was from August 2015 to February 2016. Outcomes were compared with a historical control group matched for operative approach. RESULTS: Outcomes for 83 patients enrolled to our protocol were compared with those of 83 controls. There was a 29.2% reduction in median post-operative length of stay in our protocol-based care group (19.6 versus 27.7 h; P < 0.001). The rate of discharges within 24 h improved from 12 to 42%. There was no significant difference in complication rate (4.8 versus 7.2%; P = 0.51). Mean oral morphine dose equivalent per kilogram requirement was less than half (46%) that of control group patients (P < 0.001). Mean number of ondansetron doses was also significantly lower. Projected annual direct cost savings following protocol implementation was AUD$77 057. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a criteria-led discharge protocol at our hospital decreased length of stay, reduced variation in care, preserved existing low morbidity, incurred substantial cost savings, and safely rationalized opioid and antiemetic medication. These protocols are inexpensive and offer tangible benefits that are accessible to all health care settings.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy/methods , Appendicitis/surgery , Adolescent , Appendectomy/economics , Appendicitis/economics , Case-Control Studies , Child , Clinical Protocols , Cost Savings , Female , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Length of Stay , Male , Patient Discharge , Postoperative Care/methods , Treatment Outcome
5.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 16(8): e139-52, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27321363

ABSTRACT

Few studies are available to inform duration of intravenous antibiotics for children and when it is safe and appropriate to switch to oral antibiotics. We have systematically reviewed antibiotic duration and timing of intravenous to oral switch for 36 paediatric infectious diseases and developed evidence-graded recommendations on the basis of the review, guidelines, and expert consensus. We searched databases and obtained information from references identified and relevant guidelines. All eligible studies were assessed for quality. 4090 articles were identified and 170 studies were included. Evidence relating antibiotic duration to outcomes in children for some infections was supported by meta-analyses or randomised controlled trials; in other infections data were from retrospective series only. Criteria for intravenous to oral switch commonly included defervescence and clinical improvement with or without improvement in laboratory markers. Evidence suggests that intravenous to oral switch can occur earlier than previously recommended for some infections. We have synthesised recommendations for antibiotic duration and intravenous to oral switch to support clinical decision making and prospective research.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intravenous , Administration, Oral , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Pediatrics
6.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 34(8): e185-90, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25961896

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of the threat to neonatal patients from antibiotic resistance. There are limited data on antimicrobial prescribing practices for hospitalized neonates. We aimed to describe antimicrobial use in hospitalized Australian neonatal patients, and to determine its appropriateness. METHODS: Multicentre single-day hospital-wide point prevalence survey in 2012, in conjunction with the Antimicrobial Resistance and Prescribing in European Children study. The appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions was also assessed. All patients admitted at 8 am on the survey day, in 6 neonatal units in tertiary children's hospitals across 5 states, were included in an analysis of the quantity and quality of all antimicrobial prescriptions. RESULTS: The point prevalence survey included 6 neonatal units and 236 patients. Of 109 patients (46%) receiving at least 1 antimicrobial, 66 (61%) were being treated for infection, with sepsis the most common indication. There were 216 antimicrobial prescriptions, 134 (62%) for treatment of infection and 82 (38%) for prophylaxis, mostly oral nystatin. Only 15 prescriptions were for targeted as opposed to empirical treatment. Penicillin and gentamicin were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics, with vancomycin third most common. Half of all treated patients were receiving combination antimicrobial therapy. There was marked variation in vancomycin and gentamicin dosing. Overall, few prescriptions (4%) were deemed inappropriate. CONCLUSION: This is the first Australia-wide point prevalence survey of neonatal antimicrobial prescribing in tertiary children's hospitals. The findings highlight positive practices and potential targets for quality improvement.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Sepsis/drug therapy
8.
Commun Dis Intell Q Rep ; 27 Suppl: S19-27, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12807269

ABSTRACT

In late 2001, a group of South Australian metropolitan public and private hospitals commenced voluntary contribution of data on in-hospital utilisation of antimicrobials to the Communicable Disease Control Branch of the Department of Human Services. Where possible, hospitals contributed data on all antimicrobials dispensed for use within the institution each month. These data were stratified into antimicrobials issued to intensive care units and antimicrobials issued to all other areas within the hospital. In the first instance, only data relating to four antimicrobial classes have been analysed. These classes are third or fourth generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, glycopeptides and fluoroquinolones. Utilisation of these four classes was presented as a monthly utilisation rate i.e., total defined daily doses for each antimicrobial class per month per 1,000 occupied bed days. These utilisation rates were calculated for each individual hospital and for the combined group of contributing hospitals (state-wide rate). Although limited data are currently available, results to date demonstrate a much higher antimicrobial usage rate in intensive care units than other in-patient areas for the classes currently analysed. Considerable variation in the usage of various antimicrobials has been noted for individual hospitals, and analysis of trends over a longer time period, in conjunction with resistance surveillance data, will be required.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals , Humans , Intensive Care Units , South Australia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL