Pancreas utilization rates in the UK - an 11-year analysis.

Utilization of pancreases for transplantation remains inferior to that of other organs. Herein, we analysed UK pancreas discards to identify the reasons for the low utilization rates. Data on all pancreases offered first for solid organ transplantation between 1st January 2005 and 31st December 2015 were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry. The number of organs discarded, reasons and the time point of discard were analysed. A centre specific comparison was also undertaken. 7367 pancreases were offered first for solid organ transplantation. 35% were donors after circulatory death (DCD). 3668 (49.7%) organs were not retrieved. Of the 3699 pancreases retrieved, 38% were initially accepted but subsequently discarded. 2145 (29%) grafts offered were transplanted as simultaneous pancreas-kidney or solitary pancreas. 1177 (55%) were transplanted on the first offer whilst the remaining 968 were transplanted after a median of three offers. 52% DBD pancreases were accepted and transplanted on the first offer compared with 68% DCD grafts. There were significant differences in discard rates between centres (30-80% for DBD and 3-78% for DCD, P < 0.001). A significant number of solid pancreases are discarded. Better graft assessment at retrieval could minimize unnecessary organ travel and discards. Closer links with islet programmes may allow for better utilization of discarded grafts.

In situ normothermic perfusion of livers in controlled circulatory death donation may prevent ischemic cholangiopathy and improve graft survival.

Livers from controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors suffer a higher incidence of nonfunction, poor function, and ischemic cholangiopathy. In situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) restores a blood supply to the abdominal organs after death using an extracorporeal circulation for a limited period before organ recovery. We undertook a retrospective analysis to evaluate whether NRP was associated with improved outcomes of livers from DCD donors. NRP was performed on 70 DCD donors from whom 43 livers were transplanted. These were compared with 187 non-NRP DCD donor livers transplanted at the same two UK centers in the same period. The use of NRP was associated with a reduction in early allograft dysfunction (12% for NRP vs. 32% for non-NRP livers, P = .0076), 30-day graft loss (2% NRP livers vs. 12% non-NRP livers, P = .0559), freedom from ischemic cholangiopathy (0% vs. 27% for non-NRP livers, P < .0001), and fewer anastomotic strictures (7% vs. 27% non-NRP, P = .0041). After adjusting for other factors in a multivariable analysis, NRP remained significantly associated with freedom from ischemic cholangiopathy (P < .0001). These data suggest that NRP during organ recovery from DCD donors leads to superior liver outcomes compared to conventional organ recovery.

Impact of body mass index in liver transplantation for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and alcoholic liver disease.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates long-term outcomes and body mass index (BMI) following liver transplantation (LT) for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in comparison with alcoholic liver disease (ALD). METHODS: Patient and graft survival were compared using Kaplan Meier curves and log rank test. Multivariable analysis of recipient and donor characteristics was performed as determinants of patient survival. BMI at listing was compared with BMI post-LT. RESULTS: Patient survival at 1-, 3-, 5- and 10 years post-LT was similar in the ALD group (n = 195) compared with the NAFLD group (n = 84) (93% vs. 93%, 91% vs. 89%, 86% vs. 77%, 64% vs. 66% respectively, p = 0.21). One patient in the NAFLD group was re-transplanted and none in the ALD group therefore graft survival was also similar (p = 0.20). Multivariable analysis didn't identify any significant predictors of reduced survival. In comparison with the ALD group, BMI was significantly higher in the NAFLD group at listing (31 vs. 27, p < 0.001), 3-months post-LT (28 vs. 26, p < 0.05) and 6-months post-LT (29 vs. 27, p < 0.05) but was equivalent by 5-years post-LT (29 vs. 30, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD patients had similar patient and graft survival post-LT compared to ALD. NAFLD patients returned to listing BMI by one-year post-LT but by 5-years post-LT there was no difference in BMI between the groups.

[Robotic-assisted hepatic surgery]. / La chirurgie hépatique robot-assistée.

Open surgery is currently the gold standard for most liver resection. Laparoscopic hepatic surgery is currently gaining significance, but technical challenges remain. Surgical robotics has been developed to overcome these technical limitations and to enable more difficult minimally invasive procedures. At our institution, 16 robotic hepatic resections have been performed since 2010. Shorter length of stay on intermediate care unit and shorter overall hospitalization has been observed with the robotic patients when compared to open hepatic resection. Overall, the literature shows promising data with demonstration of general feasibility of robotic liver surgery. However, more systematic research is needed to precisely determine the potential advantages of robotics over alternative approaches and its overall role for hepatic resections.

[The importance of the I-colic time in colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases. Specifics of surgical strategy]. / Importanta timpului I-colic în cancerul colo-rectal cu metastaze hepatice sincrone. Particularitati de tactica chirurgicala.

AIM: This paper proposes the presentation of a decision-making algorithm in colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases, as stressing the importance of I-colic time in obtaining the R0 desideratum. MATERIAL AND METHOD: There is no worldwide consensus regarding the surgical attitude in metastatic colorectal cancer. There are some predominantly conservative attitudes which use stenting and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by periodical re-evaluation or more aggressive surgical treatment. In the pertinent literature, emphasis is on surgery in two stages, on the separation of the colic stage from the hepatic one, the majority proposing stage one cholic and stage two hepatic, thus there are also situations in which the liver may be dealt with from the first intention. RESULTS: We propose to present, taking the examples from clinical cases, the main techniques of dealing with the cases of metastatic colorectal cancer, stressing personal attitude: aggressive surgery in a short step, which is either radical or creates the conditions for a step II radical one. CONCLUSION: In our vision the liver is the key to the surgical treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer and we must take into account from the first step through interventions with radical intent any time it is possible or through other operations: ligature of portal branch, partial hepatectomies, unilateral local destruction, preparing the way to radical step II.

[Vascular exclusion of the liver: surgical technique and initial clinical experience]. / Excluzia vasculara a ficatului (EVF): tehnica chirurgicala si experienta clinica initiala.

The intraoperative hemorrhage is the most life threatening complication during a liver resection, reason why the intraoperative vascular control represents one of the key points in the liver resection. This work presents the liver vascular exclusion without caval occlusion technique and also studies the first cases operated in University Surgery Clinic Nr. 1, Targu Mures, Romania. LVE consists of an association between hilum occlusion by Pringle manoeuvre and selective clampage of the three hepatic veins. Once achieved, the technique allows resection without blood lose and no special cautions, a continue clampage of 60-90 minutes being useful for the reconstruction of the possibly harmed or resected structures during the hepatectomy. The indications of the technique are voluminous center located liver tumors, multiple liver tumors, tumors in contact with hepatic veins or with hilum bifurcation. University Surgery Clinic Nr. 1 Targu Mures's experience in this technique began in 2005 consists in 8 cases. Preoperative diagnosis were: 2 right liver voluminous benign tumors (hemangiomas), 5 cases of colo-rectal metastasis and one resection for metastases of gastro-intestinal stromal tumor. Postsurgery evolution was very good with an average hospitalisation of 6 days. Mortality rate and morbidity were zero. We strongly recommend the use of LVE technique for selected cases of difficult liver resection, LVE being one of the most advanced techniques of liver resection.

Robotic versus open liver resections: A case-matched comparison.

BACKGROUND: Most hepatic resections are currently performed using an open approach. Robotic surgery might enable the transition of these procedures to minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: Pre-, peri- and post-operative data of all patients who underwent a liver resection from 2009/2012 to 2001/2015, were collected prospectively. All robotic resection patients were matched 1:1 to patients who underwent open surgery. Pre- and perioperative data, up to 30 days, were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixteen robotic and open hepatic resections were identified. Fewer complication events and shorter lengths of stay (LOS, 7.9 versus 11 days, P = 0.0603) were observed for robotic resections. Length of stay in the intermediate care unit (IMC) was shorter after the robotic procedure (10 h vs 16.6 h, P = 0.0699). Operating room (OR) time was significantly longer in the robotic resection cohort (352.8 vs 239.6 min, P = 0.0215). All tumor margins were negative. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary comparison demonstrates the general feasibility of minor robotic liver resection in selected cases.