Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(5): 1201-1206, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38128626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While preoperative psychological distress is known to predict risk for worse total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes, distress may be too broad and nonspecific a predictor in isolation. We tested whether there are distinct preoperative TKA patient types based jointly on psychological status and measures of altered pain processing that predict adverse clinical outcomes. METHODS: In 112 TKA patients, we preoperatively assessed psychological status (depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing) and altered pain processing via a simple quantitative sensory testing protocol capturing peripheral and central pain sensitization. Outcomes (pain, function, opioid use) were prospectively evaluated at 6 weeks and 6 months after TKA. Cluster analyses were used to empirically identify TKA patient subgroups. RESULTS: There were 3 distinct preoperative TKA patient subgroups identified from the cluster analysis. A low-risk (LR) group was characterized by low psychological distress and low peripheral and central sensitization. In addition, 2 subgroups with similarly elevated preoperative psychological distress were identified, differing by pain processing alterations observed: high-risk centralized pain and high-risk peripheral pain. Relative to LR patients, high-risk centralized pain patients displayed significantly worse function and greater opioid use at 6 months after TKA (P values <.05). The LR and high-risk peripheral pain patient subgroups had similar 6-month outcomes (P values >.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who have psychological comorbidity, only patients who have central sensitization were at elevated risk for poor functional outcomes and increased opioid use. Central sensitization may be the missing link between psychological comorbidity and poor TKA clinical outcomes. Preoperative testing for central sensitization may have clinical utility for improving risk stratification in TKA patients who have psychosocial risk factors.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Psychological Distress , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Sensitization , Analgesics, Opioid , Osteoarthritis, Knee/psychology , Pain, Postoperative/psychology , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 38(7): 1378-1384, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36716899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening following total knee arthroplasty remains one of the leading causes of long-term failure. Radiographic identification of loose implants can be challenging with standard views. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of novel radiographic findings of anterior heterotopic bone formation and medial or lateral cyst formation in patients who have aseptic loosening to patients who have well-fixed implants. METHODS: A retrospective radiographic review was performed on 48 patients' revised secondary to aseptic tibial loosening. This cohort was compared to two additional cohorts; 48 patients returning for routine postoperative follow-up (control 1), and 48 patients revised secondary to infection or instability who had well-fixed implants (control 2). RESULTS: There were 41 of 48 (85%) patients who had implant loosening and were noted to have anterior heterotopic bone formation compared to 1 of 48 (2%) patients in control 1 and 3 of 48 (6%) patients in control 2 (P ≤ .0001). There were 43 of 48 (90%) patients who had implant loosening and had medial cyst formation compared to 3 of 48 (6%) patients in control 1 and 5 of 48 (10%) in control 2 (P ≤ .0001). There were 42 of 48 (88%) patients who had implant loosening and had lateral cyst formation compared to 2 of 48 (4%) patients in control 1 and 4 of 48 (8%) in control 2 (P ≤ .0001). CONCLUSION: In this study, we describe novel radiographic findings of anterior heterotopic bone formation and cysts that develop in patients who have aseptic loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty. We believe that these radiographic features may lead to easier identification of aseptic loosening.


Subject(s)
Knee Prosthesis , Periodontal Cyst , Humans , Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Prosthesis Failure , Periodontal Cyst/surgery , Reoperation
3.
J Hand Ther ; 36(4): 923-931, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36918307

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional and descriptive study BACKGROUND: Functional dart thrower's motion (F-DTM) is an obliquely oriented wrist motion that occurs in activities such as throwing and drinking from a cup. There is limited data on clinical measurement of F-DTM. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to 1) describe and establish reference scores for F-DTM measurement for nonoperative and postoperative wrist patients 2) compare F-DTM between the affected and nonaffected sides and 3) determine F-DTM score agreement across three consecutive trials. METHODS: Two certified hand therapists evaluated F-DTM in consecutive adult patients with a unilateral wrist condition undergoing nonoperative or postoperative therapy. Three trials of goniometer measurements for radial extension (RE) and ulnar flexion (UF) were assessed on the nonaffected and affected wrists. A total arc F-DTM was computed. Mean, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and Cohen's d effect size described side-to-side differences in RE, UF, and total arc F-DTM. Agreement in scores across trials was assessed with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Thirty-one nonoperative (mean ± SD age = 40.0 ± 13.9 years, 74% female, 94% right hand dominant) and 44 postoperative patients (mean ± SD age = 44.9 ± 14.9 years, 66% female, 84% right hand dominant) were enrolled. The average side-to-side difference, in degrees, in the nonoperative group was -6.4 (95% CI: -9.4 to -3.4, Cohen's d = 0.8) for RE, -10.4 (-16.7 to -4.0, d = 0.6) for UF, and -16.8 (-24.3 to -9.2, d = 0.8) for total arc F-DTM. The average side-to-side difference in the postoperative group was -33.6 (-38.8 to -28.3, d = 1.9) for RE, -34.7 (-40.6 to -28.7, d = 1.8) for UF, and -68.2 (-77.9 to -58.5, d = 2.1) for total arc F-DTM. The range of ICCs for F-DTM measurements was 0.82-0.96. CONCLUSIONS: Goniometer measurement of F-DTM is a clinically feasible method to quantify functional motion loss in an injured wrist population, particularly patients with postoperatively managed wrist conditions.


Subject(s)
Wrist Joint , Wrist , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Biomechanical Phenomena , Motion , Range of Motion, Articular
4.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 62(2): 365-370, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36328917

ABSTRACT

Calcaneus fracture fixation is associated with high rates of morbidity and disability from wound complications, infection, subtalar arthritis, and malunion. Percutaneous fixation with Kirshner wires (K-wires) or screws may be implemented when soft tissue injury precludes an open approach. Although screws are thought to provide greater stability, limited data exists directly comparing fixation success of these implants. Medical record data from 53 patients (62 total fractures) surgically treated with percutaneous screws (28 fractures) or K-wires (34 fractures) for joint-depression calcaneus fractures at a large tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Bohler's angle and calcaneal varus were assessed from available radiographs at time of injury, postoperatively, and at final follow-up, and joint congruity was assessed postoperatively and at final follow-up. Complications were also extracted. There were no statistical differences in patient characteristics between surgical groups although a higher proportion of patients treated with K-wires compared to screws had other associated injuries (79% vs 42%, p = .01). A higher proportion of fractures treated with screws compared to K-wires maintained joint congruity at the final follow-up (69% vs 32%, p = .005). However, there were no statistically detectable differences in other postoperative radiographic metrics (p > .05). In conclusion, joint congruity was more often maintained with screw fixation although there was no statistical difference in restoration and maintenance of Bohler's angle or varus alignment. The difference in radiographic metrics was not correlated with secondary procedures, namely subtalar arthrodesis, and may not be clinically significant. Neither group was completely effective in attaining and maintaining reduction, and additional fixation strategies should be considered if feasible based on patient, injury, and soft tissue characteristics.


Subject(s)
Calcaneus , Fractures, Bone , Intra-Articular Fractures , Humans , Calcaneus/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Retrospective Studies , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Bone Screws , Treatment Outcome , Intra-Articular Fractures/surgery
5.
JAMA ; 328(23): 2334-2344, 2022 12 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36538309

ABSTRACT

Importance: Low back and neck pain are often self-limited, but health care spending remains high. Objective: To evaluate the effects of 2 interventions that emphasize noninvasive care for spine pain. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic, cluster, randomized clinical trial conducted at 33 centers in the US that enrolled 2971 participants with neck or back pain of 3 months' duration or less (enrollment, June 2017 to March 2020; final follow-up, March 2021). Interventions: Participants were randomized at the clinic-level to (1) usual care (n = 992); (2) a risk-stratified, multidisciplinary intervention (the identify, coordinate, and enhance [ICE] care model that combines physical therapy, health coach counseling, and consultation from a specialist in pain medicine or rehabilitation) (n = 829); or (3) individualized postural therapy (IPT), a postural therapy approach that combines physical therapy with building self-efficacy and self-management (n = 1150). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 3 months (range, 0 [best] to 100 [worst]; minimal clinically important difference, 6) and spine-related health care spending at 1 year. A 2-sided significance threshold of .025 was used to define statistical significance. Results: Among 2971 participants randomized (mean age, 51.7 years; 1792 women [60.3%]), 2733 (92%) finished the trial. Between baseline and 3-month follow-up, mean ODI scores changed from 31.2 to 15.4 for ICE, from 29.3 to 15.4 for IPT, and from 28.9 to 19.5 for usual care. At 3-month follow-up, absolute differences compared with usual care were -5.8 (95% CI, -7.7 to -3.9; P < .001) for ICE and -4.3 (95% CI, -5.9 to -2.6; P < .001) for IPT. Mean 12-month spending was $1448, $2528, and $1587 in the ICE, IPT, and usual care groups, respectively. Differences in spending compared with usual care were -$139 (risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.997]; P = .04) for ICE and $941 (risk ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.35 to 1.45]; P < .001) for IPT. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute or subacute spine pain, a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial intervention or an individualized postural therapy intervention, each compared with usual care, resulted in small but statistically significant reductions in pain-related disability at 3 months. However, compared with usual care, the biopsychosocial intervention resulted in no significant difference in spine-related health care spending and the postural therapy intervention resulted in significantly greater spine-related health care spending at 1 year. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03083886.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Pain , Spinal Diseases , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Health Expenditures , Musculoskeletal Pain/economics , Musculoskeletal Pain/psychology , Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy , Self-Management , Spine , Spinal Diseases/economics , Spinal Diseases/psychology , Spinal Diseases/therapy , Male , Physical Therapy Modalities , Counseling , Pain Management/economics , Pain Management/methods , Referral and Consultation
6.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(10): 1873-1879, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175276

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether early postoperative walking is associated with "best outcome" and no opioid use at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery and establish a threshold for steps/day to inform clinical practice. DESIGN: Secondary analysis from randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Two academic medical centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 248 participants undergoing surgery for a degenerative lumbar spine condition (N=248). A total of 212 participants (mean age, 62.8±11.4y, 53.3% female) had valid walking data at baseline. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability (Oswestry Disability Index), back and leg pain (Brief Pain Inventory), and opioid use (yes vs no) were assessed at baseline and 1 year after surgery. "Best outcome" was defined as Oswestry Disability Index ≤20, back pain ≤2, and leg pain ≤2. Steps/day (walking) was assessed with an accelerometer worn for at least 3 days and 10 h/d at 6 weeks after spine surgery, which was considered as study baseline. Separate multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between steps/day at 6 weeks and "best outcome" and no opioid use at 1-year. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a steps/day threshold for achieving outcomes. RESULTS: Each additional 1000 steps/d at 6 weeks after spine surgery was associated with 41% higher odds of achieving "best outcome" (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.74) and 38% higher odds of no opioid use (95% CI, 1.09-1.76) at 1 year. Walking ≥3500 steps/d was associated with 3.75 times the odds (95% CI, 1.56-9.02) of achieving "best outcome" and 2.37 times the odds (95% CI, 1.07-5.24) of not using opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Walking early after surgery may optimize patient-reported outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. A 3500 steps/d threshold may serve as an initial recommendation during early postoperative counseling.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Disability Evaluation , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/rehabilitation , Spinal Diseases/rehabilitation , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Walking/statistics & numerical data , Accelerometry , Aged , Female , Humans , Laminectomy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies
7.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 22(1): 883, 2021 Oct 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34663295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the longitudinal postoperative relationship between physical activity, psychosocial factors, and physical function in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 248 participants undergoing surgery for a degenerative lumbar spine condition. Physical activity was measured using a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X) at 6-weeks (6wk), 6-months (6M), 12-months (12M) and 24-months (24M) following spine surgery. Physical function (computerized adaptive test domain version of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) and psychosocial factors (pain self-efficacy, depression and fear of movement) were assessed at preoperative visit and 6wk, 6M, 12M and 24M after surgery. Structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques were utilized to analyze data, and results are represented as standardized regression weights (SRW). Overall SRW were computed across five imputed datasets to account for missing data. The mediation effect of each psychosocial factor on the effect of physical activity on physical function were computed [(SRW for effect of activity on psychosocial factor X SRW for effect of psychosocial factor on function) ÷ SRW for effect of activity on function]. Each SEM model was tested for model fit by assessing established fit indexes. RESULTS: The overall effect of steps per day on physical function (SRW ranged from 0.08 to 0.19, p<0.05) was stronger compared to the overall effect of physical function on steps per day (SRW ranged from non-existent to 0.14, p<0.01 to 0.3). The effect of steps per day on physical function and function on steps per day remained consistent after accounting for psychosocial factors in each of the mediation models. Depression and fear of movement at 6M mediated 3.4% and 5.4% of the effect of steps per day at 6wk on physical function at 12M, respectively. Pain self-efficacy was not a statistically significant mediator. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the relationship between physical activity and physical function is stronger than the relationship of function to activity. However, future research is needed to examine whether promoting physical activity during the early postoperative period may result in improvement of long-term physical function. Since depression and fear of movement had a very small mediating effect, additional work is needed to investigate other potential mediating factors such as pain catastrophizing, resilience and exercise self-efficacy.


Subject(s)
Catastrophization , Exercise , Fear , Humans , Neurosurgical Procedures , Pain
8.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 21(1): 783, 2020 Nov 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33246446

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective case series study was to compare changes in early postoperative physical activity and physical function between 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (mean [95% confidence interval; CI] age = 59.2 [56.2, 62.3] years, 64% female) who underwent spine surgery for a degenerative lumbar condition were assessed at 6 weeks and 3- and 6-months after surgery. The outcomes were objectively-measured physical activity (accelerometry) and patient-reported and objective physical function. Physical activity was assessed using mean steps/day and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) over a week. Physical function measures included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and 10-Meter Walk (10 MW). We compared changes over time in physical activity and function using generalized estimating equations with robust estimator and first-order autoregressive covariance structure. Proportion of patients who engaged in meaningful physical activity (e.g., walked at least 4400 and 6000 steps/day or engaged in at least 150 min/week in MVPA) and achieved clinically meaningful changes in physical function were compared at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: After surgery, 72% of patients initiated physical therapy (mean [95%CI] sessions =8.5 [6.6, 10.4]) between 6 weeks and 3 months. Compared to 6 weeks post-surgery, no change in steps/day or time in MVPA/week was observed at 3 or 6 months. From 21 to 23% and 9 to 11% of participants walked at least 4400 and 6000 steps/day at 3 and 6 months, respectively, while none of the participants spent at least 150 min/week in MVPA at these same time points. Significant improvements were observed on ODI, SF-12, TUG and 10 MW (p <  0.05), with over 43 to 68% and 62 to 87% achieving clinically meaningful improvements on these measures at 3 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Limited improvement was observed in objectively-measured physical activity from 6 weeks to 6 months after spine surgery, despite moderate to large function gains. Early postoperative physical therapy interventions targeting physical activity may be needed.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Lumbar Vertebrae , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Hand Ther ; 33(1): 45-59, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30879716

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review. INTRODUCTION: Dart thrower's motion (DTM) of the wrist primarily arises from the midcarpal joint, and minimizes stress to the scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL). After SLIL injury or surgery, early controlled DTM may reduce the effects of prolonged immobilization, while protecting SLIL integrity. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To summarize the literature on the effects of DTM on the injured and surgically repaired SLIL and the extent to which various DTM orthotic designs promote SLIL recovery. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted within 6 databases for articles published between 2003 and March 2018. Eligible studies examined DTM in the context of SLIL injury or repair. Relevant data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of 425 identified articles, 15 were eligible for inclusion. Five biomechanical studies examined the influence of DTM on the injured SLIL, whereas 5 articles described DTM orthotic designs. Also included were five articles that reported outcomes when DTM was used in the rehabilitation protocol. DISCUSSION: The included studies suggest limiting end ranges of DTM in the injured/repaired SLIL, while blocking orthogonal plane movements. Custom orthotic designs may accomplish this goal. DTM has been used in comprehensive therapy programs in small case studies reporting short-term and intermediate clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Caution should be exercised with using DTM on the torn SLIL as gap increases, particularly at the end-range motion. Orthosis designs have potential to limit this motion to midrange, while allowing early movement. Further high-level research is needed to understand the influence of DTM on injured and postsurgical populations.


Subject(s)
Carpal Joints/physiopathology , Hand Injuries/therapy , Ligaments, Articular/injuries , Motor Activity/physiology , Orthotic Devices , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Hand Injuries/physiopathology , Humans
10.
Clin Rehabil ; 32(3): 287-298, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of psychosocial interventions in improving patient-reported clinical outcomes, including return to sport/activity, and intermediary psychosocial factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched from each database's inception to March 2017 for published studies in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Studies were included if they reported on the effects of a postoperative psychosocial intervention on a patient-reported clinical measure of disability, function, pain, quality of life, return to sport/activity, or intermediary psychosocial factor. Data were extracted using a standardized form and summary effects from each article were compiled. The methodological quality of randomized trials was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale and scores greater than 5/10 were considered high quality. RESULTS: A total of 893 articles were identified from the literature search. Of these, four randomized trials ( N = 210) met inclusion criteria. The four articles examined guided imagery and relaxation, coping modeling, and visual imagery as postoperative psychosocial interventions. Methodological quality scores of the studies ranged from 5 to 9. There were inconsistent findings for the additive benefit of psychosocial interventions for improving postoperative function, pain, or self-efficacy and limited evidence for improving postoperative quality of life, anxiety, or fear of reinjury. No study examined the effects of psychosocial interventions on return to sport/activity. CONCLUSION: Overall, there is limited evidence on the efficacy of postoperative psychosocial interventions for improving functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Return to Sport , Treatment Outcome , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnosis , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/psychology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/psychology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/rehabilitation , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/psychology , Athletic Injuries/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Postoperative Care/methods , Prognosis , Psychology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function
11.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 476(4): 810-829, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29481342

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial factors are key determinants of health and can influence patient-reported outcomes after rotator cuff tears. However, to our knowledge, a systematic review of published studies has not been conducted to determine the degree of consistency and strength of the relationship between psychosocial factors and patient-reported outcomes in this patient population. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are psychosocial factors associated with patient-reported measures at initial clinical presentation in patients with rotator cuff tears? (2) Are psychosocial factors associated with patient-reported outcomes after treatment in patients with rotator cuff tears? METHODS: A systematic review of cross-sectional and prospective observational studies was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from each database's inception to June 2016. We included studies examining associations between psychosocial factors and patient-reported measures in patients with rotator cuff tears. We excluded studies not reporting on this relationship, involving patients with nonspecific shoulder pain, and written in a language other than English. Two independent reviewers performed the search, extracted information, and assessed methodological quality. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. The primary outcomes for the review were associations between each psychosocial factor and patient-reported measures of function or disability, pain, or quality of life. Associations were interpreted based on significance, strength, and direction of the relationship. A total of 10 studies (five cross-sectional and five prospective) in 1410 patients (age range, 46-62 years, 60% [571 of 958] men) were included in the review. Pooling of results for meta-analyses was not possible as a result of study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Weak to moderate cross-sectional associations were found for emotional or mental health with function or disability and pain in multiple studies. Lower emotional or mental health function was associated with greater pain or disability or lower physical function at initial evaluation. Only one psychosocial factor (patient expectation) was weak to moderately associated with patient-reported outcomes after treatment in more than one study. In the two studies that examined expectations, the higher the expectation of benefit, the greater the perceived benefit after surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: At the initial evaluation of patients with rotator cuff tear, there was an association between self-reported function and pain and emotional or mental health. However, these factors were not associated with patient-reported outcomes after intervention. This finding could be attributed to the lack of large prospective studies in this area or complex phenotypes within this patient population. Preoperative patient expectation is an important predictor of patient-reported outcomes in patients after rotator cuff surgery and may be a modifiable target for enhancing recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Musculoskeletal Pain/psychology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Rotator Cuff Injuries/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/psychology , Disability Evaluation , Emotions , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal Pain/physiopathology , Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy , Pain Measurement , Predictive Value of Tests , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Rotator Cuff Injuries/diagnosis , Rotator Cuff Injuries/physiopathology , Rotator Cuff Injuries/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
12.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 98(1): 165-172, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27576191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree to which conservative care and failure were specifically defined in studies comparing nonoperative treatment versus surgery for low back pain (LBP) conditions in adults. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature search was conducted by an experienced librarian using MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL from January 2003 to June 2014. Endnote bibliographic management application was used to remove duplicates and organize the citations. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective, randomized, or cohort trials comparing surgery versus conservative intervention for patients with LBP conditions. Study selection was conducted by 2 independent reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION: Three independent reviewers extracted data from each article using a structured data extraction form. Data extracted included type of study, participant characteristics, sample size, description, and duration of conservative care and whether failed conservative care criterion was defined. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 852 unique records were screened for eligibility; of those, 72 articles were identified for further full-text review. Thirty-four full texts were excluded based on the exclusion criteria, and 38 articles, representing 20 unique studies, were included for qualitative synthesis. Fifteen of the 20 studies defined the duration of conservative care. Only 3 studies defined the dosage of physical therapy sessions, including total number of visits and visit duration. Two studies described medication usage, including the duration and type. No studies specifically defined what constituted failed conservative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This literature review suggests conservative care is poorly defined in randomized trials, which can lead to ambiguity of research procedures and unclear guidelines for clinicians. Future studies should increase transparency and explicitly define conservative care.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment , Low Back Pain/therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Spinal Diseases/therapy , Humans , Low Back Pain/etiology , Physical Therapy Modalities , Spinal Diseases/complications , Terminology as Topic , Treatment Failure
13.
J Man Manip Ther ; 25(3): 128-136, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28694675

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The primary purpose of the current study was to assess the effects of a mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program, facilitated by non-psychologist clinicians, for improving psychosocial well-being. A secondary purpose of the current study was to explore the role of self-compassion as a potential underlying factor for improvements in emotional distress. Application of these findings to a physical therapy setting is provided. Methods: One hundred and thirty participants with a variety of medical complaints completed an eight-week MBSR program at Vanderbilt University's Osher Center for Integrative Medicine. Prior to the intervention and at the eight-week time point, participants completed measures for emotional distress (Brief Symptom Inventory), stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10), mindfulness (Mindfulness Attention and Awareness Scale), and self-compassion (Self-Compassion Scale). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate changes in outcomes after MBSR. Linear model estimation using ordinary least squares was used to evaluate the association between changes in self-compassion with changes in emotional distress. Results: Following MBSR, participants reported significant reductions in emotional distress (p < 0.001). Additionally, participants reported improvements in mindfulness and self-compassion (p < 0.001). Linear regression model revealed that changes in self-compassion were significantly associated with changes in emotional distress (p < 0.001). Discussion: An MBSR program conducted by non-psychologist clinicians was associated with improvements in emotional distress, stress, and self-compassion. MBSR is a promising adjunct intervention in which principles can be integrated within a physical therapy approach for chronic conditions. Level of Evidence: 3B.

14.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 97(8): 1254-61, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27085849

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine differences in patient-reported outcomes, neuropsychological tests, and thalamic functional connectivity (FC) between patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and individuals without mTBI and (2) to determine longitudinal associations between changes in these measures. DESIGN: Prospective observational case-control study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A sample (N=24) of 13 patients with mTBI (mean age, 39.3±14.0y; 4 women [31%]) and 11 age- and sex-matched controls without mTBI (mean age, 37.6±13.3y; 4 women [36%]). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resting state FC (3T magnetic resonance imaging scanner) was examined between the thalamus and the default mode network, dorsal attention network, and frontoparietal control network. Patient-reported outcomes included pain (Brief Pain Inventory), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), posttraumatic stress disorder ([PTSD] Checklist - Civilian Version), and postconcussive symptoms (Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire). Neuropsychological tests included the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Tower test, Trails B, and Hotel Task. Assessments occurred at 6 weeks and 4 months after hospitalization in patients with mTBI and at a single visit for controls. RESULTS: Student t tests found increased pain, depressive symptoms, PTSD symptoms, and postconcussive symptoms; decreased performance on Trails B; increased FC between the thalamus and the default mode network; and decreased FC between the thalamus and the dorsal attention network and between the thalamus and the frontoparietal control network in patients with mTBI as compared with controls. The Spearman correlation coefficient indicated that increased FC between the thalamus and the dorsal attention network from baseline to 4 months was associated with decreased pain and postconcussive symptoms (corrected P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that alterations in thalamic FC occur after mTBI, and improvements in pain and postconcussive symptoms are correlated with normalization of thalamic FC over time.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/complications , Brain Concussion/physiopathology , Thalamus/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/metabolism , Case-Control Studies , Depression/etiology , Depression/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Pain/etiology , Pain/physiopathology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Post-Concussion Syndrome , Prospective Studies , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/physiopathology , Thalamus/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
15.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(10): 1763-70, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101845

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether pain sensitivity and pain catastrophizing are associated with persistent pain and disability after lumbar spine surgery. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=68; mean age, 57.9±13.1y; 40 women [58.8%]) undergoing spine surgery for a degenerative condition from March 1, 2012 to April 30, 2013 were assessed 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were persistent back pain intensity, pain interference, and disability. Patients with persistent back pain intensity, pain interference, or disability were identified as those patients reporting Brief Pain Inventory scores ≥4 and Oswestry Disability Index scores ≥21 at all postoperative time points. RESULTS: From 6 weeks to 6 months after surgery, approximately 12.9%, 24.2%, and 46.8% of patients reported persistent back pain intensity, pain interference, or disability, respectively. Increased pain sensitivity at 6 weeks was associated with having persistent back pain intensity (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-4.1) after surgery. Increased pain catastrophizing at 6 weeks was associated with having persistent back pain intensity (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2), pain interference (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2), and disability (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4). An interaction effect was not found between pain sensitivity and pain catastrophizing on persistent outcomes (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest the importance of early postoperative screening for pain sensitivity and pain catastrophizing to identify patients at risk for poor postoperative pain intensity, pain interference, and/or disability outcomes. Future research should consider the benefit of targeted therapeutic strategies for patients with these postoperative prognostic factors.


Subject(s)
Catastrophization , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/psychology , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Pain, Postoperative/psychology , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain Threshold , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
16.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 15: 325, 2014 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25273991

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The United States has the highest rate of lumbar spine surgery in the world, with rates increasing over 200% since 1990. Medicare spends over $1 billion annually on lumbar spine surgery. Despite surgical advances, up to 40% of patients report chronic pain and disability following surgery. Our work has demonstrated that fear of movement is a risk factor for increased pain and disability and decreased physical function in patients following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and self-management treatments have the potential to address psychosocial risk factors and improve outcomes after spine surgery, but are unavailable or insufficiently adapted for postoperative care. Our research team developed a cognitive-behavioral based self-management approach to postoperative rehabilitation (Changing Behavior through Physical Therapy (CBPT)). Pilot testing of the CBPT program demonstrated greater improvement in pain, disability, physical and mental health, and physical performance compared to education. The current study compares which of two treatments provided by telephone - a CBPT Program or an Education Program about postoperative recovery - are more effective for improving patient-centered outcomes in adults following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions. METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-center, comparative effectiveness trial will be conducted. Two hundred and sixty patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions will be recruited from two medical centers and community surgical practices. Participants will be randomly assigned to CBPT or Education at 6 weeks following surgery. Treatments consist of six weekly telephone sessions with a trained physical therapist. The primary outcome will be disability and secondary outcomes include pain, general health, and physical activity. Outcomes will be assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after surgery by an assessor masked to group allocation. DISCUSSION: Effective rehabilitation treatments that can guide clinicians in their recommendations, and patients in their actions will have the potential to effect change in current clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02184143.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Physical Therapy Modalities , Postoperative Care/methods , Spinal Fusion , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/psychology , Physical Therapy Modalities/psychology , Pilot Projects , Postoperative Care/psychology , Prospective Studies , Self Care/methods , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
17.
J Man Manip Ther ; 22(4): 181-90, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25395826

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Article characteristics and trends have been elucidated for other physical therapy-focused journals using content and bibliometric analysis. These findings are important for assessing the current state of a journal and for guiding future publication of research. To date, these analyses have not been performed for the Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (JMMT). OBJECTIVE: To describe content and trends for articles published in JMMT over a 20-year period (1993-2012). METHODS: Journal articles were coded using previously-established domains (article type, participant type, research design, study purpose, and clinical condition). Total publications and proportion of publications based on domain were described. Articles specific to manual therapy intervention were examined and compared to data from other physical therapy-focused journals. Impact by citation and author was examined using bibliometric software. RESULTS: Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy was found to have a recent acceleration in the number of articles published annually. Over time, topical reviews have decreased in favor of research reports. However, rigorous study designs have represented only a small portion of total journal content, and case reports have maintained a consistent publication presence. Manual therapy intervention articles in JMMT are predominantly case designs, however are similar in characteristics to manual therapy intervention articles published in other physical therapy-focused journals. For JMMT articles overall and manual therapy intervention articles across journals, young to middle-aged symptomatic adults with low back and/or neck pain were the most common study participants. DISCUSSION: Increases in the number of papers and a move toward research reports were observed in JMMT over the 20-year period. Considerations for the future were outlined, including the publication of articles with more rigorous research designs. Manual therapy research for adolescents and older adults and for upper and lower extremity conditions should also be considered as priorities for the future.

18.
Iran J Med Sci ; 39(4): 318-26, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25031483

ABSTRACT

Whole body vibration (WBV) is a contemporary treatment modality that holds promise as an exercise training method in health-compromised individuals. A growing number of studies on individuals with Parkinson Disease are examining whether WBV improves balance and functional mobility. However, interpreting WBV studies is challenging since there is variability in the manner in which WBV intervention is conducted. The primary goal of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of WBV on improving mobility and balance as measured by a battery of clinical tests, in patients with Parkinson disease. Studies based on WBV parameters were characterized and a systematic search of peer-reviewed literature in five major databases was conducted. Randomized-controlled trials investigating the effects of WBV in patients with a Parkinson diagnosis and no cognitive impairment were included. A total of six publications met the inclusion criteria. Overall, studies demonstrated mixed results in favor of WBV for improving balance or mobility. The majority of studies seem to suggest a favorable benefit following WBV for mobility and balance, but not when compared to other active intervention or placebo. There was variability in the manner in which WBV intervention was applied. Variations among the six studies included: duration of intervention and rest, follow-up period, type of control groups, frequency of vibration, number of treatment sessions and sex distribution of subjects. Future research is needed to investigate the effects of different types of equipment and treatment dosage in individuals with Parkinson disease.

19.
J Man Manip Ther ; 32(1): 67-84, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37908101

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Changes in quantitative sensory testing (QST) after manual therapy can provide insight into pain relief mechanisms. Prior systematic reviews have evaluated manual-therapy-induced QST change. This overview of systematic reviews aims to consolidate this body of literature and critically review evidence on the hypoalgesic effects of manual therapy in clinical populations. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Embase. Peer-reviewed systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis were eligible if the reviews examined the effect of manual therapy compared to non-manual therapy interventions on QST outcomes in clinical populations. Methodological quality was assessed with the AMSTAR 2 tool. Meta-analysis results and qualitative (non-meta-analysis) interpretations were summarized by type of manual therapy. Overlap of studies was examined with the corrected covered area (CCA) index. RESULTS: Thirty systematic reviews, including 11 meta-analyses, met inclusion. There was a slight overlap in studies (CCA of 1.72% for all reviews and 1.69% for meta-analyses). Methodological quality was predominantly low to critically low. Eight (27%) reviews examined studies with a range of manual therapy types, 13 (43%) reviews focused on joint-biased manual therapy, 7 (23%) reviews focused on muscle-biased manual therapy, and 2 (7%) reviews focused on nerve-biased manual therapy. Twenty-nine (97%) reviews reported on pressure pain threshold (PPT). Meta-analytic results demonstrated conflicting evidence that manual therapy results in greater hypoalgesic effects compared to other interventions or controls. CONCLUSION: Our overview of QST effects, which has relevance to mechanisms underlying hypoalgesia, shows conflicting evidence from mostly low to critically low systematic reviews.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Manipulations , Musculoskeletal Pain , Humans , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Pain Threshold , Hypesthesia
20.
Glob Adv Integr Med Health ; 13: 27536130241236775, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38434590

ABSTRACT

Background: The association between home mindfulness practice quantity in standard length mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and chronic pain outcomes is variable. Few studies focus on abbreviated MBIs (< 8 weeks) and distinguish between formal guided practices and informal practices in daily life. Objectives: To characterize home mindfulness practice and explore associations between home practice quantity and pre-to-post-outcome changes after an MBI for chronic pain. Methods: In this single-arm study, 21 adults with chronic pain (mean age = 54 years, 81% White, mean pain duration = 7 years) completed an MBI with four weekly group sessions. Pre and post self-report measures of pain intensity/interference, physical function, depression, anxiety, positive affect, sleep disturbance (all PROMIS measures), and pain acceptance, catastrophizing, perceived stress and mindfulness were completed, along with daily surveys of formal (mindfulness of breath, body scan) and informal (breathing space, mindfulness of daily activities) practice. Bivariate correlations and multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between days and minutes of practice and change in outcomes. Results: On average, formal practice was completed on 4.3 days per week and 13.5 minutes per day. Informal practice was completed on 3.5 days per week and 8.6 minutes per day. Formal practice was not significantly correlated with outcomes (Spearman's ρ = |.01|-|.32|), whereas informal practice was correlated with multiple outcomes (ρ = |.04|-|.66|). Number of days practiced informally was associated with improved pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and catastrophizing (p's ≤ .05). Number of minutes practiced informally was associated with improved pain interference, anxiety, positive affect, and catastrophizing (p's ≤ .05). Conclusion: Informal home practice quantity, but not formal practice quantity, is associated with improved outcomes during an abbreviated MBI for chronic pain. For these MBIs, it is important to evaluate the distinct roles of formal and informal practice. ClinicalTrialsgov Registration: NCT03495856.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL