ABSTRACT
Rapidly evolving genomic technologies have made genetic expanded carrier screening (ECS) possible for couples considering a pregnancy. The aim of ECS is to identify couples at risk of having a child affected with a severe disorder and to facilitate their reproductive decision-making process. The ECS test we offer at our center, called BeGECS (Belgian Genetic ECS), consists of 1268 autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked pathogenic genes, including severe childhood-onset disorders. However, thus far data are scarce regarding the actual uptake of preconception ECS in a clinical setting. Therefore, our aim was to describe the characteristics of 407 couples to whom ECS was offered at the Center for Medical Genetics of the University Hospital Ghent (CMGG). In addition, we aimed to identify their reasons for accepting or declining BeGECS. Between October 2019 and January 2023, 407 preconception couples were offered BeGECS and were asked to fill in a questionnaire after their decision. Of the 407 couples participating in the survey, 270 (66%) decided to take the test and 137 (34%) declined. We observed that age, highest education level as well as indication for consultation were statistically different between the group that accepted to take the test and the group that declined (p = 0.037). In particular, age and education level were substantially higher in the group that accepted the test. Major reasons for taking BeGECS include prevention, wishing to obtain all information possible, helping preparing their future reproductive decision and increasing their sense of control by being informed. However, couples that do not chose to take BeGECS stated that too much information would make them anxious, that the result would not change their decision to have children, that they do not want to spend money on something that will not happen and that they do not worry about their family history. These findings show that the majority of preconception couples that were offered ECS, accepted the test.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Counseling osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) pregnancies is challenging due to the wide range of onsets and clinical severities, from perinatal lethality to milder forms detected later in life. METHODS: Thirty-eight individuals from 36 families were diagnosed with OI through prenatal ultrasonography and/or postmortem clinical and radiographic findings. Genetic analysis was conducted on 26 genes associated with OI in these subjects that emerged over the past 20 years; while some genes were examined progressively, all 26 genes were examined in the group where no pathogenic variations were detected. RESULTS: Prenatal and postnatal observations both consistently showed short limbs in 97%, followed by bowing of the long bones in 89%. Among 32 evaluated cases, all exhibited cranial hypomineralization. Fractures were found in 29 (76%) cases, with multiple bones involved in 18 of them. Genetic associations were disclosed in 27 families with 22 (81%) autosomal dominant and five (19%) autosomal recessive forms, revealing 25 variants in six genes (COL1A1, COL1A2, CREB3L1, P3H1, FKBP10, and IFITM5), including nine novels. Postmortem radiological examination showed variability in intrafamily expression of CREBL3- and P3H1-related OI. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis for distinguishing OI and its subtypes relies on factors such as family history, timing, ultrasound, genetics, and postmortem evaluation.
Subject(s)
Osteogenesis Imperfecta , Humans , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/genetics , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/diagnostic imaging , Female , Pregnancy , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Collagen Type I, alpha 1 Chain , Tacrolimus Binding Proteins/genetics , Male , Collagen Type I/genetics , Autopsy , Prolyl Hydroxylases/genetics , Adult , Membrane Glycoproteins , Membrane Proteins , ProteoglycansABSTRACT
Marfan syndrome is a rare connective tissue disorder that causes aortic dissection-related sudden death. Current conventional treatments, beta-blockers, and type 1 angiotensin II receptor blockers are prescribed to slow down aortic aneurysm progression and delay (prophylactic) aortic surgery. However, neither of these treatments ceases aortic growth completely. This review focuses on potential alternative therapeutic leads in the field, ranging from widely used medication with beneficial effects on the aorta to experimental inhibitors with the potential to stop aortic growth in Marfan syndrome. Clinical trials are warranted to uncover their full potential.