Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 24(6): 171, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39077532

ABSTRACT

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is accompanied by inflammation and fibrosis to variable extent. The biomarkers of fibrosis were measured in patients with different forms of AF and cardiac status. Herein, we assessed the associations of the baseline concentrations of different biomarkers with the long-term success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with a structurally normal heart. Furthermore, we compared biomarker levels before and 3 years after ablation to gain further insights into the AF mechanism. Methods: Patients, undergoing PVI for paroxysmal/persistent AF were enrolled prospectively. Blood samples were obtained 24 hours before and 3 years after ablation. Serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), plasma Caspase-3, Galectin-3 and Cathepsin L concentrations were measured. Follow-up visits every 6 months included 12-lead electrocardiogram, 24-hour Holter, trans-telephonic monitoring as well as transthoracic echocardiography after ablation. Biomarker levels, left ventricular ejection fraction and left atrial (LA) diameters at baseline and at the 3-year follow-up were compared in patients with versus without AF recurrence. Results: A total of 63 patients were enrolled (23 women; age 61.4 ( ± 8.8) years). The acute isolation of all pulmonary veins was achieved in all patients. During a mean follow-up of 36.3 ± 6.3 months, AF recurrence was demonstrated in 26 (41.3%) patients. No significant differences were demonstrated in the levels of CA-125, Galectin-3, Caspase-3 and Cathepsin L pre- and post-ablation in patients with versus without AF recurrence. A significant decrease was detected in the concentrations of Caspase-3, Galectin-3 and Cathepsin L during follow-up with no difference in patients with versus without AF recurrence. A positive correlation was found between Caspase-3 levels and LA diameters in the AF recurrence group both before (r = 0.477; p = 0.018) and after the procedure (r = 0.533; p = 0.019). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that the levels of CA-125, Caspase-3, Cathepsin L and Galectin-3 are not associated with AF recurrence after PVI in patients with a structurally normal heart and mainly paroxysmal AF. Except for CA-125, all the other biomarkers demonstrated a significant decrease during a 3-year follow-up post-ablation. Furthermore, Caspase-3 levels demonstrated a positive correlation with LA dimensions in patients with AF recurrence.

2.
Cardiol Ther ; 13(3): 615-630, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39136916

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist due to the common elements of the pathomechanism they share. The potential significance of the order these entities present in the same patient is ill-defined. Herein, we report our results from a nationwide database on the occurrence of various sequences AF and HF may present, the time delays between the two conditions and all-cause mortality associated with different scenarios. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with both AF and HF between 2015 and 2021 were enrolled from the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) database. The order the two entities followed each other, and the time delay in between were registered. Median survival rates were calculated in AF → HF; HF → AF and simultaneous scenarios. RESULTS: A total of 109,075 patients were enrolled: 29,937 with AF → HF, 38,171 with HF → AF, and 40,967 diagnosed simultaneously. Time delays between AF → HF and HF → AF were 6 and 10 months, respectively. The median survival was 46 months in the AF → HF, 38 months in the HF → AF, and 21 months in the simultaneous group. Patients with HF → AF, and with simultaneous presentations had 5% and 16% greater mortality risk as compared to the AF → HF sequence, with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.95 (0.93-0.97) and 0.84 (0.82-0.85), respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: HF occurred significantly earlier after the diagnosis of AF than vice versa. Patients diagnosed simultaneously had the worst, while the AF → HF sequence had the best prognosis. These data should have implications for the intensification of monitoring and therapy in different scenarios.

3.
Cardiol Ther ; 13(1): 149-161, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38216822

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-NR) have poor prognosis. Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) treatment improved the outcome of patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (HFrEF) in randomized trials with no data on the specific cohort of CRT-NRs. The aim of this study was to compare the echocardiographic and biomarker changes in CRT-NR patients treated with versus without SV, and in patients with HFrEF on SV therapy. METHODS: CRT-NR patients initiated on SV (group I), CRT-NR patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) (group II), and patients with HFrEF (without CRT) initiated on SV (group III) were identified in our heart failure (HF) registry. CRT-NR was defined as < 10% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) 6 months after the implantation. Echocardiographic parameters and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels at baseline and at the end of follow-up were compared. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients (group I, 70; group II, 70; and group III, 135) were included. After a follow-up of 7.54 ± 1.8 months (mean ± standard deviation [SD]), LV EF (%) increased in group I (25.2 ± 5.7 versus 29.4% ± 6.7; p < 0.001) and in group III (26.6 ± 6.4 versus 29.9 ± 6.7; p < 0.001). LV end-systolic diameters (mm) decreased in group I (56.6 ± 9.0 versus 54.3 ± 8.7; p = 0.004) and in group III (55.9 ± 9.9 versus 54.3 ± 11.2; p = 0.021). The levels of NT-proBNP (pg/mL) decreased in group I (2058.86 [1041.07-4502.51] versus 1121.55 [545-2541]; p < 0.001) and in group III (2223.35 [1233.03-4795.96] versus 1123.09 [500.38-2651.27]; p < 0.001). The extent of improvement was similar in groups I and III (p > 0.05). No significant changes were detected in group II. CONCLUSION: SV therapy induced similar improvements in echocardiographic parameters and in NT-proBNP levels in CRT-NR patients and in patients with HFrEF without resynchronization.

4.
Cardiol J ; 2024 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39136617

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces procedure times, but limited data is available about its impact on electrophysiology (EP) lab efficiency in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Using CEE-specific procedure data, the present study modeled cryoballoon ablation procedures on EP lab resource consumption to improve efficiency. METHODS: A discrete event simulation model was developed to assess EP efficiency with cryoballoon ablation. Model inputs were taken from CEE sites within the Cryo Global Registry, namely Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Serbia, and Slovakia. The main endpoints were percentage of days that resulted in overtime and percentage of days with time for one extra simple EP procedure. Use of the 'figure of 8' (Fo8) closure technique to reduce procedure time was also examined. RESULTS: The mean lab occupancy time across all CEE sites was 133 ± 47 minutes (min: 104 minutes, max:181 minutes). Cryoballoon ablation in the base-case scenario resulted in 14.6% of days with overtime and 64.8% of days with time for an extra simple EP procedure. Use of the Fo8 closure technique enhanced these values to 5.5% and 85.3%, respectively. Model endpoints were most sensitive to changes in lab occupancy times and overtime start time. CONCLUSIONS: In this CEE-specific analysis of EP lab efficiency it was found that 3 cryoballoon ablation procedures could be performed in 1 lab day, leaving time for a 4th simple EP procedure on most days. As such, use cryoballoon ablation for PVI is an effective way to improve EP lab efficiency.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL