ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The relationship among inhaled allergen exposure, sensitization, and asthma severity is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship among personal allergen exposure, reservoir dust allergen concentrations, and physiological measures of asthma severity; to examine the numbers of particles inspired that react with autologous IgE and IgG4. METHODS: A total of 117 patients with asthma wore 5 nasal air samplers (NASs) at home: 1 each for exposure to mite, cat and dog allergens, NAS-IgE, and NAS-IgG4. NASs were processed by HALOgen assay for allergen measurement and incubated with autologous serum for detection of NAS-IgE and NAS-IgG4. Reservoir allergen concentrations were measured by ELISA. Subjects' asthma severity was ascertained by measurement of lung function, exhaled nitric oxide, and nonspecific bronchial reactivity to histamine. RESULTS: Nasal air sampler counts correlated with reservoir concentrations for cat (r=0.31; P=.001) and dog (r=0.20; P=.03) but not mite allergen (r=0.001; P=1.0). There was no significant relationship between sensitization with exposure measured by NAS to any allergen and PD20FEV1 (F[3,60]=1.60; P=.20); however, sensitization with exposure in dust reservoirs had significant effects on PD20FEV1 for any allergen (F[3,59]=3.12; P=.03), cat (F[3,59]=3.77; P=.01), and mite (F[3,59]=2.78; P=.05), but not dog (F[3,59]=1.06; P=.37). We repeated the analysis with separate variables for sensitization and exposure, controlling for the confounders; sensitization but not exposure conferred lower PD20FEV1 values. However, increasing cat allergen exposure was associated with improving bronchial reactivity in not cat-sensitized patients. NAS-IgE and NAS-IgG4 counts bore no relationship to any measure of asthma severity. CONCLUSION: Nasal air samplers confer no advantage over reservoir dust analysis for studies of asthma severity. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In common with other measures of exposure, single nasal air samples do not provide a useful measure of home allergen exposure for the individual patient with allergic asthma.
Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Allergens/analysis , Asthma/immunology , Dust/analysis , Housing , Inhalation Exposure , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Asthma/physiopathology , Bronchial Hyperreactivity/immunology , Cats , Dogs , Environmental Monitoring , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Nose , Pyroglyphidae , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: On the basis of experimental chamber studies, vacuum cleaners with double-thickness bags and integral high-efficiency particulate arrest (HEPA) air filters are claimed to reduce airborne allergen levels and are currently recommended to allergic patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of vacuum cleaning on personal inhaled cat allergen exposure in homes with cats. METHODS: Five unused new vacuum cleaners were compared with an old non-HEPA filter vacuum cleaner. Each vacuum cleaner was tested in an experimental chamber and in 5 homes with cats. Inhaled cat allergen was measured by nasal air sampling. RESULTS: New vacuum cleaners failed to leak any allergen in the experimental chamber. There was a significant increase in inhaled cat allergen during vacuum cleaning in homes (F = 48.39, df = 1.4, P =.002) with no difference between the old vacuum cleaner and the unused new vacuum cleaners (5-fold and 3-fold increase compared to baseline, respectively; F = 0.005, df = 1.4, P =.95). CONCLUSIONS: The use of new HEPA-filter vacuum cleaners increases inhaled cat allergen in homes with cats. The use of HEPA-filter modern vacuum cleaners to reduce pet allergen exposure in the homes of pet owners should not be justified merely on the basis of experimental chamber data.