Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Immunol ; 44(4): 86, 2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578389

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The CDC and ACIP recommend COVID-19 vaccination for patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Not much is known about vaccine safety in IEI, and whether vaccination attenuates infection severity in IEI. OBJECTIVE: To estimate COVID-19 vaccination safety and examine effect on outcomes in patients with IEI. METHODS: We built a secure registry database in conjunction with the US Immunodeficiency Network to examine vaccination frequency and indicators of safety and effectiveness in IEI patients. The registry opened on January 1, 2022, and closed on August 19, 2022. RESULTS: Physicians entered data on 1245 patients from 24 countries. The most common diagnoses were antibody deficiencies (63.7%). At least one COVID-19 vaccine was administered to 806 patients (64.7%), and 216 patients received vaccination prior to the development of COVID-19. The most common vaccines administered were mRNA-based (84.0%). Seventeen patients were reported to seek outpatient clinic or emergency room care for a vaccine-related complication, and one patient was hospitalized for symptomatic anemia. Eight hundred twenty-three patients (66.1%) experienced COVID-19 infection. Of these, 156 patients required hospitalization (19.0%), 47 required ICU care (5.7%), and 28 died (3.4%). Rates of hospitalization (9.3% versus 24.4%, p < 0.001), ICU admission (2.8% versus 7.6%, p = 0.013), and death (2.3% versus 4.3%, p = 0.202) in patients who had COVID-19 were lower in patients who received vaccination prior to infection. In adjusted logistic regression analysis, not having at least one COVID-19 vaccine significantly increased the odds of hospitalization and ICU admission. CONCLUSION: Vaccination for COVID-19 in the IEI population appears safe and attenuates COVID-19 severity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccination , Hospitalization , Critical Care
3.
World Allergy Organ J ; 16(4): 100765, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37179536

ABSTRACT

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a chronic multi-organic immune fibrosing disease. It affects preferentially men around middle age and almost any organs can be involved; however, lymph nodes, submandibular and lacrimal glands, pancreas, and retroperitoneum are the most affected. The mainstay treatment is corticosteroids, sometimes adjuncts with DMARDs or rituximab as steroid sparing agents. Th2 inflammation is implicated in the pathophysiology of the disease. Several reports indicate that allergy and/or atopy often affect patients with IgG4-RD. The frequency varies greatly between studies with allergies/allergic diseases reported in 18-76% while atopy is reported in 14-46%. In studies including both, they affect 42 and 62% of patients. Rhinitis and asthma are the most frequent allergic diseases. IgE and blood eosinophiles are often elevated and few studies report that basophils and mast cells could participate in the disease pathogenesis; however, the implication of allergy and atopy remain unclear. No common allergen has been identified and IgG4 production seems to be polyclonal. Although a direct causal effect is unlikely, they could potentially shape the clinical phenotype. Allergies/allergic diseases and/or atopy are reported to be more frequent in IgG4-RD patients presenting head, neck, and thoracic involvement, with higher IgE and eosinophils and less frequent in retroperitoneal fibrosis; however, studies regarding allergy and atopy in IgG4-RD are highly heterogenous. The aim of this article is to review what is currently known about the allergy and atopy in the context of Ig4-RD.

4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 9(3): 1232-1241, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33181341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uterine contractions are recognized as a potential manifestation of anaphylaxis, but literature on their proper management is limited. It is widely recognized that anaphylactic reactions can cause uterine contractions, but little is known about their optimal management. OBJECTIVE: Review potential treatments for painful uterine contractions associated with anaphylaxis or mast cell activation. METHODS: This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched in English, French, and Spanish for reports of uterine anaphylaxis published up until July 2020. The search strategy used a combination of Boolean operators and included the following Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords: hypersensitivity; anaphylaxis; mastocytosis; uterus; uterine contraction; pelvic pain; labor, obstetric; labor, premature; and endometriosis. RESULTS: This systematic review identified 19 studies reporting on 31 cases of painful uterine contractions occurring during anaphylaxis or other events associated with mast cell activation. Nine patients were pregnant. We present 2 additional cases in nonpregnant women, one associated with an oral food challenge and the other associated with oral food desensitization. The most frequent triggers were subcutaneous immunotherapy (14 cases), food (6 cases), and drugs (4 cases). Uterine cramps were associated with systemic symptoms in 24 cases and lasted on average for 2.4 hours. Pretreatment with antihistamines and montelukast generally failed to prevent recurrence, but nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used successfully in some reports. Response to intramuscular epinephrine was inconsistent. Data from ex vivo models indicate that epinephrine may paradoxically contribute to uterine contractions through alpha-receptor activity. A small number of cases showed good response to beta-2 agonists. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of quality data on painful uterine contractions occurring in the context of anaphylactic reactions and on their optimal management. In the absence of counterindication, use of a beta-2 agonist and premedication with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could be the preferred options.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Allergens , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic , Epinephrine , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Uterine Contraction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL