Feasibility of changing for a rechargeable constant current neurostimulator in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about outcome and settings adaptations after replacement of constant-voltage non-rechargeable implantable pulse generator (CV-nrIPG) by constant-current rechargeable IPG (CC-rIPG). OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and safety of replacing a CV-nrIPG by a CC-rIPG in Parkinson's disease (PD) and the subsequent outcome. METHODS: A prospective cohort of thirty PD patients, whose CV-nrIPG was replaced by a CC-rIPG in University Hospital of Lyon between January 2017 and December 2018 (rIPG group) and 39 PD patients, who underwent the replacement of a CV-nrIPG by the same device in 2016 (nrIPG group), were enrolled in this study. Three surgeons performed the operations. Duration of hospitalization for the replacement as well as the number of in or outpatient visits during the first 3 months after the surgery were recorded. In the rIPG group, we compared preoperative DBS settings and the theoretical amplitude estimated using Ohm's law to the amplitude used at the end of follow-up. We assessed patients' and clinicians' opinion on the patient global functioning after the replacement using Clinical Global Impression score. RESULTS: Duration of hospitalization (P=0.47) and need for additional hospitalizations (P=0.73) or consultations (P=0.71) to adapt DBS parameters did not differ between the two groups. Neurological condition (CGI score) was considered as unchanged by both patients and neurologists. Final amplitude of stimulation using CC-rIPG was not predicted by Ohm's law in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing CV-nrIPG by CC-rIPG is safe and well tolerated but require neurological expertise to set the new parameters of stimulation.

Parkinson's disease associated with 22q11.2 deletion: Clinical characteristics and response to treatment.

BACKGROUND: While it is known that 22q11.2 microdeletions (22q11.2-del) increase the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD), the characteristics of PD associated with 22q11.2-del have not been specifically explored. OBJECTIVE: This report aimed to assess the clinical characteristics and treatment responses of PD patients with 22q11.2-del, and to describe any features that might lead neurologists to investigate the comorbidity. METHODS: Nine PD patients (eight men, one woman) with 22q11.2-del were followed at seven centers of the French PD Expert Network (Ns-Park). RESULTS: PD diagnosis was made before 22q11.2-del diagnosis in seven cases; their main characteristics were early onset (32-48 years) and good initial levodopa sensitivity, but with a course characterized by severe and early-onset levodopa-induced motor complications and psychiatric manifestations. Three patients received deep brain stimulation (DBS) that was effective. CONCLUSION: Searching for 22q11.2-del in PD patients presenting with suggestive features is relevant as the clinical presentation is similar to idiopathic PD, but with other associated characteristics, including a severe evolution. Results with DBS are similar to those reported for idiopathic PD.

Initial treatment of Parkinson's disease in 2016: The 2000 consensus conference revisited.

In 2000, a French consensus conference proposed guidelines for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Since then, new drugs have been concocted, new studies have been published and clinicians have become aware of some drug-induced adverse effects that were little known in the past. This has led us to reconsider the recommendations published 16 years ago. Thus, the aim of the present review is to present the recent data related to the different medications and non-pharmacological approaches available for PD, with a special focus on early-stage PD. Levodopa (LD), dopamine agonists (DAs), catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors (COMT-Is), anticholinergics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOB-Is) and amantadine have been considered, and their efficacy and safety for both motor as well as non-motor aspects are reported here. This has led to our proposal for a revised therapeutic strategy for the initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed PD patients, based on the available literature and the relative benefits/side effects balance.

An intensive exercise-based training program reduces prefrontal activity during usual walking in patients with Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) leads to a progressive loss of locomotor automaticity. Consequently, PD patients rely more on executive resources for the control of gait, resulting in increased prefrontal activity while walking. Exercise-based training programs may improve automaticity of walking and reduce prefrontal activity in this population. This study aimed to assess the effect of an intensive multidisciplinary exercise-based training program on prefrontal activity and gait performance during usual walking in PD patients. METHOD: Fourteen patients (mean age: 67 ± 9; disease duration: 6 ± 5 years; Hoehn and Yahr score: 1.9 ± 0.6) were included in this study. They were assessed in ON stage at three different times at 5-week intervals: two times before the training program (T0 and T1) and once after the training program (T2). Gait performance (stride time, speed, stride length, cadence, and their respective coefficient of variation) and cortical activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) were measured during usual walking. RESULTS: Patients had reduced cortical activity of the DLPFC at T2 compared to T1 (p = 0.003). Patients had shorter stride time at T2 compared to T1 (p = 0.025) and tended to have longer stride length at T2 than at T1 (p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: The training program led to positive effects on prefrontal activity and gait performance. Reduced prefrontal activity during usual walking after training program suggests that patients may have a greater reserve capacity to face more challenging walking conditions. Further studies will investigate the effect of this training on cortical activity during dual-task walking..

[Screening for reading difficulties in Parkinson's disease: An evaluation of the Alouette test]. / Exploration des troubles de la lecture dans la maladie de Parkinson : utilité du test de l'alouette.

INTRODUCTION: Reading disorders in Parkinson's disease (PD) are poorly evaluated due to the lack of validated tests to screen for them. They are often attributed to hand tremors associated with the disease. In this study, we evaluated the "alouette test" validated for dyslexia screening, in PD by comparing the results to healthy patients. METHODS: The "alouette test" was conducted on a fixed surface to avoid errors related to tremor. A fixation and tracking test were then performed. All the tests were filmed to be analyzed later by 2 examiners blinded to the neurological diagnosis. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included, 19 with PD, and 19 healthy age-matched patients. PD patients read on average 250.9±13.7 words correctly vs. 260.3±2.7 words for healthy patients (P=0.008). This difference was greatest for the older patient subgroup (>65 years), who had the disease longer (P=0.014). Tracking and fixation tests were more impaired in PD patients compared to healthy patients. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted many reading disorders in PD. The use of the "alouette test" which can easily be implemented in clinical practice, could help to diagnose these disorders. Better evaluation of these difficulties would allow for better medical care of these patients.

Optimizing the deep brain stimulation care pathway in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Management of Parkinson's disease (PD) using deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires complex care in specialized, multidisciplinary centers. A well-organized, efficient patient flow is crucial to ensure that eligible patients can quickly access DBS. Delays or inefficiencies in patient care may impact a center's ability to meet demand, creating a capacity bottleneck. Analysis of the current practices within a center may help identify areas for improvement. After external audit of the DBS workflow of the Lyon Neurological Hospital and comparison with other European centers, manageable steps were suggested to restructure the care pathway. Propositions of the audit comprised, for example: (1) directly admitting referred patients to hospital, without a prior neurological outpatient visit and (2) including the preoperative anesthesia consultation in the hospital stay 1 month before surgery, not separately. This reorganization (between 2013 and 2016) was performed without increases in hospital medical resources or costs. The time from patients' first referral to surgery was reduced (from 22 to 16 months; p = 0.033), as was the number of pre- and postoperative patient visits (11-5; p = 0.025) and the total cumulative length of in-hospital stay (20.5-17.5 nights; p = 0.02). Ultimately, the total number of PD consultations increased (346-498 per year), as did the number of DBS implants per year (32-45 patients). In this single center experience, restructuring the DBS care pathway allowed a higher number of PD patients to benefit from DBS therapy, with a shorter waiting time and without decreasing the quality of care.