Positive Experiences with the Use of an eHealth Smartphone Application During the Treatment of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the patient-perceived satisfaction and feasibility of a personalized eHealth application (app) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: Patients were offered to download the app prior to undergoing AAA surgery, in a prospective single-center cohort study, using a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. It offers information via the timely delivery of push notifications with text, images, and videos. The information includes chapters regarding the AAA, surgical techniques (endovascular aneurysm repair and open surgical repair), and perioperative lifestyle advice, such as physical exercise programmes, healthy and protein rich diet, geriatric care, and to stop smoking or drinking alcohol. RESULTS: The app was installed by 59/65 patients (91%). After installation, 6 patients deactivated the app (10%). The mean age was 74 years (SD = 7), and 85% of patients were male. The app was opened a median of 67 times (interquartile range [IQR] 33-127) and with a median time interval of 50 hours (IQR 28-74). Overall, 90% (53/59) completed a satisfaction questionnaire. On a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10, the median scored satisfaction for guidance was 8 (IQR 6-8), provided information was 8 (IQR 6-8), usefulness was 7 (IQR 6-8.5), and for recommending it to others it was 8 (IQR 6-9). Using purposeful sampling, 7 patients underwent a semistructured interview on the user-experience of the app. They described experiencing positive changes to lifestyle habits and appreciating the ability to share it with loved ones or informal caregivers. Several areas of improvement were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The personalized eHealth app is feasible in older AAA patients and is valued as a useful supplement to the standard of care. We argue that the app aids in managing a prehabilitation program, aids in the digital transformation of healthcare, and thereby decreases the workload of hospital staff.

Effect of conservative treatment in aortoiliac occlusive disease.

Objective: To determine the effect of primary conservative treatment without revascularization in patients with proven aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) presenting with intermittent claudication (IC).Background: The initial treatment of IC should focus on supervised exercise therapy (SET) and pharmacotherapy. Nowadays, primary endovascular revascularization (EVR) has become increasingly popular in patients with all types of AIOD. But in daily practice, EVR is often performed without initially extensive exercise.Method: This is a single centre retrospective study from December 2012 to September 2017. Primary outcomes were maximum walking distance (MWD) and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were revascularization rate and mortality.Results: Twenty-four patients were included. Mean age was 64 years (SD: 9). Mean follow-up was 28 months (SD: 17). Nineteen patients (80%) had SET. In 18 (75%) patients, the MWD was improved compared to the initial situation. In five (21%) patients, the MWD stayed the same. The MWD of one (4%) patient decreased. Overall satisfaction rate was 87%. Three patients (13%) were not satisfied with the conservative treatment and eventually got an EVR. There was no disease related death.Conclusions: Conservative treatment, especially with SET, has acceptable subjective symptom outcomes in selected patients with AIOD. It could be a good alternative treatment for certain patients with AIOD and IC.

The Role of Delirium and Other Risk Factors on Mortality in Elderly Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Major Lower Limb Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Delirium in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with increased mortality. The main goal of this study was to investigate the association between delirium and mortality in patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for CLI. In addition, other risk factors associated with mortality were analyzed. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted including all patients aged ≥70 years with CLI undergoing a major lower limb amputation between January 2014 and July 2017. Delirium was scored using the Delirium Observation Screening Score in combination with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Risk factors for mortality were analyzed by calculating hazard ratios using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In total, 95 patients were included; of which, 29 (31%) patients developed a delirium during admission. Delirium was not associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-1.73; P = 0.84). Variables independently associated with an increased risk of mortality were age (HR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.1), cardiac history (HR 3.3; 95% CI 1.8-6.1), current smoking (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.6-5.5), preoperative anemia (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.1-7.2), and living in a nursing home (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.4). CONCLUSION: Delirium was not associated with an increased mortality risk in elderly patients with CLI undergoing a major lower limb amputation. Factors related to an increased mortality risk were age, cardiac history, current smoking, preoperative anemia, and living in a nursing home.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular or open approach in a Dutch general hospital.

AIM: We compared the outcomes of 56 patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) who underwent either open repair or emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) in a general hospital. It seems feasible that the availability of eEVAR for treatment of RAAA could lead to a decrease in hospital mortality. METHODS: We analyzed all admitted patients with a RAAA, between January 2006 and April 2008, eEVAR is compared to open repair. We studied 30 days mortality, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, total blood loss and complications. RESULTS: Fifteen eEVAR procedures (26.8%) were performed. Mortality in the eEVAR-group was 26%, in the open repair-group 46%. Mean intensive care unit stay was 3.9 days and 4.8 days in the eEVAR-group and open repair-group, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 13 days and 10.5 days. The average blood loss was 210cc and 2760cc. The amount of blood products for transfusion was significantly higher in the open repair. Overall complication rate was not significantly different in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment in a Dutch general hospital of a RAAA with an eEVAR procedure has a lower mortality in comparison to the open repair. Therefore, whenever possible the eEVAR is the preferred treatment method.

Evaluation of A-V impulse technology as a treatment for oedema following polytetrafluoroethylene femoropopliteal surgery in a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of A-V impulse technology (A-V) for oedema prevention and treatment following PTFE femoropopliteal surgery. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. MATERIALS: 36 patients undergoing PTFE femoropopliteal bypass reconstructions, either being treated postoperatively with a compression stocking (CS) (Group-1, n = 19) or with A-V (Group-2, n = 17). METHODS: Patients in treatment group-1 used a CS postoperatively during 1 week day and night, patients in group-2 were treated with A-V postoperatively at night during one week. The lower leg circumference was measured preoperatively and at five postoperative time points. RESULTS: Limb circumference has increased postoperatively on day 1 (CS 1.5%/A-V 1.4%), on day 4 (5.7%/6.3%), on day 7 (6.6%/6.1%), on day 14 (7.9%/7.7%) and on day 90 (5.8%/5.2%). Differences between treatment groups were not significant. A re-operation gives a significant 3.9% increase in circumference as compared to a first operation (95% CI: 1.5-6.4%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found in the extent of developed edema between the groups following PTFE femoropopliteal bypass surgery. A redo peripheral bypass operation results in significantly more postoperative oedema than a first-time performed bypass operation.

Endovascular aneurysm repair with Zenith graft. Complications caused by leg extensions.

AIM: A large amount of Zenith endovascular stent complications is due to problems with the leg extensions. This kind of complication has never been reported in literature. The aim of this study was to monitor the complications of endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed with the Zenith endovascular graft occurred in the Amphia Ziekenhuis in Breda to see how many recurrences were due to leg extension. METHODS: The study enrolled all patients (N.=66) treated with the Zenith endograft in the period between October 2000 and September 2006. Mortality, complications and the number of reinterventions were analysed. Average age of the patients was 73.4 years, average follow-up was 24.5 months and average aneurysm size was 61.5 mm. Radiologic follow-up was performed by computed tomography scans and X-rays. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality rate was 0%. The overall mortality rate during follow-up was 3%. Ten patients required a total number of 12 reinterventions (15%). The average time for reintervention was 10 months after the primary operation. Mortality, complication and reintervention rates were comparable with those reported in the literature, but 75% of these reinterventions were related to the leg extensions. CONCLUSION: Authors observed that nine out of 12 complications which required reintervention were due to problems with one of the leg extensions. This is the first study that specifies clearly the percentage of problems with leg extensions in EVAR (75%). When placing a Zenith endovascular graft extra attention should be paid to optimal placement of the leg extensions.

[Abdominal pain as a symptom of a late complication following endovascular treatment of an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta]. / Abdominale pijn als symptoom van een late complicatie na endovasculaire behandeling van een aneurysma van de abdominale aorta.

A 72-year-old man presented with progressive pain in the left lower abdomen thought to be due to diverticulitis of the colon. Antimicrobial therapy had not reduced the symptoms. Four years before, during an endovascular procedure, the patient had been given a stent because of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). A CT scan showed a large retroperitoneal haematoma on the left side and an increased diameter of the AAA of 8.5 cm. X-rays showed a gap between the endovascular stent and the left iliac leg of the endoprosthesis. Due to the space between the two grafts, there was retroperitoneal leakage ofblood. In endovascular surgery this life-threatening situation is called a type III endoleak. The patient was operated immediately using the endovascular technique. Through the left femoral artery a new coated stent was positioned over the gap, which led to rapid recovery of the patient. Patients with abdominal pain and a history of a vascular endoprosthesis should be given a CT scan and plain radiography to exclude an endoleak.

A nearly fatal tracheal obstruction resulting from a transtracheal oxygen catheter.

In a patient with a transtracheal oxygen catheter (ITO2C), a nearly fatal complication occurred due to the formation of a mucous plug on the tip, which almost totally obstructed the tracheal lumen. To our knowledge, this complication has not been reported before with the use of this type of transtracheal oxygen catheter.

Immediate versus delayed shoulder exercises after axillary lymph node dissection.

A total of 144 evaluable patients with breast cancer were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, prospective study to establish the role of delayed shoulder exercises on wound drainage and shoulder function after axillary lymph node dissection. Patients in group 1 (n = 78) started active shoulder exercises 1 day postoperatively. Patients in group 2 (n = 66) started on the eight postoperative day, following 1 week of immobilization of the arm. Patients in group 2 had 14% less wound drainage volume than those in group 1 (600 +/- 436 mL versus 701 +/- 398 mL); this difference, however, was not significant. Also, no differences could be established between the two groups when duration and volume of wound drainage, number and volume of seroma aspirations, wound complication rates, and shoulder function were compared 6 months after surgery.

The use of iodine seed (I-125) as a marker for the localisation of lung nodules in minimal invasive pulmonary surgery.

AIM: Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is an important tool in the field of thoracic pathology both for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. The standard technique for localisation of non-visible or non-palpable lung lesions is the use of image guided insertion of a guide-wire. However, this method is associated with complications such as pneumothorax, bleeding and wire-dislocation. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using of iodine seeds (I-125) as a marker of lung lesions during VATS. METHODS: 28 consecutive patients with parenchymal lung lesions had I-125 seed localisation performed prior to VATS. After seed placement all patients underwent VATS with wedge resection. RESULTS: During surgery all lesions could be identified and radically resected. In six (21.4%) patients the seed was not placed optimally but none of these cases were associated with seed dislocation after placement. In four and in 5 patients the placement of the I-125 seed was complicated by a haematoma and pneumothorax respectively. However, in all of these patients a wait-and-see policy would have been justified. In one patient a conversion to a thoracotomy was necessary due to seed displacement. CONCLUSION: In patients with parenchymal lung lesions undergoing VATS and wedge resection I-125 seed localisation is a feasible technique. Complication rates are comparable to standard guide-wire localisation. Although I-125 seeds can be positioned under CT-guidance an optimal placement is of utmost importance for VATS wedge resection. Further research is needed to investigate the possible advantages of this technique.

Primary aortoduodenal fistula in combination with aortoiliac occlusive disease: report of a rare case.

Most of the cases of aortoenteric fistula are due to aneurysm of the aorta, although infection, tumor, radiotherapy, gastric ulcers and foreign body ingestion have also been described in the literature. We report the case of a 62-year-old woman presenting with massive gastrointestinal bleeding with hematemesis and melaena. This case is unique in that the primary aortoduodenal (PADF) fistula formed as a result of complex atherosclerotic disease of the abdominal aorta and both iliacal arteries, also known as Leriche's syndrome, and not primarily due to an aneurysm. We will give a brief summary of the difficulties and challenges which the surgeon faced during the operation and a surprisingly uneventful postoperative course.

Midterm results of autologous saphenous vein and ePTFE pre-cuffed bypass surgery in peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

INTRODUCTION: The graft of choice in lower limb bypass surgery is the autologous saphenous vein (ASV). However, a prosthetic graft is needed in the absence of an ASV. In such situations, we used an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) pre-cuffed Dynaflo graft as supragenicular bypass or Distaflo graft as infragenicular or femorocrural bypass. In respect to the expanding possibilities of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), the indication for bypass surgery moved toward patients with advanced stages of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. For this reason, this study analyzed the current performances of these ePTFE grafts and ASV grafts with special attention to limb salvage. METHODS: In a retrospective study all patients who underwent peripheral bypass surgery between 2004 and 2008 were included. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to express primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage rates at 1 and 3 years. Log-rank tests were performed to compare graft types. RESULTS: A total of 272 grafts (ePTFE/ASV: 110/162) were performed in lower limb bypass surgery. The mean follow-up was 20.3 months. The secondary 3-year patency rates were for (n=78) supragenicular grafts (ePTFE/ASV: 45%/94%)*, for (n=124) infragenicular grafts (24%/74%), and 70 for femorocrural grafts (26%/52%). Limb salvage after 3 years was 59% in the ePTFE group versus 78% in the ASV group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: In the current population of vascular patients where no PTA is possible and a peripheral bypass is necessary, the ASV remains the graft of first choice. However, the pre-cuffed ePTFE graft is a good alternative, especially in cases of critical limb ischemia, in respect to an acceptable limb salvage rate.

Autogenous radial-cephalic or prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop AVF in patients with compromised vessels? A randomized, multicenter study of the patency of primary hemodialysis access.

OBJECTIVE: The construction of an autogenous radial-cephalic direct wrist arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) is the primary and best option for vascular access for hemodialysis. However, 10%-24% of RCAVFs thrombose directly after operation or do not function adequately due to failure of maturation. In case of poor arterial and/or poor venous vessels for anastomosis, the outcome of RCAVFs may be worse and an alternative vascular access is probably indicated. A prosthetic graft implant may be a second best option. Therefore, a randomized multicenter study comparing RCAVF with prosthetic (polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]) graft implantation in patients with poor vessels was performed. METHODS: A total of 383 consecutive new patients needing primary vascular access were screened for enrollment in a prospective randomized study. According to defined vessel criteria from the preoperative duplex scanning, 140 patients were allocated to primary placement of an RCAVF and 61 patients to primary prosthetic graft implantation. The remaining 182 patients were randomized to receive either an RCAVF (n = 92) or prosthetic graft implant (n = 90). Patency rate was defined as the percentage of AVFs that functioned well after implantation. RESULTS: Primary and assisted primary 1-year patencies were 33% +/- 5.3% vs 44% +/- 6.2% (P = .03) and 48% +/- 5.5% vs 63% +/- 5.9% (P = .035) for the RCAVF and prosthetic AVF, respectively. Secondary patencies were 52% +/- 5.5% vs 79% +/- 5.1% (P = .0001) for the RCAVF and prosthetic AVF, respectively. Patients with RCAVFs developed a total of 102 (1.19/patient-year [py]) vs 122 (1.45/py; P = .739) complications in the prosthetic AVFs. A total of 43 (0.50/py) interventions in the RCAVF group and 79 (0.94/py) in the prosthetic graft group were needed for access salvage (P = .077). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were more interventions needed for access salvage in the patients with prosthetic graft implants, we may conclude that patients with poor forearm vessels do benefit from implantation of a prosthetic graft for vascular access.

Comparison of imipenem/cilastatin with the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

The clinical safety and efficacy of imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections was compared with the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin in a randomized prospective trial. The severity of illness was determined by means of the Apache II score and a fixed outcome reporting scheme was used. One hundred and four patients were entered into the study, of whom 80 were evaluable. Forty-two patients were treated with imipenem/cilastatin (500 + 500 mg qds) and 38 with aztreonam (600 tds) and clindamycin (1000 mg tds). The study groups were comparable for age and sex. The imipenem/cilastatin group differed from the aztreonam and clindamycin group in having significantly more patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (P < 0.01) and a significantly lower mean Apache score (P < 0.05). The predominate microorganisms isolated in both groups were Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. Treatment with imipenem/cilastatin proved successful in 71% and failed in 24%, and initial success only was seen in 5%. The numbers in the group treated with aztreonam and clindamycin were 64%, 29% and 7% respectively. Severity of illness, as measured by Apache II score, had no influence on the study outcome. Imipenem/cilastatin as well as the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin were effective in the treatment of abdominal infections and no major adverse reactions were seen.