ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Scaphoid non-union treatment remains nonconsensual and is based on vascularized or non-vascularized bone grafting. This study aimed to evaluate with a long follow-up the functional, clinical, and radiological outcomes, reported complications and reoperations and studied non-union treatment prognostic factors. METHODS: Patients who had undergone bone graft surgery for scaphoid non-union were retrospectively reviewed. The evaluated outcomes were pain, qDASH, PRWE and MWS scores, active range of motion, grip strength, union rate, scapholunate angle, carpal height, and presence of arthrosis. Complications and reinterventions were also reported. RESULTS: This study included 60 scaphoid non-union treatments with a mean follow-up of 7.7 (1.5-20.3) years. Twenty (33.3%) non-unions were located at the proximal pole, including 6 (10%) with preoperative avascular necrosis (AVN). Union occurred in 51 patients (85%). The functional, clinical, and radiological results were good. The complication rate was 21.3% and the reintervention rate was 16.7%. Subgroup union rate analysis found no difference if the non-union is localized in the proximal pole or if there is AVN. CONCLUSION: With a representative sample of the population and a long follow-up, we have found a good union rate, clinical and functional results regardless of the treatment method chosen. Scaphoid non-union treatment is still controversial and more studies are needed to accurate indications of each graft according to the patient and non-union characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Retrospective cohort study.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Ununited , Scaphoid Bone , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Fractures, Ununited/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Ununited/surgery , Scaphoid Bone/diagnostic imaging , Scaphoid Bone/surgery , Radiography , Upper ExtremityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess clinical, functional and radiological outcomes after three-corner arthrodesis in patients suffering from symptomatic scapholunate or scaphoid non-union advanced collapsed wrists. We hypothesised that three-corner arthrodesis provided satisfactory clinical and radiological results in the long term. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 13 patients (14 wrists) who underwent a three-corner arthrodesis between March 2004 and January 2019 with a mean follow-up of 6,7 years. Clinical assessment consisted of wrist motion, grip strength, pain and functional scores (Quick-DASH, PRWE, MWS). All complications and surgical revisions were investigated. Radiographic assessment searched for union, evaluated carpal height and ulnar translation, lunate tilt and occurrence of radio-lunate arthritis. RESULTS: At the last follow-up Quick-DASH and PRWE scores were 24,87(± 17.2) and 47.4 (± 26.9) respectively and were significantly improved. Wrist motion was 35°, 32°, 10° et 24° of flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation respectively. Union was obtained for 13 (92,9%) wrists. The mean radiolunate angle was 11° (-17°-34°). Three patients needed reintervention, which 2 consisted of total wrist arthrodesis due to persisting pain. Mild signs of radio-lunate arthritis were found in three patients. CONCLUSION: Three-corner arthrodesis seemed to provide satisfactory long-term functional outcomes. The union rate was high and even patients with signs of radio-lunate arthritis still had improved outcomes at the last follow-up. It could be a part of surgical options in wrists with radio- and midcarpal arthritis, among other procedures.