The glutathione transferase Mu null genotype leads to lower 6-MMPR levels in patients treated with azathioprine but not with mercaptopurine.

The conversion of azathioprine (AZA) to mercaptopurine (MP) is mediated by glutathione transferase Mu1 (GSTM1), alpha1 (GSTA1) and alpha2 (GSTA2). We designed a case-control study with data from the TOPIC trial to explore the effects of genetic variation on steady state 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide (6-MMPR) and 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) metabolite levels. We included 199 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (126 on AZA and 73 on MP). GSTM1-null genotype carriers on AZA had two-fold lower 6-MMPR levels than AZA users carrying one or two copies of GSTM1 (2239 (1006-4587) versus 4371 (1897-7369) pmol/8 × 108 RBCs; P<0.01). In patients on MP (control group) 6-MMPR levels were comparable (6195 (1551-10712) versus 6544 (1717-11600) pmol/8 × 108 RBCs; P=0.84). The 6-TGN levels were not affected by the GSTM1 genotype. The presence of genetic variants in GSTA1 and GSTA2 was not related to the 6-MMPR and 6-TGN levels.

The Effect of Renal Replacement Therapy in a Patient with Mercaptopurine Toxicity: Time to Revise Guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: Mercaptopurine, a thiopurine, is used in various disorders of immune regulation, such as autoimmune hepatitis. Thiopurine metabolism is complex with risk for overdosing, especially when metabolism is impaired by liver dysfunction. Hepatotoxicity may be due to mercaptopurine overdose and is often reversible after prompt cessation of the drug. CASE PRESENTATION: Treatment of thiopurine toxicity is mainly supportive and literature on enhanced elimination by renal replacement therapy is ambiguous. CONCLUSION: In this case of thiopurine toxicity, a patient with autoimmune hepatitis presents with abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. We show in this case report that renal replacement therapy had no effect on total body clearance of mercaptopurine.

A value proposition for trough level-based anti-TNFα drug dosing.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases and rheumatic disorders with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) drugs is expensive, while a significant proportion of patients does not show adequate clinical response. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) enables patient-specific anti-TNFα therapy. The role of laboratory tests in clinical care has recently been described in a value proposition framework. It describes care processes, stakeholders, costs, risks, benefits and patient outcomes based on the use of a laboratory test in a clinical care pathway. We have applied this concept to the use of TDM for anti-TNFα drugs, describing evidence that supports the intervention and its cost effectiveness, steps that need to be adjusted in the care pathway, possible treatment algorithms and measures to assess adoption of this framework into clinical practice. For effective TDM, an assay for measurement of drug levels together with appropriate target ranges and an anti-drug-antibody assay have to be implemented. Also, instead of only reporting the drug concentration, laboratorians, pharmacists and clinicians should deliver added value by introducing a TDM-based treatment algorithm into clinical practice. Thus, to maximize effectiveness of TDM of anti-TNFα therapy in routine care, adjustment of current care pathways and cooperation of many stakeholders are needed.

Absence of nodular regenerative hyperplasia after low-dose 6-thioguanine maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of 6-thioguanine has been proposed as a rescue drug for inflammatory bowel disease patients. Initial data on short-term efficacy and toxicity of 6-thioguanine were promising; however, these have been challenged by reports concerning its potential hepatotoxic effect (nodular regenerative hyperplasia). We proposed that these histological liver abnormalities may well be dose- or level-dependent. AIMS: We performed a prospective multi-centre study on the hepatotoxic potential of long-term and (as compared with prior studies) low-dose 6-thioguanine use. PATIENTS: Inflammatory bowel disease patients using 6-thioguanine for at least 30 consecutive months and consenting to undergo a liver biopsy were enrolled. METHODS: Liver biopsy specimens were scored by two pathologists, unaware of clinical data. Laboratory parameters, determined prior to initiation of 6-thioguanine therapy and prior to biopsy, were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight biopsies were analysed. The majority of patients (89%) were azathioprine and/or 6-mercaptopurine intolerant inflammatory bowel disease patients. In 26 patients (93%) no signs of nodular regenerative hyperplasia were detected; in two additional patients nodular regenerative hyperplasia could not be excluded due to inconclusive pathological findings. The mean 6-thioguanine dosage, 6-thioguaninenucleotides level, duration of use and cumulative dosage were 19.5mg, 564 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC, 38 months and 22491 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that low-dose 6-thioguanine maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients is not likely to be associated with induction of nodular regenerative hyperplasia. The induction of nodular regenerative hyperplasia appears to be 6-thioguanine dose or 6-thioguaninenucleotides level dependent.

Switching from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a 12-month multicentre observational prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab biosimilars have become available for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data showing long-term safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in IBD patients are limited. AIM: To study prospectively the switch from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in an IBD cohort with 12 months follow-up to evaluate safety and effectiveness. METHODS: Adult IBD patients from two hospitals treated with infliximab innovator (Remicade; Janssen Biotech,  Horsham ,  Pennsylvania, USA) were switched to infliximab biosimilar (Inflectra; Hospira, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA) as part of routine care, but in a controlled setting. Blood samples were taken just before the first, second, fourth and seventh infusion of biosimilar. Infliximab trough levels, antibodies-to-infliximab (ATI), CRP and ESR were measured and disease activity scores were calculated. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 133 IBD patients (64% CD, 36% UC). Before switching we found widely varying infliximab levels (median 3.5 µg/mL). ATI were detected in eight patients (6%). Most patients were in remission or had mild disease (CD: 82% UC: 90%). After switching to biosimilar, 35 patients (26%) discontinued therapy within 12 months, mostly due to subjective higher disease activity (9%) and adverse events (AE, 9.8%). AE included general malaise/fatigue (n = 7), arthralgia (n = 2), skin problems (n = 2) and infusion reactions (n = 2). No differences in IFX levels, CRP, and disease activity scores were found between the four time points (P ≥ .0917). CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in drug levels and disease activity between infliximab innovator and biosimilar in our IBD cohort, indicating that biosimilars are safe and effective. The high proportions of discontinuers were mostly due to elective withdrawal or subjective disease worsening.

Extended thiopurine metabolite assessment during 6-thioguanine therapy for immunomodulation in Crohn's disease.

The proposed metabolic advantage of 6-thioguanine (6-TG) is the direct conversion into the pharmacologically active 6-thioguaninenucleotides (6-TGN). The authors assessed metabolic characteristics of 6-TG treatment in patients with Crohn's disease (N = 7) on therapy with 20 mg 6-TG. 6-thioguanine-monophosphate (6-TGMP), 6-thioguanine-diphosphate (6-TGDP), and 6-thioguanine-triphosphate (6-TGTP) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis in erythrocytes. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity and total 6-TGN levels were determined by standard methods. High interindividual variance in metabolite measurements was observed. Main metabolites were 6-TGTP (median = 531 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells) and 6-TGDP (median = 199 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells). Traces of 6-TGMP (median = 39 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells) and 6-TG (2 patients) could be detected. 6-TGN levels correlated with 6-TGTP levels (r = 0.929, P = .003) and with the sum of separate nucleotides (r = 0.929, P = .003). No correlations were established between TPMT activity (median = 13 pmol/h/10(7)) and 6-TG metabolites. The 1-step metabolism of 6-TG still leads to high interindividual variance in metabolite concentrations. Total 6-TGN level monitoring may suffice for clinical practice.

Pancytopenia due to high 6-methylmercaptopurine levels in a 6-mercaptopurine treated patient with Crohn's disease.

In a 23-year-old female with colonic Crohn's disease 6-mercaptopurine 100 mg daily (1.7 mg/kg) was added to mesalamine and prednisolone therapy because of ongoing disease activity. One month later she had fever and a pancytopenia. 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels were extremely elevated (57,000 pmol/8x10(8) red blood cells) and 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels were subtherapeutically (126 pmol/8x10(8) red blood cells). Genotyping showed a wildtype thiopurine S-methyltransferase TPMT(H/H) (*1/*1) genotype and a wildtype inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase gene. TPMT and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase activity were normal. The pancytopenia recovered spontaneously within a few weeks, parallel with decreasing 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels after interrupting 6-mercaptopurine treatment. Epstein-Barrvirus, Cytomegalovirus and Herpesvirus infections were excluded by serology. This is the first report of pancytopenia due to extremely high 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels. No relation was found with the genotype of TPMT and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase enzymes, which play key roles in the thiopurine metabolic pathway. Apparently, 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides metabolites can cause pancytopenia, as was already known for 6-thioguanine nucleotides.

Toxicity of 6-thioguanine: no hepatotoxicity in a series of IBD patients treated with long-term, low dose 6-thioguanine. Some evidence for dose or metabolite level dependent effects?

BACKGROUND: 6-Thioguanine is used in inflammatory bowel disease since 2001, with promising short-term results. In 2003, liver histology of some 6-thioguanine treated patients showed nodular regenerative hyperplasia. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging revealed nodular regenerative hyperplasia in patients with normal histology. AIMS: Investigating the presence of nodular regenerative hyperplasia in long-term 6-thioguanine treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease patients, using 6-thioguanine minimally 24 months, were asked to undergo liver biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Fourteen patients used 6-thioguanine minimally 24 months, 13 participated. Mean 6-thioguanine therapy duration, daily dose and 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels were: 36 months, 18.8 mg (0.28 mg/kg) and 705 pmol/8x10(8) erythrocytes, respectively. Liver histology and magnetic resonance imaging showed no nodular regenerative hyperplasia. DISCUSSION: Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging showed no nodular regenerative hyperplasia in these long-term 6-thioguanine treated inflammatory bowel disease patients. 6-thioguanine dose and metabolite levels were lower compared with previous nodular regenerative hyperplasia reports, suggesting dose or metabolite level-dependent effects. Otherwise, nodular regenerative hyperplasia is related with inflammatory bowel disease itself and immunosuppressives, including azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. CONCLUSION: 6-Thioguanine is debated due to nodular regenerative hyperplasia. We found no nodular regenerative hyperplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients with long-term, low dosed 6-thioguanine, suggesting metabolite level-dependent effects. Therefore, 6-thioguanine still seems useful, but in selected patients, intolerant for other immunosuppressives, low dosed and under close surveillance of metabolite levels and hepatotoxity.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a tool in the switch from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in rheumatic patients: results of a 12-month observational prospective cohort study.

The objective of this study is to apply therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as an objective tool to monitor the switch from infliximab innovator (INX) to infliximab biosimilar (INB) in our diverse rheumatic cohort in daily clinical practice. All rheumatic patients on INX treatment (Remicade®) and ≥18 years were switched to INB (Inflectra®) as part of routine care, but in a controlled setting. Patients were monitored by taking blood samples just before the first infusion of INB (T1), and after the second (T2), fourth (T3), and seventh (T4) infusion of INB. T4 reflects the patients' status after ∼12 months. Infliximab trough levels, antibodies-to-infliximab (ATI), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and validated disease activity scores (if possible) were measured. Our population consisted of 27 patients with seven different rheumatic diseases who had received INX for 143 (58-161) months (median (IQR)). Half of the patients (52%) received concomitant immunosuppressives. We found widely varying infliximab levels, with only 56% within the proposed therapeutic range of 1-5 µg/mL. One patient had very high ATI levels (>880 au/mL), and two had low ATI levels (≤30 au/mL). After switching to INB, seven patients (26%) discontinued the therapy, partially due to subjective reasons. No difference in infliximab levels, CRP levels, and disease activity scores was found between the four time points (p ≥ 0.2460). In conclusion, no pharmacokinetic or clinical differences were found between INX and INB in our diverse rheumatic cohort. TDM is a helpful tool to monitor patients switching from INX to INB.

Early prediction of thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal complaints and general malaise are common limiting adverse reactions of azathioprine and mercaptopurine in IBD patients, often related to high steady-state 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide (6-MMPR) metabolite concentrations. AIM: To determine the predictive value of 6-MMPR concentrations 1 week after treatment initiation (T1) for the development of these adverse reactions, especially hepatotoxicity, during the first 20 weeks of treatment. METHODS: The cohort study consisted of the first 270 IBD patients starting thiopurine treatment as part of the Dutch randomised-controlled trial evaluating pre-treatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotype testing (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00521950). Blood samples for metabolite assessment were collected at T1. Hepatotoxicity was defined by alanine aminotransaminase elevations >2 times the upper normal limit or a ratio of alanine aminotransaminase/alkaline phosphatase ≥5. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (17%) presented hepatotoxicity during the first 20 weeks of thiopurine treatment. A T1 6-MMPR threshold of 3615 pmol/8 × 108 erythrocytes was defined. Analysis of patients on stable thiopurine dose (n = 174) showed that those exceeding the 6-MMPR threshold were at increased risk of hepatotoxicity: OR = 3.8 (95% CI: 1.8-8.0). Age, male gender and BMI were significant determinants. A predictive algorithm was developed based on these determinants and the 6-MMPR threshold to assess hepatotoxicity risk [AUC = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91)]. 6-MMPR concentrations above the threshold also correlated with gastrointestinal complaints: OR = 2.4 (95% CI: 1.4-4.3), and general malaise: OR = 2.0 (95% CI: 1.1-3.7). CONCLUSIONS: In more than 80% of patients, thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity could be explained by elevated T1 6-MMPR concentrations and the independent risk factors age, gender and BMI, allowing personalised thiopurine treatment in IBD to prevent early failure.

Risk factors for thiopurine-induced myelosuppression and infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients with a normal TPMT genotype.

BACKGROUND: Leucopenia is a common side effect in patients treated with thiopurines. Variants in the thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) gene are the best-known risk factor, but only explain up to 25% of leucopenia cases. AIM: To identify the clinical risk factors for thiopurine-induced leucopenia in patients without a common TPMT variant, and explore if these patients are at increased risk for infections. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the Thiopurine response Optimisation by Pharmacogenetic testing in Inflammatory bowel disease Clinics (TOPIC) trial. For this analysis, patients without a variant in TPMT (*2, *3A or*3C) were included. Uni- and multivariate Cox-proportional hazard models were used to identify risk factors for leucopenia and infections. Leucopenia was defined as a white blood cell (WBC) count <3.0 × 109 /L and infections were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: Sixty hundred and ninety-five patients (90.6%) included in the TOPIC-trial had no variant in TPMT, of which 45 (6.5%) developed leucopenia. Median time to leucopenia was 56 (29-112) days. Multivariate analysis showed that use of mercaptopurine compared to azathioprine was associated with leucopenia (hazard ratio [HR] 2.61 [95% CIs, 1.39-4.88; P < .01]) and a higher baseline WBC count was protective (HR 0.80 [95% CIs, 0.71-0.89; P < .01]). Risk factors for infections were older age (per 10 year; HR 2.07 [95% CIs, 1.18-3.63; P = .01]) and concomitant use of biologic drugs (HR 2.15 [95% CIs, 1.14-4.07; P = .02]). CONCLUSIONS: Low baseline WBC count and mercaptopurine, due to a relatively higher dose, were risk factors for thiopurine-induced leucopenia in patients without a TPMT variant.

Review article: thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: In the past 10-20 years, knowledge of both thiopurine pharmacology and -pharmacogenetics has been extended dramatically and used to develop new strategies to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity. AIM: To review thiopurine efficacy, toxicity, pharmacology, pharmacogenetics, interactions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Special attention was paid to new strategies for optimization of pharmacotherapy. METHODS: To collect relevant scientific articles, a Pubmed search was performed from 1966 through January 2006 with the following key words (MeSH terms preferentially) in multiple combinations: 'azathioprine', '6-mercaptopurine', '6-MP', '6-thioguanine', '6-TG', 'thiopurine(s)', 'metabolites', 'level(s)', 'TDM', 'TMPT', 'ITPA', 'genotype(s)', 'phenotype(s)', 'inflammatory bowel disease', 'Crohn('s) disease', 'ulcerative colitis'. RESULTS: Strategies for optimization of pharmacotherapy include therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurine metabolites, geno- or phenotyping crucial enzymes in thiopurine metabolism like thiopurine S-methyltransferase and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase, and the use of thioguanine as such. CONCLUSIONS: Thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotyping and therapeutic drug monitoring are useful instruments for individualizing thiopurine pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase genotyping may be helpful in case of unexplainable myelotoxicity. In case of azathioprine- or mercaptopurine-intolerance, thioguanine seems a promising alternative. However, more knowledge needs to be gathered about its potential hepatotoxicity.

The pharmacokinetic effect of discontinuation of mesalazine on mercaptopurine metabolite levels in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

BACKGROUND: In vitro studies suggest interactions between mesalazine (mesalamine) and thiopurines by thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) inhibition, influencing the balance of hepatotoxic 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide and immunosuppressive tioguanine (thioguanine) metabolites. AIM: To examine the in vivo pharmacokinetic interaction between mesalazine and mercaptopurine. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease patients using the combination of mercaptopurine and mesalazine. Laboratory parameters, 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide and tioguanine levels and thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity in erythrocytes were measured at stable medication, after mesalazine discontinuation and mesalazine reintroduction, further mercaptopurine was continued. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were participated. Mean mercaptopurine dose was 0.78 mg/kg/day and median of mesalazine dose was 3000 mg/day. After mesalazine discontinuation, mean tioguanine levels changed significantly from 262 to 209 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cell, increasing to 270 after reintroduction. Mean 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide levels were 1422, 2149 and 1503 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cell respectively. Mean 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide/tioguanine ratio increased significantly from 6.3 at baseline to 11.2. Mean baseline thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity was 0.58 pmol/10(6) red blood cell/h and stable. All patients had wild-type thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotypes however, leucocyte counts were stable. DISCUSSION: A significantly higher tioguanine levels and improving 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide/tioguanine ratio were found during mesalazine/mercaptopurine combination. Theoretically, mesalazine inhibits thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity. In vivo thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity did not change, however. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine has synergistic effects on mercaptopurine therapy, but the mechanism is unclear. Combining these drugs may be further indication for mesalazine in inflammatory bowel disease treatment.

Thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease: pharmacogenetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical recommendations.

There is a growing interest in the use of thiopurines (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and 6-thioguanine) for the management of inflammatory bowel disease. The genetically controlled thiopurine (S)-methyltransferase enzyme is involved in the metabolism of these agents and is hypothesised to determine the clinical response to thiopurines. Diminished activity of this enzyme decreases the methylation of thiopurines, theoretically resulting in potential overdosing, while high thiopurine (S)-methyltransferase status leads to overproduction of toxic metabolites and ineffectiveness of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. In practice, controversies exist regarding the utility of standard thiopurine (S)-methyltransferase pheno- and genotyping. Current pharmacogenetic insights suggest that another enzyme system may participate in the efficacy and toxicity of thiopurines; inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase. Other topics discussed in this review are the utilisation of therapeutic drug monitoring and the experimental use of 6-thioguanine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. 6-Thioguanine has a less genetically controlled metabolism and skips genetically determined metabolic steps. On theoretical basis, 6-thioguanine might therefore have a more predictable profile than azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. However, the use of 6-thioguanine has been associated with an increased risk of nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver and veno-occlusive disease. Further research is warranted before 6-thioguanine can be considered as a treatment option for inflammatory bowel disease.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and established azathioprine therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Azathioprine is widely used in the treatment of corticosteroid-dependent and refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The efficacy of this treatment is based on the production of 6-thioguanine nucleotides, but extremely elevated levels may cause bone marrow suppression. Other azathioprine metabolites, 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides, are associated with hepatotoxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be of help in optimising azathioprine treatment, but data on TDM in established azathioprine therapy are lacking. We therefore measured metabolite levels in a small cohort of patients established on azathioprine therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 6-Thioguanine (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) levels in erythrocytes were measured in 15 IBD outpatients established on azathioprine therapy for at least 3 months at baseline and 1, 4 and 8 weeks after inclusion (mean duration of treatment 28 months; range 7-67 months). Disease activity was evaluated by the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (Crohn's disease) or Truelove-Witts (ulcerative colitis) scores. Metabolite levels were measured by modified high-performance liquid chromatography assay (HPLC). Primary outcome measures were 6-TGN and 6-MMP metabolite levels and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). SECONDARY OUTCOMES were correlations between metabolite levels, drug dose, disease activity and laboratory parameters and compliance. RESULTS: One patient had active disease during the study period. Eleven of 15 patients (73%) completed the 8-week study period. Dropout reasons were noncompliance in three patients (20%) and intolerance in one patient (7%). PRIMARY OUTCOMES: At baseline mean 6-TGN levels were 158 (95% CI 113, 203) pmol/8.10(8) RBC (red blood cells), steadily increasing over the 8-week study period, but not significantly. Two patients had zero levels. Another two had significantly increasing levels also suggesting noncompliance. Mean 6-MMP levels showed almost a similar pattern. At baseline, levels were 2213 (95% CI 722, 3704) pmol/8.10(8) RBC. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: A correlation was found between all RBC 6-MMP levels and azathioprine dose (mg/kg bodyweight) [r = 0.43, p = 0.001] and also between the 6-MMP/6-TGN ratio and azathioprine dose (mg/kg) [r = 0.36, p = 0.010). There was no correlation between RBC 6-TGN or 6-MMP levels and haematological parameters or disease activity scores. No hepatic, pancreatic or myelotoxicity occurred.Thirteen of 15 patients (87%) had baseline steady-state 6-TGN levels below the therapeutic threshold of 235 pmol/8.10(8) RBC. Forty percent (6/15) of our patients were noncompliant; TDM revealed this noncompliance in four of the six patients (27% of all patients). CONCLUSION: Our small study demonstrates that TDM may provide insight into individual pharmacokinetics. However, TDM does not seem to be useful in patients with IBD established on azathioprine therapy and without disease activity, although it may be helpful in cases of worsening IBD activity to elucidate noncompliance or inefficient treatment.

Safety of thiopurines in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines have proven efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, concerns regarding toxicity have limited the use of these agents as first line of medical therapy. METHODS: Review of the literature regarding metabolism, efficacy and side effects. RESULTS: In clinical trials, up to 15% of patients discontinued 6-mercaptopurine or its pro-drug azathioprine prematurely due to adverse events. These events may be divided into dose-independent idiosyncratic reactions and dose-related, pharmacologically explainable toxicity. Dose-independent reactions include skin rash, fever, diarrhoea and pancreatitis. Most frequently observed dose-dependent adverse events are nausea, malaise and myelotoxicity. Furthermore, dose-dependent and dose-independent hepatotoxicity may occur. Recent insights obtained by therapeutic drug monitoring in patients on azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine have led to strategies to reduce toxicity. One strategy is to detect poor metabolisers of thiopurines by establishing the activity of the key enzyme thiopurine methyltransferase. However, the clinical relevance of this strategy is still a point of debate. Another strategy is to administer 6-thioguanine, which is an agent close to the effective 6-thioguanine nucleotides. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurines resulted in strategies to reduce toxicity. The value of these strategies has yet to be proven in prospective randomized trials.

Short-term variation in plasma mitotane levels confirms the importance of trough level monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Mitotane is the drug of choice in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma. The anti-neoplastic effect is correlated with mitotane plasma levels, which render it crucial to reach and maintain the concentration above 14 mg/l. However, mitotane pharmacokinetics is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the variation in plasma mitotane levels during the day and the influence of a single morning dose. DESIGN: A prospective case-control study was conducted to investigate the variation in plasma mitotane levels. METHODS: Patients who had been treated for at least 24 weeks and had reached the therapeutic plasma level (14 mg/l) at least once were eligible. In the first group, mitotane levels were determined hourly for the duration of 8 h after administration of a single morning dose. In the second group, mitotane levels were assessed similarly without administration of a morning dose. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in this study, and three patients participated in both groups. Median plasma level at baseline was 16.2 mg/l (range 11.3-23.3 mg/l) in the first group (n=7) and 17.0 mg/l (13.7-23.8) in the second group (n=6). Plasma levels displayed a median increase compared with baseline of 24% (range 6-42%) at t=4 after morning dose and a change of 13% (range -14 to 33%) at t=4 without morning dose (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: A substantial increase in mitotane plasma levels was observed in steady-state patients within a period of 8 h after morning dosing. Without morning dose, mitotane curves showed a variable profile throughout the day. This implies that random sampling could yield incidentally high levels. For this reason, we recommend early-morning trough sampling as standard management in monitoring mitotane treatment.