Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 171: 76-82, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36827841

ABSTRACT

The original vision of the field of gynecologic oncology was to establish a multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with gynecologic cancers. Fifty years later, scientific advances have markedly changed the overall practice of gynecologic oncology, but the profession continues to struggle to define its value-financial and otherwise. These issues were examined in full at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Future of the Profession Summit and the purpose of this document is to summarize the discussion, share the group's perceived strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) for gynecologic oncologists, further educate members and others within the patient care team about the unique role of gynecologic oncologists, and plan future steps in the short- and long- term to preserve the subspecialty's critical mission of providing comprehensive, longitudinal care for people with gynecologic cancers.


Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female , Gynecology , Oncologists , Female , Humans , Medical Oncology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/therapy
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 162(1): 200-202, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33926748

ABSTRACT

Cervical cancer screening guidelines currently recommend cessation of cervical cancer screening after age 65, despite 20% of new cervical cancer cases occurring in this age group. The US population is aging, research methodology that examines cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates has changed, and sexual behaviors and the rates at which women have hysterectomies have changed over time. Current guidelines do not adequately address these changes, and may be missing significant opportunities to prevent cervical cancer cases and deaths in older women. Furthermore, racial disparities in cervical cancer outcomes may be exacerbated by not addressing the preventive health needs of older women through cervical cancer screening.


Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Age Factors , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Female , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 156(2): 498-502, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31848025

ABSTRACT

Studies with prophylactic HPV vaccination have demonstrated impressive efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety results; however, the implementation and uptake in both low and high-income countries continues to be challenging. Since 2006, administration guidelines have undergone multiple updates regarding age, dosing schedule, and gender. Despite these changes, the basic tenet remains the same: prioritize immunization before initiation of sexual activity and subsequent exposure to HPV. The importance of immunizing males and females equally and the role for catch-up vaccination in late adolescent and adulthood has also been supported by subsequent research. Very recently, the FDA approved to expand the range of eligible patients for the nonavalent (9vHPV) vaccine to women and men from age 27 to 45 for the prevention of HPV-related cancers and diseases. Furthermore, members of the ACIP voted to recommend that individuals between ages 27 and 45 who have not yet been vaccinated discuss the option with their physician. This review will highlight the history of the vaccine, barriers to vaccination, current recommendations, and future directions for success.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Papillomavirus Infections/immunology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/immunology , Young Adult
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 153(2): 381-384, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30808517

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer that have failed first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: We created a model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab compared to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or bevacizumab for the treatment of women with recurrent endometrial cancer who have failed carboplatin and paclitaxel. Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and non-microsatellite instability-high (non-MSI-H) tumors were evaluated. We included 4400 patients in the model; 800 patients were assumed to have MSI-H tumors. Drug costs were calculated using 2016-2017 wholesale acquisition costs, and cost of Grade III-IV toxicities was estimated from clinical experience. Effectiveness was calculated as 2-year overall survival (OS). We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to determine the cost per 2-year survivor. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. The willingness to pay threshold was $100,000 per year of OS. RESULTS: The cost of therapy with PLD and bevacizumab were $33.2 million (M) and $167.9 M, respectively. The cost of pembrolizumab therapy was $318.3 M for non-MSI-H patients compared to $57.9 M for MSI-H patients. For non-MSI-H patients, bevacizumab was cost-effective relative to PLD with an ICER of $153,028, while pembrolizumab was not cost-effective relative to bevacizumab with an ICER of $341,830. For MSI-H patients, pembrolizumab was cost-effective compared to PLD with an ICER of $147,249, while bevacizumab was subjected to extended dominance. Sensitivity analysis revealed that for non-MSI-H patients, one cycle of pembrolizumab would need to cost $7253 or less to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with MSI-H recurrent endometrial cancers who have failed first-line chemotherapy, pembrolizumab is cost-effective relative to other single agent drugs. To be cost-effective in non-MSI-H patients, the cost of pembrolizumab should decrease substantially.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/economics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Endometrial Neoplasms/drug therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/economics , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Doxorubicin/economics , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Microsatellite Instability , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/economics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Polyethylene Glycols/economics , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , United States/epidemiology
5.
Gynecol Oncol ; 151(1): 6-9, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29887484

ABSTRACT

A 32 year-old nulligravid woman with a uterine mass underwent exploratory laparotomy with myomectomy. Final pathology revealed a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) with positive margins. She subsequently underwent definitive robotic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian preservation. She was diagnosed with a stage IB low-grade ESS. She is currently undergoing observation. Discussion of classification, surgical options, and adjuvant therapy is presented.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/therapy , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/therapy , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Adult , Biopsy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/pathology , Fallopian Tubes/diagnostic imaging , Fallopian Tubes/surgery , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Humans , Hysterectomy , Laparoscopy/methods , Margins of Excision , Neoplasm Staging , Ovary/diagnostic imaging , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Salpingectomy , Uterine Myomectomy , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Uterus/pathology , Uterus/surgery
6.
Gynecol Oncol ; 149(1): 49-52, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29605050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Population-based studies of women with epithelial ovarian cancer suggest that black women have worse survival compared to white women. The primary objective of this study was to determine if, at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) serving a diverse racial and socioeconomic population, race is independently associated with differences in survival. METHODS: A retrospective review of women with EOC diagnosed between 2004-2009 undergoing treatment with follow-up at our institution was performed. Records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities (as defined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)), tumor characteristics, treatment, progression-free (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Multivariate survival analysis was performed with Cox (proportional hazards) model. RESULTS: 367 patients met inclusion criteria. 54 (15%) were black and 308 (84%) were white. Compared to white women, black women had higher BMI, lower rates of optimal surgical cytoreduction, lower rates of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and higher CCI scores. The median PFS for black and white women were 9.7 and 14.6months, respectively (p=0.033). The median overall survival was 21.7months for black women and 42.6months for white women (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, black race independently correlated with a worse overall survival (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.06-2.43). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, racial disparities may be due to higher medical comorbidities and lower rates of optimal surgical cytoreduction. After accounting for these differences, race remained an independent predictor of worse overall survival.


Subject(s)
Black People/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/ethnology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/ethnology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , White People/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/mortality , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 218(5): 467-473, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28888586

ABSTRACT

Since the development of the human papillomavirus vaccine, many countries have created implementation programs to bolster vaccination rates and protect their populations. Despite demonstrated efficacy with decreased human papillomavirus-related disease abroad, the vaccine's potential to prevent morbidity and mortality in the United States is not being met. The purpose of this review is to discuss strategies of both international and domestic vaccination programs, their impact on human papillomavirus-related diseases, the unique obstacles faced by the United States, and future directions for success.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination , Female , Humans , United States
8.
Prev Med ; 113: 124-131, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29800594

ABSTRACT

The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is an important tool for cancer prevention. However, vaccination rates in Alabama, a state with high rates of HPV-related cancers, remain below the national average. Our objective was to develop a comprehensive assessment of HPV vaccination in our state, with the goal to make recommendations for tailored multilevel interventions. A multimodal approach with quantitative and qualitative data was used to determine barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination in Alabama. This included a survey of pediatric care providers and structured interviews with pediatricians, parents, nurses and community stakeholders. Two separate investigators evaluated the interview transcripts for major themes that occurred in 65% or more interviews. Major barriers included lack of knowledge, concerns about vaccine safety, and the link between the HPV vaccine and sexuality. Qualitative interviews further revealed barriers such as misinformation received from the internet and parental vaccine hesitancy. Opportunities for increasing vaccination include parental education, establishment of a reminder system, increasing access to HPV vaccine providers, and education for providers. Additional facilitators revealed through interviews included: trust in physicians, using the internet or social media to propagate positive messaging, physicians and clinical staff education, utilizing existing technology more effectively, highlighting nurses' roles as partners in HPV prevention, and the potential of schools as a venue for promotion of the vaccine. Our data are consistent with prior research showing major barriers to HPV vaccination. Several recommendations for optimizing HPV vaccination uptake in Alabama on the patient, provider and system level are given.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Alabama , Attitude of Health Personnel , Child , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Vaccines/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control
9.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 22(4): 269-273, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30063575

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Despite screening, disparities exist in cervical cancer incidence and outcomes. Demographic factors are associated with diagnosis at advanced stage (AS), but less is known about geographic factors. We sought to investigate risk factors for developing AS cervical cancer in Alabama. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified women treated for cervical cancer from 2005 to 2015 at our institution. Stages II-IV were considered AS. ZIP codes were categorized by federal Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes, and 16 historically underserved counties were categorized as Black Belt rural. Using data from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, we identified women's health provider locations. We explored associations between stage and multiple factors using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 934 patients, 29.2% were black, 52.7% had AS cancer, and 63.4% lived in urban areas. Average distance to nearest American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fellow in urban, rural, and Black Belt rural areas was 5.0, 10.6, and 13.7 miles, respectively. Black race, public insurance and age of older than 65 years were associated with increased risk of AS cancer. Living in a rural area trended toward higher risk but was not significant. When stratified by race, insurance status and age were associated with AS cancer in white women only. CONCLUSIONS: Living further from a women's health provider or in a rural area was not associated with a higher risk of AS cervical cancer. Black women had a higher risk of AS than white women regardless of age, insurance status, and geography. Disparities in cervical cancer are multifactorial and necessitate further research into socioeconomic, biologic, and systems causes.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix/epidemiology , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alabama/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Geography , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Racial Groups , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
10.
Gynecol Oncol ; 146(3): 642-646, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28655413

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Physician burnout is associated with mental illness, alcohol abuse, and job dissatisfaction. Our objective was to estimate the impact of burnout on productivity of gynecologic oncologists during the first half of their career. METHODS: A decision model evaluated the impact of burnout on total relative value (RVU) production during the first 15years of practice for gynecologic oncologists entering the workforce from 2011 to 2015. The SGO practice survey provided physician demographics and mean annual RVUs. Published data were used to estimate probability of burnout for male and female gynecologic oncologists, and the impact of depression, alcohol abuse, and early retirement. Academic productivity was defined as annual PubMed publications since finishing fellowship. RESULTS: Without burnout, RVU production for the cohort of 250 gynecologic oncologists was 26.2 million (M) RVUs over 15years. With burnout, RVU production decreased by 1.6 M (5.9% decrease). Disproportionate rates of burnout among females resulted in 1.1 M lost RVUs for females vs. 488 K for males. Academic production without burnout was estimated at 9277 publications for the cohort. Burnout resulted in 1383 estimated fewer publications over 15years (14.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of burnout on clinical and academic productivity is substantial across all specialties. As health care systems struggle with human resource shortages, this study highlights the need for effective burnout prevention and wellness programs for gynecologic oncologists. Unless significant resources are designated to wellness programs, burnout will increasingly affect the care of our patients and the advancement of our field.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/psychology , Efficiency , Gynecology , Models, Statistical , Oncologists/statistics & numerical data , Serial Publications/statistics & numerical data , Alcoholism/psychology , Decision Support Techniques , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Oncologists/psychology , Probability , Relative Value Scales , Retirement , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Gynecol Oncol ; 146(2): 373-379, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28577884

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Data suggesting a link between the fallopian tube and ovarian cancer have led to an increase in rates of salpingectomy at the time of pelvic surgery, a practice known as opportunistic salpingectomy (OS). However, the potential benefits, risks and costs for this new practice are not well established. Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of laparoscopic permanent contraception or hysterectomy for benign indications. METHODS: We created two models to compare the cost-effectiveness of salpingectomy versus usual care. The hypothetical study population is 50,000 women aged 45 undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with ovarian preservation for benign indications, and 300,000 women aged 35 undergoing laparoscopic permanent contraception. SEER data were used for probabilities of ovarian cancer cases and deaths. The ovarian cancer risk reduction, complication rates, utilities and associated costs were obtained from published literature. Sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulation were performed, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated to determine the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: In the laparoscopic hysterectomy cohort, OS is cost saving and would yield $23.9 million in health care dollars saved. In the laparoscopic permanent contraception cohort, OS is cost-effective with an ICER of $31,432/QALY compared to tubal ligation, and remains cost-effective as long as it reduces ovarian cancer risk by 54%. Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated cost-effectiveness with hysterectomy and permanent contraception in 62.3% and 55% of trials, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic salpingectomy for low-risk women undergoing pelvic surgery may be a cost-effective strategy for decreasing ovarian cancer risk at time of hysterectomy or permanent contraception. In our model, salpingectomy was cost-effective with both procedures, but the advantage greater at time of hysterectomy.


Subject(s)
Hysterectomy/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control , Prophylactic Surgical Procedures/methods , Salpingectomy/methods , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/economics , Laparoscopy/economics , Laparoscopy/methods , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Monte Carlo Method , Ovarian Neoplasms/economics , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prophylactic Surgical Procedures/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , SEER Program , Salpingectomy/economics , Sterilization, Tubal/economics , Uterine Diseases/surgery
12.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 216(6): 576.e1-576.e5, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28235464

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus-related cancers, which include cervical, vulvovaginal, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers, are on the rise in the United States. Although the human papillomavirus vaccine has been on the market for 10 years, human papillomavirus vaccination rates are well below national goals. Research identified many barriers and facilitators to human papillomavirus vaccination, and provider recommendation remains the most important factor in parental and patient decisions to vaccinate. While much of the burden of human papillomavirus vaccine provision falls on pediatricians and primary care providers, they cannot do it alone. As clinicians who care for a large proportion of human papillomavirus-related conditions, obstetrician-gynecologists and other women's health care providers must share the responsibility for vaccination of eligible patients. Obstetrician-gynecologists can support the efforts to eradicate human papillomavirus-related disease in their patients and their families via multiple avenues, including providing the human papillomavirus vaccine and being community leaders in support of vaccination.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/prevention & control , Neoplasms/virology , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Adolescent , Female , Gynecology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Obstetrics , Parental Consent , Parents/psychology , Physician's Role , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaccination/psychology
13.
Gynecol Oncol ; 143(3): 617-621, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27720232

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential relationship between outcomes in cervical cancer patients based on distance from our Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of cervical cancer patients was performed. Abstracted data included: demographics, clinicopathologic variables, treatment, and survival. Analyses both by quartiles and distance <100 and ≥100miles from our institution were performed. Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.2. RESULTS: 390 patients living a median distance of 58.1miles (range 1.2-571miles) from our CCC were identified. Patients were generally white (n=249), non-smokers (n=226), with Stage IB disease (n=222), squamous histology (n=295) and underwent primary surgical therapy (n=229). Patients were divided into both quartiles as well as two strata: <100 and ≥100miles for comparison. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) favored patients living closer to our center with a lower median OS for patients living ≥100miles (65.4vs. 99.4months; p=0.040). Cox proportional hazard modeling noted that advanced stage was predictive of inferior PFS and OS, while other clinical covariates including age, BMI, race, smoking status and histology had a variable impact on outcomes and distance >100miles was associated with a higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]=1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.54). CONCLUSION: Overall survival for patients living >100miles from our CCC was worse when compared to patients in closer proximity. Outreach efforts and utilization of navigators may help decrease the impact of geographic and racial disparities on outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Cancer Care Facilities , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Geography , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Travel , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adult , Alabama , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/pathology , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Health Services Research , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Transportation , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy
14.
Gynecol Oncol ; 138(1): 121-7, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25913132

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the impact of socioeconomic status and other demographic variables on adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network ovarian cancer treatment guidelines among patients with stage I/II disease. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I/II epithelial ovarian cancer between 1/1/96-12/31/06 were identified from the California Cancer Registry. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate differences in surgical procedures, chemotherapy regimens, and overall adherence to the NCCN guidelines according to increasing SES quintiles (SES-1 to SES-5). RESULTS: A total of 5445 stage I and II patients were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 54.0years (range=18-99years); 72.5% of patients had stage I disease, while 27.5% had stage II disease. With a median follow-up time of 5years, the 5-year ovarian cancer-specific survival for all patients was 82.7% (SE=0.6%). Overall, 23.7% of patients received care that was adherent to the NCCN guidelines. Compared to patients in the highest SES quintile (SES-5), patients in the lowest SES quintile (SES-1) were significantly less likely to receive proper surgery (27.3% vs 47.9%, p<0.001) or chemotherapy (42.4% vs 53.6%, p<0.001). There were statistically significant trends between increasing SES and the likelihood of overall treatment plan adherence to the NCCN guidelines: SES-1=16.4%, SES-2=19.0%, SES-3=22.4%, SES-4=24.2% and SES-5=31.6% (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that compared to SES-5, decreasing SES was independently predictive of a higher risk of non-standard overall care. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, low SES is a significant and independent predictor of deviation from the NCCN guidelines for surgery, chemotherapy, and overall treatment.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/economics , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/economics , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , California/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Social Class , Young Adult
15.
Obstet Gynecol ; 2024 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39208443

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether routine postpartum human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is acceptable and feasible and to identify key themes and strategies that can be used to increase postpartum HPV vaccination rates. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried from inception to July 2024 for postpartum and HPV vaccination. Studies were limited to human subjects and the English language. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Screening was performed for studies of any method that evaluated HPV vaccination in the postpartum period (N=60). Only original research that reported either uptake or acceptability of the HPV vaccine was included. Thirty-nine studies were eliminated after abstract review because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Nine studies were categorized according to the primary aim of the study (defining the problem, assessing patient perspectives, or testing interventions to increase vaccination) and demonstrated that postpartum HPV vaccination programs can significantly increase HPV vaccination rates and are feasible and acceptable to patients. CONCLUSION: Incorporating HPV vaccination into standard postpartum care provides an opportunity to reach vulnerable patient populations, reduces cost for patients, and has the ability to prevent HPV-related cancers.

17.
Obstet Gynecol ; 142(6): 1347-1356, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884007

ABSTRACT

In this narrative review, we describe evidence regarding the associated risks, benefits, and cost effectiveness of postpartum complete salpingectomy compared with partial salpingectomy. Permanent contraception can be performed via several methods, but complete salpingectomy is becoming more common secondary to its coincident benefit of ovarian cancer risk reduction. Small prospective studies and larger retrospective cohort studies have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of complete salpingectomy in the postpartum period. Additionally, multiple cost-effectiveness analyses have demonstrated the cost effectiveness of this method secondary to ovarian cancer reduction over the life span. Although future larger cohort studies will allow for more precise estimates of the effect of complete salpingectomy on ovarian cancer risk and incidence of rare complications, current data suggest that complete salpingectomy should be offered to patients as a method of permanent contraception in the postpartum period.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms , Sterilization, Tubal , Female , Humans , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Salpingectomy/methods , Postpartum Period , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control
18.
J Gynecol Oncol ; 32(6): e92, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34708594

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation in medically frail patients undergoing surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: We created a cost-effectiveness model evaluating the impact of prehabilitation on a cohort of medically frail women undergoing primary surgical intervention for EOC. Cost was assessed from the healthcare system perspective via (1) inpatient charges from 2018-2019 institutional Diagnostic Related Grouping data for surgeries with and without major complications; (2) nursing facility costs from published market surveys. Major complication and non-home discharge rates were estimated from the literature. Based on published pilot studies, prehabilitation was determined to decrease these rates. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for cost per life year saved utilized a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/life year. Modeling was performed with TreeAge software. RESULTS: In a cohort of 4,415 women, prehabilitation would cost $371.1 Million (M) versus $404.9 M for usual care, a cost saving of $33.8 M/year. Cost of care per patient with prehabilitation was $84,053; usual care was $91,713. When analyzed for cost-effectiveness, usual care was dominated by prehabilitation, indicating prehabilitation was associated with both increased effectiveness and decreased cost compared with usual care. Sensitivity analysis showed prehabilitation was more cost effective up to a cost of intervention of $9,418/patient. CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation appears to be a cost-saving method to decrease healthcare system costs via two improved outcomes: lower complication rates and decreased care facility requirements. It represents a novel strategy to optimize healthcare efficiency. Prospective studies should be performed to better characterize these interventions in medically frail patients with EOC.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms , Preoperative Exercise , Aged , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Frail Elderly , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Prospective Studies
20.
Cancer Health Disparities ; 3: e1-e12, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33842845

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between geographic regions and ovarian cancer disparities in the United States. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was used to identify women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. 18 registries were divided into two groups: South region and US14 region. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions, the logistic regression model to evaluate the association between 5-year survival and other variables, and the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratios. The South region had a lower incidence rate than the US14 region (12.0 vs. 13.4 per 100,000), and a lower 5-year observed survival rate (37.5% vs. 39.8%). White women living in the US14 region had the best overall survival, compared to white women living in the South region, and black women living in both regions. Women in the South region were less likely to have insurance (6.6% vs. 2.7%, p<0.0001) and surgery (73.4% vs. 76.2%, p<0.0001). Women living in the South were 1.4 times more likely to die after five years of diagnosis than women living in the US14 region. The data confirmed regional disparities in ovarian cancer in the United States, showing women living in the South region were disadvantaged in ovarian cancer survival regardless of race, black or white. Future research focusing on the identification of contributing factors to regional disparity in ovarian cancer is necessary to develop practical approaches to improve health outcomes related to this lethal disease.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL