Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39041261

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We present an unusual case of a 28-year-old rheumatologic male patient who developed eosinophilia while he was on etanercept therapy first and then on golimumab. CASE REPRESENTATION: Although eosinophilia is rarely reported in the literature as a side-effect of various Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha [TNF-alpha] antagonists, it represents a riddle about the future treatments of these patients since the persistence of therapy might lead to the onset of dermatologic or visceral eosinophilic complications in such patients. CONCLUSION: Furthermore, the pathogenesis of eosinophilia is still unknown, and all the proposed hypotheses do not explain the eosinophilic proliferation in certain subjects.

2.
Ophthalmol Ther ; 13(3): 761-774, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206518

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since many biological drug patents have expired, biosimilar agents (BIOs) have been developed; however, there are still some reservations in their use, especially in childhood. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors BIOs as treatment for pediatric non-infectious uveitis (NIU). METHODS: Data from pediatric patients with NIU treated with TNF inhibitors BIOs were drawn from the international AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) registries dedicated to uveitis and Behçet's disease. The effectiveness and safety of BIOs were assessed in terms of frequency of relapses, risk for developing ocular flares, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), glucocorticoids (GCs)-sparing effect, drug survival, frequency of ocular complications, and adverse drug event (AE). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (77 affected eyes) were enrolled. The BIOs employed were adalimumab (ADA) (89.4%), etanercept (ETA) (5.3%), and infliximab (IFX) (5.3%). The number of relapses 12 months prior to BIOs and at last follow-up was 282.14 and 52.43 per 100 patients/year. The relative risk of developing ocular flares before BIOs introduction compared to the period following the start of BIOs was 4.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.38-5.98, p = 0.004). The number needed to treat (NNT) for ocular flares was 3.53. Median BCVA was maintained during the whole BIOs treatment (p = 0.92). A significant GCs-sparing effect was observed throughout the treatment period (p = 0.002). The estimated drug retention rate (DRR) at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up were 92.7, 83.3, and 70.8%, respectively. The risk rate for developing structural ocular complications was 89.9/100 patients/year before starting BIOs and 12.7/100 patients/year during BIOs treatment, with a risk ratio of new ocular complications without BIOs of 7.1 (CI 3.4-14.9, p = 0.0003). Three minor AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: TNF inhibitors BIOs are effective in reducing the number of ocular uveitis relapses, preserving visual acuity, allowing a significant GCs-sparing effect, and preventing structural ocular complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05200715.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL