Novel Gene-Modified Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy Reverses Impaired Wound Healing in Ischemic Limbs.

OBJECTIVE: Here, we report a new method to increase the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) for ischemic wound healing. We tested biological effects of MSCs modified with E-selectin, a cell adhesion molecule capable of inducing postnatal neovascularization, on a translational murine model. BACKGROUND: Tissue loss significantly worsens the risk of extremity amputation for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. MSC-based therapeutics hold major promise for wound healing and therapeutic angiogenesis, but unmodified MSCs demonstrate only modest benefits. METHODS: Bone marrow cells harvested from FVB/ROSA26Sor mTmG donor mice were transduced with E-selectin-green fluorescent protein (GFP)/AAV-DJ or GFP/AAV-DJ (control). Ischemic wounds were created via a 4 mm punch biopsy in the ipsilateral limb after femoral artery ligation in recipient FVB mice and subsequently injected with phosphate-buffered saline or 1×10 6 donor MSC GFP or MSC E-selectin-GFP . Wound closure was monitored daily for 7 postoperative days, and tissues were harvested for molecular and histologic analysis and immunofluorescence. Whole-body DiI perfusion and confocal microscopy were utilized to evaluate wound angiogenesis. RESULTS: Unmodified MSCs do not express E-selectin, and MSC E-selectin-GFP gain stronger MSC phenotype yet maintain trilineage differentiation and colony-forming capability. MSC E-selectin-GFP therapy accelerates wound healing compared with MSC GFP and phosphate-buffered saline treatment. Engrafted MSC E-selectin-GFP manifest stronger survival and viability in wounds at postoperative day 7. Ischemic wounds treated with MSC E-selectin-GFP exhibit more abundant collagen deposition and enhanced angiogenic response. CONCLUSIONS: We establish a novel method to potentiate regenerative and proangiogenic capability of MSCs by modification with E-selectin/adeno-associated virus. This innovative therapy carries the potential as a platform worthy of future clinical studies.

Hyperactivity in patients with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia: an exploratory study.

Introduction: Patients with either Idiopathic Hypersomnia or Narcolepsy demonstrate excessive daytime somnolence (EDS) with resultant inattention mimicking Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Patients with ADHD also often express sleep problems including EDS. Thus, patients with ADHD and patients with idiopathic hypersomnia or narcolepsy may share inattention and daytime drowsiness as common features. However, it is not known whether EDS patients with idiopathic hypersomnia or narcolepsy also have increased movement (hyperactivity) like ADHD patients, the determination of which is the purpose of this study. Methods: We studied 12 patients (7 Narcolepsy type 2 and 5 Idiopathic Hypersomnia) with EDS as shown by Multiple Sleep Latency Test which served as the gold standard for entry into the study. Twelve subjects without symptoms of EDS served as the control group. None of the participants had a previous history of ADHD. Each participant underwent a one-hour session laying at 45 degrees with surveys about the need to move and actigraphy as an objective measure of movement. Results: Sleep-disordered patients with EDS reported more symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity on the ADHD Self-Report Scale. At each of the time points patients with EDS had a clear trend to express the need to move more than controls on the Suggested Immobilization Test (SIT). For the total 60 minutes, a large effect size for the need to move during the SIT test was found between patients and controls (Cohen's d = 0.61, p=0.01). Patients with EDS did not express a need to move more to combat drowsiness than controls, nor did actigraphy show any difference in objective movement between patients and controls during the SIT. Conclusion: Patients with EDS express inattention and a need to move more than controls. However, hyperactivity was not verified by objective measurement, nor did the EDS patients express a need to move to combat drowsiness more than controls. Thus, a hypothesis to be further tested, is whether narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia may be more a model of the inattentive form of ADHD rather than the combined or inattentive/hyperactive form of ADHD. Further studies are needed to explore the relationship between EDS and hyperactivity.

Restless legs syndrome is increased in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and restless legs syndrome (RLS) are both characterized by sleep disturbance along with autoimmune/inflammatory features and autonomic dysfunction. However, to our knowledge, there has been no direct study looking at the prevalence of RLS in patients with POTS patients compared with healthy participants (controls). METHODS: Ninety-six physician-diagnosed patients with POTS (89 female and 7 male) and 130 controls (99 female and 31 male) were administered the Cambridge Hopkins questionnaire. Participants who were diagnosed with probable or definite RLS on the Cambridge Hopkins questionnaire were then contacted to determine the severity of RLS with the International Restless Legs Scale. RESULTS: More patients with POTS (15 of 96; 15.6%) than controls (6 of 130; 4.6%) were diagnosed with probable or definite RLS on the Cambridge Hopkins questionnaire (P = .0048). A sensitivity analysis with only female respondents yielded similar results. RLS severity was in the moderate range (12.23 ± 9.22). CONCLUSIONS: There is a higher prevalence of RLS in patients with POTS patients compared with controls. This association may have to do with shared increased inflammatory/autoimmune load and autonomic dysfunction.