Evaluation of A-V impulse technology as a treatment for oedema following polytetrafluoroethylene femoropopliteal surgery in a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of A-V impulse technology (A-V) for oedema prevention and treatment following PTFE femoropopliteal surgery. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. MATERIALS: 36 patients undergoing PTFE femoropopliteal bypass reconstructions, either being treated postoperatively with a compression stocking (CS) (Group-1, n = 19) or with A-V (Group-2, n = 17). METHODS: Patients in treatment group-1 used a CS postoperatively during 1 week day and night, patients in group-2 were treated with A-V postoperatively at night during one week. The lower leg circumference was measured preoperatively and at five postoperative time points. RESULTS: Limb circumference has increased postoperatively on day 1 (CS 1.5%/A-V 1.4%), on day 4 (5.7%/6.3%), on day 7 (6.6%/6.1%), on day 14 (7.9%/7.7%) and on day 90 (5.8%/5.2%). Differences between treatment groups were not significant. A re-operation gives a significant 3.9% increase in circumference as compared to a first operation (95% CI: 1.5-6.4%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found in the extent of developed edema between the groups following PTFE femoropopliteal bypass surgery. A redo peripheral bypass operation results in significantly more postoperative oedema than a first-time performed bypass operation.

Surgical removal of an infected aortic endoprosthesis using a wire cutter.

The purpose of this study is to report a new method of removing an infected endoprosthesis from the abdominal aorta using a wire cutter. A 65-year-old man with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was admitted to our hospital. He was treated with an endovascular abdominal endoprosthesis and discharged one week later. Three months after placement, the patient returned with an infection of the aortic endoprosthesis. The endoprosthesis had been fixed with barbs and hooks above the renal arteries and was surgically explanted by using a wire cutter to cut the hooks. The bare suprarenal stent was left in place. The patient was discharged one month after stent removal, and was treated with oral antibiotics for another ten weeks. At one year follow-up the patient showed no clinical, biochemical, or radiological signs of infection. In conclusion, infected endoprostheses should be surgically removed according to the medical literature. We recognize that removing a Zenith endoprostheses requires a dangerous operation because the hooks of the bare stent are engaged into the supra-renal aorta. This case report documents a new technique to safely remove an infected endoprosthesis with the help of a wire cutter.

Endovascular aneurysm repair with Zenith graft. Complications caused by leg extensions.

AIM: A large amount of Zenith endovascular stent complications is due to problems with the leg extensions. This kind of complication has never been reported in literature. The aim of this study was to monitor the complications of endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed with the Zenith endovascular graft occurred in the Amphia Ziekenhuis in Breda to see how many recurrences were due to leg extension. METHODS: The study enrolled all patients (N.=66) treated with the Zenith endograft in the period between October 2000 and September 2006. Mortality, complications and the number of reinterventions were analysed. Average age of the patients was 73.4 years, average follow-up was 24.5 months and average aneurysm size was 61.5 mm. Radiologic follow-up was performed by computed tomography scans and X-rays. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality rate was 0%. The overall mortality rate during follow-up was 3%. Ten patients required a total number of 12 reinterventions (15%). The average time for reintervention was 10 months after the primary operation. Mortality, complication and reintervention rates were comparable with those reported in the literature, but 75% of these reinterventions were related to the leg extensions. CONCLUSION: Authors observed that nine out of 12 complications which required reintervention were due to problems with one of the leg extensions. This is the first study that specifies clearly the percentage of problems with leg extensions in EVAR (75%). When placing a Zenith endovascular graft extra attention should be paid to optimal placement of the leg extensions.

Pathophysiology and treatment of edema following femoropopliteal bypass surgery.

Substantial lower-limb edema affects the majority of patients who undergo peripheral bypass surgery. Edema has impairing effects on the microvascular and the macrovascular circulation, causes discomfort and might delay the rehabilitation process of the patient. However, the pathophysiology of this edema is not well understood. The Cochrane Library and Medline were used to retrieve literature on edema following peripheral bypass surgery. Factors other than local wound healing alone are suggested in the literature to play a role, given the severity and duration of this edema. Hyperemia, microvascular permeability, reperfusion-associated inflammation and lymphatic disruptions are likely to facilitate the development of edema. Preventive methods could be lymphatic-sparing surgery, intraoperative antioxidative therapy and postoperative elevation. Successful treatment strategies to reduce postoperative edema are based on lymph massage and external compression. In conclusion, the pathophysiology of edema following peripheral surgery is not fully understood, although reperfusion-associated inflammation and lymphatic disruptions are likely to play a crucial role. When future less-invasive techniques prove to be successful, postoperative edema might be minimized. Until then, a careful lymphatic-sparing dissection should be executed when performing a peripheral bypass reconstruction. Postoperatively, the use of compression stockings and leg elevation are currently the golden standards.