ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate use (both appropriate and inappropriate) of rescue corticosteroids before and after the implementation of a guideline for their use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a pharmacy log to identify women who received an initial course of antenatal corticosteroids in the year before (2008) and in the 4 years (2009-2012) after implementation of the guideline. The charts were then reviewed to determine eligibility and assess receipt of rescue corticosteroids according to the guideline. Our primary study outcome was a temporal change in the percentage of appropriate rescue corticosteroid administration. RESULTS: Of 2,528 women who received a first course of corticosteroids, 142 (5.6%) were eligible for a rescue course, of whom 103 (73%) received it. The rate of appropriate administration increased from 18.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5-40%) in 2008 to 65.4% (95% CI 44-83%) in 2009, 93.5% (95% CI 79-99%) in 2010, 96.1% (95% CI 80-99%) in 2011, and 75.7% (95% CI 59-88%) in 2012 (P for test of trend <.001). Only 25 of these 103 eligible women (24.3%) delivered within 2-7 days of receipt of the rescue course. The rate of inappropriate administration among women who were not eligible for a rescue course (n=2,381) also rose from 0.4% (95% CI 0.04-1.4%) in 2008 to 1.9% (95% CI 0.9-3.5%) in 2009, 1.8% (95% CI 0.8-3.6%) in 2010, 2.4% (95% CI 1.2-4.3%) in 2011, and 2.2% (95% CI 1.1-4.0%) in 2012 (P for test of trend=.03). Among all recipients of rescue corticosteroids, 28% (41/144) were ineligible according to the guideline. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an institutional guideline for rescue corticosteroids was associated with a high rate of use among eligible women.
Subject(s)
Betamethasone , Infant, Premature, Diseases/prevention & control , Medication Therapy Management , Adult , Betamethasone/administration & dosage , Betamethasone/therapeutic use , Eligibility Determination , Female , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Medication Therapy Management/statistics & numerical data , Medication Therapy Management/trends , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/trends , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Solid pseudopapillary pancreatic tumor is a rare tumor affecting young women. Case reports have presented pregnancy outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) in pregnancy for this neoplasm. We report a case of a woman who underwent a preconception Whipple procedure for a solid pseudopapillary pancreatic tumor who experienced recurrent pancreatitis confined to pregnancy. CASE: A 28-year-old gravida 2 para 1 woman with a history of a Whipple procedure for a solid pseudopapillary pancreatic tumor 2 years prior had three episodes of severe pancreatitis in pregnancy. She was managed conservatively with each episode. She delivered at term and did not have a recurrence in the 8 months since her delivery. CONCLUSION: Recurrent pancreatitis in pregnancy after a preconception Whipple procedure can be managed conservatively without surgical intervention.