Increasing buprenorphine access for patients with chronic pain: a quality improvement initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Buprenorphine is effective for chronic pain and safer than full-agonist opioids; however, limited education about and support for buprenorphine can result in under-prescribing in primary care and reduced access in specialty pain clinics. The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to optimize and evaluate procedures for transferring patients stable on buprenorphine for chronic pain from a specialty pain clinic back to primary care. SETTING: Eight primary care clinics within a Veterans Health Administration health care system. METHODS: A standard operating procedure for facilitated transfer of prescribing was developed after a needs assessment and was introduced during an educational session with primary care providers, and providers completed a survey assessing attitudes about buprenorphine prescribing. Success of the initiative was measured through the number of patients transferred back to primary care over the course of 18 months. RESULTS: Survey results indicated that primary care providers with previous experience prescribing buprenorphine were more likely to view buprenorphine prescribing for pain as within the scope of their practice and to endorse feeling comfortable managing a buprenorphine regimen. Providers identified systemic and educational barriers to prescribing, and they identified ongoing support from specialty pain care and primary care as a facilitator of prescribing. Metrics suggested that the standard operating procedure was generally successful in transferring and retaining eligible patients in primary care. CONCLUSION: This quality improvement initiative suggests that a facilitated transfer procedure can be useful in increasing buprenorphine prescribing for pain in primary care. Future efforts to increase primary care provider comfort and address systemic barriers to buprenorphine prescribing are needed.

Religious institutions as a link to substance use treatment: Characterizing the potential service population through national survey data.

Background: Relatively few Americans with current alcohol or drug use disorders receive outpatient or residential treatment. Outreach initiatives at local places of religious worship have been proposed as a way of facilitating such service use, but the number and characteristics of adults who may be reached in this way has not been studied. Methods: Data from the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of U.S. adults were used to estimate the number of and proportion of adults with substance use disorders (SUDs) who attended monthly religious service and did not receive SUD treatment in the past year and used multinomial logistic regression to compare them to three SUD groups who did or did not receive treatment and/or attend religious services. Results: A total of 5,795 respondents representing 35.8 million Americans met criteria for a past-year SUD, of whom 8.3 million (23.1%) attended religious services monthly and did not receive substance use treatment. This more often African-American group had substantially fewer socio-demographic disadvantages (e.g., unemployment), behavioral problem indicators (e.g., police involvement), a higher quality of life score and less likelihood of an illicit drug use diagnosis than those who received treatment and either did or did not attend religious services. Conclusion: Almost one quarter of adults with a SUD attend religious services monthly and do not receive SUD treatment. Although they have fewer adversities than people who receive treatment, outreach to this population may link this substantial group of people to needed services.Highlights/reviewNational survey data suggest 8 of 36 million Americans with substance use diagnoses' (23%) do not receive specialized SUD treatment, but they do attend religious services monthly or more.This group, notably, has less numerous problems, such as unemployment, police involvement, and drug use disorder, and have higher quality of life scores than those who receive treatment for SUD.Outreach and linkage initiatives with religious institutions may facilitate use of services by this population.

The Body, the Mind, and the Spirit: Including the Spiritual Domain in Mental Health Care.

This article supports the expansion of Engel's (Science (AAAS) 196(4286):129-136, 1977) biopsychosocial model into a biopsychosocial-spiritual model, as Sulmasy (The Gerontologist 42(5):24-33, 2002) and others have suggested. It utilizes case studies to describe five areas of clinical work within mental health (religious grandiosity, depression and grief, demoralization and suicidality, moral injury, and opioid use disorder) with emerging evidence for the inclusion of the spiritual domain in addition to the biological, psychological, and social. For each clinical area, an underutilization of the spiritual domain is compared with a more developed and integrated use. An argument is made for continuing to develop, understand, and utilize a biopsychosocial-spiritual model in mental health.

Brief Counseling for Veterans with Musculoskeletal Disorder, Risky Substance Use, and Service Connection Claims.

OBJECTIVE: High proportions of post-9/11 veterans have musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), but engaging them in care early in their course of illness has been challenging. The service connection application is an ideal point of contact for referring veterans to early interventions for their conditions. DESIGN: Among MSD claimants who reported risky substance use, we pilot-tested a counseling intervention targeting pain and risky substance use called Screening Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment-Pain Module (SBIRT-PM). Veterans were randomly assigned in a 2:1:1 ratio to SBIRT-PM, Pain Module counseling only, or treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS: Participants assigned to either counseling arm were offered a single meeting with a study therapist with two follow-up telephone calls as needed. Participants completed outcome assessments at four and 12 weeks after randomization. RESULTS: Of 257 veterans evaluated, 101 reported risky substance use and were randomized. Counseling was attended by 75% of veterans offered it and was well received. VA pain-related services were used by 51% of participants in either of the pain-focused conditions but only by 27% in TAU (P < 0.04). Starting with average pain severity ratings of 5.1/10 at baseline, only minimal changes in mean pain severity were noted regardless of condition. Self-reported risky substance use was significantly lower over time in the SBIRT-PM condition relative to the two other conditions (P < 0.02). At week 12, proportions of veterans reporting risky substance use were 0.39, 0.69, and 0.71 for the SBIRT-PM, Pain Module counseling, and TAU conditions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SBIRT-PM shows promise as a way to engage veterans in pain treatment and reduce substance use.

Beyond the 12 steps: Integrating chaplaincy services into Veteran Affairs substance use specialty care.

Background: Interprofessional training is increasing in focus within medical education. Although substance use treatment has long been interprofessional in nature, chaplaincy has been relatively absent in outpatient settings. Since 2013, the Veterans Health Administration has supported an Interprofessional Advanced Fellowship in Addiction Treatment (IAFAT), with 7 sites nationally recruiting across multiple health care disciplines. In the fall of 2017, Veteran Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System (VACHS) became the first such fellowship to expand its recruitment to include chaplain fellows. We seek to share rationale for recruiting chaplains, current curriculum and curricular needs, and the potential roles of chaplains in outpatient addiction treatment. Methods: Collaborating with the office of chaplaincy education, we describe the process of chaplain recruitment, incorporation into a new treatment setting, and supervision, and we report on the feasibility of this innovative training initiative. Results: During the first year, the chaplain fellow has developed and maintained a new clinical service in an outpatient substance use disorder (SUD) specialty care setting, delivering over 150 hours of group and individual treatment to veterans. He has provided 12 presentations to staff on the role of a chaplain and other related topics, as well as written an article on the topic of addiction for a clergy audience. Anecdotally, staff satisfaction has been high, and the current chaplain is helping to recruit for his replacement. Limitations: As a feasibility pilot project, there is no outcome and very limited quantitative data. Conclusions: Chaplain fellows can be successfully incorporated into outpatient SUD clinics with a noticeable degree of fellow, staff, and patient satisfaction.

Evaluation of an Integrated, Multidisciplinary Program to Address Unsafe Use of Opioids Prescribed for Pain.

Objectives: Unsafe use of opioids prescribed for pain is a common challenge in primary care. We aimed to describe a novel clinical program designed to address this issue-the Opioid Reassessment Clinic-and evaluate preliminary efficacy. Methods: The Opioid Reassessment Clinic is a multidisciplinary care team staffed by an internist, addiction psychiatrist, advanced practice nurse, and health psychologist designed to perform enhanced assessment and longitudinal treatment of patients with unsafe use of opioids prescribed for pain. We assessed preliminary efficacy of the clinic using a priori-defined metrics at the patient, provider, clinic process, and health system levels. Results: Of referred patients (N = 87), 84% had a history of substance abuse/dependence and 70% had current misuse of prescribed opioids; 22% received a new substance use disorder diagnosis, each of whom engaged in addiction treatment. Among primary care physicians, 48% referred a patient to the clinic. In terms of process metrics, high fidelity to structured clinical assessments was assisted by templated electronic progress notes. Wait time averaged 22.1 days while length of treatment averaged 137 days. Urine drug testing was performed on 91% of patients an average of 6.4 times, while assessing out-of-system opioid receipt occurred universally. Systems-level findings included evidence of institutional support: hiring a nurse case manager to help with care coordination. Conclusions: Results suggest the Opioid Reassessment Clinic was effective in the management of a small group of high-complexity patients. Wide-scale dissemination may require adapted care models.

Multimodal Treatment Options, Including Rotating to Buprenorphine, Within a Multidisciplinary Pain Clinic for Patients on Risky Opioid Regimens: A Quality Improvement Study.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate a novel clinical program designed to address unsafe use of opioids prescribed for pain-the Opioid Reassessment Clinic (ORC)-to inform practice and health system improvement. Design: Controlled, retrospective cohort study. Setting: The ORC is a multidisciplinary clinic in a primary care setting in a Veterans Health Administration hospital designed to perform longitudinal treatment of patients with unsafe use of opioids prescribed for pain, including tapering or rotating to the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine. Subjects: We included patients referred to the ORC from March 1, 2016, to March 1, 2017, who had an intake appointment (intervention group) and who did not (control group). Methods: We compared a priori-defined metrics at the patient, clinic process, and health system levels and compared metrics between groups. Results: During the study period, 114 veterans were referred to the ORC, and 71 (62%) of these had an intake appointment. Those in the intervention group were more likely to trial buprenorphine (N = 41, 62% vs N = 1, 2%, P < 0.01) and had greater reductions in their full agonist morphine equivalent daily dose than those in the control group (30 mg [interquartile range {IQR} = 0-120] vs 0 mg [IQR = 0-20] decrease, P < 0.01). Of those engaging in the ORC, 20 (30%) had not transitioned chronic pain management back to their primary care providers (PCPs) by the end of follow-up. Only one patient transitioned the management of buprenorphine to the PCP. Conclusions: Results suggest the ORC was effective in reducing total prescribed opioid doses and in transitioning patients to partial-agonist therapy, but PCP adoption strategies are needed.

Integrating interdisciplinary pain management into primary care: development and implementation of a novel clinical program.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to develop and implement an interdisciplinary pain program integrated in primary care to address stakeholder-identified gaps. DESIGN: Program development and evaluation project utilizing a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to address the identified problem of insufficient pain management resources within primary care. SETTING: A large Healthcare System within the Veterans Health Administration, consisting of two academically affiliated medical centers and six community-based outpatients clinics. METHODS: An interprofessional group of stakeholders participated in a Rapid Process Improvement Workshop (RPIW), a consensus-building process to identify systems-level gaps and feasible solutions and obtain buy-in. Changes were implemented in 2012, and in a 1-year follow-up, we examined indicators of engagement in specialty and multimodal pain care services as well as patient and provider satisfaction. RESULTS: In response to identified barriers, RPIW participants proposed and outlined two readily implementable, interdisciplinary clinics embedded within primary care: 1) the Integrated Pain Clinic, providing in-depth assessment and triage to targeted resources; and 2) the Opioid Reassessment Clinic, providing assessment and structured monitoring of patients with evidence of safety, efficacy, or misuse problems with opioids. Implementation of these programs led to higher rates of engagement in specialty and multimodal pain care services; patients and providers reported satisfaction with these services. CONCLUSIONS: Our PDSA cycle engaged an interprofessional group of stakeholders that recommended introduction of new systems-based interventions to better integrate pain resources into primary care to address reported barriers. Early data suggest improved outcomes; examination of additional outcomes is planned.

Does stimulant use impair housing outcomes in low-demand supportive housing for chronically homeless adults?

BACKGROUND: Recent research suggests low-demand housing (i.e., not contingent upon abstinence) is effective in helping people exit homelessness, even among recent active substance users. Whether active users of illicit drugs and stimulants have worse housing outcomes than primary alcohol users, however, is unknown. METHODS: A total of 149 participants in a multisite supportive housing program who reported high levels of active substance use at program entry were classified as either (1) predominantly "Alcohol Use" (>10 of 30 days alcohol, but not >10 days of drug use) or (2) "Illicit Drug Use" (>10 of 30 days any single illicit drug use with or without alcohol use). Sub-analysis of the "Illicit Drug Use" group compared participants reporting high levels of "Stimulant Use" (>10 days cocaine, crack, or methamphetamine use) to those with high levels of "Non-stimulant Use" (>10 days marijuana or other non-stimulant drug use). Group differences in housing outcomes were examined with mixed model multivariate regression. RESULTS: During 24-month follow-up, days housed increased dramatically for both the "Alcohol Use" and the "Illicit Drug Use" groups without significant differences. Sub-analysis of illicit drug users showed stimulant use was associated with fewer days housed (p = .01) and more days homeless (p = .02) over time. CONCLUSIONS: Among illicit drug users, stimulant users have somewhat less successful housing outcomes than other active drug and alcohol users, though both groups maintained substantial housing improvements in low-demand housing.

How Should the Use of Opioids Be Regulated to Motivate Better Clinical Practice?

This article describes historical and political reasons for-and devastating consequences of-US opioid prescribing policy since the 1990s, which has restricted opioid prescribing for pain less than for treating opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. This article considers merits and drawbacks of a new diagnostic category and proposes a regulatory and clinical framework for prescribing long-term opioid therapy for pain and for prescribing opioids to treat OUD.

Development of Health Professions Education Competencies for a National Fellowship Program: A Group Consensus Process.

ABSTRACT: Health professions educators need knowledge, skills, and attitudes to provide high-quality education within dynamic clinical learning environments. Although postgraduate training opportunities in health professions education (HPE) have increased significantly, no shared competencies exist across the field. This article describes the systematic development of postgraduate HPE competencies for the Health Professions Education, Evaluation, and Research (HPEER) Advanced Fellowship, a 2-year, interprofessional, post-master's degree and postdoctoral HPE training program funded through the Department of Veterans Affairs' Office of Academic Affiliations. Using a modified RAND/University of California at Los Angeles Appropriateness Method, the authors developed competencies from March 2021 to August 2021 that were informed by current practices and standards in HPE. Literature reviews were conducted of published literature from November 2020 to February 2021 and gray literature from February to March 2021, identifying 78 and 274 HPE training competencies, respectively. These competencies were combined with 71 competencies submitted by program faculty from 6 HPEER fellowship sites, resulting in 423 initial competencies. Competencies were organized into 6 primary domains and condensed by deleting redundant items and combining overlapping concepts. Eight subject matter experts completed 3 Delphi surveys and met during 2 nominal group technique meetings. The final 25 competencies spanned 6 domains: teaching methods and learning theories; educational assessment and program evaluation; educational research methods; diversity, equity, and inclusion; interprofessional practice and team science; and leadership and management. In addition to informing the national HPEER curriculum, program evaluation, and learner assessment, these advanced competencies describe the knowledge, skills, and attitudes health professions educators need to provide high-quality education with an emphasis on the global and societal impact of HPE. These competencies represent a step toward leveraging HPE expertise to establish competencies to drive HPE program changes. Other programs should report their competencies and competency development processes to spur further dialog and progress.

Perioperative Management of Extended-release Buprenorphine.

Perioperative management of buprenorphine is increasingly characterized by continuation of buprenorphine throughout the perioperative period while coadministering full agonist opioids for analgesia. Although this "simultaneous strategy" is commonly used for the shorter-acting sublingual buprenorphine formulations, there is little to guide management of the extended-release formulations of buprenorphine. Here we report the perioperative experience of an individual maintained on extended-release buprenorphine who successfully underwent major surgeries utilizing a strategy of performing the surgeries at the time of the next scheduled dose.

Rates and correlates of pathological gambling among VA mental health service users.

The rate and correlates of diagnosed pathological gambling (PG) among mental health patients in the Veterans Health Administration, the only national system of mental health care, have not been studied. Using fiscal year 2009 (FY2009) VA administrative data, a case-control study compared those with an ICD code of 312.31 (PG) versus those without. The analytic group was limited to 1,102,846 Veterans Affairs (VA) specialty mental health (MH) services users because 94.5% of all those diagnosed with PG in the U.S. VA health system received such services. Chi-square tests and logistic regression assessed associations between demographic and clinical factors and PG diagnosis. The past-year rate of PG diagnosis among veterans treated in specialty MH program was 0.2%, significantly lower than prevalence rates in other treatment samples and the general U.S population, suggesting under-diagnosis and/or a low-income sample. Being female, ages 40-74, and higher income increased the risk of PG diagnosis, as did past-year homelessness (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.2), alcohol use disorders (OR = 2.8), bipolar disorder (OR = 2.1) and personality disorders (OR = 2.1). Depression, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorders other than PTSD, were also positively associated with PG diagnosis. Drug use disorder had no significant independent association with PG. PTSD, dementia, and living in isolated rural areas conferred reduced risk. More systematic screening and surveillance of PG among MH service users generally, and veterans with heavy alcohol use, severe mental illness, and homelessness specifically, appears warranted.

Moral Injury in the Context of Substance Use Disorders: a Narrative Review.

The rate of annual drug overdose deaths in the USA recently topped 100,000 (CDC/National Center for Health Statistics 2021), an illustration of the critical need to prevent and treat substance use disorders (SUDs). As a complex, chronic medical condition, substance use treatment requires psychological, emotional, and spiritual interventions along with medical care. The recently developed concept of moral injury has been increasingly studied and applied to military service members who experience conflict between the expectations or survival needs of combat and their moral values. This review explores whether moral injury, along with the related emotional, psychological, and spiritual symptoms, can also develop in the context of SUDs. This review identified 5 manuscripts related to moral injury arising in a substance use context. These studies were small in sample size and qualitative in nature but did indicate the presence of moral injury within the context of substance use. Further studies are needed to better understand and treat moral injury related to SUDs. A conceptualization of how moral injury may arise in the context of substance use is presented here. It is suggested that the activation of the primitive dopaminergic reward system causes a potential conflict between the experienced need for the addictive substance and a person's moral code or values. The moral injury resulting from this collision may impact treatment and recovery.

Healthcare Providers' Perceptions about the Role of Spiritual Care and Chaplaincy Services in Substance Use Outpatient Treatment.

Addressing patients' religion and spirituality (R/S) needs has been associated with positive health outcomes. However, despite receiving extensive training in spiritual assessment and care, chaplaincy services are primarily confined to inpatient settings, with few studies occurring in outpatient settings. The study sought to understand mental health providers' views about what shaped provider and patient motivation to engage in R/S discussions and seek referrals to chaplaincy services. We conducted five one-hour focus group sessions with a total of 38 staff members and thematically analyzed the resulting session and field notes. We identified four themes concerning provider knowledge and attitudes about R/S and chaplaincy services: Staff Information Needs, Staff Motivation to Discuss R/S and Refer, Patient Motivation to Use Chaplaincy Services, and Chaplain Accessibility. The study findings suggest that providers in outpatient substance use treatment clinics in the Veterans Health Administration are receptive to learning about R/S care and the possibility of expanding chaplaincy services. However, staff have misconceptions about the roles and responsibilities of chaplains. Attitudes about and experiences with R/S discussions varied. Trust and confidence in the benefits of chaplaincy services may be improved among both providers and patients by increasing chaplains' accessibility and visibility within these outpatient settings.

Association of substance use and VA service-connected disability benefits with risk of homelessness among veterans.

Recent public attention on homelessness has shifted beyond emergency services and supportive housing to primary prevention. This study compares a national sample of homeless and nonhomeless Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health services users to determine risk and protective factors for homelessness. Using VA administrative data, veterans were identified as homeless (ie, used VA homeless services or received a diagnostic code for "lack of housing") or nonhomeless and compared using logistic regression. Additional analyses were conducted for two low-risk subgroups: veterans who served in current Middle East wars (Operation Enduring Freedom [OEF]/Operation Iraqi Freedom [OIF]) and veterans with ≥50% service-connected disability. Among all VA mental health users, OEF/OIF (odds ratio [OR]) = 0.4) and ≥50% service-connected (OR = .3) veterans were less likely to be homeless. In the overall and subgroup analyses, illicit drug use (OR = 3.3-4.7) was by far the strongest predictor of homelessness, followed by pathological gambling (PG) (OR = 2.0-2.4), alcohol use disorder (OR = 1.8-2.0), and having a personality disorder (OR = 1.6-2.2). In both low-risk groups, severe mental illness (schizophrenia or bipolar disorder), along with substance use disorders, PG, and personality disorders, increased homelessness risk. Substance use, PG, and personality disorders confer the greatest modifiable risk of homelessness among veterans using VA services, while service-connected disability conferred reduced risk. Clinical prevention efforts could focus on these factors.

Nicotine dependence and its risk factors among users of veterans health services, 2008-2009.

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in the United States and is disproportionately higher among veterans than nonveterans. We examined the prevalence of nicotine dependence and its associated risk factors among veterans who used health services in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) system. METHODS: Using a case-control design, we compared all VA health service users in fiscal year 2008-2009 (N = 5,031,381) who received a nicotine dependence diagnosis with those who did not. Independent risk and protective factors associated with receiving a nicotine dependence diagnosis were identified using logistic regression analysis. We conducted subgroup analyses on 2 groups of particular policy concern: homeless veterans and veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. RESULTS: Among all recent VA health service users, 15% (n = 749,353) received a diagnosis of nicotine dependence. Substance abuse, other mental health diagnoses, and homelessness were identified as major risk factors. Veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan were not found to be at increased risk compared to veterans from other war eras. Major risk and protective factors within the subgroups of homeless veterans and veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan were broadly similar to those in the general VA population. CONCLUSION: Given that other studies have found higher rates of nicotine dependence among veterans, this risk behavior may be underdiagnosed in VA medical records. Veterans who are homeless or have mental health or substance abuse problems are at highest risk and should be targeted for smoking prevention and cessation interventions. These results support, in principle, efforts to integrate smoking cessation programs with mental health and homeless services.

An Interdisciplinary Approach to Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer and Comorbid Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Within a VA Health Care System.

A multidisciplinary approach provided safe and feasible cancer treatment in a patient with advanced pancreatic cancer and coexisting active substance use disorder.