ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is typically aggressive and related with high mortality in children with a hematological malignancy. The association of medical and surgical treatment may ameliorate the outcome. The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical treatment of fungal infections in pediatric oncological populations. METHODS: Retrospective study (2000-2022) of a single-center experience. We reviewed the medical record of all patients with hematologic malignancies and IFD, analyzing the outcome. RESULTS: From the 70 pediatric cases of hematologic malignancies with the diagnosis IFD over 22 years, we included in the present study 44 cases who required surgical approaches for either diagnosis or treatment. Twenty-one patients were males and the mean age was 11 (range 1-23) years. The main indications for surgery were lack of improvement following medical treatment and/or progression of fungal infection (80%) and diagnosis confirmation (20%). Only five patients needed an emergency operation for rapid worsening of symptoms. The most common site of infection was the lung (80%) and the most frequently identified pathogen was Aspergillus (75%). The most common surgical procedures were lobectomy (performed in 17 patients) and atypical lung resection (10). Complications of surgery were mostly treated by medical approach. The mean time of resumption of oncological treatment was 40 (range 0-150) days. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is an important step in the multimodal treatment of invasive fungal infection with excellent resolution rate. Overall mortality depends on the underlying malignancy.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Invasive Fungal Infections , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Male , Female , Invasive Fungal Infections/diagnosis , Invasive Fungal Infections/surgery , Invasive Fungal Infections/mortality , Invasive Fungal Infections/etiology , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Child, Preschool , Retrospective Studies , Infant , Young Adult , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Disease ManagementABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Acute appendicitis is a wide spectrum disease, from simple inflammation to evident intestinal perforation. The correct interpretation of the degree of inflammation is crucial to guarantee appropriate treatment and adherence to protocols and guidelines. In order to investigate this concordance, the authors compared the definition of appendicitis and the predicted treatment among all surgeons affiliated to a single Pediatric Surgery School (consisting of 8 different centers). DESIGN: Twenty-two short recordings of intra-operative manipulation of appendices were shown to 56 surgeons, blindly to clinical information. Four items were collected and analyzed: classification of appendicitis, type and length of predicted antibiotic therapy, day of re-alimentation. Data were analyzed to identify the concordance kappa coefficient, stratified according to expertise of the responding surgeon. RESULTS: The 1232 evaluations obtained in all valued items low overall concordance. Subgroup analysis identified a good agreement between younger surgeons only in the choice of antibiotic (k 0.47). However, if the centers were divided between University and non-University Hospitals, a strong agreement was found in the former both for classification (k 0.45 vs 0.32) and type of antibiotic (k 0.42 vs 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: The overall concordance between surgeons in different centers in the diagnostic classification and predicted treatment of appendicitis is quite low. University Hospital have a highest concordance in both items at all levels of expertise; it might be postulated that teaching to younger surgeon increase the comparison between experts and finally the concordance and adherence to protocols within the center.