Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
J Aging Soc Policy ; 36(3): 460-475, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36848315

ABSTRACT

This commentary argues that precarity and inequity across the life course and aging has accelerated via the COVID-19 pandemic. President Biden's vaccination efforts, $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act, and Build Back Better framework reflect a paradigm shift to restore faith and trust in government that boldly confronts entrenched austerity ideologues. We offer emancipatory sciences as a conceptual framework to analyze and promote social structural change and epic theory development. Emancipatory sciences aim to advance knowledge and the realization of dignity, access, equity, respect, healing, social justice, and social change through individual and collective agency and social institutions. Epic theory development moves beyond isolated incidents as single events and, instead, grasps and advances theory through attempts to change the world itself by demanding attention to inequality, power, and action. Gerontology with an emancipatory science lens offers a framework and vocabulary to understand the individual and collective consequences of the institutional and policy forces that shape aging and generations within and across the life course. It locates an ethical and moral philosophy engaged in the Biden Administration's approach, which proposes redistributing - from bottom-up - material and symbolic resources via family, public, community, and environmental benefits.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Geriatrics , United States , Humans , Pandemics , Aging , Social Change
2.
Gerontol Geriatr Educ ; 33(1): 6-19, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22289063

ABSTRACT

The aging of society requires more trained aging specialists. Are higher education institutions prepared? Results of a comparison of gerontology programs in 2000 and 2010 indicate that the number of programs has declined and that higher education is not prepared. To address this challenge, the authors propose that gerontology be professionalized. To do so will require the accreditation of gerontology programs, the credentialing of gerontology graduates, and the employment of professional gerontologists. The authors offer a model that describes these relationships. The authors make the case, using a symbolic interactionist approach, that the Association for Gerontology in Higher Education must accredit gerontology programs.


Subject(s)
Accreditation/methods , Geriatrics/education , Professional Role , Social Identification , Universities/standards , Accreditation/standards , Aged , Aging , Educational Status , Geriatrics/standards , Humans , Models, Educational , United States
3.
J Aging Soc Policy ; 22(4): 360-78, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20924892

ABSTRACT

This project is based on the results of telephone surveys with 52 local, state, and national informed respondents including policymakers, county leaders, planners, and advocates in mental health and aging with a particular focus on the states of California and Florida. This article addresses challenges to access to mental health services for diverse older adults including barriers related to race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, location, age, gender, immigrant status, language, sexual orientation, and diagnosis. The article also highlights broad themes that emerged including (1) the importance of outreach and transportation tailored to diverse elders, and (2) recruitment of diverse staff and training related to diversity. The article concludes with policy and practice recommendations to reduce these disparities in access to mental health services for diverse populations of older adults.


Subject(s)
Communication Barriers , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Health Services for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Aged , California , Female , Florida , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
4.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 23(10): 1086-92, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18727133

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In this secondary data analysis of Primary Care Research in Substance Abuse and Mental Health for the Elderly (PRIMSe) study, we hypothesized that older minorities who receive mental health services integrated in primary care settings would have greater service use and better mental health outcomes than older minorities referred to community services. METHOD: We identified 2,022 (48% minorities) primary care patients 65 years and older, who met study inclusion criteria and had either alcohol misuse, depression, and/or anxiety. They were randomized to receive treatment for these disorders in the primary care clinic or to a brokerage case management model that linked patients to community-based services. Service use and clinical outcomes were collected at baseline, three months and six months post randomization on all participants. RESULTS: Access to and participation in mental health /substance abuse services was greater in the integrated model than in referral; there were no treatment by ethnicity effects. There were no treatment effects for any of the clinical outcomes; Whites and older minorities in both integrated and referral groups failed to show clinically significant improvement in symptoms and physical functioning at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: While providing services in primary care results in better access to and use of these services, accessing these services is not enough for assuring adequate clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services , Mental Disorders/therapy , Minority Groups , Primary Health Care , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Aged , Delivery of Health Care , Ethnicity , Female , Health Services for the Aged , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Models, Organizational , Psychotherapy , Substance-Related Disorders/ethnology , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci ; 62(2): S79-89, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17379685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the distribution of dominant values, actors, and ideological advocacy coalitions influencing the Social Security debate across two presidential administrations. METHODS: Through content and cluster analyses, we analyzed federal legislative hearing testimonies on Social Security reform spanning 11 years. RESULTS: Witnesses consistently expressed six dominant values: (a) advancing the market, (b) self-interest, (c) generational equity, (d) belief in market activity, (e) recommendations for market solutions, and (f) favoring the replacement of Social Security with private accounts. We identified three advocacy coalitions: conservative, progressive, and nonaligned. Conservatives dominated the hearings and were more consistent in their expression of market values when compared to progressives, who expressed social contract values less frequently. Congressional Democrats were inconsistent in upholding Social Security's social contract values. The distribution of testimonies paralleled historical, political, and economic events. DISCUSSION: Our research indicates that one can interpret social policies as well as policy options as sets of values, and these as ideological models. We anticipate that the coherence on one political ideological view (market) and the relative lack of consistency in another (social contract) will be highly consequential for the future of Social Security, U.S. politics, and the public.


Subject(s)
Politics , Social Security/economics , Social Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/economics , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy , Humans , Policy Making , Social Security/trends , United States
7.
Gerontologist ; 43(1): 36-44, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12604744

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This article reviews the problems associated with recruiting older minorities into mental health research studies and proposes a consumer-centered model of research methodology that addresses the barriers to recruitment and retention in this population. DESIGN AND METHODS: The authors discuss and compare the results of recruitment and retention interventions for two geriatric mental health studies, one that used traditional methods of recruitment and retention and another that used consumer-centered methods. RESULTS: Although the consumer-centered methods result in better recruitment of older minorities in general (chi(2) = 54.90, p <.001), it was not superior to the traditional method in recruiting older minorities (chi(2) = 0.82, ns). However, the consumer-centered approach yielded better retention of older minorities (chi(2) = 6.20, p <.05) than did the traditional method. Within both methods, recruitment through provider referral and face-to-face contact were the superior recruitment methods (chi(2) = 6.78, p <.05). Having an experienced recruiter or a community recruiter resulted in greater agreement to participate than simply having an ethnically matched recruiter (chi(2) = 36.00, p <.001). IMPLICATIONS: Although these data are observational, and rigorous research on the best methods for recruiting and retaining older minorities is still necessary, the results suggest that a consumer-centered model of research yields greater overall recruitment and retention rates than do traditional research methods.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Mental Health Services , Minority Groups , Patient Compliance/ethnology , Patient Selection , Black or African American , Aged , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Male , United States/ethnology , White People
8.
Gerontologist ; 44(1): 104-15, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14978326

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This article reports findings from a nationwide study on factors associated with the perceived effectiveness of state Long Term Care Ombudsman Programs (LTCOPs). DESIGN AND METHODS: Researchers conducted telephone interviews with ombudsmen from the 50 state programs as well as from Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico. Data from the National Ombudsman Reporting System were incorporated into the study, and statistical tests analyze associations between self-rated program effectiveness and adequacy of resources, organizational placement-autonomy, interorganizational relationships, and other variables. RESULTS: Several factors limit the perceived effectiveness of state LTCOPs, including insufficient funding and insufficient LTCOP autonomy caused by organizational placement. Despite these problem areas, state ombudsmen report that their programs meet statutorily mandated requirements with varying degrees of effectiveness. Findings show significant positive associations between program funding and paid and volunteer staff levels and between the ratio of long-term care beds per ombudsman and the percentage of nursing facilities visited. Sufficient funding is positively associated with perceived effectiveness of work with nursing facilities. IMPLICATIONS: Sufficient resources, sufficient organizational autonomy, and a supportive political and social environment are key elements in achieving varying types of perceived effectiveness in the state LTCOPs. Research is needed to extend this work to local ombudsman programs and to compare self-rated effectiveness with other outcome measures.


Subject(s)
Long-Term Care/standards , Nursing Homes/standards , Patient Advocacy , Quality of Health Care , Budgets , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Organizational Objectives , Patient Advocacy/economics , Program Evaluation , Research , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United States
9.
Int J Health Serv ; 32(2): 279-97, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12067032

ABSTRACT

A new political economy is shaping the lives of present and future generations of older people. The key change has been the move from the mass institutions that defined growing old in the period from 1945 through the late 1970s to the more individualized structures--privatized pensions, privatized health and social care--that increasingly inform the current period. The authors examine the role of international governmental organizations in promoting this trend, with examples drawn from the work of the World Bank, World Trade Organization, and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and the relationship between international governmental organizations and the state. The article concludes with an assessment of the changes to citizenship that accompany globalization and the implications for political organization among older people themselves.


Subject(s)
Capitalism , International Agencies , Population Dynamics , Privatization , Public Policy , Social Welfare/trends , Socialism/trends , Aged , Civil Rights , Developed Countries , Health Care Sector/trends , Humans , International Cooperation , Medicare , Pensions , Social Security , Social Welfare/economics , Socialism/economics , United Nations , United States
11.
J Appl Gerontol ; 32(6): 708-28, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25474795

ABSTRACT

Local Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs (LLTCOPs) protect the health, safety, welfare, and rights of residents in long-term care (LTC) facilities. This study examines the (a) existing resources available to LLTCOPs in Georgia, California, and New York, (b) relationship of resources to LLTCOP's reported effectiveness in meeting its federal mandates, and (c) state-specific mediating factors influencing LLTCOPs' resources and reported effectiveness. Quantitative and qualitative data from the National Ombudsman Reporting System (NORS) and a telephone survey of LLTCOPs in Georgia, California, and New York were collected and analyzed. Resource adequacy, as measured by beds per full-time equivalent staff (beds/FTE), is inconsistently associated with effectiveness in meeting federal mandates across and within the states studied. Analysis of alternate resource measures suggests a threshold of LLTCOP size, under which program effectiveness may be lower. LLTCOPs report the changing LTC environment and additional state mandates as factors influencing resource adequacy.


Subject(s)
Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Patient Advocacy , California , Data Collection , Financing, Government/statistics & numerical data , Georgia , Humans , Long-Term Care/standards , Long-Term Care/statistics & numerical data , New York , Patient Advocacy/economics , Patient Advocacy/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation
12.
J Aging Health ; 22(6): 772-803, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20495151

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Long-term care (LTC) ombudsman advocate for the health, safety, welfare, and rights of residents in LTC facilities. This article examines factors associated with self-rated effectiveness of local LTC Ombudsman Programs (LTCOPs) in California and New York across the five statutorily mandated activities under the Older Americans Act: complaint investigation, resident/family education, community education, monitoring laws, and policy advocacy. METHOD: Data were collected from telephone interviews with coordinators of local LTCOPs in California and New York and from the National Ombudsman Reporting System. Analyses examined factors associated with effectiveness: program size, resource adequacy, organizational autonomy, interorganizational relationships, and program outputs. RESULTS: Resource and autonomy measures are significantly associated with different effectiveness measures in each state. Staff full-time equivalencies and coordinator hours per week in New York and the quality of training in California are significantly associated with effectiveness in most mandated activities. DISCUSSION: Findings highlight variability within and between the local LTCOPs in California and New York.


Subject(s)
Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Patient Advocacy , Program Evaluation , Social Support , California , Humans , Long-Term Care/standards , New York , Organizational Policy , Program Evaluation/standards , State Government
14.
Soc Work Public Health ; 23(4): 3-24, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19213475

ABSTRACT

The Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) grew out of a small community organization in San Francisco and has been replicated by non-profit organizations in a number of other communities across the country. The authors review the successes of PACE as reported in the literature and discuss reasons for its limited growth as well as its significant influence on state and federal long term care policy. They argue that PACE has significantly changed how we think of long term care through its pioneering work fully integrating medical and long term care. PACE has also provided an influential model for breaking down the funding silos that characterize the medical and long term care services arena. State Medicaid agencies and Medicare have learned from PACE. Health plans and private long term insurers may also still learn from PACE. However, the fact that only a little more than 10,000 elders have enrolled in PACE nationwide prevents the authors from finding that PACE has brought about significant structural change in a long term care industry dominated by for-profit nursing homes.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Community Health Services , Geriatric Nursing/organization & administration , Aged , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Community Networks , Health Maintenance Organizations , Humans , San Francisco , United States
15.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 15(10): 906-12, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17911367

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated whether the integration of mental health into primary care overcomes ethnic disparities in access to and participation in mental health (MH) and substance abuse (SA) treatment. METHODS: The authors conducted site-specific analysis of a multisite clinical trial to compare participation of black and white elderly in an integrated model of care (all MH/SA services are provided at primary care clinics) versus an enhanced referral model of care (all MH/SA services are provided at specialized MH clinics). In all, 183 elderly (56% black) diagnosed with depression (82%), anxiety (32%), and/or problem drinking (22%) were randomized. RESULTS: Blacks in the integrated arm were significantly more likely to have at least one MH/SA visit (77.5%) relative to blacks in the enhanced referral arm (22%; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 14.13; confidence interval [CI]: 4.76-41.95, Wald chi(2): 22.75, df = 1, p <0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between whites in the integrated treatment arm (66.6%) and whites in the enhanced referral arm (46.9%, adjusted OR: 2.98; CI: 0.98-9.06, Wald chi(2): 3.72, df = 1, p = 0.05). In the enhanced referral arm, blacks had a significantly smaller number of overall MH/SA visits (mean [SD]: 2.08 [5.28]) relative to whites (mean [SD]: 5.31 [7.76], adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR]: 2.87; CI: 1.06-7.73, Wald chi(2): 4.37, df = 1, p = 0.03). In the integrated arm, there was no statistically significant difference between blacks (mean [SD]: 3.22 [3.71]) and whites (mean [SD]: 2.75 [4.29], adjusted IRR: 0.58; CI: 0.25-1.33, Wald chi(2): 1.64, df = 1, p = 0.20). For both groups, time between baseline evaluation to first MH/SA visit was significantly shorter in the integrated treatment arm (for blacks: mean days [SD]: 31.06 [28.66]; for whites: mean days [SD]: 22.18 [33.88]) than in the enhanced referral arm (mean [SD]: 62.45 [43.53], adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 7.82; CI: 3.65-16.75, Wald chi(2): 28.02, df = 1, p <0.0001; mean [SD]: 63.46 [32.41], adjusted HR: 2.48; CI: 1.20-5.13, Wald chi(2): 6.02, df = 1, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: An integrated model of care is particularly effective in improving access to and participation in MH/SA treatment among black primary care patients.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Health Facility Merger/methods , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , White People/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/psychology , Aged , California/ethnology , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Educational Status , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Health Services/standards , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Models, Organizational , Primary Health Care/standards , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/standards , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , White People/psychology
16.
J Aging Soc Policy ; 18(1): 41-63, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16635980

ABSTRACT

Whereas many studies of welfare reform have focused on effects on children and families, little research has examined the implications of welfare reform for the elderly. This case study incorporates interviews with service providers for the aging, members of advocacy organizations, and two focus groups of older consumers conducted in the multi-ethnic urban community of San Francisco. Study findings suggest that welfare reform has had both direct and indirect effects on the elderly and their services in the study community. Direct effects derive primarily from changes in the welfare reform legislation that had the effect of undermining both immigrants' eligibility for and claiming of public assistance benefits. Indirect effects on older persons include increased child-care demands upon grandparents. The case study data bear on a significant policy change within the broader trend of devolution at a historical point when anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States was running high.


Subject(s)
Health Services for the Aged/economics , Housing for the Elderly/economics , Public Assistance/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Policy , Social Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Consumer Organizations , Emigration and Immigration/statistics & numerical data , Focus Groups , Humans , Organizational Case Studies , San Francisco , Social Security/statistics & numerical data , Social Welfare/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transportation/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL