Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 37(12): 488-495, 2023 12 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38133563

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Exceptional response to therapy is rare in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This study explored potential genomic differences between typical and exceptional responses that could confer more favorable biology. METHODS: We included exceptional responders and controls with advanced pancreatic cancer from Cleveland Clinic from April 2013 to August 2017. Exceptional responders were defined as patients with an overall survival of more than 18 months for metastatic disease and more than 24 months for locally advanced disease. Clinical data were obtained, and next-generation sequencing was performed. Statistical analyses comparing the 2 groups were performed using descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test. RESULTS: The study comprised 4 exceptional responders and 6 controls. Both groups were well balanced in age, sex, race, and treatment regimens. Exceptional responders had significantly fewer nonsynonymous mutations than controls (2.25 vs 5.17; P = .014). A mutation count of less than 3 was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (17.2 vs 2.3 months; P = .002) and overall survival (29.4 vs 4.6 months; P = .013). Tumor mutational burden did not differ between exceptional responders and controls (4.88 vs 5.70 mut/Mb; P = .39). CONCLUSION: A lower number of nonsynonymous mutations may correlate with exceptional outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer. These findings should encourage future studies into genomic signatures of exceptional response.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Genomics , Progression-Free Survival , Mutation , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
2.
Cancer Med ; 12(6): 7327-7338, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36621839

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Young-onset gastrointestinal malignancies appear to be increasing in incidence. There are limited data on young-onset pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (YO-PBA). METHODS: The study comprised patients with PBA (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, intra-, and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma) and included in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2017. YO-PBA was defined as a diagnosis at age less than 50 years. Logistic regression to assess factors associated with YO-PBA status, and cox proportional hazards modeling to associate relevant factors with overall survival was performed. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 360,764 patients, with 20,822 (5.8%) YO-PBA. YO-PBA was associated with (p-values<0.0001 for all): male sex (6.3% YO-male out of all male patients vs. 5.2% YO-female, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.33), Black race (7.9% YO-Black vs. 5.0% YO-White, OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.64-1.80), lower income (6.4% YO-lowest household income based group vs. 5.5% highest, OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13). YO-PBA were more likely to present with stage-IV disease (6.4% YO-Stage IV of all stage IV vs. 5.4% YO-Stage I-III, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.21-1.29 p-value < 0.0001). Factors associated with overall survival (OS) in non-operable patients included-sex - male vs. female, HR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.15); race - Black vs. White, HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.06-1.42); income group - lowest vs. highest, HR 1.33 (95% CI 1.27-1.39), and treatment center type - academic vs. nonacademic center, HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors significantly impact incidence and outcomes for young-onset pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (YO-PBA). More work is needed to help understand the mechanisms involved while addressing the disparities.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Age of Onset , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Black People , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Socioeconomic Factors , White People
3.
World J Clin Oncol ; 13(6): 540-552, 2022 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35949429

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus associated smooth muscle tumor (EBV-SMT) is a rare oncological entity. However, there is an increasing incidence of EBV-SMTs, as the frequency of organ transplantation and immunosuppression grows. EBV-SMT diagnosis relies on histopathology and immunochemical staining to distinguish it from post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). There is no clear consensus on the treatment of EBV-SMTs. However, surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunosuppression reduction have been explored with varying degrees of success. CASE SUMMARY: Our case series includes six cases of EBV-SMTs across different age groups, with different treatment modalities, adding to the limited existing literature on this rare tumor. The median latency time between immunosuppression and disease diagnosis is four years. EBV-SMTs present with variable degrees of aggressiveness and seem to have worse clinical outcomes in patients with tumor multiplicity and worse immunocompetency. CONCLUSION: It is imperative to continue building on this knowledge and keeping EBV-SMTs on the differential in immunocompromised individuals.

4.
JAMA Surg ; 157(6): 524-530, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35353121

ABSTRACT

Importance: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death, and nearly 70% of patients with this cancer have unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs). Compared with chemotherapy, liver transplant has been reported to improve survival in patients with CRLMs, but in North America, liver allograft shortages make the use of deceased-donor allografts for this indication problematic. Objective: To examine survival outcomes of living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) for unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included patients at 3 North American liver transplant centers with established LDLT programs, 2 in the US and 1 in Canada. Patients with liver-confined, unresectable CRLMs who had demonstrated sustained disease control on oncologic therapy met the inclusion criteria for LDLT. Patients included in this study underwent an LDLT between July 2017 and October 2020 and were followed up until May 1, 2021. Exposures: Living-donor liver transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perioperative morbidity and mortality of treated patients and donors, assessed by univariate statistics, and 1.5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free and overall survival for transplant recipients. Results: Of 91 evaluated patients, 10 (11%) underwent LDLT (6 [60%] male; median age, 45 years [range, 35-58 years]). Among the 10 living donors, 7 (70%) were male, and the median age was 40.5 years (range, 27-50 years). Kaplan-Meier estimates for recurrence-free and overall survival at 1.5 years after LDLT were 62% and 100%, respectively. Perioperative morbidity for both donors and recipients was consistent with established standards (Clavien-Dindo complications among recipients: 3 [10%] had none, 3 [30%] had grade II, and 4 [40%] had grade III; donors: 5 [50%] had none, 4 [40%] had grade I, and 1 had grade III). Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings of recurrence-free and overall survival rates suggest that select patients with unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs may benefit from total hepatectomy and LDLT.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Liver Transplantation , Adult , Female , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 44(6): 885-893, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359831

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with few available studies assessing incidence and mortality. In this study, we aim to investigate trends of incidence and mortality in a large nation-wide epidemiologic study. METHODS: We used SEER 18 database to study cholangiocarcinoma cases in the US during 2000-2015. Incidence and mortality rates of cholangiocarcinoma were calculated by race and were expressed by 1,000,000 person-years. Annual percent change (APC) was calculated using joinpoint regression software. RESULTS: We reviewed 16,189 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, of which 64.4% were intrahepatic. Most patients were whites (78.4%), males (51.3%), and older than 65 years (63%). A total of 13,121 patients died of cholangiocarcinoma during the study period. Cholangiocarcinoma incidence and mortality were 11.977 and 10.295 and were both higher among Asians, males, and individuals older than 65 years. Incidence rates have significantly increased over the study period (APC=5.063%, P<.001), while mortality increased significantly over the study period (APC=5.964%, P<.001), but decreased after 2013 (APC=-25.029, P<.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence and mortality of cholangiocarcinoma were increasing in the study period with significant observed disparities based on race and gender.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cholangiocarcinoma/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , SEER Program , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology
6.
J Oncol Pract ; 13(7): e666-e672, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28636421

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Hospital transfers may affect clinical outcomes. Evaluation of admission by source of transfer, time of admission, and provider type may identify opportunities to improve inpatient outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed charts of patients admitted to the solid tumor oncology service between July and December 2014 from the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) Main Campus emergency department (ED), CCF Regional EDs, outside hospital (OSH) ED, OSH inpatient services, and CCF outpatient clinics. Data collected included time of admission, mortality and severity risk scores, and provider type. Risk factors were assessed for clinical outcomes, including activations of the Adult Medical Emergency Team, intensive care unit transfers, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Five hundred admissions were included. OSH inpatient transfers had significantly higher disease severity compared with all other origins of admission. OSH inpatient transfers demonstrated significantly longer LOS compared with all other origins of admission, and higher mortality rates compared with the outpatient direct admits and CCF Main Campus ED admits. After adjusting for disease severity and risk of mortality, OSH ED patients remained at higher risk for Adult Medical Emergency Team activation, OSH inpatient transfers had the longest LOS, and CCF Main Campus ED patients had the lowest risk of mortality. Time of admission and provider type were not associated with any of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Oncology inpatients transferred from an outside health care facility are at higher risk for adverse outcomes. The magnitude of difference is lessened, but still significant, after adjustment for disease severity and risk of mortality.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Health Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL