ABSTRACT
Background: Fatigue is the most common symptom among cancer survivors. Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) may occur at any point in the cancer care continuum. Multiple factors contribute to CRF development and severity, including cancer type, treatments, presence of other symptoms, comorbidities, and medication side effects. Clinically, increasing physical activity, enhancing sleep quality, and recognizing sleep disorders are integral to managing CRF. Unfortunately, CRF is infrequently recognized, evaluated, or treated in lung cancer survivors despite more frequent and severe symptoms than in other cancers. Therefore, increased awareness and understanding of CRF are needed to improve health-related quality of life in lung cancer survivors. Objectives: 1) To identify and prioritize knowledge and research gaps and 2) to develop and prioritize research questions to evaluate mechanistic, diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches to CRF among lung cancer survivors. Methods: We convened a multidisciplinary panel to review the available literature on CRF, focusing on the impacts of physical activity, rehabilitation, and sleep disturbances in lung cancer. We used a three-round modified Delphi process to prioritize research questions. Results: This statement identifies knowledge gaps in the 1) detection and diagnostic evaluation of CRF in lung cancer survivors; 2) timing, goals, and implementation of physical activity and rehabilitation; and 3) evaluation and treatment of sleep disturbances and disorders to reduce CRF. Finally, we present the panel's initial 32 research questions and seven final prioritized questions. Conclusions: This statement offers a prioritized research agenda to 1) advance clinical and research efforts and 2) increase awareness of CRF in lung cancer survivors.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Sleep Wake Disorders , Humans , Quality of Life , Survivors , Evidence Gaps , FatigueABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Sleep disturbances are common in patients with breast cancer, but comprehensive evaluations with patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and sleep evaluation with polysomnography (PSG) are lacking. This study describes sleep disruption using PROs and PSG to identify underlying sleep disorders. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with breast cancer undergoing formal sleep evaluation from 4/1/2009 to 7/31/2014 was performed. Clinical characteristics, PROs using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and PSG data were reviewed. RESULTS: 404 patients were identified with 43% early, 30% locally advanced and 17% metastatic disease. PSQI revealed poor sleep in 75%, and ESS demonstrated daytime sleepiness in 55%. Sleep aid use was reported by 39%, and pain medication use in 22%. Most patients (50.2%) had multiple sleep disorders. Insomnia (54.5%) was the most frequent sleep disorder, followed closely by obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (53.7%). PSG was performed in 74%. Multivariate analysis linked poor sleep to use of sleep aids [OR 7.7, 95% CI 3.9 to 15.2], anxiety disorder [OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.7 to 14.0], and metastatic disease [OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.6]. Daytime sleepiness correlated with known diagnosis of OSA [OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.3] and sleep aid use [OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9]. CONCLUSIONS: Poor sleep was associated with sleep aid use, anxiety disorder and metastatic disease. Insomnia was the most common sleep disorder, followed by OSA (mostly mild). Education about sleep health and proactive screening for sleep symptoms would be beneficial in patients with breast cancer.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), remains the most reliable and practical test to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Current literature is sparse regarding the rates of discordance between NPS and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in patients with cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with cancer who had BAL samples tested for SARS-CoV-2 at a comprehensive cancer center. Patients without NPS PCR for SARS-CoV-2 before BAL were excluded. RESULTS: In a cohort of 345 patients, 12% and 17% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on NPS and BAL, respectively. There was a 6.3% NPS-/BAL+ discordance rate and a 9.5% NPS+/BAL- discordance rate. Patients with lymphoma (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.06; P = .007) and Hispanic patients (aOR = 3.76; P = .009) were more likely to have NPS-/BAL+ discordance on multivariate analysis. Among patients with NPS- /BAL- for SARS-CoV-2, an alternate infectious (23%) and a noninfectious etiology (16%) were identified in BAL. CONCLUSIONS: Our discordance rates between NPS and BAL were sufficient to recommend BAL in certain patients with cancer with a high clinical suspicion of COVID-19. BAL has value in identifying alternative etiologies of illness in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Bronchoalveolar Lavage , COVID-19 Testing , Nasopharynx , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/diagnosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pneumonitis causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Estimates of real-world incidence and reported risk factors vary substantially. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 419 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with anti-PD-(L)1 with or without anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Clinical, imaging, and microbiological data were evaluated by multidisciplinary adjudication teams. The primary outcome of interest was grade ≥2 (CTCAEv5) pneumonitis. Clinicopathologic variables, tobacco use, cancer therapies, and preexisting lung disease were assessed for univariate effects using Cox proportional hazards models. We created multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to assess risk factors for pneumonitis and mortality. Pneumonitis, pneumonia, and progression were modeled as time-dependent variables in mortality models. RESULTS: We evaluated 419 patients between 2013 and 2021. The cumulative incidence of pneumonitis was 9.5% (40/419). In a multivariate model, pneumonitis increased the risk for mortality (HR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.0-2.5), after adjustment for disease progression (HR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.4-1.8) and baseline shortness of breath (HR 1.5, 95% CI, 1.2-2.0). Incomplete resolution was more common with more severe pneumonitis. Interstitial lung disease was associated with higher risk for pneumonitis (HR 5.4, 95% CI, 1.1-26.6), particularly in never smokers (HR 26.9, 95% CI, 2.8-259.0). CONCLUSION: Pneumonitis occurred at a high rate and significantly increased mortality. Interstitial lung disease, particularly in never smokers, increased the risk for pneumonitis.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Lung Neoplasms , Pneumonia , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Incidence , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), combined with hypomethylating agents, can be used to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but this strategy results in a high rate of pneumonitis. The authors sought to determine risk factors for pneumonitis development and whether pneumonitis increased mortality. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 258 AML patients who received ICI-containing regimens from 2016 to 2018. A multidisciplinary adjudication committee diagnosed pneumonia and pneumonitis by reviewing symptoms, imaging, microbiology, and response to therapies. To measure risk factors for pneumonitis and mortality, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were constructed. Pneumonia, pneumonitis, and disease progression were modeled as a time-dependent variable and incorporated a standard risk set modifying variables into the models. RESULTS: Thirty patients developed pneumonitis (12%). Of these, 17 had partial or complete resolution, whereas 13 patients died from pneumonitis. Increasing age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.08), and baseline shortness of breath increased pneumonitis risk (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.13-5.55). Female sex (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.70) and increasing platelet count (HR, 0.52 per log-unit increase; 95% CI, 0.30-0.92) decreased pneumonitis risk. In adjusted models, ICI-related pneumonitis significantly increased mortality (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.84-4.37). CONCLUSIONS: ICI-related pneumonitis occurs at a high rate in AML patients and increases mortality. LAY SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remove inhibitory signals that reduce T-cell function and allow T-cells to better attack cancer cells. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the effectiveness of ICIs is limited in part by inflammation of the lung, called pneumonitis. This study reviewed 258 patients with AML who received ICIs and identified 30 patients who developed pneumonitis, nearly half of whom died. Older age and baseline shortness of breath increased pneumonitis risk, whereas female sex and higher baseline platelet counts decreased pneumonitis risk. Pneumonitis increased mortality by nearly 3-fold. This work highlights the significant harm imposed by pneumonitis after ICI therapies.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Lung Neoplasms , Pneumonia , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Dyspnea/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pneumonia/chemically induced , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Cancer patients have an increased risk of bleeding compared to non-cancer patients with anticoagulant therapy. A bleeding risk assessment before initiation of anticoagulation is recommended. Currently low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the mainstays of treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Since DOACs are administered orally, they offer some convenience and ease of administration; however, LMWH may be preferred in certain cancers. Given the prevalence of anticoagulant therapies in cancer patients, clinical providers must be able to recognize potentially critical bleeding sites and modalities to reverse major hemorrhage. Reversal agents or antidotes to bleeding may be required when bleeding is persistent or life-threatening. These include vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), protamine, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or andexanet alfa, and idarucizumab. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion can be also considered in those with major bleeding. Evidence for timing and need for re-initiation of anticoagulant therapy after a major bleeding remains sparse, but a multi-disciplinary approach and shared decision-making can be implemented in the interim.
Subject(s)
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Neoplasms , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Antidotes/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protamines/therapeutic use , Vitamin KABSTRACT
OPINION STATEMENT: Sleep and circadian rhythm disturbance are among the most commonly experienced symptoms in patients with cancer. These disturbances occur throughout the spectrum of cancer care from diagnosis, treatment, and long into survivorship. The pathogenesis of these symptoms and disturbances is based on common inflammatory pathways related to cancer and its' treatments. The evaluation of sleep and circadian disorders requires an understanding of how these symptoms cluster with other cancer-related symptoms and potentiate each other. A thorough evaluation of these symptoms and disorders utilizing validated diagnostic tools, directed review of clinical information, and diagnostic testing is recommended. Treatment of sleep and circadian disturbance in cancer patients should be based on the findings of a detailed evaluation, including specific treatment of primary sleep and circadian disorders, and utilize integrative and personalised management of cancer-related symptoms through multiple pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic modalities. Recognition, evaluation, and treatment of sleep and circadian rhythm disturbance in cancer may lead to improved symptom management, quality of life, and outcomes.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/complications , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/diagnosis , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/etiology , Algorithms , Biomarkers , Clinical Decision-Making , Combined Modality Therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Management , Disease Susceptibility , Humans , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/therapy , Symptom Assessment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Pulmonary function testing (PFT) in patients with tracheostomies has been perceived as difficult to perform and clinically unreliable. We studied the feasibility, quality, repeatability and clinical significance of PFT. METHODS: Patients with tracheostomies that underwent PFT from January 1, 2010 to February 29, 2012 were identified. Clinical history and PFT data were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Fifty patients (88% men) were identified. Forty-seven (94%) patients were able to perform PFT. Acceptable repeatability was obtained for FVC in 39 (83%) and for FEV1 in 41 (87%). Patients with tracheostomies showed difficulty in meeting ATS end-of-test criteria; only 9 (19%) met plateau criteria and 25 (53%) had exhalation times of greater than 6 s. Obstructive pattern was observed in 30 (64%) and restrictive pattern in 9 (19%). DLCO measurements were attempted in 43 patients and satisfactorily obtained in 34 (79%). CONCLUSIONS: PFT can be performed with reliability in patients with tracheostomies, and they are useful for detecting and classifying types of lung dysfunction.
Subject(s)
Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Lung/physiopathology , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Tracheostomy , Vital Capacity/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is commonly reported in patients with cancer, and it is also a cardinal feature of central disorders of hypersomnolence. Multiple sleep latency testing (MSLT) is used for objective assessment. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with cancer history who underwent formal sleep evaluation and MSLT from 2006 to 2019 was performed. Clinical characteristics, sleep-related history, and polysomnographic data were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 16 patients with cancer history, 9 were women (56%) and median age was 49. Cancer diagnoses included 4 central nervous system, 3 breast, 1 lymphoma, and 9 other solid malignancies, and 31% were undergoing active treatment. Comorbid conditions included depression, obstructive sleep apnea, and cancer-related fatigue. Daytime fatigue (94%), daily naps (81%), and EDS (69%) were the most common symptoms. Hypnopompic and hypnogogic hallucinations, sleep paralysis, sleep attacks, and cataplexy were present in a few. Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores were consistent with EDS in 88%, and mean sleep latency was less than 8 min in 69%. Only 31% had more than 2 sleep-onset REM periods. MSLT supported diagnoses of central disorders of hypersomnolence in 5 patients (4 narcolepsy, 1 idiopathic hypersomnia); 5 hypersomnia due to a medical disorder, psychiatric condition, or medication; and 6 with normal results. Pharmacotherapy was prescribed in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: EDS in patients with cancer may be multifactorial, but persistent symptoms may indicate an underlying disorder of hypersomnolence. Sleep referral and polysomnography to exclude other sleep disorders may be indicated. MSLT can help confirm the diagnosis. In those with normal MSLT, further evaluation for mood disorder should be considered.
Subject(s)
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Neoplasms/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thoracentesis using suction is perceived to have increased risk of complications, including pneumothorax and re-expansion pulmonary oedema (REPO). Current guidelines recommend limiting drainage to 1.5â L to avoid REPO. Our purpose was to examine the incidence of complications with symptom-limited drainage of pleural fluid using suction and identify risk factors for REPO. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who underwent symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction at our institution between January 1, 2004 and August 31, 2018 was performed, and a total of 10â344 thoracenteses were included. RESULTS: Pleural fluid ≥1.5â L was removed in 19% of the procedures. Thoracentesis was stopped due to chest discomfort (39%), complete drainage of fluid (37%) and persistent cough (13%). Pneumothorax based on chest radiography was detected in 3.98%, but only 0.28% required intervention. The incidence of REPO was 0.08%. The incidence of REPO increased with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥3 compounded with ≥1.5â L (0.04-0.54%; 95% CI 0.13-2.06â L). Thoracentesis in those with ipsilateral mediastinal shift did not increase complications, but less fluid was removed (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction is safe even with large volumes. Pneumothorax requiring intervention and REPO are both rare. There were no increased procedural complications in those with ipsilateral mediastinal shift. REPO increased with poor ECOG PS and drainage ≥1.5â L. Symptom-limited drainage using suction without pleural manometry is safe.
Subject(s)
Pleural Effusion , Pneumothorax , Adult , Drainage , Humans , Pleural Effusion/epidemiology , Pleural Effusion/etiology , Pleural Effusion/therapy , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Pneumothorax/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Suction , ThoracentesisABSTRACT
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been described in myelofibrosis (MF), but it is rare and typically found in advanced disease. Although the etiology of PH in MF is unclear, early predictors may be detected by echocardiogram. The goals of our study were to evaluate the prevalence of PH as determined by echocardiography in a cohort of MF patients and to identify clinical risk factors for PH. We performed a retrospective review of MF patients from October 2015 to May 2017 at MD Anderson Cancer Center in the ambulatory clinic, and those with echocardiogram were included. Clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory data were reviewed. Patients with and without PH were compared using a chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression was performed with an outcome variable of PH. There were 143 patients with MF who underwent echocardiogram, and 20 (14%) had echocardiographic findings consistent with PH. Older age, male gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, dyspnea, hematocrit, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and N-terminal prohormone BNP (NT-proBNP) were significantly different between those without PH and those with PH (p < 0.05). Female gender was protective (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.049-0.90, p = 0.035), and NT-proBNP was a significant clinical predictor of PH (OR 1.07, CI 1.02 = 1.12, p = 0.006). PH in MF is lower than previously reported in our MF cohort, but many patients had cardiac comorbidities. PH due to left-sided heart disease may be underestimated in MF. Evaluation of respiratory symptoms and elevated NT-proBNP should prompt a baseline echocardiogram. Early detection of PH with a multidisciplinary approach may allow treatment of reversible etiologies.
Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pulmonary/etiology , Primary Myelofibrosis/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Echocardiography , Female , Humans , Hyperlipidemias/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/blood , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnostic imaging , Hypertension, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised hematologic malignancy (HM) patients experience high mortality after respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). We measured radiologic severity to determine whether it could improve the performance of 60-day mortality models based only upon immunodeficiency severity. METHODS: We studied 155 HM patients, including 84 hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, who developed RSV LRTI from 2001 to 2013. We measured immunodeficiency using lymphopenia (lymphocyte count <200 cells/mm3 ), Immunodeficiency Severity Index (ISI), and Severe Immunodeficiency (SID) criteria. Radiologic severity was measured by the Radiologic Severity Index (RSI, range 0-72) at time of LRTI (baseline-RSI) and peak severity (peak-RSI). Delta-RSI was defined as the difference between baseline-RSI and peak-RSI. We used logistic regression models to measure the association of immunodeficiency and RSI with 60-day all-cause mortality, and measured model discrimination using areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curves, calibration using Brier scores, and explained variance using pseudo-R2 values. RESULTS: Forty-one patients died within 60 days of RSV LRTI. Severe immunodeficiency was associated with higher mortality. Peak-RSI (odds ratio [OR] 1.06/point, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.08), and delta-RSI (OR 1.07/point, 95% CI 1.05-1.10) were associated with 60-day mortality after RSV LRTI, but not baseline-RSI. Addition of peak-RSI or delta-RSI to baseline immunodeficiency improved the discrimination, calibration, and explained variance (P < 0.001) of 60-day mortality models. CONCLUSIONS: Although baseline immunodeficiency in HM patients helps predict 60-day mortality after RSV LRTI, mortality risk estimates can be further refined by also measuring LRTI progression using RSI. RSI is well-suited as a marker of LRTI severity in RSV infection.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/virology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pleural effusions in patients with hematologic malignancy may represent malignant pleural effusion (MPE) or occur secondary to infection, treatment effects, and other common causes. The impact of MPE on prognosis in this cohort remains unclear. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are routinely placed for palliation of recurrent symptomatic MPEs, but perceived concerns over infection and bleeding may limit their use in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, recent evidence suggests IPCs are both well tolerated and effective in this cohort. In this review, the evaluation of pleural effusions in hematologic malignancies and their management with an IPC are outlined. RECENT FINDINGS: Two retrospective studies have been published regarding the use of IPCs in hematologic malignancies. Lymphomatous effusions are the most common cause of MPE in this cohort. The rates of complications and pleurodesis with IPC in hematologic malignancies are similar to those with solid organ tumors. SUMMARY: Pleural effusions in patients with hematologic malignancies may be managed safely with an IPC. Sterile technique, barrier protection, standardized algorithms for placement and removal, and quality assurance initiatives are crucial to centers that place IPCs for all patients. The safety of IPC in hematologic malignancies warrants a paradigm shift in the management of pleural disease for this cohort.
Subject(s)
Catheters, Indwelling , Chest Tubes , Drainage , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/surgery , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/economics , Chest Tubes/adverse effects , Chest Tubes/economics , Drainage/adverse effects , Humans , Palliative Care , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/diagnosis , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/economics , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/etiology , Pleurodesis , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is associated with high mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies (HM). We sought to determine whether allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients would be at higher risk for 60-day mortality. METHODS: We examined a retrospective cohort of adults with HM with or without HCT treated for RSV LRTI (n = 154) at our institution from 1996-2013. We defined possible RSV LRTI as RSV detected only in the upper respiratory tract with new radiologic infiltrates and proven RSV LRTI as RSV detected in BAL fluid with new radiologic infiltrates. Immunodeficiency Scoring Index (ISI) and Severe Immunodeficiency (SID) criteria were calculated for HCT recipients. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors associated with 60-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Mortality was high in HM patients (25%), but there was no difference between those without HCT, autologous or allo-HCT recipients in logistic regression models. Separate multivariate models showed that at RSV diagnosis, neutropenia (OR 8.3, 95% CI 2.8-24.2, P = 0.005) and lymphopenia (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7-8.2, P = 0.001) were associated with 60-day mortality. Proven LRTI was associated with higher 60-day mortality (neutropenia model: OR 4.7, 95%CI 1.7-13.5; lymphopenia model: OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2-8.8), and higher ICU admission. In HCT recipients, high ISI and very severe immunodeficiency by SID criteria were associated with higher 60-day all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality is similarly high among HM patients without HCT and HCT recipients. High-grade immunodeficiency and detection of RSV from BAL fluid are associated with higher 60-day mortality.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/surgery , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/mortality , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/isolation & purification , Respiratory Tract Infections/mortality , Adult , Aged , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/virology , Bronchoscopy , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Lymphopenia/blood , Lymphopenia/immunology , Lymphopenia/mortality , Lymphopenia/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Neutropenia/blood , Neutropenia/immunology , Neutropenia/mortality , Neutropenia/virology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/blood , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/immunology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/blood , Respiratory Tract Infections/immunology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Young AdultSubject(s)
Biopsy, Needle/methods , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/surgery , Thoracentesis/methods , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnosis , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/etiology , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/physiopathology , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Interleukin-27 , Pleural Diseases , Pleural Effusion , Tuberculosis , Catheters, Indwelling , Dasatinib , Humans , Pleurodesis , Prospective StudiesSubject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Serositis/chemically induced , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Humans , Piperidines , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is a prominent complaint of cancer patients. Most studies have focused on insomnia and cancer-related fatigue. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been reported in small studies and case reports. METHODS: In a retrospective review of patients who underwent formal sleep evaluation and polysomnography (PSG) from 2006 to 2011, 56 patients with tumors in the head and neck region were identified. Clinical characteristics, sleep-related history, and PSG data were reviewed. RESULTS: Most patients had active cancer (80%), and the majority had squamous pathology (68%). Prominent symptoms included daytime fatigue (93%), daytime sleepiness (89%), and snoring (82%). Comorbid conditions primarily included hypertension (46%) and hypothyroidism (34%). Significant sleep-related breathing disorder was noted in 93% of patients, and 84% met clinical criteria for OSA. A male predominance (77%) was noted, and patients were not obese (body mass index <30 kg/m(2) in 52%). The majority of patients (79%) underwent radiation prior to sleep study, of which 88% had OSA, and in the group without prior radiation, 67% had OSA. Adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy was slightly better when compared with the general population. A subset of patients with persistent hypoxia despite advanced forms of PAP required tracheostomy. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with active disease and radiation prior to PSG were more likely to have OSA. CONCLUSION: Sleep-related breathing disorder was common in patients with tumors in the head and neck region referred for evaluation of sleep disruption, and most met clinical criteria for OSA. Daytime fatigue and sleepiness were the most common complaints. OSA was prevalent in male patients, and most with OSA were not obese. Architectural distortion from the malignancy and/or treatment may predispose these patients to OSA by altering anatomic and neural factors. A heightened clinical suspicion for sleep-related breathing disorder and referral to a sleep specialist would be beneficial for patients with these complaints.