SBRT planning for spinal metastasis: indications from a large multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: The dosimetric variability in spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning was investigated in a large number of centres to identify crowd knowledge-based solutions. METHODS: Two spinal cases were planned by 48 planners (38 centres). The required prescription dose (PD) was 3â€¯× 10 Gy and the planning target volume (PTV) coverage request was: VPD > 90% (minimum request: VPD > 80%). The dose constraints were: planning risk volume (PRV) spinal cord: V18Gy < 0.35 cm3, V21.9 Gy < 0.03 cm3; oesophagus: V17.7 Gy < 5 cm3, V25.2 Gy < 0.03 cm3. Planners who did not fulfil the protocol requirements were asked to re-optimize the plans, using the results of planners with the same technology. Statistical analysis was performed to assess correlations between dosimetric results and planning parameters. A quality index (QI) was defined for scoring plans. RESULTS: In all, 12.5% of plans did not meet the protocol requirements. After re-optimization, 98% of plans fulfilled the constraints, showing the positive impact of knowledge sharing. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation (p < 0.05) between the homogeneity index (HI) and PTV coverage for both cases, while the correlation between HI and spinal cord sparing was significant only for the single dorsal PTV case. Moreover, the multileaf collimator leaf thickness correlated with the spinal cord sparing. Planners using comparable delivery/planning system techniques produced different QI, highlighting the impact of the planner's skills in the optimization process. CONCLUSION: Both the technology and the planner's skills are fundamentally important in spine SBRT planning optimization. Knowledge sharing helped to follow the plan objectives.

Incorporating 18FDG-PET-defined pelvic active bone marrow in the automatic treatment planning process of anal cancer patients undergoing chemo-radiation.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the incorporation of 18FDG-PET into the automatic treatment planning process may be able to decrease the dose to active bone marrow (BM) for locally advanced anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation (CHT-RT). METHODS: Ten patients with locally advanced anal cancer were selected. Bone marrow within the pelvis was outlined as the whole outer contour of pelvic bones or employing 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within osseous structures. Four treatment planning solutions were employed with different automatic optimization approaches toward bone marrow. Plan A used iliac crests for optimization as per RTOG 05-29 trial; plan B accounted for all pelvic BM as outlined by the outer surface of external osseous structures; plan C took into account both active and inactive BM as defined using 18FDG-PET; plan D accounted only for the active BM subregions outlined with 18FDG-PET. Dose received by active bone marrow within the pelvic (ACTPBM) and in different subregions such as lumbar-sacral (ACTLSBM), iliac (ACTIBM) and lower pelvis (ACTLPBM) bone marrow was analyzed. RESULTS: A significant difference was found for ACTPBM in terms of Dmean (p = 0.014) V20 (p = 0.015), V25 (p = 0.030), V30 (p = 0.020), V35 (p = 0.010) between Plan A and other plans. With respect to specific subsites, a significant difference was found for ACTLSBM in terms of V30 (p = 0.020)), V35 (p = 0.010), V40 (p = 0.050) between Plan A and other solutions. No significant difference was found with respect to the investigated parameters between Plan B,C and D. No significant dosimetric differences were found for ACTLSPBM and ACTIBM and inactive BM subregions within the pelvis between any plan solution. CONCLUSIONS: Accounting for pelvic BM as a whole compared to iliac crests is able to decrease the dose to active bone marrow during the planning process of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The same degree of reduction may be achieved optimizing on bone marrow either defined using the outer bone contour or through 18FDG-PET imaging. The subset of patients with a benefit in terms of dose reduction to active BM through the inclusion of 18FDG-PET in the planning process needs further investigation.

Three-dimensional ultrasound-based image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: results of a consecutive case series.

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a standard of care in the treatment of prostate cancer. Hypofractionation is a valid option either radiobiologically and logistically in this context. Image-guidance procedures are strongly needed to provide ballistic precision to radiation delivery. The Clarity platform allows for the acquisition of three-dimensional ultrasound scans (3D-US) to perform image-guided radiotherapy. We treated a consecutive series of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients (according to NCCN stratification) with a hypofractionated schedule (70.2 Gy/26 fractions at 2.7 Gy/daily to the prostate gland excluding the seminal vesicles at 62.1 Gy) under 3D-US guidance with the Clarity platform. The 3-year biochemical-relapse-free survival, distant-metastases-free, cancer-specific and overall survival were 98.6% (CI: 91.1-99.6%), 98.6% (CI: 91.1-99.6%), 97.5% (CI: 94.5-99.1%), and 94.3% (CI: 90.4-96.7%), respectively. Maximum detected acute GU toxicity was G0 in 22 patients (29.7%), G1 in 30 (22.7%), G2 in 19 (25.6%), G3 in 3 (4%). Maximum detected acute GI toxicity at the end of EBRT was G0 in 42 patients (56.8%), G1 in 22 (29.7%), G2 in 9 (12.1%), G3 in 1 (1.4%). The 3-year actuarial rates of ≥ G2 late toxicities were 6.1% for genito-urinary and 8.9% for gastrointestinal. The whole image-guidance workflow resulted in being robust and reliable. EBRT delivered employing a hypofractionated schedule under 3D-US-based image guidance proved to be a safe and effective treatment approach with consistent biochemical control and a mild toxicity profile. Hence, it has been transferred into daily clinical practice in our Department.

A feasibility dosimetric study on prostate cancer : are we ready for a multicenter clinical trial on SBRT?

PURPOSE: The Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) started a working group dedicated to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment. In this work, we performed a multicenter planning study on patients who were candidates for SBRT in the treatment of prostate cancer with the aim of evaluating the dosimetric consistency among the different hospitals. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen centers were provided the contours of 5 patients. Plans were performed following the dose prescription and constraints for organs at risk (OARs) of a reference paper. The dose prescription was 35 Gy in five fractions for the planning target volume (PTV). Different techniques were used (3D-CRT, fixed-Field IMRT, VMAT, CyberKnife). Plans were compared in terms of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. Furthermore, the median DVH was calculated and one patient was re-planned. RESULTS: A total of 70 plans were compared. The maximum dose to the body was 107.9 ± 4.5 % (range 101.5-116.3 %). Dose at 98 % (D98 %) and mean dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) were 102.0 ± 0.9 % (global range 101.1-102.9 %) and 105.1 ± 0.6 % (range 98.6-124.6 %). Similar trends were found for D95 % and mean dose to the PTV. Important differences were found in terms of the homogeneity index. Doses to OARs were heterogeneous. The subgroups with the same treatment planning system showed differences comparable to the differences of the whole group. In the re-optimized plans, DVH differences among institutes were reduced and OAR sparing improved. CONCLUSION: Important dosimetric differences with possible clinical implications, in particular related to OARs, were found. Replanning allowed a reduction in the OAR dose and decreased standard deviations. Multicenter clinical trials on SBRT should require a preplanning study to standardize the optimization procedure.

Novel radiotherapy techniques for involved-field and involved-node treatment of mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma: when should they be considered and which questions remain open?

PURPOSE: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease. Reducing late complications and second malignancies has become increasingly important. Radiotherapy target paradigms are currently changing and radiotherapy techniques are evolving rapidly. DESIGN: This overview reports to what extent target volume reduction in involved-node (IN) and advanced radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy-compared with involved-field (IF) and 3D radiotherapy (3D-RT)- can reduce high doses to organs at risk (OAR) and examines the issues that still remain open. RESULTS: Although no comparison of all available techniques on identical patient datasets exists, clear patterns emerge. Advanced dose-calculation algorithms (e.g., convolution-superposition/Monte Carlo) should be used in mediastinal HL. INRT consistently reduces treated volumes when compared with IFRT with the exact amount depending on the INRT definition. The number of patients that might significantly benefit from highly conformal techniques such as IMRT over 3D-RT regarding high-dose exposure to organs at risk (OAR) is smaller with INRT. The impact of larger volumes treated with low doses in advanced techniques is unclear. The type of IMRT used (static/rotational) is of minor importance. All advanced photon techniques result in similar potential benefits and disadvantages, therefore only the degree-of-modulation should be chosen based on individual treatment goals. Treatment in deep inspiration breath hold is being evaluated. Protons theoretically provide both excellent high-dose conformality and reduced integral dose. CONCLUSION: Further reduction of treated volumes most effectively reduces OAR dose, most likely without disadvantages if the excellent control rates achieved currently are maintained. For both IFRT and INRT, the benefits of advanced radiotherapy techniques depend on the individual patient/target geometry. Their use should therefore be decided case by case with comparative treatment planning.

Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound-based IGRT with the Clarity platform.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of daily prostate localization with ultrasound imaging of various radiation oncologists with nonhomogeneous expertise. For ten patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, 11 radiation oncologists reviewed daily ultrasound scans acquired during three different treatment sessions. The average values of two senior radiation oncologists, considered to be expert observers, were selected as reference. The remaining nine observers were divided into two groups, Group 1 and Group 2, with more and less than one year of experience, respectively. The recorded shifts in prostate position were divided in three classes: <3 mm, 3-5 mm, and > 5 mm. Deviations from reference were less than 3 mm in all directions in 91% and 81% of measurements in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The maximum difference in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) was reported for superior-inferior (SI) direction, in particular a mean difference of 3.24 mm was observed for Group 2 in respect to the reference; moreover RMSE was 1 and 1.3 mm higher for Group 2 for anterior-posterior (AP) and left-right (LR) directions, respectively. The difference between Groups 1 and 2 was significant (p < 0.01) for all directions. The mean values for the shifts in all three directions between Group 1 and the references were 0.235 mm, 0.385 mm, and 0.009 mm for the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. The position of the prostate gland is more easily detectable (p = 0.956) in the AP direction, while the visibility is lower for LR (p = 0.105) and SI boundaries (p < 0.05). The observers' experience is essential for positioning the target correctly; therefore, a training period is recommended before putting the system into clinical practice.

Machine Learning for Predicting Clinician Evaluation of Treatment Plans for Left-Sided Whole Breast Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: The objective of this work was to investigate the ability of machine learning models to use treatment plan dosimetry for prediction of clinician approval of treatment plans (no further planning needed) for left-sided whole breast radiation therapy with boost. Methods and Materials: Investigated plans were generated to deliver a dose of 40.05 Gy to the whole breast in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, with the tumor bed simultaneously boosted to 48 Gy. In addition to the manually generated clinical plan of each of the 120 patients from a single institution, an automatically generated plan was included for each patient to enhance the number of study plans to 240. In random order, the treating clinician retrospectively scored all 240 plans as (1) approved without further planning to seek improvement or (2) further planning needed, while being blind for type of plan generation (manual or automated). In total, 2 × 5 classifiers were trained and evaluated for ability to correctly predict the clinician's plan evaluations: random forest (RF) and constrained logistic regression (LR) classifiers, each trained for 5 different sets of dosimetric plan parameters (feature sets [FS]). Importances of included features for predictions were investigated to better understand clinicians' choices. Results: Although all 240 plans were in principle clinically acceptable for the clinician, only for 71.5% was no further planning required. For the most extensive FS, accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and Cohen's κ for generated RF/LR models for prediction of approval without further planning were 87.2 ± 2.0/86.7 ± 2.2, 0.80 ± 0.03/0.86 ± 0.02, and 0.63 ± 0.05/0.69 ± 0.04, respectively. In contrast to LR, RF performance was independent of the applied FS. For both RF and LR, whole breast excluding boost PTV (PTV40.05Gy) was the most important structure for predictions, with importance factors of 44.6% and 43%, respectively, dose recieved by 95% volume of PTV40.05 (D95%) as the most important parameter in most cases. Conclusions: The investigated use of machine learning to predict clinician approval of treatment plans is highly promising. Including nondosimetric parameters could further increase classifiers' performances. The tool could become useful for aiding treatment planners in generating plans with a high probability of being directly approved by the treating clinician.

Helical tomotherapy and two types of volumetric modulated arc therapy: dosimetric and clinical comparison for several cancer sites.

Radiotherapy accelerators have undergone continuous technological developments. We investigated the differences between Radixact™ and VMAT treatment plans. Sixty patients were included in this study. Dosimetric comparison between the Radixact™ and VMAT plans was performed for six cancer sites: whole-brain, head and neck, lymphoma, lung, prostate, and rectum. The VMAT plans were generated with two Elekta linear accelerators (Synergy® and Versa HD™). The planning target volume (PTV) coverage, organs-at-risk dose constraints, and four dosimetric indexes were considered. The deliverability of the plans was assessed using quality assurance (gamma index evaluation) measurements; clinical judgment was included in the assessment. The mean AAPM TG218 (3%-2 mm, global normalization) gamma index values were 99.4%, 97.8%, and 96.6% for Radixact™, Versa HD™, and Synergy®, respectively. Radixact™ performed better than Versa HD™ in terms of dosimetric indexes, hippocampi D100%, spinal cord Dmax, rectum V38.4  Gy, bladder V30 Gy, and V40 Gy. Versa HD™ saved more of the (lungs-PTV) V5 Gy and (lungs-PTV) Dmean, heart Dmean, breasts V4 Gy, and bowel V45 Gy. Regarding Synergy®, the head and neck Radixact™ plan saved more of the parotid gland, oral cavity, and supraglottic larynx. From a clinical point of view, for the head and neck, prostate, and rectal sites, the Radixact™ and Versa HD™ plans were similar; Radixact™ plans were preferable for the head and neck and rectum to Synergy® plans. The quality of linac plans has improved, and differences with tomotherapy have decreased. However, tomotherapy continues to be an essential add-on in multi-machine departments.

Implementation of automatic plan optimization in Italy: Status and perspectives.

PURPOSE: To investigate and report on the diffusion and clinical use of automated radiotherapy planning systems in Italy and to assess the perspectives of the community of Italian medical physicists involved in radiotherapy on the use of these tools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of medical physicists (one per Institute) of 175 radiotherapy centers in Italy was conducted between February 21st and April 1st, 2021. The information collected included the institute's characteristics, plan activity, availability/use of automatic tools and related issues regarding satisfaction, criticisms, expectations, and perceived professional modifications. Responses were analysed, including the impact of a few variables such as the institute type and experience. RESULTS: 125 of the centers (71%) answered the survey, with regional variability (range: 47%-100%); among these, 49% have a TPS with some automatic option. Clinical use of automatic planning is present in 33% of the centers, with 13% applying it in >50% of their plans. Among the 125 responding centres the most used systems are Pinnacle (16%), Raystation (9%) and Eclipse (4%). The majority of participants consider the use of automated techniques to be beneficial, while only 1% do not see any advantage; 83% of respondents see the possibility of enriching their professional role as a potential benefit, while 3% see potential threats. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey shows that 49% of the responding centres have an automatic planning solution although clinically used in only 33% of the cases. Most physicists consider the use of automated techniques to be beneficial and show a prevalently positive attitude.

The influence of small field output factors simulated uncertainties on the calculated dose in VMAT plans for brain metastases: a multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: This multicentric study was carried out to investigate the impact of small field output factors (OFs) inaccuracies on the calculated dose in volumetric arctherapy (VMAT) radiosurgery brain plans. METHODS: Nine centres, realised the same five VMAT plans with common planning rules and their specific clinical equipment Linac/treatment planning system commissioned with their OFs measured values (OFbaseline). In order to simulate OFs errors, two new OFs sets were generated for each centre by changing only the OFs values of the smallest field sizes (from 3.2 × 3.2 cm2 to 1 × 1 cm2) with well-defined amounts (positive and negative). Consequently, two virtual machines for each centre were recommissioned using the new OFs and the percentage dose differences ΔD (%) between the baseline plans and the same plans recalculated using the incremented (OFup) and decremented (OFdown) values were evaluated. The ΔD (%) were analysed in terms of planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organs at risk (OARs) sparing at selected dose/volume points. RESULTS: The plans recalculated with OFdown sets resulted in higher variation of doses than baseline within 1.6 and 3.4% to PTVs and OARs respectively; while the plans with OFup sets resulted in lower variation within 1.3% to both PTVs and OARs. Our analysis highlights that OFs variations affect calculated dose depending on the algorithm and on the delivery mode (field jaw/MLC-defined). The Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm resulted significantly more sensitive to OFs variations than all of the other algorithms. CONCLUSION: The aim of our study was to evaluate how small fields OFs inaccuracies can affect the dose calculation in VMAT brain radiosurgery treatments plans. It was observed that simulated OFs errors, return dosimetric calculation accuracies within the 3% between concurrent plans analysed in terms of percentage dose differences at selected dose/volume points of the PTV coverage and OARs sparing. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: First multicentre study involving different Planning/Linacs about undetectable errors in commissioning output factor for small fields.

Adoption of Expansion Margins to Reduce the Dose Received by the Coronary Arteries and the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Lymphoma Patients.

PURPOSE: Mediastinal radiation therapy (RT) in patients with lymphoma implies involuntary coronary artery (CA) exposure, resulting in an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Accurate delineation of CAs may spare them from higher RT doses. However, heart motion affects the estimation of the dose received by CAs. An expansion margin (planning organ at risk volume [PRV]), encompassing the nearby area where CAs displace, may compensate for these uncertainties, reducing CA dose and CAD risk. Our study aimed to evaluate if a planning process optimized on CA-specific PRVs, rather than just on CAs, could provide any dosimetric or clinical benefit. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients receiving RT for mediastinal lymphomas were included. We contoured left main trunk, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. An isotropic PRV was then applied to all CAs, in accordance with literature data. A comparison was then performed by optimizing treatment plans either on CAs or on PRVs, to detect any difference in CA sparing in terms of maximum (Dmax), median (Dmed), and mean (Dmean) dose. We then investigated, through risk modeling, if any dosimetric benefit obtained with the PRV-related optimization process could translate to a lower risk of ischemic complications. RESULTS: Plan optimization on PRVs demonstrated a significant dose reduction (range, 7%-9%) in Dmax, Dmed, and Dmean for the whole coronary tree, and even higher dose reductions when vessels were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV (range, 13%-15%), especially for left main trunk and left circumflex (range, 16%-21%). This translated to a mean risk reduction of developing CAD of 12% (P < .01), which increased to 17% when CAs were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of CA-related PRVs in the optimization process reduces the dose received by CAs and translates to a meaningful prevention of CAD risk in patients with lymphoma treated with mediastinal RT.

Concurrent Chemoradiation in Anal Cancer Patients Delivered with Bone Marrow-Sparing IMRT: Final Results of a Prospective Phase II Trial.

We investigated the role of the selective avoidance of haematopoietically active pelvic bone marrow (BM), with a targeted intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) approach, to reduce acute hematologic toxicity (HT) in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation. We designed a one-armed two-stage Simon's design study to test the hypothesis that BM-sparing IMRT would improve by 20% the rate of G0-G2 (vs. G3-G4) HT, from 42% of RTOG 0529 historical data to 62% (α = 0.05; ß = 0.20). A minimum of 21/39 (54%) with G0-G2 toxicity represented the threshold for the fulfilment of the criteria to define this approach as 'promising'. We employed 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within the pelvis. Acute HT was assessed via weekly blood counts and scored as per the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4.0. From December 2017 to October 2020, we enrolled 39 patients. Maximum observed acute HT comprised 20% rate of ≥G3 leukopenia and 11% rate of ≥G3 thrombocytopenia. Overall, 11 out of 39 treated patients (28%) experienced ≥G3 acute HT. Conversely, in 28 patients (72%) G0-G2 HT events were observed, above the threshold set. Hence, 18FDG-PET-guided BM-sparing IMRT was able to reduce acute HT in this clinical setting.

The influence of basic plan parameters on calculated small field output factors - A multicenter study.

PURPOSE: The influence of basic plan parameters such as slice thickness, grid resolution, algorithm type and field size on calculated small field output factors (OFs) was evaluated in a multicentric study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three computational homogeneous water phantoms with slice thicknesses (ST) 1, 2 and 3 mm were shared among twenty-one centers to calculate OFs for 1x1, 2x2 and 3x3 cm2 field sizes (FSs) (normalized to 10x10 cm2 FS), with their own treatment planning system (TPS) and the energy clinically used for stereotactic body radiation therapy delivery. OFs were calculated for each combination of grid resolution (GR) (1, 2 and 3 mm) and ST and finally compared with the OFs measured for the TPS commissioning. A multivariate analysis was performed to test the effect of basic plan parameters on calculated OFs. RESULTS: A total of 509 data points were collected. Calculated OFs are slightly higher than measured ones. The multivariate analysis showed that Center, GR, algorithm type, and FS are predictive variables of the difference between calculated and measured OFs (p < 0.001). As FS decreases, the spread in the difference between calculated and measured OFs became larger when increasing the GR. Monte Carlo and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithms, presented a dependence on GR (p < 0.01), while Collapsed Cone Convolution and Acuros did not. The effect of the ST was found to be negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Modern TPSs slightly overestimate the calculated small field OFs compared with measured ones. Grid resolution, algorithm, center number and field size influence the calculation of small field OFs.

Bone Marrow-Sparing IMRT in Anal Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemo-Radiation: Results of the First Phase of a Prospective Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: to investigate the role of selective avoidance of hematopoietically active BM within the pelvis, as defined with 18FDG-PET, employing a targeted IMRT approach, to reduce acute hematologic toxicity (HT) profile in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation. METHODS: a one-armed two-stage Simon's design was selected to test the hypothesis that BM-sparing approach would improve by 20% the rate of G0-G2 (vs. G3-G4) HT, from 42% of RTOG 0529 historical data to 62% (α = 0.05 and the ß = 0.20). At the first stage, among 21 enrolled patients, at least 9 should report G0-G2 acute HT to further proceed with the trial. We employed 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within the pelvis. Acute HT was assessed via weekly blood counts and scored as per the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4.0. RESULTS: from December 2017 to October 2019, 21 patients were enrolled. Maximum observed acute HT comprised 9% rate of ≥G3 leukopenia and 5% rate of ≥G3 neutropenia and anemia. Overall, only 4 out of 21 treated patients (19%) experienced ≥G3 acute HT. Conversely, 17 patients (81%) experienced G0-G2 events, way above the threshold set by the trial design. CONCLUSION: 18FDG-PET-guided BM-sparing IMRT was able to reduce acute HT in anal cancer patients treated with concomitant chemo-radiation. These results prompted us to conclude the second part of this prospective phase II trial.

Computed Tomography to Cone Beam Computed Tomography Deformable Image Registration for Contour Propagation Using Head and Neck, Patient-Based Computational Phantoms: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of various algorithms for deformable image registration (DIR) for propagating regions of interest (ROIs) using multiple commercial platforms, from computed tomography to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and megavoltage computed tomography. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen institutions participated in the study using 5 commercial platforms: RayStation (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden), MIM (Cleveland, OH), VelocityAI and SmartAdapt (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), and ABAS (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Algorithms were tested on synthetic images generated with the ImSimQA (Oncology Systems Limited, Shrewsbury, UK) package by applying 2 specific deformation vector fields (DVF) to real head and neck patient datasets. On-board images from 3 systems were used: megavoltage computed tomography from Tomotherapy and 2 kinds of CBCT from a clinical linear accelerator. Image quality of the system was evaluated. The algorithms' accuracy was assessed by comparing the DIR-mapped ROIs returned by each center with those of the reference, using the Dice similarity coefficient and mean distance to conformity metrics. Statistical inference on the validation results was carried out to identify the prognostic factors of DIR performance. RESULTS: Analyzing 840 DIR-mapped ROIs returned by the centers, it was demonstrated that DVF intensity and image quality were significant prognostic factors of DIR performance. The accuracy of the propagated contours was generally high, and acceptable DIR performance can be obtained with lower-dose CBCT image protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the systems proved to be image quality specific, depending on the DVF type and only partially on the platforms. All systems proved to be robust against image artifacts and noise, except the demon-based software.

Automatic genetic planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy: A large multi-centre validation for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The first clinical genetic autoplanning algorithm (Genetic Planning Solution, GPS) was validated in ten radiotherapy centres for prostate cancer VMAT by comparison with manual planning (Manual). METHODS: Although there were large differences among centres in planning protocol, GPS was tuned with the data of a single centre and then applied everywhere without any centre-specific fine-tuning. For each centre, ten Manual plans were compared with autoGPS plans, considering dosimetric plan parameters and the Clinical Blind Score (CBS) resulting from blind clinician plan comparisons. AutoGPS plans were used as is, i.e. there was no patient-specific fine-tuning. RESULTS: For nine centres, all ten plans were clinically acceptable. In the remaining centre, only one plan was acceptable. For the 91% acceptable plans, differences between Manual and AutoGPS in target coverage were negligible. OAR doses were significantly lower in AutoGPS plans (p < 0.05); rectum D15% and Dmean were reduced by 8.1% and 17.9%, bladder D25% and Dmean by 5.9% and 10.3%. According to clinicians, 69% of the acceptable AutoGPS plans were superior to the corresponding Manual plan. In case of preferred Manual plans (31%), perceived advantages compared to autoGPS were minor. QA measurements demonstrated that autoGPS plans were deliverable. A quick configuration adjustment in the centre with unacceptable plans rendered 100% of plans acceptable. CONCLUSION: A novel, clinically applied genetic autoplanning algorithm was validated in 10 centres for in total 100 prostate cancer patients. High quality plans could be generated at different centres without centre-specific algorithm tuning.

Dosimetric predictors of radiation-induced lung injury in stereotactic body radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aim was to retrospectively investigate correlations between potential predictive parameters and the occurrence of radiation-induced lung injury in patients with primary or secondary lung tumours treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Sixty patients (63 tumours) underwent SBRT, with a dose of 45 Gy in 3 fractions over 5 days or 26 Gy in single fraction. The following parameters were tested for correlation with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) lung toxicity score: planning target volume (PTV), tumour location, primary vs. metastatic tumour, and Mean Lung Dose (in 2 Gy fractions, MLD2). Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) values were then estimated. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 30.9 months (range 6.7-56.7). RTOG grade 0-1 toxicity was observed in 54/63 (85.7%) and grade 2-3 in 9/63 (14.3%) cases. Mean values of MLD(2) for RTOG grade 0-1 and 2-3 were respectively 11.2 Gy (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 10.1-12.3 Gy) and 20.3 Gy (95% CI 16.6-23.9 Gy). NTCP mean values for RTOG grade 0-1 and 2-3 were respectively 4% (95% CI 2-5.9%) and 37% (95% CI 11.6-62.3%). Univariate analysis, performed with t-Student test, showed a statistically significant difference between MLD(2) values in the two groups (t=5.93 and p < or = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed a good correlation between MLD(2) and toxicity scores 2-3 (p=0.008, odds ratio 1.5). From logistic regression relationship between the observed rates of grade 2-3 and MLD(2), a D(50)=19.8 Gy and a gamma50= 2.2 were obtained. From the sigmoid-shaped dose-response relationship between NTCP and MLD(2), a D(50)=22.4 Gy and gamma(50)= 2.2 were derived. DISCUSSION: MLD(2) is strongly associated to the risk of lung injury. Higher NTCP values are associated with a higher risk, but when comparing the expected to the observed toxicity rate, NTCP seems to underestimate the risk.

Small field correction factors determination for several active detectors using a Monte Carlo method in the Elekta Axesse linac equipped with circular cones.

A Monte Carlo (MC) method was used to determine small field output correction factors for several active detectors (Exradin A16, Exradin A26, PTW microLion, PTW microDiamond, Exradin W1 and IBA RAZOR) for an Elekta Axesse linac equipped with circular cones. MC model of the linac was built with the GamBet software, using the Penelope code system. The dose-to-water simulation for each cone, ranging from 5 to 30 mm of diameter size, was used to calculate field factors and the results were validated together with Gafchromic EBT3 film. Output factors (OFs) were measured with the active detectors and correction factors were determined using the MC results. The MC simulations agreed with films within 1.2%. OFs measured with Exradin W1 scintillator were in agreement within 0.8% with MC simulations. The Exradin A16 and A26 microchambers under-responded for small fields relative to the MC (-13.1% and -4.6%, respectively). PTW microLion, IBA RAZOR and PTW microDiamond overestimated the output factor for the smallest field (+3.9%, +5.4 and +7.1%, respectively). The present study pointed out that it is crucial to apply the appropriate correction factors in order to provide accurate measurements in small beams geometry. The results showed that the Exradin W1 can be used for very small field dosimetry without correction factors, which shall be contrariwise employed for other detectors.

Clinical evaluation of a transmission detector system and comparison with a homogeneous 3D phantom dosimeter.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performances of the Dolphin system for pre-treatment verification (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) based on transmission measurements, employing a clinical perspective. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty treatment plans were verified by Dolphin and Delta4 detectors (Scandidos, Uppsala, Sweden) during the same session and subsequently by the Delta4 itself. The attenuation factor of the transmission detector (required for on-line dosimetry) was evaluated by comparing Delta4 measurements with and without Dolphin. Gamma evaluation was performed to compare the plan dose with the one delivered in case of Delta4 and Dolphin (gamma analysis within the structures). Dose-volume based parameters for PTV and OARs doses were considered for Compass calculation and Dolphin reconstruction and clinical decisions were made by two expert physicians in order to assess the "pass", "fail" or "evaluate" grade of the treatment plans. A statistical analysis was performed to investigate the eventual correlation between Delta4 gamma analysis and Dolphin clinical evaluation. RESULTS: A value of 10.7% ±â€¯0.7% was found for detector attenuation. No patients were classified as "fail" by the two instruments as well as by physicians. No correlation was found between the Delta4gamma metric and physician classification; conversely, a significant correlation was observed for Dolphin between the numbers of points with gamma ≥1 (gamma failure rate, as evaluated by the Dolphin) in the PTV area and clinical decision. CONCLUSION: The Dolphin system demonstrated to be an accurate detector for pre-treatment purposes and could be used as a clinical decision making tool for plan acceptance.

Inclusion of heart substructures in the optimization process of volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques may reduce the risk of heart disease in Hodgkin's lymphoma patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is an effective treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), but increases the risk of long term complications as cardiac events and second cancers. This study aimed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events through an optimization of the dose distribution on heart substructures in mediastinal HL patients with the adoption of different volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques, while maintaining the same risk of second cancer induction on lungs and breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (15 males and 15 females, 15 bulky lesions) treated between 2012 and 2017 at our institution were selected. Disease extent was mediastinum plus neck (n = 10), mediastinum plus unilateral axilla (n = 10) and mediastinum alone (n = 10). Lungs, breasts, whole heart and sub-structures (coronary arteries, valves and chambers) were contoured as organs at risk and included in the optimization process. A "first-generation" multi-arc butterfly VMAT (B-VMAT) planning solution was compared to a full-arc butterfly VMAT (FaB-VMAT) approach, consisting of a full arc plus a non-coplanar arc. Lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of second breast and lung cancer and relative risk (RR) of coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) were estimated. RESULTS: FaB-VMAT resulted in lower mean dose to whole heart (7.6 vs 6.9 Gy, p = 0.003), all coronary arteries (16.1 vs 13.5 Gy, p < 0.001), left ventricle (4.2 vs 3.4 Gy, p = 0.007) and in lower V20Gy to the lungs (15% vs 14%, p = 0.008). A significant lower RR for CAD and CHF was observed for FaB-VMAT. The risk of second breast and lung cancer was comparable between the two solutions, with the exception of female patients with mediastinal bulky involvement, where B-VMAT resulted in lower mean dose (2.8 vs 3.5 Gy, p = 0.03) and V4Gy (22% vs 16%, 0.04) to breasts, with a significant reduction in LAR (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: FaB-VMAT significantly decreased the RR for CAD and CHF compared to B-VMAT, with almost the same overall risk of lung and breast cancer induction. These results are influenced by the different anatomical presentations, supporting the need for an individualized approach.