Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am Heart J ; 164(6): 846-55, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23194484

ABSTRACT

The ability to make informed benefit-risk assessments for potentially cardiotoxic new compounds is of considerable interest and importance at the public health, drug development, and individual patient levels. Cardiac imaging approaches in the evaluation of drug-induced myocardial dysfunction will likely play an increasing role. However, the optimal choice of myocardial imaging modality and the recommended frequency of monitoring are undefined. These decisions are complicated by the array of imaging techniques, which have varying sensitivities, specificities, availabilities, local expertise, safety, and costs, and by the variable time-course of tissue damage, functional myocardial depression, or recovery of function. This White Paper summarizes scientific discussions of members of the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium on the main factors to consider when selecting nonclinical and clinical cardiac function imaging techniques in drug development. We focus on 3 commonly used imaging modalities in the evaluation of cardiac function: echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radionuclide (nuclear) imaging and highlight areas for future research.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Imaging Techniques , Cardiomyopathies/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Cardiomyopathies/chemically induced , Echocardiography , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radionuclide Angiography , Risk Assessment
2.
Am Heart J ; 160(4): 627-34, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20934555

ABSTRACT

Electrocardiographic monitoring is an integral component of the clinical assessment of cardiac safety of all compounds in development. The International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use E14 guideline recommends a dedicated study to evaluate drug-induced effects on cardiac repolarization ("thorough QT/QTc study"). There has been limited published information on QT interval changes secondary to therapeutic proteins; however, in theory, biologic therapies may affect cardiac electrical activity either directly or indirectly. This article summarizes scientific discussions of members of the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium and includes possible approaches to consider for the clinical evaluation of drug-induced QT prolongation in development programs of therapeutic proteins.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Biomedical Research/methods , Electrocardiography/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Proteins/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Humans
3.
Am Heart J ; 159(1): 17-24, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20102862

ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major public health problem in the United States that is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Of the therapeutic modalities available to treat AF, the use of percutaneous catheter ablation of AF is expanding rapidly. Randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy and safety of AF ablation are currently underway; however, such trials can only partially determine the safety and durability of the effect of the procedure in routine clinical practice, in more complex patients, and over a broader range of techniques and operator experience. These limitations of randomized trials of AF ablation, particularly with regard to safety issues, could be addressed using a synergistically structured national registry, which is the intention of the SAFARI. To facilitate discussions about objectives, challenges, and steps for such a registry, the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium and the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, in collaboration with the US Food and Drug Administration, the American College of Cardiology, and the Heart Rhythm Society, organized a Think Tank meeting of experts in the field. Other participants included the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the AdvaMed AF working group, and additional industry representatives. The meeting took place on April 27 to 28, 2009, at the US Food and Drug Administration headquarters in Silver Spring, MD. This article summarizes the issues and directions presented and discussed at the meeting.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation , Critical Pathways , Registries , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Female , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Male , Safety Management , United States
4.
Am Heart J ; 158(3): 317-26, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19699852

ABSTRACT

In October 2008, in a public forum organized by the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium and the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, leaders from government, the pharmaceutical industry, and academia convened in Bethesda, MD, to discuss current challenges in evaluation of short- and long-term cardiovascular safety during drug development. The current paradigm for premarket evaluation of cardiac safety begins with preclinical animal modeling and progresses to clinical biomarker or biosignature assays. Preclinical evaluations have clear limitations but provide an important opportunity to identify safety hazards before administration of potential new drugs to human subjects. Discussants highlighted the need to identify, develop, and validate serum and electrocardiogram biomarkers indicative of early drug-induced myocardial toxicity and proarrhythmia. Specifically, experts identified a need to build consensus regarding the use and interpretation of troponin assays in preclinical evaluation of myocardial toxicity. With respect to proarrhythmia, the panel emphasized a need for better qualitative and quantitative biomarkers for arrhythmogenicity, including more streamlined human thorough QT study designs and a universal definition of the end of the T wave. Toward many of these ends, large shared data repositories and a more seamless integration of preclinical and clinical testing could facilitate the development of novel approaches to both cardiac safety biosignatures. In addition, more thorough and efficient early clinical studies could enable better estimates of cardiovascular risk and better inform phase II and phase III trial design. Participants also emphasized the importance of establishing formal guidelines for data standards and transparency in postmarketing surveillance. Priority pursuit of these consensus-based directions should facilitate both safer drugs and accelerated access to new drugs, as concomitant public health benefits.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Heart Diseases/chemically induced , Safety , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/blood , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Biomarkers/analysis , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Critical Pathways , Drug Evaluation , Electrocardiography , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Research , Risk Management , Technology Transfer , Troponin/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL