Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 102
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Nat Immunol ; 14(3): 211-20, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23354483

ABSTRACT

Two major populations of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) and polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs) regulate immune responses in cancer and other pathologic conditions. Under physiologic conditions, Ly6C(hi)Ly6G(-) inflammatory monocytes, which are the normal counterpart of M-MDSCs, differentiate into macrophages and dendritic cells. PMN-MDSCs are the predominant group of MDSCs that accumulates in cancer. Here we show that a large proportion of M-MDSCs in tumor-bearing mice acquired phenotypic, morphological and functional features of PMN-MDSCs. Acquisition of this phenotype, but not the functional attributes of PMN-MDSCs, was mediated by transcriptional silencing of the retinoblastoma gene through epigenetic modifications mediated by histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC-2). These data demonstrate a new regulatory mechanism of myeloid cells in cancer.


Subject(s)
Gene Silencing , Genes, Retinoblastoma , Myeloid Cells/pathology , Neoplasms/genetics , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Epigenesis, Genetic , Macrophages/immunology , Mice , Monocytes/immunology , Myeloid Cells/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Phenotype , Retinoblastoma Protein/genetics
2.
Cancer ; 127(9): 1476-1482, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33378113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increases in fatigue, depressive symptomatology, and cognitive impairment are common after the initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer. To date, no studies have examined the potential role of inflammation in the development of these symptoms in ADT recipients. The goal of the current study was to examine circulating markers of inflammation as potential mediators of change in fatigue, depressive symptomatology, and cognitive impairment related to the receipt of ADT. METHODS: Patients treated with ADT for prostate cancer (ADT+; n = 47) were assessed around the time of the initiation of ADT and 6 and 12 months later. An age- and education-matched group of men without a history of cancer (CA-; n = 82) was assessed at comparable time points. Fatigue, depressive symptomatology, and cognitive impairment were assessed with the Fatigue Symptom Inventory, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, and a battery of neuropsychological tests, respectively. Circulating markers of inflammation included interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), interleukin 6 (IL-6), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II (sTNF-RII), and C-reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: Fatigue, depressive symptomatology, and serum IL-6 increased significantly over time in the ADT+ group versus the CA- group; rates of cognitive impairment also changed significantly between the groups. No significant changes in IL-1RA, sTNF-RII, or CRP over time were detected. Treatment-related increases in IL-6 were associated with worsening fatigue but not depressive symptomatology or cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this preliminary study suggest that increases in circulating IL-6, perhaps due to testosterone inhibition, may play a role in fatigue secondary to receipt of ADT. Additional research is needed to determine whether interventions to reduce circulating inflammation improve fatigue in this population.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Inflammation/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/etiology , Fatigue/diagnosis , Fatigue/etiology , Humans , Inflammation/complications , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/blood , Interleukin-6/blood , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Preliminary Data , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type II/blood , Symptom Assessment
3.
Cancer ; 127(13): 2204-2212, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy (ST) can be deferred in patients who have metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and slow-growing metastases. Currently, this subset of patients managed with active surveillance (AS) is not well described in the literature. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients with mRCC across 46 US community and academic centers. The objective was to describe baseline characteristics and demographics of patients with mRCC initially managed by AS, reasons for AS, and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographics, baseline characteristics, and patient-related outcomes. Wilcoxon 2-sample rank-sum tests and χ2 tests were used to assess differences between ST and AS cohorts in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess survival. RESULTS: Of 504 patients, mRCC was initially managed by AS (n = 143) or ST (n = 305); 56 patients were excluded from the analysis. Disease was present in 69% of patients who received AS, whereas the remaining 31% had no evidence of disease. At data cutoff, 72 of 143 patients (50%) in the AS cohort had not received ST. The median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 122 months to not estimable) in patients who received AS versus 30 months (95% CI, 25-44 months) in those who received ST. Quality of life at baseline was significantly better in patients who were managed with AS versus ST. CONCLUSIONS: AS occurs frequently (32%) in real-world clinical practice and appears to be a safe and appropriate alternative to immediate ST in selected patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Watchful Waiting
4.
Cancer ; 125(14): 2400-2408, 2019 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30951193

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In a prior open-label study, the combination of dalantercept, a novel antiangiogenic targeting activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1), plus axitinib was deemed safe and tolerable with a promising efficacy signal in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: In the current phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with clear cell RCC previously treated with 1 prior angiogenesis inhibitor were randomized 1:1 to receive axitinib plus dalantercept versus axitinib plus placebo. Randomization was stratified by the type of prior therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS in patients with ≥2 prior lines of anticancer therapy, overall survival, and the objective response rate. RESULTS: Between June 10, 2014, and February 23, 2017, a total of 124 patients were randomly assigned to receive axitinib plus dalantercept (59 patients) or placebo (65 patients). The median PFS was not found to be significantly different between the treatment groups (median, 6.8 months vs 5.6 months; hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.71-1.73; P = .670]). Neither group reached the median overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.70-2.77; P = .349]). The objective response rate was 19.0% (11 of 58 patients; 95% CI, 9.9%-31.4%) in the dalantercept plus axitinib group and 24.6% (15 of 61 patients; 95% CI, 14.5%-37.3%) in the placebo plus axitinib group. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event of ≥grade 3 was observed in 59% of patients (34 of 58 patients) in the dalantercept group and 64% of patients (39 of 61 patients) in the placebo group. One treatment-related death occurred in the placebo plus axitinib group. CONCLUSIONS: Although well tolerated, the addition of dalantercept to axitinib did not appear to improve treatment-related outcomes in previously treated patients with advanced RCC.


Subject(s)
Activin Receptors, Type II/therapeutic use , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Axitinib/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use , Activin Receptors, Type II/administration & dosage , Activin Receptors, Type II/adverse effects , Activin Receptors, Type II/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Axitinib/administration & dosage , Axitinib/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Diarrhea/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/etiology , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/administration & dosage , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/metabolism , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/adverse effects , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism
5.
Lancet Oncol ; 19(3): 405-415, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29439857

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies combining PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the VEGF pathway have been characterised by excess toxicity, precluding further development. We hypothesised that axitinib, a more selective VEGF inhibitor than others previously tested, could be combined safely with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) and yield antitumour activity in patients with treatment-naive advanced renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: In this ongoing, open-label, phase 1b study, which was done at ten centres in the USA, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older who had advanced renal cell carcinoma (predominantly clear cell subtype) with their primary tumour resected, and at least one measureable lesion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, controlled hypertension, and no previous systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Eligible patients received axitinib plus pembrolizumab in a dose-finding phase to estimate the maximum tolerated dose, and additional patients were enrolled into a dose-expansion phase to further establish safety and determine preliminary efficacy. Axitinib 5 mg was administered orally twice per day with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg given intravenously every 3 weeks. We assessed safety in all patients who received at least one dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab; antitumour activity was assessed in all patients who received study treatment and had an adequate baseline tumour assessment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed dose-limiting toxicity during the first two cycles (6 weeks) to estimate the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02133742. FINDINGS: Between Sept 23, 2014, and March 25, 2015, we enrolled 11 patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma to the dose-finding phase and between June 3, 2015, and Oct 13, 2015, we enrolled 41 patients to the dose-expansion phase. All 52 patients were analysed together. No unexpected toxicities were observed. Three dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the 11 patients treated during the 6-week observation period (dose-finding phase): one patient had a transient ischaemic attack and two patients were only able to complete less than 75% of the planned axitinib dose because of treatment-related toxicity. At the data cutoff date (March 31, 2017), 25 (48%) patients were still receiving study treatment. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34 (65%) patients; the most common included hypertension (n=12 [23%]), diarrhoea (n=5 [10%]), fatigue (n=5 [10%]), and increased alanine aminotransferase concentration (n=4 [8%]). The most common potentially immune-related adverse events (probably related to pembrolizumab) included diarrhoea (n=15 [29%]), increased alanine aminotransferase concentration (n=9 [17%]) or aspartate aminotransferase concentration (n=7 [13%]), hypothyroidism (n=7 [13%]), and fatigue (n=6 [12%]). 28 (54%) patients had treatment-related serious adverse events. At data cutoff, 38 (73%; 95% CI 59·0-84·4) patients achieved an objective response (complete or partial response). INTERPRETATION: The treatment combination of axitinib plus pembrolizumab is tolerable and shows promising antitumour activity in patients with treatment-naive advanced renal cell carcinoma. Whether or not the combination works better than a sequence of VEGF pathway inhibition followed by an anti-PD-1 therapy awaits the completion of a phase 3 trial comparing axitinib plus pembrolizumab with sunitinib monotherapy (NCT02853331). FUNDING: Pfizer Inc.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Axitinib/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Axitinib/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Dosage Calculations , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
6.
Cancer ; 124(3): 499-506, 2018 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29072790

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are at risk of sleep disturbance; however, to the authors' knowledge, the mechanisms by which ADT may affect sleep are not well understood. The current study compared objective and subjective sleep disturbance in ADT recipients and controls and examined whether sleep disturbance in ADT recipients is attributable to the influence of ADT on hot flashes and nocturia. METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer were assessed before or within 1 month after the initiation of ADT as well as 6 months and 12 months later (78 patients). Patients with prostate cancer were treated with prostatectomy only (99 patients) and men with no history of cancer (108 men) were assessed at similar intervals. Participants self-reported their sleep disturbance (Insomnia Severity Index) and interference from hot flashes (Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale). One hundred participants also wore actigraphs for 3 days at the 6-month assessment to measure objective sleep disturbance and reported their nocturia frequency. RESULTS: ADT recipients reported worse sleep disturbance, higher rates of clinically significant sleep disturbance, and greater hot flash interference than controls (Ps≤.03). In cross-sectional analyses among those with actigraphy data, ADT recipients had greater objective sleep disturbance and more episodes of nocturia (Ps<.01). Cross-sectional mediation analyses demonstrated that the association between ADT and objectively and subjectively measured sleep disturbance was partly attributable to nocturia and hot flashes (Ps<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that the association between ADT and sleep may be partly explained by nocturia and hot flash interference. Future studies should examine behavioral and pharmacologic interventions to address these symptoms among ADT recipients. Cancer 2018;124:499-506. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Hot Flashes/epidemiology , Nocturia/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatectomy
7.
Psychooncology ; 27(1): 316-324, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28557112

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The adverse sexual effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on men with prostate cancer have been well described. Less well known is the relative degree of sexual dysfunction and bother associated with ADT compared to other primary treatment modalities such as radical prostatectomy. We sought to describe the trajectory and relative magnitude of changes in sexual function and bother in men on ADT and to examine demographic and clinical predictors of ADT's adverse sexual effects. METHODS: Prostate cancer patients treated with ADT (n = 60) completed assessments of sexual function and sexual bother 3 times during a 1-year period after the initiation of ADT. Prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy only and not receiving ADT (n = 85) and men with no history of cancer (n = 86) matched on age and education completed assessments at similar intervals. RESULTS: Androgen deprivation therapy recipients reported worsening sexual function and increasing bother over time compared to controls. Effect sizes for the differences in sexual function were large to very large, and for bother were small to very large. Age younger than 83 years predicted relatively poorer sexual function, and age younger than 78 years predicted greater sexual bother at 12 months in men on ADT compared to men not on ADT. CONCLUSIONS: Most men on ADT for prostate cancer will never return to baseline levels of sexual function. Interventions focused on sexual bother over function and designed to help couples build and maintain satisfying relationship intimacy are likely to more positively affect men's psychological well-being while on ADT than medical or sexual aids targeting sexual dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/chemically induced , Adaptation, Psychological , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/drug therapy , Sexual Partners/psychology
8.
Cancer ; 123(23): 4566-4573, 2017 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28832978

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway has improved outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC); however, resistance inevitably occurs. CD105 (endoglin) is an angiogenic pathway that is strongly upregulated after VEGF inhibition, potentially contributing to resistance. The authors tested whether TRC105, a monoclonal antibody against endoglin, impacted disease control in patients with previously treated RCC who were receiving bevacizumab. METHODS: Eligible patients with metastatic RCC who had previously received 1 to 4 prior lines of therapy, including VEGF-targeted agents, were randomized 1:1 to receive bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks (arm A) or the same plus TRC105 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks (arm B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 and 24 weeks. Correlative studies included serum transforming growth factor ß (TGFß) and CD105 levels as well as tissue immunostaining for TGFß receptors. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled (28 on arm A and 31 on arm B), and 1 patient on each arm had a confirmed partial response. The median PFS for bevacizumab alone was 4.6 months compared with 2.8 for bevacizumab plus TRC105 (P = .09). Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred in 16 patients (57%) who received bevacizumab compared with 19 (61%) who received bevacizumab plus TRC105 (P = .9). Baseline serum TGFß levels below the median (<10.6 ng/mL) were associated with longer median PFS (5.6 vs 2.1 months; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: TRC105 failed to improve PFS when added to bevacizumab. TGFß warrants further study as a biomarker in RCC. Cancer 2017;123:4566-4573. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Papillary/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Papillary/secondary , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Survival Rate
9.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 15(6): 804-834, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28596261

ABSTRACT

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for the clinical management of patients with clear cell and non-clear cell renal carcinoma. These guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of leading experts from NCCN Member Institutions consisting of medical oncologists, hematologists and hematologic oncologists, radiation oncologists, urologists, and pathologists. The NCCN Guidelines are in continuous evolution and are updated annually or sometimes more often, if new high-quality clinical data become available in the interim.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Management , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retreatment
10.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 28(2): 254-259, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27955832

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of transarterial hepatic radioembolization treatment of patients with liver-dominant metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2010 to December 2014, 18 patients with liver-dominant metastatic RCC were treated with yttrium-90 glass microsphere radioembolization. Retrospective review of medical records and imaging studies was performed to evaluate toxicities, treatment response, and overall survival. The median follow-up period from radioembolization treatment was 17.8 months (range, 3-54.4 months). RESULTS: Median overall survival from RCC diagnosis was 64 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-144.1 months), from diagnosis of liver metastasis was 29 months (95% CI, 7.2-50.8 months), and from radioembolization treatment was 22.8 months (95% CI, 13.2-32.3 months). After treatment, 10 patients reported grade 1 clinical toxicities, and 8 patients had grade 1 or 2 biochemical toxicities. The best radiographic responses of 17 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging showed complete response in 16 patients and partial response in 1 patient evaluated by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. The last available imaging of these 17 patients demonstrated complete response in 14 patients, partial response in 1 patient, and progression of disease in 2 patients. Images of a patient who underwent noncontrast CT showed stable disease as best response and stable disease on the last available imaging evaluated by RECIST. CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization is safe and effective and led to improved hepatic disease control and overall survival in patients with liver-dominant metastatic RCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Yttrium Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Yttrium Radioisotopes/adverse effects
11.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 65(12): 1533-1544, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27714434

ABSTRACT

High-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) was approved for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in 1992 and for metastatic melanoma (mM) in 1998, in an era predating targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The PROCLAIMSM registry was established to collect and analyze data for patients treated with HD IL-2 in the current era. This analysis includes 170 patients with mM and 192 patients with mRCC treated between 2005 and 2012 with survival data current as of July 27, 2015. For patients with mM, complete response (CR) was observed in 5 %, partial response (PR) in 10 %, stable disease (SD) in 22 %, and 63 % had progressive disease (PD). The median overall survival (mOS) for these patients was 19.6 months, with a median follow-up of 43.1 months. The mOS was not reached for patients achieving CR or PR, and was 33.4 months for patients with SD. For patients with mRCC, 6 % achieved CR, 9 % had PR, 22 % had SD, and 62 % had PD. The mOS was 41 months, with a median follow-up of 46.6 months. The mOS for patients who had CR and PR was not reached and was 49.6 months for patients with SD. There were no treatment-related deaths among 362 patients. The duration of mOS for patients with mM and mRCC is longer than historically reported. These data support a continued role for IL-2 in the treatment of eligible patients with mM or mRCC and warrant further evaluation of HD IL-2 in combination or sequence with other therapeutic agents.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Immunotherapy/methods , Interleukin-2/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Interleukin-2/administration & dosage , Interleukin-2/pharmacology , Male , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Young Adult
12.
World J Urol ; 34(11): 1567-1573, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27072536

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can downstage invasive bladder cancers prior to radical cystectomy (RC) and improve overall survival. However, the optimal management in patients with persistent non-organ confined disease (pT3-T4 and/or pN+) following RC has not been completely defined. The aim of this study was to describe outcomes associated with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with residual non-organ confined cancer at RC following NAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from a high-volume referral institution, pT3-T4 and/or pN+ patients who received NAC and then also RC were identified. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2013, 161 patients received NAC and then RC. Eighty-eight pT3-T4 and/or pN+ patients were identified. Twenty-nine (33 %) received AC. Adjuvant chemotherapy in the majority of patients was carboplatin-based (16), followed by cisplatin (8) and other, mainly taxane-containing regimens (5). The median RFS was 17.5 months in the AC and 13.7 months in the non-AC group (p = 0.78). AC remained an insignificant predictor for RFS after adjusting for pT, pN and margin status (HR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.48-1.68]). CSS was 23 and 22 months (p = 0.65) and remained insignificant after adjusting for pathologic confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In our current study population, adjuvant conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy was not associated with significant improvements in RFS or CSS. The choice of AC regimens, and incorporation of newer treatments, may be the key for improving outcomes in this high-risk patient group.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy , Cystectomy/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
13.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(10): 4159-66, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27142516

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although fatigue is a common problem for men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), there has been little systematic research on this issue. The present study examined changes in fatigue among prostate cancer patients receiving ADT compared to controls and predictors of heightened fatigue in ADT patients. METHODS: Prostate cancer patients treated with ADT (ADT+ group, n = 60) completed assessments of fatigue prior to or just after ADT initiation (baseline) and 6 and 12 months later. Prostate cancer patients treated with prostatectomy only (ADT- group, n = 85) and men without cancer (CA- group, n = 86) matched on age and education completed assessments at similar intervals. RESULTS: Group-by-time interactions for fatigue severity, interference, and duration were observed when comparing the ADT+ group to the controls. Groups did not differ at baseline; however, the ADT+ group reported worse fatigue at 6 and 12 months. The same pattern was observed for changes in the prevalence of clinically meaningful fatigue and the extent of clinically meaningful change in fatigue. Within the ADT+ group, higher baseline comorbidity scores were associated with greater increases in fatigue interference, and higher baseline Gleason scores were associated with greater increases in fatigue duration. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer patients receiving ADT demonstrate a trajectory of worsened fatigue during the first 12 months following treatment initiation relative to the controls. Greater comorbidities and higher Gleason scores at baseline appear to be risk factors for heightened fatigue during the first year following ADT initiation. Results highlight important time points for implementation of interventions aimed at fatigue reduction.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Fatigue/chemically induced , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Humans , Male , Risk Factors
14.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(5): 2201-2207, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26563183

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to examine changes in muscle strength and self-reported physical functioning in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer compared to matched controls. METHODS: Prostate cancer patients scheduled to begin ADT (n = 62) were assessed within 20 days of starting ADT and 6 and 12 months later. Age and geographically matched prostate cancer controls treated with prostatectomy only (n = 86) were assessed at similar time intervals. Grip strength measured upper body strength, the Chair Rise Test measured lower body strength, and the SF-12 Physical Functioning scale measured self-reported physical functioning. RESULTS: As expected, self-reported physical functioning and upper body muscle strength declined in ADT recipients but remained stable in prostate cancer controls. Contrary to expectations, lower body muscle strength remained stable in ADT recipients but improved in prostate cancer controls. Higher Gleason scores, more medical comorbidities, and less exercise at baseline predicted greater declines in physical functioning in ADT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: ADT is associated with declines in self-reported physical functioning and upper body muscle strength as well as worse lower body muscle strength relative to prostate cancer controls. These findings should be included in patient education regarding the risks and benefits of ADT. Findings also underscore the importance of conducting research on ways to prevent or reverse declines in physical functioning in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Motor Activity/drug effects , Muscle Strength/drug effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/physiopathology , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Quality of Life , Self Report
15.
J Urol ; 194(3): 690-5, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25791402

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Many men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer experience hot flashes. This study aimed to describe the course of hot flash interference with time in androgen deprivation therapy recipients relative to matched prostate cancer and cancer-free controls from before the start of androgen deprivation therapy to 12 months later. We also examined demographic, clinical and genetic predictors of the impact of androgen deprivation therapy on hot flash interference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups were examined, including 60 patients with prostate cancer recruited before or within 21 days of starting androgen deprivation therapy, 83 age and education matched patients with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy only, and 86 age and education matched men with no history of cancer. Participants provided blood samples and completed the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale at baseline as well as 6 and 12 months later. RESULTS: Androgen deprivation therapy recipients reported increasing hot flash interference with time relative to controls (p <0.001). Group differences were evident at 6 and 12 months (all p <0.001) with androgen deprivation therapy recipients reporting greater hot flash interference than controls. Several genetic polymorphisms were found to predict greater increases in hot flash interference (all p <0.01), including polymorphisms on genes associated with vasoconstriction, immune function, neurotransmission and circadian rhythms. Androgen deprivation therapy recipients who were younger and had a lower body mass index at baseline also showed greater increases in hot flash interference with time (all p ≤0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study, which is to our knowledge the first to prospectively examine hot flash interference in androgen deprivation therapy recipients, reveals that those with certain genetic polymorphisms, younger age and lower body mass index had greater increases in hot flash interference with time relative to controls.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Hot Flashes/chemically induced , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies
16.
Psychooncology ; 24(4): 472-7, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24924331

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer patients who receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) often experience many physical and psychological side effects. ADT may be associated with increased risk for depression, but the relationship between ADT and depression is not fully understood. This study used a longitudinal design to assess depressive symptomatology in patients receiving ADT compared with two groups of matched controls. METHODS: Participants were men initiating ADT treatment (ADT+ group; n = 61) and their matched controls: prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (ADT- group; n = 61), and no-cancer controls (CA- group; n = 61). Depressive symptomatology was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale at ADT initiation and again 6 months later. Differences in depressive symptomatology and rates of clinically significant depressive symptomatology were analyzed between groups at each time point and within groups over time. RESULTS: Between baseline and follow-up, ADT+ participants demonstrated increased depressive symptomatology and increased rates of clinically significant depressive symptomatology (ps < 0.05). ADT+ participants also reported greater depressive symptomatology than both control groups at follow-up (ps < 0.001). Rates of clinically significant depressive symptomatology were higher in the ADT+ group than the ADT- and CA- groups at both time points (baseline: 28%, 5%, 12%; follow-up: 39%, 9%, 11%). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the hypothesis that ADT administration yields increases in depression and suggest that the mechanism behind ADT's association with depression should be explored and that prostate cancer patients treated with ADT should receive particular focus in depression screening and intervention.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Depression/psychology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antidepressive Agents , Case-Control Studies , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Depression/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Goserelin/therapeutic use , Humans , Leuprolide/therapeutic use , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Risk Factors
17.
Can J Urol ; 22(4): 7882-9, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26267026

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We present our experience with minimally-invasive retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (MI-RPLND) in the post-chemotherapy (PC) setting for residual masses in patients with nonseminoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen men who underwent PC MI-RPLND (14--laparoscopic, 5--robotic) for low-volume residual disease (no more than 5 clinically enlarged retroperitoneal masses, size < 5 cm, no adjacent organ or vascular invasion) between 2006 and 2011 were identified. Clinicodemographic information and pathological outcomes were reported. RESULTS: Median age of our study population was 32 (interquartile range [IQR]: 28-39). Most patients presented with clinical stage II disease (63%) and were categorized as good risk (90%) by the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification. Median size of residual masses on PC imaging was 2.1 cm (IQR: 1.7-3). Full-template bilateral RPLND was completed in 53% of cases, and modified left-sided RPLND in 47%. Median operative time was 370 minutes (IQR: 320-420), and median estimated blood loss was 300 cc (IQR: 150-450). Median length of stay was 3 days (IQR: 2-3). Five patients (26%) experienced a postoperative 30 day complication, but none were higher than Clavien grade II. On final pathology, median number of lymph nodes removed was 12 (IQR: 8-23), and 8 patients (42%) had residual teratoma. No patient experienced a recurrence at median follow up of 24 months (IQR: 5-76). CONCLUSIONS: PC MI-RPLND is a feasible option in a select group of patients with acceptable patient morbidity and short-term outcomes. Longer follow up is required to determine the oncologic efficacy of this approach.


Subject(s)
Lymph Node Excision , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/secondary , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Length of Stay , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Neoplasm, Residual , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/drug therapy , Operative Time , Retroperitoneal Space , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/secondary , Tumor Burden
18.
Lancet Oncol ; 14(12): 1233-42, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24140184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Population pharmacokinetic data suggest axitinib plasma exposure correlates with efficacy in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. Axitinib dose titration might optimise exposure and improve outcomes. We prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of axitinib dose titration in previously untreated patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2 study, patients were enrolled from 49 hospitals and outpatient clinics in the Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, Russia, Spain, and USA. Patients with treatment-naive metastatic renal-cell carcinoma received axitinib 5 mg twice daily during a 4 week lead-in period. Those patients with blood pressure 150/90 mm Hg or lower, no grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxic effects, no dose reductions, and no more than two antihypertensive drugs for 2 consecutive weeks were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1), and then randomly assigned (1:1) to either masked titration with axitinib to total twice daily doses of 7 mg, and then 10 mg, if tolerated, or placebo titration. Patients who did not meet these criteria continued without titration. The primary objective was comparison of the proportion of patients achieving an objective response between randomised groups. Safety analyses were based on all patients who received at least one dose of axitinib. FINDINGS: Between Sept 2, 2009, and Feb 28, 2011, we enrolled 213 patients, of whom 112 were randomly assigned to either the axitinib titration group (56 patients) or the placebo titration group (56 patients). 91 were not eligible for titration, and ten withdrew during the lead-in period. 30 patients (54%, 95% CI 40-67) in the axitinib titration group had an objective response, as did 19 patients (34%, 22-48]) in the placebo titration group (one-sided p=0·019). 54 (59%, 95% CI 49-70) of non-randomised patients achieved an objective response. Common grade 3 or worse, all-causality adverse events in treated patients were hypertension (ten [18%] of 56 in the axitinib titration group vs five [9%] of 56 in the placebo titration group vs 45 [49%] of 91 in the non-randomised group), diarrhoea (seven [13%] vs two [4%] vs eight [9%]), and decreased weight (four [7%] vs three [5%] vs six [7%]). One or more all-causality serious adverse events were reported in 15 (27%) patients in the axitinib titration group, 13 (23%) patients in the placebo titration group, and 35 (38%) non-randomised patients. The most common serious adverse events in all 213 patients were disease progression and dehydration (eight each [4%]), and diarrhoea, vomiting, pneumonia, and decreased appetite (four each [2%]). INTERPRETATION: The greater proportion of patients in the axitinib titration group achieving an objective response supports the concept of individual axitinib dose titration in selected patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. Axitinib shows clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in treatment-naive patients with this disease.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Indazoles/administration & dosage , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Axitinib , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Double-Blind Method , Europe , Female , Humans , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Indazoles/adverse effects , Japan , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
19.
Res Rep Urol ; 16: 161-176, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39072353

ABSTRACT

The treatment paradigm for high risk localized and advanced kidney cancer has been characterized by ongoing changes, with the introduction of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs) and later with immune checkpoint blockade. In this article, we review how current evidence informs our decision-making on post-checkpoint inhibitor systemic therapies, the role of adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapies, and the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the evolving systemic therapy landscape. While some studies support a post-checkpoint inhibitor benefit from the VEGFR TKIs cabozantinib or axitinib, the benefit of doublet therapies including a VEGF receptor inhibitor and a checkpoint inhibitor remains an area of active investigation, with the combination of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showing promise but with a Phase III trial of the combination of atezolizumab plus cabozantinib showing no benefit over cabozantinib alone. The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk disease who have undergone cytoreductive nephrectomy and potentially metastasectomy is also an area of continuing interest. While the S-TRAC study demonstrated a disease-free survival benefit for adjuvant sunitinib, no overall survival benefit was shown, and multiple other studies of adjuvant VEGFR TKI therapy have been negative. Subsequently, adjuvant pembrolizumab has shown a benefit in overall survival, whereas trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant nivolumab, adjuvant atezolizumab, and adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab have all been negative. Finally, the role for cytoreductive nephrectomy continues to be an area of active debate. The CARMENA study raised important questions about the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy given the advances in VEGFR TKI therapy but was characterized by accrual difficulties and a significant number of patients not receiving treatment according to the study protocol. Two ongoing studies (NORDIC-SUN and PROBE) seek to further address the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the doublet therapy era.

20.
Cancer Control ; 20(3): 222-32, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23811706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Therapy for metastatic kidney cancer is actively evolving, particularly in the results of registration drug trials that have led to the approval of vascular endothelial growth factor pathway drugs such as sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, bevacizumab, and axitinib, with focus on patients with good- or intermediate-risk criteria and clear cell histology. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) drugs such as everolimus and temsirolimus pivotal trials emphasize experiences in the setting of prior treatment or high-risk features. Interferon and interleukin 2 also are part of the treatment algorithms. METHODS: The results of pivotal trials and the underlying context for the development of a cogent, cohesive treatment plan for an individual are reviewed, touching on decision points such as nephrectomy, metastasectomy, and medical initiation and discontinuation time points. RESULTS: To the extent that these drug therapies are essential for achieving best outcomes for patients, these pivotal trial results and associated guidelines exist within a multidimensional, multidisciplinary context of many other disease features, comorbid features, and non-drug treatment decisions. Other dimensions include investigational targeted therapies, patient selection strategies, surgical strategies, and immunotherapies, some of which are in active development. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should work toward the best use of drug sequencing and selection strategies based on core data derived from prospective randomized trials. To address individual patient needs, they should also recognize and emphasize individualized goals, to the extent that these are different from issues that were directly addressed in the trials.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Patient Selection , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/metabolism , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL